Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effectiveness of the justice system shown
The effectiveness of the criminal justice system dealing with prosecution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effectiveness of the justice system shown
The justice system is put in place to control crimes and impose penalties on those you violate the law; it's suppose to provide citizens with security, however it didn't protect Zachary. There are little things that could have been done over the course of this case that would have saved Zachary. Shirley Turned should have not had custody of her child Zachary, the courts should have focused on Zachary´s rights during his life but weren't and the judge on the case was uninformed and biased;therefore should have been taken off the case. The justice system failed Zachary; if these simple things that any reasonable person can think of doing, Zachary would be alive today. Shirley Turner should have not had custody of her child Zachary; if the court …show more content…
Shirley never acted as a reasonable person would while taking care of her child. The focus should of been on Zachary´s rights during his life but weren´t. The courts never worked in Zachary´s best interest. His death was preventable, and no individual gave any notice to what Zachary needed; he should have been in the custody of his grandparents even though his mother was granted bail. The Children Protective Services department was notified that there was a possible danger to the child and demanded supervised custody and nothing was done about it. The Judge Gale Welsh is not only biased but uninformed on the involved and the case itself. Zachary should be alive if it wasn't for this Judge's absurd decision to allow Shirley out on bail. The court expressed sympathy for the accused and did not follow the legal system; she gave Shirley advice on how to appeal her arrest and imprisonment. Courts must be fair in each trial; Welsh should have absolutely not spoken of the case with Shirley before the hearing. The Judge was unaware of the accused because she neglected to realize that Shirley was a former offender and on suicide
The case was unfair in my opinion because, the state assumed Peterson murdered Kathleen after his fourth wife disappeared. In the initial autopsy of Kathleen, it was found that there was no murder and Kathleen death was accidental drowning. Furthermore, Kathleen was exhumed after three years of her death which also contends the states were only basing their hunch’s off the disappearance of Stacy. To add to the unfairness of the trial, when The defendant's motion asked the court to clarify whether it ruled under the common law doctrine when the courts ruled that some of the hearsay could be admissible, during a hearing held the same day, the court stated, “I didn't even get to that. There was no request as to any of the others. I ruled strictly pursuant there was a hearing pursuant to the statute.” This entire statement from the court shows the motion to consider was not affectively
Charles Smith attacked easy targets; many of those he helped convict shared parenting similarities. James Lockyer represented Marquardt and several others in which Smith played a part in the conviction. He asserts that being an “easy, easy mark” was the common denominator among those he helped exonerate from Smith’s wrongdoing and “Tammy was a good example of an easy mark [being] a young, single mother who was impoverished and on welfare” (Shapiro, 2011). It becomes very clear that Charles Smith targeted his victims regardless of the evidence found (or fabricated) to support their guilt or innocence. He speculated on issues that were so far from his line of duty as a medical expert, raising legitimate concern of his intention to fulfill his assigned role, or if his desire be a hero for the prosecution and secure convictions of ‘failed parents’. Tammy Marquardt easily fit into this category of poor parent being a “teen mother with a history of substance abuse and troubled relationships with men” (Shapiro, 2011). Her lifestyle and choices were classified as deviant, leaving her stigmatized. Her youth and heavy drug use raised questions about her ability to parent responsibly and were consequently used to convict her. The cold, hard facts of the case meant less to the Crown than the social status of the accused, as is often seen in cases of wrongful
While researching this case I stumbled upon many others and I became aware of how many people have suffered from the injustice of being found guilty. While reading parts of the book “Real Justice: Fourteen and Sentenced to Death the Story of Steven Truscott” I learned that the police played a large role in why 14-year-old Truscott was found guilty of murder. The book showed that they forced witnesses to change their story to further “prove” Truscott’s guilt of the crime. This led to the conclusion that in this case (like many others) the police were solely and unjustly targeting one
The killings of unarmed black men have increased tremendously with different races to blame for. In January 2011, the life of Justin Patterson was snatched from him and his family by Mr. Neesmith, who only served in prison for one year. How do you think the community of Toombs County and Justin's family feel about him only serving one year in a detention center? Many people protested that the racial issues behind his travesty caused an upstir in the world, including the murder of Trayvon Martin that just recently happened in Florida during that time. However, Justin Patterson's murder did not make national news or even in the papers because most people thought he was just another dead man.
The evidence presented to myself and the other juror’s proves that Tyrone Washburn is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the murder of his wife, Elena Washburn. On March 12, 1979 Elena Washburn was strangled in the living room of her family’s home. Her body was then dragged to the garage, leaving a trail of blood from the living room to the place it was found. Her husband, Tyrone Washburn, found her in the family’s garage on March 13, 1979 at 1:45 A.M. When officer Dale Chambers arrived at the scene he found her lying face down in a pool of blood. The solid evidence in this case proves only one person, Tyrone Washburn, is guilty of murder.
