Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short essay on shay's rebellion
The impact of the American revolution on society
Essay on shays rebellion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As simply stated, a rebellion is an effort by many people to change a government or leader of a country by the use of protest or violence. In 1786, one man had returned home from serving his country in the American Revolutionary War to find that the same government he was fighting for had turned against him. With heavy taxes, loss of livestock, and possibly his social status at risk he sold his most prized possessions in hopes of one day regaining control of his livelihood. This man was Daniel Shays; in the late summer of 1786 he banned together a group of likeminded farmers who were about to lose everything they had worked so hard to achieve to an unruly elite. Shays’ Rebellion was an armed uprising that was triggered by financial difficulties brought out of post war economic depression, a credit crunch caused by a lack of hard currency, and financially harsh government policies.
Daniel Shays was a poor farmhand from Massachusetts when the revolution broke out who fought for the new America- a country who would promise him freedom and a life with endless possibilities. The states were drafting constitutions that would guarantee religious freedoms, increase the states size and power allowing them to tax more progressively, and reform inheritance laws. He joined the Continental Army and saw action in the battles of Lexington, Concord, Bunker Hill, and Saratoga. As the Revolutionary War raged on between Great Britain and the colonies for eight years between 1775 and 1783, his farm was being taxed without his knowledge. Shays managed to not only live through the battles he was in but also the disease, such as small pox, that claimed more lives than the war itself. When he finally got wounded in action he returned home, unpaid, o...
... middle of paper ...
...ardoned in 1788 and he returned back to Massachusetts after hiding out in the Vermont woods. He later moved to New York where he lived until he died poor and lonely in 1825.
The rebellion took place in the perfect political era where reform of the country’s governing document, the Articles of Confederation, was seen as necessary. The federal government was notably weak under the Articles of Confederation. Under this confederation states often argued amongst themselves, they refused to support the national government which made it powerless to enforce any acts it did pass. Shay’s rebellion played a small role in what shaped our American history. These rebels drew out some anti-federalists to the strong government side. As early as 1785 many influential merchants and political officials were in agreement that a strong central government was what the states needed.
This Rebellion was so significant because it was the first time in the American Colonies that the Frontiersmen joined in something as bold as this. It also became a very significant rebellion because it hastened
Zinn goes into detail how proletarian unrest, namely Shays’ Rebellion and the Whiskey Rebellion, caused unease amongst the wealthy. The solution, according to James Madison in Federalist #10, was a unifying Constitution. Madison believed that it would be easier to quell uprisings and dissent if the government was much larger; instead of unruly residents solely dealing with a state’s governing body, they would have to deal with the entire country (156).
The reason that Shays’ led Shays’ rebellion is because that poor farmers could not pay their debts and the government kept on raising taxes so more people were put into to debtors prison. That caused problems with the farmers causing Shays’ Rebellion. Those are also some reasons that Daniel Shays’ had his rebellion which had been caused to solve those problems but had also shown the weakness of the articles of confederation
...e gun, it seemed, the greater the owner‘s pride in it.” (McCullough 33) The Continental army certainly did not look like an army yet these people were brought together in this fight for freedom and prevailed even winning the support of Americans who had no hope the British would be defeated.” Merchant Erving had sided with the Loyalists primarily because he thought the rebellion would fail. But the success of Washington‘s army at Boston had changed his mind as it had for many” (McCullough 108). The reader must comprehend the power of this accomplishment for the rag-tag army. “Especially for those who had been with Washington and who knew what a close call it was at the beginning-how often circumstance, storms, contrary winds, the oddities or strengths of individual character had made the difference- the outcome seemed little short of a miracle.” (McCullough 294).
colonies' acts of rebellion, they decide to try and stop it by taking away a
In the Summer of 1787, fifty-five delegates representing 12 out of the 13 states in Philadelphia to fix the Articles of Confederation. They met in philadelphia because the Articles of Confederation was too weak. Shay’s rebellion was the end of the Articles of Confederation bringing down the whole network calling for a change of government. They did this to prevent a tyrant or tyranny. A tyrant/tyranny is when someone or a group abuses their power.
“Join, or Die.” “Don’t Tread on Me.” These are two mottos often used by Revolutionary supporters and fighters from about 1754 to 1783, and even sometimes today it is still used. These were battle cries that patriotic men would scream with all their might before charging onto the battlefield, where they might take their last breath. Nearly five thousand men gave their lives, for freedom’s sake. Their sacrifices were not done in vain, as the war was ended on September 3rd, 1783. This sense of victory and accomplishment is what lead these new Americans to further establishing their country, making their mark on history, and creating a new identity for themselves, as free men and woman.
In the book Whiskey Rebellion: George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and the Frontier Rebels Who Challenged America’s Newfound Sovereignty by William Hogeland. The author doesn’t just talk about what started the Whiskey Rebellion and what happened during this period. But he wanted to show you the underlining of this Rebellion as it was one of the major parts of the founding period. Also that there are lot of characters that we don’t learn about, he realizes that people don’t really know about the Whiskey Rebellion. That is wasn’t just a couple of “blackened faced, dress wearing” (Hogeland 20) people. He wanted the general people to understand what the Whiskey Rebellion really was the establishment of federal authority.
