Pros And Cons Of Shays Rebellion

211 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Shay rebellions

I believe in the actions of members of Shays’s Rebellion because they were losing their land. I believe in their actions because if the government stole my land and my money I would revolt as well. I also believe that the government didn’t care about the farmers at all. I know this because they passed 2 acts. One act was the Militia act which stated “If anybody in the militia was to rebel against congress they could be killed.” The other act they passed was the riot act in 1786 which stated, “If 12 or more people rebelled they could be imprisoned, killed, or pay debts.” They had disadvantages as well. One disadvantage was that the farmers had barely any weapons, but the militia did. The militia also stopped Shays’s Rebellion on Governor Bowdoin’s

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast Bacon's Rebellion

    228 Words  | 1 Pages

    Bacon’s Rebellion, King Phillip’s War and the Pequot War were similar in that there were conflicts with Natives over land, however they differed in the ways the wars were carried out and the results of the wars. Bacon’s rebellion was a result of the poorer classes moving west to cultivate land, however they encountered natives and the governor refused to protect them. Likewise the Pequot war was a direct effect of puritans moving westward, additionally all three wars resulted in the colonists as victors. During King Phillip’s war the natives destroyed a fifth of the towns in Masseuses and Rhode Island in contrast to the other wars where the natives did not cause as much damage to the colonists. Bacon’s Rebellion was significant because afterwards

    Read More

  • The Whiskey Rebellion: Frontier Epilogue to the American Revolution by Thomas P. Slaugther

    1004 Words  | 3 Pages

    Professor Thomas Slaughter has provided a most thorough overview of the Whiskey Rebellion, which he asserts had by the time this book was conceived nearly two centuries after the episode transpired, had become a largely forgotten chapter of our nation's history since the time of the Civil War. He cites as direct evidence of this fact the almost complete absence of any mention of the event in many contemporary textbooks of the conservative era of the 1980's, which this reviewer can attest to as well, having been a high school student in the late 1970's, who never heard of the Whiskey Rebellion until years later. Building off of his own dissertation on the topic, the author convincingly shows that the Whiskey Rebellion was in fact an event of tremendous importance for the future of the fledgling United States of America, which was spawned by the head-long collision of a variety of far-reaching forces and factors in the still quite primitive environs of western Pennsylvania that summer and fall. Slaughter contends that one must place the frontier at the center of the great political debates of the era and fully explore the ideological, social, political, and personal contexts surrounding the episode in order to fully understand the importance of its place in American history. In doing so the author has produced a very readable work that may be enjoyed by casual readers, who will likely find the individual vignettes which open each chapter particularly fascinating, and a highly useful basis of further research by future scholars into the importance of the frontier region as it relates to events on a national scale in those early days of the republic.

    Read More

  • Federalist vs. Democratic-Republicans

    796 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Hamiltonians favored a strong central government, with the elastic clause allowing whatever power “needed” to the government. The elastic clause had a very loose construction. The government should use power to control and help with large trade. The high class people should have control over the people. People in lower classes were not trusted and could not make decisions for the nation. The Whiskey Rebellion was unconstitutional, rude masses of people did not understand the democratic ways, and think they can form a rebellious group every time a law they do not like gets passed. It showed that they need a strong government to prevent that from happeni...

    Read More

  • Comparing the Western Rebellion and Kett's Rebellion in Terms of Causes and Threat

    739 Words  | 2 Pages

    Comparing the Western Rebellion and Kett's Rebellion in Terms of Causes and Threat The year 1549 in which both rebellions took place was a troublesome year for the Lord Protector, at the time, Somerset. It was plagued with bad harvests, inflation, poverty and war. These factors made 1549 a watershed year for rioting and rebellion. Though these are the only two rebellions that posed a serious threat, they were definitely not unique.

    Read More

  • Evaluate The Relative Importance Of The Following As Factors Prompting Americans To Rebel In 1776

    1747 Words  | 4 Pages

    Evaluate the relative importance of the following as factors prompting Americans to rebel in 1776:

    Read More

  • Causes Of American Rebellion in 1776

    1305 Words  | 3 Pages

    Evaluate the relative importance of two of the following as factors prompting Americans to rebel in 1776.

    Read More

  • The Whiskey Rebellion by William Hogeland

    1020 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the book Whiskey Rebellion: George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and the Frontier Rebels Who Challenged America’s Newfound Sovereignty by William Hogeland. The author doesn’t just talk about what started the Whiskey Rebellion and what happened during this period. But he wanted to show you the underlining of this Rebellion as it was one of the major parts of the founding period. Also that there are lot of characters that we don’t learn about, he realizes that people don’t really know about the Whiskey Rebellion. That is wasn’t just a couple of “blackened faced, dress wearing” (Hogeland 20) people. He wanted the general people to understand what the Whiskey Rebellion really was the establishment of federal authority.

