Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racism in literature
Racism and literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
On the Subway, a poem by Shawn Olds, is about two different people on a subway, a black male and a white female. That right there are the two portraits, the two different worlds of a black male and a white woman. These portraits, in the poem, are contrasted and developed by tone and imagery. The imagery in the poem depicts a portrait of a black male as violent, a thug, tings of that nature. We see this when Olds expresses, "He has the casual cold look of a mugger, alert under hooded lids." We can imagine here the male just sitting there, with his hood on, having a evil look ready to steal something, which is exactly what is implied. This depicts the portrait of a criminal. Another example of this portrait is when Olds articulates, "I look …show more content…
at his raw face, he looks at my fur coat, and I don't know if I am in his power---." Through her diction, we can picture the black male staring at her nice coat, ready to pounce on her and take it. Once again this indicates the portrait of a thug, a monstrous man . These two examples strongly depict the black male's portrait as monstrous and criminal;. The same way the black man is shown as this through the imagery, the white woman is shown as vulnerable. In those two examples, she is shown as an easy target for the man, as he just stares at her. Through the examples, it is depicted that she could be taken advantage of. The tone in this poem also shows the black male as monstrous.
The tone is disrespectful and ignorant, and this shown by how stereotypical she speaks of him. We see this when Olds writes, " he could take my coat so easily, my briefcase, my life." That is extremely disrespectful, and it makes it seem like every black male will rob or attack a white individual. Another example of a rude, ignorant tone is when Olds remarks, "the way he absorbs the murderous beams of the nations heart." Her strong language here is saying that he and the black male population in general absorb the uncivilized, violent beams of the nation and hold it within them. This is ignorant, once again implying that all black males are thugs, where this generalization is wrong. The indication of blacks not being on the same pedestal as whites is also present. This seen when Olds remarks, " or if he is in my power, the way I am living off his life, eating the steak he does not eat." She is trying to say here that whites are superior to blacks, as "eating the steak he does not eat" is saying she lives more luxurious than blacks, once again being ignorant and disrespectful. Throughout the rest of the poem, she was depicting a portrait of blacks being more superior, however that was safety and vulnerability wise. Here, she indicates whites are more superior in the society aspect. That one line shows the white portrait. Superior in society, vulnerable everywhere
else. Overall, the portrait of white vulnerability is shown through the use of tone and imagery. while describing the malicious and evil nature of blacks at the same time. I do not agree in any way, however that's how the author feels. Blacks against whites is the theme in the poem, and the point trying to be made is that blacks win violently. Her insights are revealed as well. The fur coat is false protection of her. She has all this privilege, yet she still feels like she's taking from blacks. She doesn't realize the greatness of blacks till the end. She realizes the power and wealth of blacks, specifically the black male. Overall, she changed how she is, but still depicted the blacks as bad people.
In this poem, “On the Subway”, written by Sharon Olds brings two worlds into proximity. We will identify the contrast that develops both portraits in the poem and discuss the insights the narrator comes to because of the experience. The author refers to several literary techniques as tone, poetic devices, imagery, and organization. The poem talks about a historical view based on black and white skin. It positions the two worlds the point of view of a black skinned and a white skinned. The boy is described as having a casual cold look for a mugger and alert under the hooded lids. On the other hand, based on his appearance the white skinned person felt threatened by the black boy. She was frightened that he could take her coat, brief case, and
A few examples are the words, you versus they, and white versus black. He says, "Sometimes though, if you're not white and a lot of other people are- but they don’t know it." (7-9). This implies the differences between the words you and they. It can be inferred that this poem is more geared toward an audience of color, since "they" are referred to as white people. In the stanza, "I know some brothers, they see a white face and their whole bodies sneer-."(21-22) Seibles is referring to "brothers" as people of color in comparison to "a white face". People of color see themselves as family (brothers) because they must stick together to get through the age of white supremacy. On the other hand, the cold tone of the word "a white face", makes it seem as if white people are strangers and they cannot connect with them in ways that they connect with one
