Sexuality, Disability Issues In Education And Training

1135 Words3 Pages

Sexuality, Disability, issues in Education and Training People with disabilities have often been over looked with regard to their sexuality, or alternatively being considered asexual or ‘hyper-sexed’(Rembis, 2010). The social stigma around sex and disability has left this community unable to easily access education or services that help provide a healthy framework for them to develop and explore their sexuality (Schaafsma, Kok, & Curfs, 2010). This has also made it difficult for parents and support workers to address the sexual needs and concerns of their children and patients, while also overcoming their own lack of training and understanding in this area (Hannah & Stagg, 2016; C. Murphy, Lincoln, Meredith, Cross, & Rintell, 2016). The …show more content…

However it could be argued that mainstream sex education is often inadequate, and not easily accessible to people with disabilities (G. H. Murphy & Ocallaghan, 2004). Further more, the education may generally not be relevant to the specific persons disability. People with disabilities experience sex in different ways, leaving a large knowledge gap with how to educate this community in what is already considered a complicated area (Smith, Molton, McMullen, & Jensen, 2015). A person with an intellectual disability may not understand the variable social nuances, and the right way to express their sexual desires and attractions (Hannah & Stagg, 2016; Schaafsma et al., 2010). While a person with severe muscular dystrophy may not be able to navigate their body in the same way an able bodied person can (Smith et al., 2015). Consequently, this lack of comprehensive and relevant sex education often leaves them to figure it out alone, or not at …show more content…

Yet, despite many having attended some training in regard to sexuality and disability, they often refer on to outside ‘experts’ to assist with sex education, relationship counselling or helping their clients with information and/or skills to enjoy these tasks themselves (Chivers & Mathieson, 2000; Schaafsma et al., 2010). Research indicates that the majority of experienced trained staff are still ignoring the area of sexuality and only addressing the everyday living skills of people in their care. Further more, organisations operate from a discourse of people with disabilities being vulnerable and potential victims. Therefore being ‘protective’ ie. Needing careful supervision. Extensive training and re-examination of policies and procedures my help bridge the gap between sexual autonomy and protection (Chivers & Mathieson, 2000; Kramers-Olen,

Open Document