Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Native americans indigenous religions around the world
Native american culture and spirituality
Summary of american literature on based on american indian storytelling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Identity of Native Americans over the Religious Imperialism There are always different stories acquainted about the various challenges incurred before settling peacefully, on subjects concerning the existence of a given group of people especially indigenous American. Samson Occom wrote the primary text Sermon on Moses Paul (1772) which addresses the sermon preached about the life of a young Indian man called Moses Paul who faced execution in the year 1772 after allegedly being drunk and killing Moses Cock. The second primary text by Mary Rowlandson is Sovereignty and Goodness of God (1682). It is a religious narration based on Christianity by the writer on her encounter with Native Americans after they attacked Lancaster and took her along …show more content…
with her family and other people into captivity. These two primary texts address the fact that Christianity and British Imperialism were the leading causes of interfering with the identity of the Native Americans in the Colonial Period prior to 1750. Both aspects of the texts came as a result of bias and intimidation brought by the social and political issues that existed during the era. The Native Americans embraced Christianity in the early years while still under the British Empire, yet they still faced oppression and discrimination that led to the Natives being rebellious against the British Empire. The identity of Native Americans can be described in connection with Christianity consider their stand on religious matters. In the text Sermon on Moses Paul, the writer, Samson Occom explains how grave sins can be and the fact that they can produce severe consequences as the singular mode of address. During his sermon, there is the mention of the matter regarding crime was a direct reference to alcoholism that Moses Paul had indulged himself. The consequences thereof, being a death penalty (Occom 657). Mary Rowlandson converse this mode of address in her text The Sovereignty and Goodness of God, which she does not seem to explicates the consequences that may be brought about as a result of commitment of sin. She asserts that the claim of Indians attempts to murder the pregnant woman and her unborn child was wrong but does not explicitly say whether there were consequences. Uniquely, both books coil the naïve concepts of society into the modern practicability. The two authors Occom and Rowlandson consequently seek to explore the importance of having a peculiar way of life and living. In the light of Christianity, Mary Rowlandson states that the Native Americans were adversaries of Christianity. She links the reason why she thinks that the Native Americans were enemies of Christianity to how they handled her, as well as her daughter when they were in captivity. When she stayed with the Indians, and they had to move to the wilderness, they fall off the horse carrying them, and the Native Americans laugh at them. This reason is a different point of view from that of Samson Occom’s mode of address over Indigenous Americans. In addition, he portrays the Native Americans as caring people who love and treat people equally in his book. The picture he paints of the Native Americans being caring people is evident from the words he quotes from the Bible about having the same body. Samson here was showing the love that was shared by the Indian people and not the love that they showed to outsiders or people who did not belong to their community (Occom 17). The Native Americans had become closely associated with Christianity which is the main reason why Moses Paul requested to preach during his execution (Occom 12). One can prove their association by the fact that the author of the Sermon on Moses Paul, Samson Occom, shares the gospel about the Christian God using the Bible. The God who if he is received by anyone who has committed any sin, will be accepted and forgiven hence get a chance of entering heaven. On the other hand, in her book, The Sovereignty Goodness of God, Mary Rowlandson implies that the Native Americans do not exercise anything that tries to identify them as people who believe in God. She holds the thought of Native Americans not being real believers of God. Her assumption is based on the incident when the Indians burnt and killed a woman with her child. In Mary Rowlandson’s perspective, the act of burning a person who is alive did not observe to be godly. Apart from the differences mentioned earlier, there are also similarities cited by the two authors concerning Christianity among the Native Americans in the both texts. Samson Occom talks of the goodness of Jesus who came to the world to pay the price for the sinners such as Moses Paul who had sinned. The goodness of God depicted here was to teach the people the importance of being concerned with other people's problems and helping them. The same is also evident in Mary Rowlandson's book where she talks of an instance where the Native Americans were kind enough to offer her help when she cries before them. The Native Americans started practicing Christianity which is shown by their act towards Mrs. Rowlandson. They offered her food and gave her the assurance of being safe with them, which is a Christian virtue. Another similarity that stands out in both books in regards to Christianity is the ideas of God spare those who have sinned and, offer them a chance to change before taking action against them. In Mary Rowlandson's The Sovereignty and the Goodness of God, she points to a scenario where the English who were to attack the Native Americans but are halted at the river. The act of the English people being stopped by the river and denied supremacy over the Indians was perceived as a way of allowing them to live in a godly manner. To live in a godly way would then be an entering wedge to enable them to know about God and his purpose for their lives. The British Imperialism and the Native American are the two major features that contrast in the two texts, in terms of the different pictures about this relationship by the authors print. In Samson Occom’s Sermon on Moses Paul, he explores how the Native Americans were treated by the British and how they faced intimidation under their rule (Occom 657). Proof of this mistreatment is the fact that one of the Natives, execution of Moses Paul occurs because of alcoholism and murder even without getting a chance to defend himself. On the other side, in Mary Rowlandson's book The Sovereignty and the Goodness of God, the narrative is different because the writer explains how the Native Americans attack the Lancaster and they destroy their property. She narrates on how they were taken into captivity and tortured by the Native Americans whom she claims took them through hell. The two authors explicitly address the relationship between the Native Americans and the British imperialism. British imperialism here referring to the rule and power exercised through military force. Samson Occom explains the fears he has in connection to the treatment of the Native Americans by the British. When it came to issues concerning alcoholism, the Native Americans were considered unpleasant by the non-Natives (Occom 657). Therefore, Samson imagined the possibility of the Native Americans to be forgiven when they involved themselves in alcoholism. Samson addresses the forgiving of those associated with addiction after the action that was taken against Moses Paul. On the other hand, Mary Rowlandson does not clarify the issue of punishment of Native Americans by the British Empire. Samson Occom suggests even further, that the Native American were voiceless under the rule non-Natives who seemed to be dominant in their society.
The non-Natives did not accord the Indians an opportunity to express themselves, which "Moses Paul is only a Native American just as he is a detestable being." The author implies that there are a lot of partialities practiced by the non-natives who were the British at the time. The Indians suffered silently under the British Empire since they had nowhere to air their views and fight for their rights as the result. On the contrary, Mary Rowlandson book explains how the Native Americans did not allow them to say anything. Even when they were injured or fell sick such as it happened to Mrs. Rowlandson's daughter, there were no medications to be given to …show more content…
them. In his sermon, Samson Occom addresses the vices conducted against the Native Americans. He mentions the evils in his bid to ensure that everyone under the British Empire received equal treatment. The equal treatment anticipated was to see all the people under the British authority get to enjoy all the opportunities available in the same manner. Samson through his sermon at Moses Paul's execution was championing the need for fairness when dealing with crimes and any other mistakes committed by any person. Moreover, the writer of the Sovereignty and the Goodness of God narrates her experience with the Native Americans so as to show that they too are not innocent. She gives her experience with the Indians and the way they seemed merciless even when her daughter and passed away. She explains how at some point, the Indians afforded pity on them and could even allow her to meet her children who had separated from her. The mistreatment brought out in the sermon by Samson during the execution of Moses Paul is portrayed to be having a foundation.
The foundation here is the action of committing murder under the influence of alcohol. Though the action is not right, the British Empire takes advantage of it and applies the punishment of death. The decision to execute a Native American, therefore, does not augur well with the preacher who feels that his people are despised. Contrarily, Mary Rowlandson in her narration implies that the Native Americans were on a revenge mission. The idea of a revenge mission is not mentioned in the book. However, the attack at Lancaster shows that Indians had a plan to revenge. Mary Rowlandson’s narration points out to a rescue plan by the English soldiers; this suggests that the Indians wanted to get even with the British
Empire. In conclusion, Christianity and British Imperialism were the leading causes of interfering with the identity of the Native Americans as they came as a result of bias and intimidation brought by the social and political issues. Forcefully, the Native Americans had to embrace Christianity while under the rule of the British Empire. They had to accept the Christianity teaching since they were answerable to a regime that upheld Christianity. Later, they embraced the Christianity and as a result, people like Samson Occom became preachers. As explained earlier by Mary Rowlandson, the Native Americans were adversaries of Christianity, which proves that the ancient Indians were not Christians. The Native Americans faced intimidation from the British Empire where they had no representation hence those in power was deaf to their voices. The result of lack of representation, the Native Americans felt despised by the British Empire; therefore, all the factors discussed led the Native Americans losing their original identity.