Almost everything it says isn't the direct meaning, its suggested. “I was the time to hear things and talk. These sitters have been tongueless, earless, eyeless conveniences all day long. Mules and other brutes occupied their skin. But now the sun and the bossman were gone….” This is the biggest suggestive meaning in the except because it leads to show you why the people on the porch feel drawn to talk negatively and judge her. They have been nothing but slaves all day. They spend their days working long and hard, being nothing but mules. Expected to keep quiet and do nothing but their work. Therefore, speaking harshly about the woman gives them a sense of power. It makes them feel better about how low on the poll they are by portraying her lower than them. There are multiple other suggestive meanings such as “she turned her face and spoke. They scrambled a noisy “good evenin” and left their mouths sitting open and their ears full of hope.” They talk big game knowing if she gave them the time of day it would be much different. The men talk bad about her to other women knowing they think she's beautiful and would be eager to be at her beckoning
Here he has used the word “we” representing his race and “theirs” as representing the whites. Furthermore he uses the words like “dirt”, “thorn”, ”shadows” to convey the darkness surrounding them. Poet states in the
The old Negro was known as more of a myth than a man, because of the vindictive formula’s of who Negroes were allowed to be way back when. When it came to African Americans, there was always debate as to how they should be treated, because of the color of their skin. In addition to being condemned and silenced as if they had no voice. Commonly being enslaved whether it was physically or mentally the old Negro could not dispose of past, history has contributed to them socially. Furthermore, the old Negro never knew his worth he was known as a “creature of moral debate” treated like a non human figure in society eyes. In order to get ahead or outsmart the old Negro played the role of a trickster, because of their socially declination they played
The first two lines of the poem set the mood of fear and gloom which is constant throughout the remainder of the poem. The word choice of "black" to describe the speaker's face can convey several messages (502). The most obvious meaning ...
...eemed full of hate and were using the N-word in every sentence they spoke. Arnold believed that these men were jealous of her father and grandfather who had nice homes and businesses. Arnold’s father got out his gun and demanded that the men get off their property and they next day after Arnold’s family had fled, someone in the neighborhood remembered an armed white guy who was asking about an “uppity Nigger who was so bold yesterday” (Gates). The white people in Tulsa planned to promote white supremacy at all cost. Simply because Arnold’s father had stood up for his family and his property he could have been murdered the next day by a mobster seeking revenge. The white mobs in Tulsa believed it was their duty to correct the black people in Tulsa who had become too “uppity”, but people like Arnold’s father were not going to be taken advantage of without a fight.
He refers to all the immigration groups in a judgmental way. He complains about the intelligence levels of the Italians, how dirty and deceitful the Jews are, and even the immaculate cleanliness of the Chinamen. Although he does possess quite a bit of bigotry that boarders on the line of prejudice when it comes to African Americans he recognizes that they are suffering from racism and he sympathizes with th...
While underground in Philadelphia’s subway, Ross repeatedly uses word correspondence to establish a narrative rhythm for the reader. Fran Ross critiques different commuters as they struggle to avoid the “irritation, humiliation, irrigation, and syncopation,” caused by the station’s leaky pipes. The vernacular is strongly based on tempo, rhyming and movement through the composition’s emphasis on movement. Furthermore, she stresses the consecutive repetition in the following sentence, stating, “According to the number of drops that fell on the traveler from the Leaky Pipes, he or she was irritated, humiliated or irrigated.” Not only does this establish a friendly narrative voice, it stresses what is at stake for the passengers on the subway. If they take a wrong step, the
The author distinguishes white people as privileged and respectful compare to mulattos and blacks. In the racial society, white people have the right to get any high-class position in job or live any places. In the story, all white characters are noble such as Judge Straight lawyer, Doctor Green, business-man George, and former slaveholder Mrs. Tryon. Moreover, the author also states the racial distinction of whites on mulattos. For example, when Dr. Green talks to Tryon, “‘The niggers,’…, ‘are getting mighty trifling since they’ve been freed. Before the war, that boy would have been around there and back before you could say Jack Robinson; now, the lazy rascal takes his time just like a white man.’ ” (73) Additionally, in the old society, most white people often disdained and looked down on mulattos. Even though there were some whites respected colored people friendly, there were no way for colored people to stand parallel with whites’ high class positions. The story has demonstrations that Judge Straight accepted John as his assistant, Mrs. Tryon honor interviewed Rena, and George finally changed and decided to marry Rena; however, the discrimination is inevitable. For example, when Mrs. Tryon heard Rena was colored, she was disappointed. “The lady, who had been studying her as closely as good manners would permit, sighed regretfully.” (161) There, Mrs. Tryon might have a good plan for Rena, but the racial society would not accept; since Rena was a mulatto, Mrs. Tryon could not do anything to help Rena in white social life. The racial circumstance does not only apply on mulattos, but it also expresses the suffering of black people.