In July of 2008, one of the biggest crime cases devastated the United States nation-wide. The death of Caylee Anthony, a two year old baby, became the most popular topic in a brief amount of time. Caylee’s mother, Casey Anthony, became the main suspect after the child supposedly was kidnapped and went missing. To this day, the Casey Anthony case shocks me because justice, in my opinion, wasn’t served. I feel as if the criminal conviction system became somewhat corrupted in this case. The entire nation, including the court system, knew that Casey Anthony was behind this criminal act, but yet she escaped all charges. I chose this case not only because it’s debatable, but also to help state the obvious, this case was handled the wrong way. Clearly the legal system was biased, which worked in Casey Anthony’s favor, freeing a murderer.
Dear Zachary is a heart-wrenching documentary made by filmmaker Kurt Kuenne. Originally intended as a tribute for the deceased Andrew Bagby’s unborn son, Zachary, the purpose changes drastically when Shirley Turner, Andrew’s ex-girlfriend and killer (and Zachary’s mother), kills Zachary in a tragic murder-suicide. Believing that Shirley Turner should never have had custody of Zachary and that poorly made bail laws led to Zachary’s death, Kuenne alters his documentary to have a more argumentative message. Kurt Kuenne’s argument in his documentary Dear Zachary is that bail laws for those charged with a serious crime need to be reformed in order to protect people – especially any children – who may fall under the custody of the accused criminal.
On December 15, 2005, Minnie Smith was found dead in the home she shared with her husband, Marvin Smith. Smith was charged with first-degree murder for the death of his wife. At the end of the trial, the prosecution asked for and received an aiding-and-abetting instruction, which would allow the jury to convict Smith even if they found that he had not delivered the fatal blow. The jury convicted Smith but did not specify which theory of guilt they adopted. The California Court of Appeal affirmed the conviction and rejected Smith’s argument that he had not been given adequate notice of the possibility of the aiding-and-abetting instruction. The California Supreme Court denied Smith’s petition for review.
The case of Tennessee V. Cyntoia Brown was a case of major controversy and ethical dilemmas. This case is that of a young girl who had suffered more than any should. The State had failed her, her entire life. Her story is that of having no chance to succeed in life. All Together her childhood, teenage years, the night it happened, prosecutorial discretion, and judicial discretion.
A 13-year-old girl from Alberta was charged guilty for murdering her parents and her younger brother on April 22,06. The girl was sentenced six years in jail, followed up by four years supervision in the community. During the trial the girl spoke up and said that her 23-year-old Jeremy Steinke (charged with three counts of first degree murder), broke into her home and attacked and killed her mother and father. The girl also testified that Jeremy ordered her to stab her brother, which she did once, then Jeremy slit her brother's throat. The girl spoke up and confirmed that she and her boyfriend did talk about killing her parents before, but as a joke. The crown anticipated that she was an equal participant in the killings of her family, because of the disapproval her parents had with her relationship with
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, this case is about the defendant, Dana Martin who is strict liability for drug induced death or the possession of controlled dangerous substances or the possession of controlled dangerous substance with the intent to distribute. On the night of June 25th, witness Robin Simon found his son unconscious on his sofa non- responsive, in Robin’s mind he was probably sleeping. But, the touch of his cold skin alerted Robin, begging for him to wake. Later that night, Robin’s son, Zachary Simon was declared dead at Metro Hospital from overdosing on fentanyl. Zach will now be 21 years old forever in time. Zach was always a good student, he was a shy kid, did what he was told,and was an only child, he lost his mother
Should Kraigen Grooms serve time for his crime? Did the judge make the right decision on
It is important that each case is treated equally when carrying out justice to keep the United States a safe place, to form a nation with good education, and to teach people to judge right from wrong. However, sometimes rights are taken from the wrong people. Our legal system is creating a dangerous path for African Americans in our country because of its’ highest per capita incarceration rate, its’ favoritism towards those in power, and its failure to carry out justice to protect people from the dangerous acts of those who are defined as criminals. Was justice really served in the “State of Florida vs. George Zimmerman” case? Is our justice system fair to all races?
The first court session that was observed was about a young mother who appears to be in her twenties, her son was taken away from her when he was an infant. The reason why he was taken away because of abuse and the mother drug addiction, the court has given this young women many chances to change her life around. The first order that was given to attend parenting class, pay child support, and to be drug free. The mother had a total of two years to comply with any of the order that the judge has given her, however the mother did not comply. In result the young mother is in danger of losing her parental rights. Therefore if the parents show no concern for their child chances are the child will place with a family who provides and show adequate
worst decision in her life. She was found guilty for murder and charged life in prison. But she was