In the fourth chapter titled “Native Reactions to the invasion of America” in the book, “Beyond 1492: Encounters in Colonial North America, the author James Axtell shares with us an essay he wrote and shared at a conference at Vanderbilt University. Historical accounts are followed beginning at the arrival of explorers and settlers until the 1700’s with various Native tribes in North America. Axtell’s goal is to educate us on the multitude of ways Native Americas reacted during various periods of colonization, and the various methods that the Native Americans perished. Axtell also educates us in his essay on the ways that Native Americans tried to ultimately prevent their extinction at any cost. Overall, the authors intent is to educate us
Reverend John Williams’ narrative on the Deerfield raid (1704) is an informative account on what this experience entailed for him; although, while one may think that his narrative would be mostly focused on the actual raid and what occurred to him as a captive, the primary focus of Williams’ narrative was largely based on his views on Catholicism and his extreme hatred for this religion (pg. 91). In essence, most of his narrative was an anti-Catholicism rant describing how blasphemous the religion is and how though there was numerous opportunities to change his faith through forced measures while being a captive, he never faltered, choosing death over all else (pg. 91).
The book started out with a bloody massacre at Mary Ingles Virginia settlement in 1755. Mary Ingles was pregnant with her third child and twenty-four years of age when the Shawnee Indians came and kidnapped her, her two sons, her sister-in-law, and her neighbor. The journey to the Shawnee village lasted five weeks in the Virginia wilderness, and once the captives arrived at the village they were divided up amongst the Shawnee Indians, leaving Mary alone with no hope but to go home and make a new family with her husband Will Ingles. While in the village of the Shawnee Mary was able to make friends with an elderly Dutch woman who was a captive too, this elderly woman was to be Mary’s companion through the scary wilderness home. Mary and the old Dutch woman were unable to swim but knew that the Ohio River would lead them back home to freedom so they decided to make an escape from the heathen Indians and return home to civilization, not knowing the hardships that would fall on them at the beginning of winter. To start the journey the women had two blankets, one tomahawk, and the clothes that were on their backs, after a week into the trip th...
Franklin's attitude towards the Native Americans is very different from Mary Rowlandson's because he recognized that even though their manners were different from english men, they weren't savages as Rowlandson described them. In Rowlandson's narrative she clearly shows her opinion on their habits when she says: "and myself also in this wilderness condition," by comparing their normal condition to "wilderness" she calls them animals. Meanwhile Franklin is sure to state that: "These Employments of Men and Women are accounted natural & honorable," and by doing so he clarifies a good opinion on the natives and in the way they lived. Rowlandson also compares the Indian's manners as unpleasant, when she describes: "(in their hellish manner)."
In “A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson,” Mary Rowlandson, a Puritan mother from Lancaster, Massachusetts, recounts the invasion of her town by Indians in 1676 during “King Philip’s War,” when the Indians attempted to regain their tribal lands. She describes the period of time where she is held under captivity by the Indians, and the dire circumstances under which she lives. During these terrible weeks, Mary Rowlandson deals with the death of her youngest child, the absence of her Christian family and friends, the terrible conditions that she must survive, and her struggle to maintain her faith in God. She also learns how to cope with the Indians amongst whom she lives, which causes her attitude towards them to undergo several changes. At first, she is utterly appalled by their lifestyle and actions, but as time passes she grows dependent upon them, and by the end of her captivity, she almost admires their ability to survive the harshest times with a very minimal amount of possessions and resources. Despite her growing awe of the Indian lifestyle, her attitude towards them always maintains a view that they are the “enemy.”
Mary Rowlandson was captured from her home in Lancaster, Massachusetts by Wampanoag Indians during King Phillip’s War. She was held captive for several months. When she was released she penned her story, A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson. During much of her story she refers to the Indians as savage beasts and heathens but at times seems admire them and appreciate their treatment of her. Mary Rowlandson has a varying view of her Indian captors because she experienced their culture and realized it was not that different from Puritan culture.
In conclusion to all these articles, Mary Rowlandson and John Smith set the perception for Native Americans due to their Captivity Narratives. Puritans already had an evil view of Indians and these stories adding to their belief of how they were in cahoots with the Devil.
