Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons member of european union
European Union about immigration
European Union about immigration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pros and cons member of european union
A referendum will be held in 2017, in order to determine whether or not Britain should remain a member of the European Union (EU). The EU is an economic and political partnership between 28 countries in Europe and its main objectives are: to promote peace and well-being for the unions citizens, to have an area of freedom, security and justice without internal frontiers, to have a sustainable development based on balanced economic growth and social justice, to have a social market economy, and to have a free single market (allowing goods and people to move around, essentially as if member states were one country). The EU has its own parliament and can control many laws, such as the environment, transport, consumer rights, and even mobile phone …show more content…
There is an astronomical cost just to become a member of the EU; an analysis by Full Fact estimates that Britain invests £33 million per day and £12 billion per year in the EU. Although we pay an enormous fee to be a part of this union, what do we gain from it? No government has yet demonstrated in a fully detailed assessment that the EU is of overall benefit to its members. Remarkably, even the EU itself has failed to produce any convincing figures to demonstrate the benefit of the organization, according to the guardian. European Commissioner, Gunter Verheugen estimated in 2006 that the cost of regulation to the European economy as a whole is £405 billion per year, while the Commission itself believes that between 1986 and 2002 the Single Market only brought benefits of £110 billion, even after taking inflation into account, meaning that the EU Commission itself believes that the costs are three times larger than the benefits. When weighing up any activity it is important to work out how much it costs and what benefits it produces. The costs of the EU membership could be holding back faster-developing countries, in particular, the UK, which has a more global company than many member states. If you join a club, you would expect the perks received in return to be worth at least the cost of your membership. If they were not, then you wouldn’t join – there are better things you could do with your …show more content…
However with this perk, many problems occur for the UK in particular as it is such a desirable place to migrate to as it is rich in jobs and offers support for people who require it. This year, annual net migration to Britain has hit a record level of 330,000 – 10,000 higher than its previous high in 2005, according to the Office for National Statistics. The latest rise has been mainly driven by a continuing rise in those coming to work in Britain, who account for 65,000 of the increase. The majority of these migrants are Bulgarians and Romanians (EU members), with the number of Bulgarians and Romanians doubling from 28,000 to 56,000 in twelve months. The immigration minister, James Brokenshire, said the following figures showing net migration 220,000 higher than the government's 100,000 target was ‘deeply disappointing’. It is clear that there is an overflow of immigrants entering the UK, but how is the UK supposed to resolve this issue if border control is out of their hands? UKIP leader Nigel Farage says any attempt by the government to control immigration into the UK is futile as long as we are in the
The benefits of the European Union outweigh the costs. Ever since the end of World War II, countries in the EU have been helped economically, politically, and culturally.
Furthermore, Norway didn’t join because they do not want to give up their independence. Small countries such as Portugal, Greece, Italy joined so they could be more powerful and wants more money. Still, does do the advantages of being in the EU excel the sacrifices? Honestly, I would say yes; essentially for economic competition, peace and security, and cultural diversity.
In conclusion, the benefits of the UK’s membership in the EU outweigh the costs. The most significant benefit is the access they have to the single market as this has managed to benefit quite Access to single market is aiding this inward investment
Bohuslav Sobotka, the Czech prime minister, said the following in a recent interview as a warning ‘immigrants may bring about the collapse of the EU.’ Refugees are intruders and impose burdens onto other countries. Refugees will take jobs and resources from struggling
The United Kingdom, in the next year the people will get a chance to choose their countries’ fate in whether the United Kingdom should leave the European Union. What makes this important is that it would be the first country to leave the European Union in a time when other European countries are either in negotiation or planning to join so it would be a big deal as the United Kingdom is Europe’s third largest economy. As the people are about to vote on their future, there are concern as what would be the economical, social, and political consequences while for some what would be the benefit if the United Kingdom leave. Today In the next paragraphs I would explore the United Kingdom in the European Union and the Political economical and social
Firstly to justify why countries limit their immigrations, there should be knowledge of the different types of immigrants as there are different reasons to leave from one country and move into another. In the last 30 years, the number of international immigrants has been estimated 191 million worldwide, two times as before. As ...
Gozdziak, E.M. and E, C. 2005. A Review Of Literature. International Migration. [online] Available at: EBSCOhost [Accessed: 20 Nov 2013].
When analysts criticise the lack of democratic legitimacy in the EU they generally point to the mode of political representation and the nature of policy outputs. Only one branch of the EU is directly elected is the European Parliament. Though stronger than it once was, the EP remains is actually only one of four major actors in the EU policy-making process. The EP is a body without power or accountability, and easily dismissed just as a ‘talking shop’ (Colin Pilkington.) Only 75% of its amendments are accepted by the Commission and the Council of Ministers.
...: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40 (4), pp. 603-24.
The EU is a union of sovereign European states who share sovereignty based on treaty. The union also possesses competences in policy sectors with exclusive jurisdiction in the area of Economic and Monetary Union while others are shared with Member States (MS), the other powers belong to MS as derived from the conferral of powers art 5(2) TEU, 2(1) TFEU art.3 & 4 TFEU additionally other powers have been offered by the decisions of the European Court for direct effect on citizens
This essay seeks to investigate the negative and positive effects of migration in London. As the London Migration Observatory claim London has the largest number of migrants among all regions of the United Kingdom (UK). About 37% of the UK’s foreign-born population was in London (LMO, Dr.Rienzo and Dr.Vargas-Silva). Furthermore, According to the Benton-Smith statistic, London is the 5th International city in the world after New York, Toronto, Dubai and Los Angeles.That is why author choose this city. This research will analyze the impacts of migration to the London in the different aspects, such as social and economy.
These are very exciting times for our country, we are now part of the largest economic community the world has ever seen, opening the doors of opportunity for us, the Irish citizens, everywhere we look. Ireland's membership of the EU is seen by most to be of great benefit to the country as it will solidify the foundations of our economy as well as increase the awareness of Ireland as an investment opportunity for multi national companies; however, some will argue that the change would be detrimental to our nation in the long run.
Senior, Nello Susan. "Chapters:4,15." The European Union: Economics, Policies and History. London: McGraw-Hill, 2009. Print.
In Europe, immigration has always been a part of its history, but large-scale migration has been in more recent years. In a 13-year span from 1960 to 1973 there was a major increase in the number of foreign workers in the work force. The percent doubled from 3 percent to six percent of workers in the
Because it could be quite complicated to look at the EU model from a point of classical democratic nation-state, it seems to be reasonable to discuss this problem, not by abstract reasoning, but by focusing on a concrete case. European Union is the best case available, which in recent decades has developed into a new type of political system with enormous consequences on democracy and governance in its member states. Despite repeated attempts for major institutional reforms, this system is likely to persist in its basic structures for the future and is unlikely to develop into a federal state or to disintegrate into a classic international organization. The present state of democracy and governance in the EU is therefore worth to be analyzed, as it is not a mere transitory state.