    Read More

  • Shays Rebellion

    1679 Words  | 4 Pages

    “In the first years of peacetime, following the Revolutionary War, the future of both the agrarian and commercial society appeared threatened by a strangling chain of debt which aggravated the depressed economy of the postwar years”.1 This poor economy affected almost everyone in New England especially the farmers. For years these farmers, or yeomen as they were commonly called, had been used to growing just enough for what they needed and grew little in surplus. As one farmer explained “ My farm provides me and my family with a good living. Nothing we wear, eat, or drink was purchased, because my farm provides it all.”2 The only problem with this way of life is that with no surplus there was no way to make enough money to pay excessive debts. For example, since farmer possessed little money the merchants offered the articles they needed on short-term credit and accepted any surplus farm goods on a seasonal basis for payment. However if the farmer experienced a poor crop, shopkeepers usually extended credit and thereby tied the farmer to their businesses on a yearly basis.3 During a credit crisis, the gradual disintegration of the traditional culture became more apparent. During hard times, merchants in need of ready cash withdrew credit from their yeomen customers and called for the repayment of loans in hard cash. Such demands showed the growing power of the commercial elite.4 As one could imagine this brought much social and economic unrest to the farmers of New England. Many of the farmers in debt were dragged into court and in many cases they were put into debtors prison. Many decided to take action: The farmers waited for the legal due process as long as them could. The Legislature, also know as the General Court, took little action to address the farmers complaints. 5 “So without waiting for General Court to come back into session to work on grievances as requested, the People took matters into their own hands.”6 This is when the idea for the Rebellion is decided upon and the need for a leader was eminent.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Whiskey Rebellion

    1111 Words  | 3 Pages

    The whiskey Rebellion Witten by Thomas P. Slaughter talks bout a rebellion that setup a precedent in American history. It gives us the opportunity to really comprehend this rebellion that thanks to fast action from the Federal government didn’t escalate to a more serious problem like civil war. The book the Whiskey Rebellion frontier of the epilogue to the American Revolution captures the importance and drama of the rebellion. The book is divided into three sections context, chronology and sequence. In the first section Slaughter explain the reason why the taxes was needed in the first place. According to Anthony Brandt in his article of American history name “Rye Whiskey, RYE Whiskey” Alexander Hamilton, secretary of the

    Read More

  • Essay On Boston Massacre

    653 Words  | 2 Pages

    On March 5th, 1770 the colonists were going to protest against the British rule because they were being unfair to the colonists, with taxes being passed without the colonists’ approval. The proclamation of 1763 didn’t help stopping people from settling across the Appalachian mountains even though people fought for it. Also each house had to house and feed a soldier. Many other taxes on different items also caused colonists to be angry. Many started to protest one of these protests had the colonists in front of government building with weapons the British soldiers then fired killing five and injuring others. There was not a massacre on March 5, 1770 in Boston because there was not a massacre on March 5, 1770 in Boston because less than ten colonists

    Read More

  • The Whiskey Tax of 1791: Insurrection and Early Government Debt

    1607 Words  | 4 Pages

    Pennsylvania went through an insurrection period after the American Revolution. Several battles kept reoccurring within the west dealing with the government, such as the Shays Rebellion, which in the end the government brushed it off as mere small violence. Hamilton and his fellow associates believed “the monies raised would facilitate a properly managed national debt and ‘render a national blessing,’” (Krom 95). Cynthia Krom is a major contributor to The Whiskey Tax of 1791 and The Consequent Insurrection: A Wicked and Happy Tumult, in which she evaluates the funding of early government debt, operations, and also the procedures of finance and social aspects of the Whiskey Tax. Through her research, the operations of the government evolved

    Read More

  • Westward Expansion In America In The 1800s

    1528 Words  | 4 Pages

    After settlements were established, farmers opposed the government. The farmers united to form their opposing union that would lead their opposing movement and solve their common problems that they had with economic distress and railroads. The grange and farmers´ alliances surged with the quest to get the government to support them. The rise of the populist party caused a scare and panic to other government groups, but it didn´t last, the populist party collapsed.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Civil War

    1092 Words  | 3 Pages

    When thinking about the necessity of war it is always hard to determine when it ever really is essential for change to be made. There are different sides of a war and while sometimes many, in simplest form there are really only two sides of a war. Both sides of a war are said to be correct depending on whom is telling the story or argument. In the case of the Civil War slavery was the main opposition through this time and the division was through the North and the South. On the subject of the Civil War being a battle to be avoid it would have to be no. The Civil War was a long time coming. There are many reasons as to why America could not have continued with such opposing views on the ownership of slaves. With such an issue of an individual’s

    Read More

  • Essay On The Boston Massacre

    1004 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the 1760s, Boston was full of disorder. With each new British law came protest from American colonists. The people of Boston believed that Britain did not have the right to tax them because they did not elect their representatives in Parliament. Only the Massachusetts Assembly, whose members were elected every year, had the right to tax its citizens. The Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Acts of 1767 led to boycotts and unrest, steered by a group known as the Sons of Liberty. As a result, the British government sent troops to Boston to keep order. Instead of staying in a fort on an island in the Boston harbor, the British troops stayed on the commons and were living in buildings in the middle of town. The British troops’ presence in Boston was not welcome and Bostonians viewed them as a threat. Because they did not like the English army in their city, fights between the American colonists and the British troops were common.

    Read More

  • Impact Of Thomas Jefferson Views On Shay's Rebellion

    246 Words  | 1 Pages

    After analyzing Thomas Jefferson's perspective on the Shay's Rebellion and his perspective about protesters; I believe that he would support modern day protests. I believe because he has said that protesting is a reminder to the government that something that they are doing is wrong, for in Thomas Jefferson's letter about the Shay's rebellion it says, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure." Also, in The Declaration of Independence, which Thomas took part in, it states that, "That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it..." meaning that if the government has done wrong and is unfair;

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Shays Rebellion

Open Document