In Mary Rowlandson, “A Captivity Narrative”, Rowlandson recounts her experiences as a captive of the Wampanoag tribe. The tribe took captives from Lancaster in 1676 because of the ongoing violent altercations between the English colonists and Native Americans during King Philip’s War. Since many of the Native Americans brethren had fallen in battle, they saw it fit to take English folk captive and use them to take the place of their fallen brethren, trading/ransom pieces, or killing them in revenge. This was becoming a common practice for the Native Americans to attack villages and in result, some English started fleeing the area or started to retaliate. Rowlandson was a Puritan wife and mother, in her
...ve Indians. From the copious use of examples in Winthrop's work, and the concise detail in Rowlandson's narrative, one can imbibe such Puritans values as the mercy of God, place in society, and community. Together, these three elements create a foundation for Puritan thought and lifestyle in the New World. Though A Model of Christian Charity is rather prescriptive in its discussion of these values, Rowlandson's captivity narrative can certainly be categorized as descriptive; this pious young woman serves as a living example of Winthrop's "laws," in that she lives the life of a true Puritan. Therefore, both 17th century works are extremely interrelated; in order to create Winthrop's model community, one must have faith and closely follow Puritan ideals, as Rowlandson has effectively done in her A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson.
Aquinas, St. Thomas. COMMENTARY on SAINT PAUL'S EPISTLE to the GALATIANS. Trans. F. R. Larcher. Albany: Magi Books, 1996.
Mary Rowlandson’s “A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson” and Benjamin Franklin’s “Remarks Concerning the Savages of North America” are two different perspectives based on unique experiences the narrators had with “savages.” Benjamin Franklin’s “Remarks Concerning the Savages…” is a comparison between the ways of the Indians and the ways of the Englishmen along with Franklin’s reason why the Indians should not be defined as savages. “A Narrative of the Captivity…” is a written test of faith about a brutally traumatic experience that a woman faced alone while being held captive by Indians. Mary Rowlandson views the Indians in a negative light due to the traumatizing and inhumane experiences she went through namely, their actions and the way in which they lived went against the religious code to which she is used; contrastingly, Benjamin Franklin sees the Indians as everything but savages-- he believes that they are perfect due to their educated ways and virtuous conduct.
The Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson is a personal account, written by Mary Rowlandson in 1682, of what life in captivity was like. Her narrative of her captivity by Indians became popular in both American and English literature. Mary Rowlandson basically lost everything by an Indian attack on her town Lancaster, Massachusetts in 1675; where she is then held prisoner and spends eleven weeks with the Wampanoag Indians as they travel to safety. What made this piece so popular in both England and America was not only because of the great narrative skill used be Mary Rowlandson, but also the intriguing personality shown by the complicated character who has a struggle in recognizing her identity. The reoccurring idea of food and the word remove, used as metaphors throughout the narrative, could be observed to lead to Mary Rowlandson’s repression of anger, depression, and realization of change throughout her journey and more so at the end of it.
Mary Rowlandson was a pretentious, bold and pious character. Her narrative did not make me feel sorry for her at all, which is strange since she really did go through a lot. During the war, the Narragansett Indians attacked Lancaster Massachusetts, and burned and pillaged the whole village. During the siege Mary and her six year old child were shot, she watched her sister and most of her village either burn or get shot. She was kept as a captive, along with her three children and taken with the Narragansett’s on their long retreat. The exposition of the story is set immediately. The reader is perfectly aware of Missus Rowlandson’s status and religious beliefs. She constantly refers to the Narragansetts in an incredibly condescending way, to the point that you know that she does not even consider them human. She paints them as purely evil pe...
Interestingly although she feared and reviled the Indians she states that not one of them offered the least abuse of unchastity to her. Her captors never sexually molested or violated her. Rowlandson learned to adapt and strove to make it thought her captivity alive. She learned how to gather food for herself. Tolerate the ways of the Indians, and make clothes for the tribe. She even decided to stay with the Indians when given the chance to escape. “Rowlandson refused them choosing to stay put and let God choose when she was fully redeemed and ready to be released”
The beginnings of my life are an interesting jumble, and they highlight the cosmopolitan world that was the Roman Empire. I was born in an Asian city now located on the southern coast of Turkey called Tarsus in about the year 10. My parents were Jewish, presumably strict Pharisees. They were also Roman citizens.