Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Themes and motifs in a midsummer night's dream
Introduction about midsummer night's dream
Bring out the elements of feminism in a midsummer night dream
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Themes and motifs in a midsummer night's dream
Shakespeare's Presentation of Contrast Relationships
Theseus and Chipolata's relationship is a key element to the play as
all other events and characters are centred around their wedding. For
example, the mechanical's play "Pyramus and Thisby" is to be performed
at their wedding; Oberon and Titania argue over each other's feelings
towards Theseus and Hippolyta, and Hermia is told to
"Take time to pause, and by the next new moon - the sealing day
betwixt my love and me,"
She must wait until after Theseus wedding day before she makes the
decision of whether to marry Demetrius or not. So, in a way some of
the characters actions are controlled by the wedding.
The wedding itself is a symbol of the ideal pattern of love and
marriage in Theseus's own world, which is the court. Theseus won
Hippolyta, Queen of the Amazons in battle. This suggests that
Hippolyta is more like an object if she is "won" and represents the
typical view that men were superior over women. However with
Hippolyta's character Shakespeare mocks this ideal, as Hippolyta,
being queen of the Amazons, a tribe of warrior women, represents a
very strong and independent woman, therefore does not conform to the
stereotypical view of the "wife."
Theseus and Hippolytas first scene is important as it sets the scene
for the play. Shakespeare stresses the differences between the two.
Theseus is very impatient for their wedding to take place:
" But, O, methinks, how slow this old moon wanes."
Whereas Hippolyta replies,
" Four days will quickly steep themselves into night, four nights will
quickly dream away the time."
...
... middle of paper ...
...ong nature of
Titania and Oberon's relationship.
As blank verse is used by Theseus and Hippolyta as a representation of
the court, Oberon and Titania use blank verse as an expression of
disharmony. For example, in the argument. When the two are reconciled
at the end they revert back to couplets.
Oberon and Titania and Theseus and Hippolyta's relationships are
vital. They introduce some of the key themes and ideas central to the
play. All other relationships are in some way linked to them, whether
it is through themes or directly. Shakespeare uses them as a basis for
creating two different worlds, which explore both the conventional and
passionate sides to love and how it can be looked upon in different
ways. They raise the questions should passion rule over reason? Or
does passion in the end give way to reason?
Hippolyta's nightlife role as Titania is stage-managed by Theseus-Oberon, who gets his will by magical means. if his own imperial gaze has proved ineffectual, he will capture Titania's gaze and refocus it with an aimlessness that would have gratified Cupid:
There are many characters in the play but the most important one would be Hermia, who is the daughter to Egeus. She is in love with Lysander, but her father disapproves and wants her to marry Demetrius, who loves her. However Hermia does not love Demetrius back, but her friend Helena does. Egeus asks Theseus, the King of Athens, for help in Hermia wedding Demetrius.
However, the ideal relationships are not immune to experiencing unharmonious periods. Despite this, the ideal couples eventually found harmony which allowed them to experience a joyous ending. Lysander and Hermia have a harmonious relationship in that they display similar desires and mindsets. In the beginning, after declaring their love for one another Lysander and Hermia devise a plan to run away and elope (A Midsummer Night’s Dream 1.1.156-178). Even when they are not of the same mindset Hermia and Lysander find an amicable solution. After becoming lost in the forest, Lysander’s desire is for them to sleep together, Hermia refuses for fear of the disgrace that would be placed upon her if for some reason they did not become married. Even though Lysander is a reluctant he respects her wishes (A Midsummer Night’s Dream 2.1.47-67). On the other hand, the relationship between Oberon and Titania in spite of being plagued by dysfunction comes to a harmonious agreement. At the beginning Titania and Oberon are quarreling over the control of an Indian changeling boy (A Midsummer Night’s Dream 2.1.18-31). While under the influence of an enchantment that Oberon had placed on her Titania relinquishes the control of the changeling boy to Oberon (A Midsummer Night’s Dream 4.1.56-60). After the enchantment is removed from her Titania no longer has feelings of defiance toward Oberon (A Midsummer Night’s
The views on women in this play are shown through Hermia’s recklessness, Helena’s desperation, and Hippolyta’s hypocritical behavior. The women in this era of when Shakespeare wrote this play were subservient to men and had no will and choice of their own. This included marriages that were usually arranged by a powerful male relative instead of giving the woman the opportunity of choosing a husband that she loved. First, Helena was a woman who chased after men. She contradicts her gender by breaking society’s rules. Helena even says, “We cannot fight for love, as men may do; we should be woo’d and were not made to woo” (Rogers, 1998, Act 2, Scene 1, 241-242). Second, Hermia disobeys her father and cannot decide on marriage. She is disrespectful towards her father’s commands. Hermia goes on to say, “I do entreat your grace to pardon me. I know not by what power I am bold” (Rogers, 1998, Act 1, Scene 1, 58-59). Lastly, we have Hippolyta who pretends to love King Theseus and is a liar. She stands by through the oppression of different women in the play. Although, Hippolyta shows dominance in her words. “Four days will quickly steep themselves in night; four nights will quickly dream away time” (Rogers, 1998, Act 1, Scene 1, 6). We see the King’s impatience at having Hippolyta, but Hippolyta has the control and patience. “Hippolyta, I wooed thee with my sword, And won thy love,
Foreshadowing, comparison. Detestation is first inaugurated in a family feud between the two families of Montague and Capulet’s. “What, drawn, and talk of peace! I hate the word, as I hate hell, all Montague’s and thee.” The use of comparison between the Montague and hell showed how much the Montague family despised the Capulet’s. This helps us to understand the the idea of hate. Shakespeare uses an embittered tone to show us that the Capulet despises the Montague family back, “A dog of the Montague moves me”. The derogatory language showed he strong presence of hate existing between the families. Shakespeare shows us that hate not only exists within the family but permeates the social sphere around the. “Down with the Montague’s” and “Down with the Capulet’s”. The recurrence of the word Down uses with the name of the houses shows that the disapproval of both houses amongst the civilians of Verona. “If you ever cause disturbance again you shall pay for it with your lives” Shakespeare uses foreshadowing to f...
