Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of editing in film
Essay on the effects of music in films
Essay on the effects of music in films
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of editing in film
Sherlock Jr. is a black and white silent movie released in 1924. Bister Keaton is the protagonist, who projects movie in a theater and also longs to be a detective. The clip starts from 10:30 to 11:30, consisting of fifteen shots. It shows the moment when the young man volunteers to take charge of the stealing of the pocket watch without noticing the tricks of the local sheik, after he hears the news in the girl’s home. Even though the extra-diegetic music does not belong to the world of the movie, its different rhythms function as one of the primary devices for the viewers to understand the plots in the silent movie and its importance would be further elaborated in the essay. The first shot starts with a title card: “[s]ome one has stolen my watch”(Keaton, Sherlock Jr.), informing the viewers the silent dialogue happened among the figures. The off-screen music, which might be made by an orchestra, further helps the viewer to imagine the atmosphere in the room. The following shot shows the father from a slightly lower angle with a medium close-up, as well as two other people on the side, while the edges of the frame appear blurry due to the use of a soft focus lens or an iris shot. Following the instruction on the title card, the second shot …show more content…
Standing behind the sofa, the villain slips a piece of paper in the pocket of Sherlock, while Sherlock is still reading his tutorial book on the sofa without noticing the little trick. The music, to some extent, not only corresponds to the intense emotion of the villain but also indicates Sherlock’s upcoming troubles. The camera, then, pans slightly to the left with a long shot at the moment the villain walks to the curtain. In the living room, four members of the family are arguing on one side, while the villain observes the situation. Sherlock, on the contrary, still watches his
Fang the main character is a gray cub wolf. Wolves in this novels were used
Initially the audience is witness to how particular sound techniques shape this film. For instance, one of the main details that the audience hears is the song that the murderer whistles. Due to the marvel of sound the audience can pick out that the whistling is related to the murderer. Along with the blind man who figured this mystery out, the audience could only put these two together with this sound technique. The director shows the audience how such a simple part of every day sound can be so important to solving such a terrible crime.
Then the question is posed to Mr. Lockwood, "How did it all begin?" The answering of this question is what my paper will explain. I will attempt to break down the opening scene and show how it all started. By using tools of film such as sound, editing, mise en scene, and cinematography, this paper will show how the scene was made as well. Mise en scene played an important role in this movie as with any other movie.
During the beginning of the film “Sherlock Jr”, there are multiple cut shots when he is trying to buy a portrait from the store lady.This scene shows continuity due to the fact that this is an eyeline match shot between Sherlock and the portrait. This scene establishes the setting Sherlock and the other characters occupy. The portrait also indicates that there is a graphic match towards the store lady and the portrait in the next upcoming shots. This also contributes to continuity because they both share the same pose, facial expression indicating the resemblance and establish that there is not a change between time and space.This scene also presents rhythmic relation that connects the shots together. This is to link the shots together in a format that relates to Sherlock’s hopes and coordinates with the music tempo. The shots decrease in time in order to represent the anticipation of the outcome, still contributing to the continuity.
The desolate and chaotic conditions of the society can have a significant amount of influence on the development on a certain character of a novel. For instance, at the time the novel, Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky was written, the conditions of the setting, was very chaotic and was in turmoil. Crime and Punishment took place in Russia, where Russia during the time Crime and Punishment was written was suffering due to economical downfalls and failure of the poor reforms of Tsar Alexander II; ultimately transforming Russia into a poverty-stricken country. The failure of Alexander’s reforms affected much of setting in which Crime and Punishment was written in, which ultimately contributed in character development of Raskolinokov. This is evident through the use of metaphor, which Dostoevsky uses to compare the state of the country to Raskolinkov’s apartment.
