Sexual Citizenship

530 Words2 Pages

One of the most significant analytical approaches of sexual citizenship refers to the work of Richardson (1998, 2000a, 2000b, 2004) and Richardson and Monro (2012, 2013, 2014). Richardson’s criticism are based on the British context in the 1990s where the British government and political parties showed very rare concern about gay and lesbian on both local and national levels. With a plenty of issues surrounding gay men and lesbian movement and campaigns due to claiming equal rights, Richardson argued that gay men and lesbians were being excluded from the dominant model of citizenship, and they were not given the same rights as heterosexual couples. Be it social rights of welfare or financial support to gay and lesbians on micro or macro level, all these aspects suggested a disadvantaged position of gay men and lesbians. Regarding the construction of nationality, it links only to heterosexuality that has always been the only socially approved form, and this brings about penetrating against gay and anti-lesbian atmosphere. In order to clearly construct the notion of sexual citizenship, Richardson (2000a) conceptualized sexual citizenship through three types of sexual rights. These included conducted-based rights, …show more content…

108). This kind of rights mainly refers to the participation in sexual acts. Secondly, identity-based rights can be understood as “seeking rights through self-definition of individual identities” (Richardson, 2000a p. 108). Identity is centered on two categories. The first category is about self-identity. Sexual identity is regarded as the essential foundation for the inclusion and exclusion of citizenship. The second category concerns with the development of individual sexual identities and self-definition in sexual dimension. It refers to the notion of self-ownership and

Open Document