It seems to be a perennial feature of human society that individuals judge each other by using the language of similarity and difference. Some of these judgments are reasoned, taking into account the actual qualities of the individual being assessed. Too many of these judgments are superficial, presuming from the existence of one readily observable characteristic a whole host of unrelated characteristics. Assessment and prejudice should be very different activities, but too often human beings combine the two, muddling their understanding of other individuals and the world.
The old moon keeps Theseus waiting for his wedding night with Hippolyta, on the new moon. Theseus compares the old moon to an older woman, which stepmothers or a dowager usually are, and accuses her of keeping from him what is his to have, Hippolyta and their wedding night, like old widows might keep an inheritance from a young man.
Shakespeare has been around for centuries and will continue to be around for many more centuries to come. With the current day and age, Shakespeare is still relevant in today’s time. It is especially more relevant to young adults in this age of time. Shakespeare’s plays are a classic that can be interpreted in many ways. The human nature and human behavior has not changed, but only the motivating factors and conditions through time.
Human nature is a concept that has interested scholars throughout history. Many have debated over what human nature is – that is, the distinguishing characteristics that are unique to humans by nature – while others have mulled over the fact that the answer to the question “what is human nature?” may be unattainable or simply not worth pursuing. Shakespeare explores the issue of human nature in his tragedy King Lear. In his play, he attempts to portray that human nature is either entirely good or entirely evil. He seems to suggest, however, that it is not impossible for one to move from one end of the spectrum of human nature to the other, as multiple characters go through somewhat of a metamorphosis where their nature is changed. In this paper I analyze and present Shakespeare’s account of human nature in King Lear in comparison with other authors that we have read throughout our year in the Aquinas program.
Once a person has a thorough understanding of the English language they’re able to communicate their thoughts and feelings without blatantly saying it.One of these people would undoubtedly be William Shakespeare, in his piece Sonnet XVII his understanding of the English language can truly be observed as he describes his deep infatuation for another without using the word love once.Instead, Shakespeare uses different stylistic elements such as interesting language, imagery, and details in order to express his feelings to the reader.In the beginning of the Sonnet, the reader can instantaneously observe Shakespeare’s use of a rhetorical question being “Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?”(Shakespeare 1).The simple rhetorical question starts
William Shakespeare (1564-1616) was a Renaissance poet and playwright who wrote and published the original versions of 38 plays, 154 sonnets, two long narrative poems, and several other poems. He is widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language, and often called England’s national poet. Several of his works became extremely well known, thoroughly studied, and enjoyed all over the world. One of Shakespeare’s most prominent plays is titled The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. In this tragedy, the concept that is discussed and portrayed through the characters is love, as they are recognized as being “in love”. The general umbrella of love encompasses various kinds of love such as romantic love, the love of a parent for a child, love of one’s country, and several others. What is common to all love is this: Your own well-being is tied up with that of someone (or something) you love… When love is not present, changes in other people’s well being do not, in general, change your own… Being ‘in love’ infatuation is an intense state that displays similar features: … and finding everyone charming and nice, and thinking they all must sense one’s happiness. At first glance it seems as though Shakespeare advocates the hasty, hormone-driven passion portrayed by the protagonists, Romeo and Juliet; however, when viewed from a more modern, North-American perspective, it seems as though Shakespeare was not in fact endorsing it, but mocking the public’s superficial perception of love. Shakespeare’s criticism of the teens’ young and hasty love is portrayed in various instances of the play, including Romeo’s shallow, flip-flop love for Rosaline then Juliet, and his fights with Juliet’s family. Also, the conseque...
Every American high- school student knows the name of Shakespeare. The reason is fairly simple- Shakespearean studies are a necessity enforced by nationwide curriculum. However, one could say, albeit intense studies into his works, few of these students are well versed in Shakespeare’s personal life. Shakespeare had an unusual life- his unorthodox early childhood, strange teenage years, and mysterious “lost years-“that may surprise many.
Shakespeare’s play Measure for Measure uses words to both confuse and represent the religious and sexual struggles of the characters. We can see this in act two, scene four of the play. This conversation between Angelo and Isabella shows how the characters use language to convey their ideas, to each other and against each other, and how sexual and religious influences are undercurrents throughout, especially for Isabella.
Shakespeare writes for a public who views marriage unsentimentally. At all levels of society, from king to commoner, marriage is entered into for commercial and dynastic reasons. People marry to increase their property and to secure its inheritance. Wise parents, who may dispose of their children in marriage, will of course try to avoid matches which the contracting parties find intolerable, but there are limits to this. On the other hand, children have a duty of obedience. And the husband Egeus proposes for Hermia is by no means unattractive; his chief defect is that he is not Lysander, whom Hermia loves, perhaps intemperately.
The class started with “Traffic Light” as warming up exercise, followed by “Bomb and Shield”, “Catch the moment” and “Stage direction”, and ended with the presentations on William Shakespeare’s Life Brief Candle. The activities that impressed me the most are: