Sfc Picart Failure Analysis

556 Words2 Pages

1. Summary: On 17 April 2018, I was ordered by COL O’Connor to conduct further analysis during the active investigation process for FLIPL #102. My conclusion remains unchanged in which, to recommend financial liability is assessed to SFC Picart for the loss of $78K worth of USG equipment. Ultimately, this investigation reveals that SFC Picart’s actions of simple negligence, caused by his failure to enforce effective accountability and safekeeping practices to include, key witness sworn statements further corroborates that SFC Picart failed to follow CPT Reid’s directives (instructions). Hence, SFC Picart’s substandard leadership skills, as a Senior NCO (by soliciting assistance from untrained personnel) his actions were contrary to the commander’s directives (instructions) for this task to be performed by the 67th Rear Detachment Supply Team (trained 92A NCOs/Soldiers) were contributing factors that have likely resulted in the loss of USG equipment.

1. Overview: …show more content…

According to DA 735-5, to initiate a turn-in into the appropriate supporting activity; therefore, the equipment must be maintained (carried) on the commander hand receipt (property book), to be processed for removal from company commander (CPT Reid) property book. Therefore, this also corroborates why CPT Reid did not sub-hand receipt this equipment to either SFC Picart or to any other members of the 67th Supply Team. As the commander, CPT Reid had exclusive access and control of the sole keys for the storage facilities, which contained the itemized missing equipment as shown on the DD Form

Open Document