Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros of teaching sexual education to teenagers
What are the importance of sexual education for adolescents
Debate over sex education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pros of teaching sexual education to teenagers
Nineteen-fifty five marked the debut of sex education programs in schools in the United States. Along the years, many have argued whether or not sex education should be taught in schools. Many believe that the education of sex encourages students to engage in sexual activities which lead to a higher number of pregnancies and sexual transmitted diseases (STD’s). As the number of unplanned pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases climbs higher and higher every day in our country, one can only think that sexual education is a necessity in our school systems. Teens as young as fourteen years old have admitted to already engaging in sexual activities. No teen should be engaging in such acts at that age. Many schools give parents the choice to have their child opt out of the lesson or class. Few states are required to teach sex education to students in secondary schools unless they were withdrawn from the class by their parents.
As a teenager, I firmly believe that sex education should be taught in schools because students need to be educated. Many parents don’t address this topic at home, so school is the best opportunity. States that require sex education programs mandate that all students participate in these programs unless their parents decide to opt them out. How can parents do that? The parents have the right to have a say in whether or not their child is going to participate in these sorts of programs because “parental rights are derived from parental duty and exist only so long as they are needed for the protection ... of the child”. Sex education should be mandated in all public schools because it is a right to every student, the knowledge that they have about sex affects the student, not the parents.
Students need to...
... middle of paper ...
...t. from "'Let's Talk About Sex': Balancing Children's Rights and Parental Responsibilities." Legal Studies 26.1 (Mar. 2006): 88-108. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 23 Oct. 2013.
Kasun, Jacqueline R. "Condom nation: government sex education promotes teen pregnancy." Policy Review 68 (1994): 79+. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 9 Oct. 2013.
Parker, Alison Mia. "Dude! Your Browser Doesn't Allow Iframes? Bummer." YOUniversityTV. YOUniversityTV, 22 Apr. 2011. Web. 30 Oct. 2013
Pardini, Priscilla. "Federal Law Mandates 'Abstinence-Only' Sex Ed." Rethinking Schools Online. Rethinking Schools, n.d. Web. 30 Oct. 2013.
Paul, Regina. "10 Reasons We Need Comprehensive Sex Education in Our Schools." Yahoo Contributor Network. Yahoo, 03 Feb. 2007. Web. 30 Oct. 2013.
Unknown. "Sex Education Should Be Taught in Public Schools." Debate Issue:. N/a, n.d. Web. 30 Oct. 2013.
"US Government Should Stop Funding Abstinence-Only Education: Virginity Pledge Ineffective." Reproductive Health Matters Nov. 2009: 223. Academic OneFile. Web. 4 Apr. 2012.
It has been almost thirty three years since the first federal funding was put to use in “. . . sex education programs that promote abstinence-only-until-marriage to the exclusion of all other approaches . . .” according to the article “Sex education” (2010) published by “Opposing Viewpoints in Context;” a website that specializes in covering social issues. Since then a muddy controversy has arisen over whether that is the best approach. On one hand is the traditional approach of abstinence (not having sex before marriage), and on the other is the idea that what is being done is not enough, and that there needs to be a more comprehensive approach. This entails not only warning against sex, but also teaching teens about how to have “Safe Sex” (“Sex Education,” 2010).
Masland, Molly. “The Sex Education Debate: An Overview.” Sex Education. Ed. Kristen Bailey. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. At issue. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 23 Oct. 2013.
Teenage sexual activity is a major problem confronting the nation and has led to a rising incidence of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and teenage pregnancy. The existence of HIV/AIDS has given a sense of urgency to the topic of sex education. The issue of sex education in schools especially in the formative years has been a subject of intense debate among parents, school officials, health scientists and religious authorities worldwide for a considerable period of time. The debate centers on comprehensive sex education versus abstinence-only sex education in school. Abstinence only sex education is a sex education model that focuses on the virtue of abstinence from sexual activities; therefore, encouraging sexual abstinence until marriage. This form of sexual education completely ignores all other elements of comprehensive sexual education like safe sex and reproductive health education issues like the use of contraceptives and birth control methods. Comprehensive sex teaching encourages promiscuous sexual activity as “a natural part of life.” Proponents of abstinence only education activists cite several reasons why this type of education is the best. It focuses on the upholding of moral virtues. They also claim that sex outside marriage hat is “encouraged” by the comprehensive sex education which as a result, has some emotional and physical downfall especially when done at a very young age. They blame the comprehensive sex education for failing to discourage premarital sex especially at this time when the HIV pandemic is busy devouring young people in various parts of the world (Deborah 2). In fairness, both programs were designed to decrease the incidence of STDs...
e. The views of whether sexual education should be taught in schools. In “Carnal Knowledge: The Sex Ed Debate”, Molly Masland uses plenty of outside sources to suggest accuracy. She uses executive director’s from associations to add differentiated opinions. For instance, she was the assistant executive director of the National Association of School of Psychology and the executive director of the Eagle Forum.
