Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The seven principles of Criminal liability
Basic Principles of Criminal Law
7 principles of criminal law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The seven principles of Criminal liability
The Seven Principles of Criminal Law When examining crime, it can sometimes be difficult to tell where to start. Distinguishing a crime from a non-crime can seem like a simple task, but the criminal justice system has several guidelines that answer the question, “What constitutes a crime”. This is the first and most fundamental question in all of the criminal justice system. It is of the utmost importance to determine who has committed a crime so, if found guilty, that individual can be punished and justice can be given to the victim. All crimes must be properly vetted to the maximum power of the law to keep a safe and civilized society, and all crimes have at least one thing in common, they all fit the seven basic principles of criminal law. …show more content…
Those principles are legality, conduct, harm, causation, mens rea, the concurrence requirement, and the punishment requirement. All of these standards must be met to determine if an action is indeed a crime or not. If even one standard is not met totally, then the action is not a crime. This does not necessarily mean that the action is socially acceptable or proper conduct though. Some of these actions are known as Torts. These Torts are non-punishable under criminal law, but may entitle the offended party to compensation such as money. The criminal justice principles start with the concept of legality. Legality refers to the question of whether or not there is a law that has been broken. In order for an act to be considered illegal, it must violate a current criminal law. These laws come from court decisions known a “common law” and others come when “…the public demands protection against “new” crimes and in response to new situations”. (Adler, 2012) Next is the principle of conduct. Conduct states that only the actions of a person are chargeable under criminal law. Conduct also dictates that a person must have done the action freely. If there was a threat or force behind the person’s actions they would not constitute
In order to understand how the criminal justice system will handle or process this crime it is imperative that one understands how the criminal justice system looks at procession of a controlled...
Criminal law attempts to balance the rights of individuals to freedom from interference with person or property, and society’s need for order. Procedural matters, the rights of citizens and powers of the state, specific offences and defences, and punishment and compensation are some of the ways society and the criminal justice system interact.
...iable above all the others. This principle is the framework of what the code of conduct is based on.
Crime is some action/omission that causes harm in a situation that the person/group responsible ‘ought’ to be held accountable and punished irrespective of what the law book of state say.
Well written procedures, rules, and regulation provide the cornerstone for effectively implementing policies within the criminal justice system. During the investigational process, evidence collected is subjected to policies such as Search and Seizure, yet, scrutinized by the Exclusionary Rule prior to the judicial proceeding. Concurrent with criminal justice theories, evidence collected must be constitutionally protected, obtained in a legal and authorized nature, and without violations of Due Process. Although crime and criminal activities occur, applicability of policies is to ensure accountability for deviant behaviors and to correct potentially escalation within social communities It is essential the government address such deviant behavior, however, equally important is the protection of the accused which also must become a priority when investigating criminal cases.
There are seven elements of crime that define if an act is a crime. However, the definition does not detail if all seven elements must be present to consider an act a crime. In the criminal justice arena someone's actions are considered a crime if more than one element is displayed. The seven elements are listed as harm, legality, actus reus, mens rea, causation, concurrence, and punishment. When considering illegal drug use, prostitution, and gambling in relation to these seven element the following is learned.
Wanting to understand and be involved with putting the right criminal behind bars has always been a passion. Getting a better understanding of the criminal justice system explained how innocent can be convicted. During, this learning process it has been obvious that there are new and lethal forms of criminality, which can range from international terrorism to transnational syndicates.
Conscious efforts to critique existing approaches to questions of crime and justice, demystify concepts and issues that are laden with political and ideological baggage, situate debates about crime control within a socio-historical context, and facilitate the imagination and exploration of alternative ways of thinking and acting in relation to crime and justice. (p. 3).
The theorists have described some of these general principles and values as the principle of personal autonomy, the principle of welfare, the harm principle and offense principle. The objective of each of these principles is the promotion of ideals which may be considered worthy or good in themselves but when applied in a particular context or even culture may yield different or even unsatisfactory outcomes. With the evolution of modern society and changing societal values, what was once considered a “wrong” may become “a right” and certain criminal acts may now call for “decriminalisation” or legalisation. Decriminalisation implies the removal of criminal sanctions while legalisation suggests making the act legal, therefore not subjected to any sanctions or regulations. The application of t...
Several individuals within society typically follow social guidelines that they are unaware of performing. Social guidelines such as stopping at a red light or saying thank you when someone has done something for you. These social guidelines or norms give society a script to follow regarding their behavior and actions. Although norms are the acceptable actions and behaviors that society is taught to perform, there are occurrences where individuals stay away from those in which they are now enacting deviance. To act deviant is considered to break away or do something different of a social norm. There are several forms of deviance that occur frequently within society that violate social norms and hinder society’s overall function.
Lippman, M. (2012). Contemporary Criminal Law Concepts, Cases and Controversies (3rd ed.). [Vitalsouce Bookshelf version]. Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com/books/9781452277660/5/3
During the evaluation of the events in each topic area there are some legal terms that may need to be defined. These terms may also be defined differently depending on the state that the event occurs in. At the end of this paper there is a list of definitions that describe what a certain legal action could mean. All forms of government view these definitions similarly, however, each state may have differing consequences for each of the crimes.
The Law today is a summary of various principles from around the world from the past and the present. Early practises of law were the foundation of the law that we know and abide by today. These practises were referred to as the Classical school. Over time however, different criminologist have altered and greatly improved the early, incomplete ideas and made them more complete and practical to more modern times. This newer version is referred to as the Positivist school. This rapid change from the classical to the positivist perspective was due to the change and growth of civilization. Even though one perspective came from another, they are still different in many ways and it is evident when relating them to section 462.37, Forfeiture of Proceeds of Crime, and section 810, Sureties to keep the Peace. The Classical School of criminology’s time of dominance was between 1700 and 1800. Its conception of deviance was that deviance was a violation of the social contract. Classical theorists believed that all individuals were rational actors and they were able to act upon their own free will. A person chose to commit crimes because of greed and because they were evil. The primary instrument that could be used in regards to the classical school to control crime was to create “criminal sanctions that instil fear of punishment in those contemplating criminal acts” (Gabor 154). Classical school theorists believed the best defence was a good offence and therefore they wanted to instil so much fear into people about what would happen to them if they were to commit a crime that even those who were only thinking of committing a crime were impacted greatly. The classical school individuals operated entirely on free will and it was their ...
Firstly in this report, I will be giving the different definitions of rule of law by different philosophers; secondly, I will be applying the rule of law to the English Legal system and thirdly I will be explaining separation of powers with a focus on the impartial judiciary. Finally, I will be using cases to support every detailed point given.
Campaigns for individual rights, the American and French revolutions and the increase of industrial production and exchange, changed the way of how crime was seen and defined and with the help of famous and educated philosophers, scientists and writers such as; Beccaria and Bentham , authorities and states started to understand that not all people are criminals, but that criminals make rational decisions and that crimes are committed in order to satisfy an individual’s needs for things like money, power or