An elegance in word choice that evokes a vivid image. It would take a quite a bit of this essay to completely analyze this essay, so to break it down very briefly. It portrays a positive image of blackness as opposed to darkness and the color black normally being connected with evil, sorrow, and negativity. The poem as a whole connects blackness with positivity through its use of intricate, beautiful words and images.
In the poem, he mentions black people that were treated unfairly and how many of those people are not recognized as much. He powerfully wrote: “Names lost. Know too many Trayvon Martins / Oscar Grants / and Abner Louimas, know too many / Sean Bells, and Amadou Diallos / Know too well that we are the hard-boiled sons of Emmett Till” (Lines 53-60). This quote shows how many of our black people are discriminated by their skin color are mistreated. Abner Louimas, Sean Bells and Amadou Diallos were men that were victims of police brutality and were shot several times by police officers. Specifically, Emmett Till and Trayvon Martin’s deaths were great examples as to how people were and still are racist. To take a case in point, Emmett Till who was African-American was tortured and killed because he flirted with a white woman. Trayvon Martin was a teenager who was shot and killed just because he went to grab a bag of skittles from his pocket, which the person who shot him thought he was reaching for a weapon. The many examples that Johnson makes help show how racism and stereotypes play a major role in our society because many people are still victims of discrimination. They are automatically stereotyped into a criminal who is about to do something that is illegal. In the society that we live in, blacks do not have any power, they do not get the benefit of the doubt whether or not
At the start of the poem, the tone starts out fearful about the upcoming harvest with the speaker saying, “ I planted deep within my heart for fear/ that wind and fowl would take the grain away”(L2-3). By his word choice it’s obvious that he is nervous and afraid of the outcome, but he also says “I planted safe against this stark, lean year”(L4) Although he likely expects the outcome of the harvest will not be in his favor, he seems to have a glimmer of hope, that with hard work and wise decisions, he might get a fair share of the harvest. As the poem progresses, the white man takes all the best fruit for himself, leaving the African Americans with nothing. The tone shifts to acceptance and despair, as the speaker says, “Yet what I sowed and what the orchard yields, my brother’s sons are gathering stalk and root”(L9-10)The speaker appears despaired over the inevitable loss of his crop, but also accepting that the white man will always take it and that there is nothing he can do about it. It almost seems as if he isn’t the first one to experience this and that his descendants have had to deal with the same injustice. By showing how submissive this farmer is after years of mistreatment and getting less than the white man, it might inspire a black reader to think that accepting an unfair outcome, hoping that one day they will be treated fairly, doesn’t work. Through the tone it gives people an example of what you can’t do, and to rise up and take a more effective action against the injustice of not just the farmer but of every African American in the
We want “poem that kill”. Here Baraka is using Synecdoche a figurative form to refer to human (black) “stinking whores” he want the reader to know that poem become a powerful and important object so he can use to teach a lesson to the enemy. Moreover, here he writes about his wish to have “poems that wrestle cops into alleys/ /and take their weapons, leaving them dead with tongues pulled out and sent to Ireland”. Author wishes they could undo the role of power so African- Americans take control over the white and black and those from the other side of the world can return to their country where they belong so we can have some kind of peace right here. If only they can reverse that power, it would be a much easier for us. In addition, it sounds like an imaginary fiction of the African-Americans uprising. Baraka says “Knockoff poems for dope selling wops or slick half white//politicians Airplane poems, rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr….tuhtuhtuhtuhtuhtuhtuhtuhtuhtuh rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr… Setting fire and death to whities ass”. Right there the author is referring to enemy as whities that letting them know black people do care, by using weak syllable follow by a strong syllable that is the way Amiri is using an imaginary gun to kill his enemy. He is also telling the white audience, I dare you to try to comprehend it. He used the words as gun to shoot somebody or the enemy. Well words can be hurtful when you take into
Chasar points out that Brown was referring to a law at that time in certain areas that if an African American wanted to laugh in public, that African American had to stick his or her head in a designated barrel (69). Brown is clear that he doesn’t like restrictive laws like these; he is speaking out against the whites that made the law and is doing so through emotion in his literature. The accent and slang used in the poem illustrates the black laughter Chasar speaks of. Sterling Brown uses slang such as “telefoam” instead of telephone and “de” instead of the to create black dialect in the poem. This provides the poem the “black acoustic” in its message. This acoustic gives the black laughter the right emotion to reach out to the readers and inspire them in their purpose. Writers such as Brown created humorous poems such as this one to voice their opinion and speak out against whites in a joking