“In the first years of peacetime, following the Revolutionary War, the future of both the agrarian and commercial society appeared threatened by a strangling chain of debt which aggravated the depressed economy of the postwar years”.1 This poor economy affected almost everyone in New England especially the farmers. For years these farmers, or yeomen as they were commonly called, had been used to growing just enough for what they needed and grew little in surplus. As one farmer explained “ My farm provides me and my family with a good living. Nothing we wear, eat, or drink was purchased, because my farm provides it all.”2 The only problem with this way of life is that with no surplus there was no way to make enough money to pay excessive debts. For example, since farmer possessed little money the merchants offered the articles they needed on short-term credit and accepted any surplus farm goods on a seasonal basis for payment. However if the farmer experienced a poor crop, shopkeepers usually extended credit and thereby tied the farmer to their businesses on a yearly basis.3 During a credit crisis, the gradual disintegration of the traditional culture became more apparent. During hard times, merchants in need of ready cash withdrew credit from their yeomen customers and called for the repayment of loans in hard cash. Such demands showed the growing power of the commercial elite.4 As one could imagine this brought much social and economic unrest to the farmers of New England. Many of the farmers in debt were dragged into court and in many cases they were put into debtors prison. Many decided to take action: The farmers waited for the legal due process as long as them could. The Legislature, also know as the General Court, took little action to address the farmers complaints. 5 “So without waiting for General Court to come back into session to work on grievances as requested, the People took matters into their own hands.”6 This is when the idea for the Rebellion is decided upon and the need for a leader was eminent.
Slaughter I finally understand the meaning of the rebellion. Even though it was just briefly mention in our history book America, Past and Present Vol 1- by Divine, Robert A. in about half a page about the people from western Pennsylvanians protested the tax on Whiskey in in 1794 basically the end of the rebellion. (170) This revolution is way more than that, it created a precedent for future generations that when the people is not okay with laws created by government they can come together and protest against it. A few years later we see that this was the case on the civil war were the south was not happy with the government abolition of slavery and they came together an acted against the president and the federal government. In my case I am a true believer that we must learn from the past to be able to enjoy a better
During the late 1860s the Red River Settlement was rapidly changing and along with these changes came multiple causes and conflicts that would subsequently to a resistance called the Red River Rebellion. Many profound changes occurred in the Red River Settlement that had caused problems and hostility among the inhabitants to emerge such as:the arrival of Canadians to the settlement, the economic problems and the decline of the Hudson Bay Company. However, the Red River Rebellion was sparked by the Hudson Bay Company selling Rupert’s Land to the new Dominion of Canada without consulting with the inhabitants nor paying any regards to their interests.The colonists of the Red River Settlement, many of whom were Metis, feared for their culture and land rights under the dominion’s control. In order to ascertain that their rights would be protected, the Metis set up a provisional government under the leadership of Louis Riel to negotiate an agreement with the new Dominion of Canada that the Red River Settlement and the lands surrounding it, could enter Confederation as the province of Manitoba under their own terms.
I believe in the actions of members of Shays’s Rebellion because they were losing their land. I believe in their actions because if the government stole my land and my money I would revolt as well. I also believe that the government didn’t care about the farmers at all. I know this because they passed 2 acts. One act was the Militia act which stated “If anybody in the militia was to rebel against congress they could be killed.” The other act they passed was the riot act in 1786 which stated, “If 12 or more people rebelled they could be imprisoned, killed, or pay debts.” They had disadvantages as well. One disadvantage was that the farmers had barely any weapons, but the militia did. The militia also stopped Shays’s Rebellion on Governor Bowdoin’s
Governor James Bowdoin appealed for congress to help but since they had little power, and they too were bankrupt, they hardly had anything to offer. The state of Virginia finally stepped up and offered many troops. With the Virginia troops and the small Massachusetts militia, a 4,400 person army was formed in order to take down the 1,312 group of Shaysites. With an infuriated James Bowdoin, and General Benjamin Lincoln on the frontlines, the odds were not looking good for the Shaysites. In fact, James Bowdoin was so upset that he suspended Habeas Corpus, however, that did not stop the Shaysites from protesting and shutting down courthouses. It seemed like every time Bowdoin would do something to try to prevent a skirmish, or have someone such as Samuel Adams speak to the Shaysites and try to get them to surrender, they become more and more angry, and determined to get back their land. Their cause was so appealing that “ominously many members of the militia broke ranks and also joined the insurgency” (Winik p 221). Eventually little skirmishes weren’t enough and the Shaysites decided they need to step it up. Their new goal was to take over the federal arsenal at Springfield which held fifteen thousand muskets and many cannons. They would then decide where to go. However, both sides would soon face many
The elite opted to prevent rebellions which voiced the opinions of disregarded members of society such as women, slaves, indentured servants, and men who didn't own land, by intervening and taking them into their own hands because they wanted to preserve their power. In 1780, Shay's rebellion, led by Daniel Shay, a veteran of the Battle of Bunker Hill, allowed farmers who were unable to pay their mortgage, to speak out. Creating chaos amongst the peaceful streets of Springfield, armed farmers were stopped by state militia. Shay's rebellion led way to the Philadelphia Convention in which fifty-five men representing twelve states congregated on 1787, in proposal of drafting a new constitution. Through the occurrence of the American Revolution, they were aware of the power that their people were able to execute and wanted to stabilize the government by creating a new Constitution....
The states are battling and not agreeing with each other on anything. Shay’s Rebellion helped to bring the new country’s problems into focus. This closed the courts in three counties in Massachusetts. The government was to weak to do anything to hold the new country together. There was hardly any sense of national identity. The states taxed each others goods and national commerence was very difficult. Politics in the states were chaotic. “ By the mid 1780s for example, state legislatures were printing paper money and passing acts on behalf of debtors.”(Davis Pg. 93) The legislatures went past their authority and assumed executive and judiciary responsibilities, like directing military and decisions of courts. The weakness of the central government was beginning to threaten the existence of the new nation. “The delegates were in agreement that the situation