“Throughout the 1980’s these arguments began to lose legitimacy as the American republic reiterated its support (Fose)”. “Although this topic is highly debated, 93 percent of Americans support “sex or sexuallity” courses being taught in high school and 84 percent supports teachings in junior high (Fose)”. More people requested sex education because of the AIDs epidemic. The AIDs epidemic cau...
...firm that effective sexual education is imperative to the American society as “rates of sexually transmitted disease (STD), teen pregnancy, and teen births are higher in the [U.S.] than in most other industrialized countries” (Kohler). In the contemporary society of America, the involvement of young adolescents in sexual relationships is a reality that cannot be denied and no school-based intervention can undo the pressure of media and natural hormonal urges that adolescents experience; but at least through an effective comprehensive-based sexual education teenagers can be provided with accurate medical and health information about prevention methods for teenage pregnancy, STDs and STIs, and HIV. Engaging in sexual behaviors is a personal decision and teenagers need to have accurate information about sexual self-protection so that they can be well-prepared and safe.
Santelli, J., Ott, A., Lyon, M., Rogers, J., Summers, D., &Schelifer, R. (2006). Abstinence and abstinence-only education: A review of U.S. policies and programs. Journal of Adolescent Health 38 p.p.72-81.
Some of the American public believe that sex education should be taught at home by the children's parents. They feel that sex education programs in schools do not put an emphasis on abstinence and encourages children to have sexual intercourse.
In the United States, there is a rising problem that is not going anywhere anytime soon, that is if we, as citizens, don 't change it. This problem is causing billions of dollars and people 's futures all because schools would rather teach ignorance than the truth. What’s the problem? Sex education. Although sex education may not seem like a rising conflict, it is actually one of the top controversial topics in our country regarding education. According to Brigid McKeon, “Each year, U.S. teens experience as many as 850,000 pregnancies, and youth under age 25 experience about 9.1 million sexually transmitted infections (STIs)” (McKeon). This number is so unbelievable to any sane person, but somehow schools still won 't take the initiative to teach realistic sex education. Sex education can be taught in two different procedures- comprehensive or abstinence only. The difference between the two methods is that comprehensive sex education teaches abstinence as a secondary choice, so that teens who decide not to wait are well educated on how to keep themselves protected. Comprehensive sex education should be required in every single public school because it is the most effective method on how to keep teenagers well informed and prepared.
Imagine that you are a parent of a young teenage girl, and she has returned home to tell you that she is now pregnant, or maybe you have a son who has contracted HIV, perhaps you even know a young child who has been abused by a significant other. That teenager will now have to face the consequences of these events for the rest of their lives, consequences that could have been avoided had these teenagers had proper sex education. To many, sex education is a sensitive topic, and because of this students do not receive the essential information that can help to protect them. This allows students to make poor decisions involving their sex life that can negatively affect the rest of their lives. Because parents do not always provide the truth about sex or enough information on it, the best solution is to have mandated sex education classes in school. These classes should begin in primary school and continue through adolescence and they should all have a clear, consistent message.
According to the “State Policies on Sex Education in Schools” published February 16, 2016 on ncsl.org, twenty-four states and the District of Columbia require sex education in public schools, while thirty-three states and the District of Columbia require HIV education and twenty-one states require both. However, parents have rights involving sex education in the majority of the states. Thirty-eight states and the District of Columbia allow parents to participate in sex education whilst four require consent from parents and thirty-five states and the District of Columbia allow parents to choose not to have their children in sex education. Since many opinions of sex education are morally based, it is sometimes difficult for public schools and parents of students to see eye to eye on approaches to it. Although a multitude of public schools require sex ed, but the types and quality of sex education vary.
Why should comprehensive sex education be allowed in schools? Should teens be exposed to comprehensive sex education? Sex education should be taught in school because it give children stable and accurate information , it informs them of the danger and diseases associated with sex, and it teaches them about safe sex options.
Sexual education is very strong subject that should be taught in public schools. It is essential in everyday life to know the dangers involving sex and the diseases associated with it. Sexual education is a very controversial subject in the United States. There are many religions that think it is unrighteous to teach students about such a strong subject, especially if it involves fornication. Todays youth is unaware that it is very easy to contract diseases and having accidental pregnancies when having sex.
Before moving on, one must know that sex education is about, but not limited to the discussion of sexual intercourse. As a Buzzle article states, it involves a multitude of topics that introduce human sexual behaviors such as puberty, sexual health, sexual reproduction, sexuality, and more (Iyer). If formally received in school, these topics are brought up and discussed at age-appropriate times over the course of children’s junior high and high school education. Moreover, as I have introduced earlier, the way sex education should be taught is divided into two approaches. It is between taking either a conservative, abstinence-only approach or a more liberal, comprehensive approach. Abstinence-only education, approaches students by stressing the importance of “no sex before marriage” as be...