Should History Textbooks Be Preserved

672 Words2 Pages

If we lived in a world where all books had to be burned and it was illegal to read then I would memorize a history book. A history book should be preserved because we should know about past events, we can prevent bad things in the past from reoccurring, and we can recreate positive things from the past to help with our current problems we may have. The first reason why a history book should be preserved is so we can know about past events. Some examples are the Boston tea party, World war I and II. We should know that these things have happened so we can learn how our current society has come to be. In Fahrenheit 451 it says “When did it all start, you ask, this job of ours , how did it come about, where, when?” (Bradbury 51) This shows that Montag doesn't know about the past because in their society because there is nothing to read so there is no way anyone can know about it. So I believe that a history book should be preserved so we can know about the …show more content…

Some examples of events we wouldn't want to repeat are things like slavery, WWI and WWII etc. If we learn and read about these events then we can prevent them from happening all over again because people will realize that we have already made terrible mistakes and hopefully not make them happen again because they would see what devastating effects it had on the country or even the world in the past. In Fahrenheit 451 it says “We’ve started and won two atomic wars since 2022.” (Bradbury 69) This shows that they have had more wars, and if we were to read about past wars or known about them then we could have prevented it from happening because we could've seen the effects it made, but since books have to be burned and it’s illegal to read we couldn’t read about the past. I think that a history book should be preserved so we can prevent things from the past from

More about Should History Textbooks Be Preserved

Open Document