Watson’s actor angrily expresses Watson’s character of being disapproving of Holmes’ use of drugs. Sherlock Holmes’ actor stares off to somewhere, while sounding calm and delivers his line of drugs being the only thing that makes existence not dull. The tone when delivering the dialogue was rather monologue and stern, which somewhat complements his stoicness. At this point, the movie has strayed from the direction of the book. Holmes then hands Watson a letter to read which has instructions of what to do and the time to do it. Watson listens to Holmes’ deduction of who crafted the letter, all his speculations ranged from penmanship and paper quality, to
The paintings in the background have uneven, angled frames which duly create a gloomy and of course concealing dark shadows. And also The low angle tilt camera angle shows to the audience the difference mindsets between the two characters. Marion sits nicely in her chair kind of leaning forward; as she enjoys her sandwich, she gives the audience a feeling of calm and normal. On the other side, Norman is viewed from an uneasy low shot, showing him sitting uncomfortably in the chair; he is unnaturally positioning his hand into his inner thigh, Hitchcock places the camera eye level, so the audience can see Marion as two people might see each other while sitting and talking, It is also noticed that, Marion's face is always shot as a full on facial camera close-up, although Norman is always shot with a side-on close up which doesn’t show his other side. Overlooking the symbolic stuffed birds that is in the corners of the room that gives a foreshadow to Norman's corrupted mind. As he quotes, "I like stuffing things", I believe it signifies a graphic image of death. This should tell the viewers that all of the tension will eventually end with a horrific event. The music that accompany the scene is also great as it is a repeating melody which changes tempo as the tension
The short story of “A Scandal in Bohemia” by Conan Doyle relates to the BBC crime drama series Sherlock episode “A Scandal in Belgravia”. BBC crime drama was filmed based on the short story that Conan Doyle wrote. The film and the text is based on a similar concept, but contains different details of information. There are three comparisons that is easily identified such as theme, characters and setting. These differences make the text and the film different.
is a great aspect of humour, this is shown in two major ways. One of
The first scene is a television which automatically brings the modern feel to the film. As the camera gives the sense of the television moving slowly towards us we suddenly break into a quick speedy montage showing the story and some of the characters. The introduction to the play is repeated, once on the television by the news reader and again during the opening montage. This may be to create effect or perhaps to show the importance and publicity this story had. The scene in the petrol station focuses on the rivalry and hatred of the two families, The Capulets and the Montagues.
This paper will explore the relationship between Sherlock Holmes and his companion and friend Dr. John Watson. What is the relationship between Holmes and Watson? Are they compatible or are their differences to great for them to overcome. Looking at how they work together will also be a key factor in how well the relationship works between the two of them. Do their own interests and abilities get in the way? Does the time period in which they live factor into the environment of their communication styles?
For Sherlock Holmes, his partner in crime is Dr. John H. Watson. Not only is he a trusted friend, but also he is Holmes’ associate and the first person narrator of the Sherlock tales. The stories of Sherlock Holmes are a collection of short stories and fictional novels created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. These stories are based on a famous and most notorious detective all throughout London, Sherlock Holmes. Along his side, Dr. Watson narrates his and Holmes’ detective cases and reveals Sherlock’s abilities and knowledge of solving cases and fighting deadly crimes. For the duration of the stories, Watson and Holmes share a particular relationship where Holmes verbally dominates Watson, “You see, but you do not observe. The distinction is very clear” (Doyle 241). When he isn’t insulting Dr. Watson he talks about how much he relies on his partner, “I am lost without my Boswell” (Doyle 243).
In the novel, Sherlock Holmes The Hound of the Baskervilles, by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson are given a case that is paranormal. They decide to split up and Dr. Watson is given the task to stay by Sir Henry’s side while looking for clues. They cross paths against and Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson meet to discuss this case as a murder. They find major clues against Mr. Stapleton leading to his death. The novel explores the theme of not being ruled by fear through characters dealing with the apparent supernatural myth coming to life.
Sherlock Holmes, a name most people would know if they were to hear it, has come to greatly influence the modern world of mysteries. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle had no idea a character he started to write about for the first time in 1887 would still be carried alive by other TV and movie producers in 2014. Doyle also never new that Holmes would become such a popular character or result in a name mostly everybody would know. Even if there was a person who did not know who or what Sherlock Holmes was, they are certain to have at least heard his name before. “Doyle turned his principal character into a household word” (Haining 7). Doyle started a legacy that lives on forever. Sherlock Holmes personality and looks may change with every generation he is in, but his main characteristics remain the same. Sherlock Holmes’ style of deduction, great sense of observation and strange personality in Arthur Doyle’s stories influenced how TV and movie producers would portray Holmes in their version of Doyle’s mysteries in shows such as Elementary and Sherlock.
James Kissane and John M. Kissane, “Sherlock Holmes and the Ritual of Reason”, in Nineteenth-Century Fiction, Vol.17, NO.4, March 1963, pp.353-62.