Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Censorship of art
I think ‘Sensation’ exhibit should not have been censored because it is the new form of art. Through out time art is used to express people’s feelings and emotions in all forms. It is also used to represent the period of time an artist is living in. Today’s art represents the people of this time. If it has sexual elements, there should be no objection to that. There is more sexual acts shown in movies and television than in these pieces of art. ‘Sensation’ was shown in an art museum, not in a public area where everyone can see it. Mature adults who want to see it should have all right to see the art. No one is being forced to look at something they do not want to. The thing that is not right is having to censor ‘Sensation’ because everyone
has the right to see the art they want to. People from all over the country came to see ‘Sensation’ when it was exhibited in New York. That means there is a depend for art of that form. This benefits the artists as well. They gain popularity and probably earn some money as well. Contemporary art should not be censored because art is a form of expression and everyone has the right to express their emotions and feelings. Contemporary art represents today’s time and people. It gives artist a chance to share something amazing with other people. I fully support contemporary art.
After reading “Let’s Put Pornography Back in the Closet” by Susan Brownmiller, my opinion regarding the censorship of pornography has not changed. Although her essay was very forthright and descriptive, it seemed very biased.
Rathnasambhava, the Transcendent Buddha of the South and Madonna Enthroned are very similar images that were produced by very different cultures. Both images were produced during the 13th Century. The image of Rathnasambhava, the Transcendent Buddha of the South was produced in Tibet during an interesting period of the country’s religious history. The branch of Tibetan Buddhism is led by a religious and sometimes political leader called the Dalai Lama. It was during the 13th Century during the reign of Kublai Khan, around the time of the production of this painting, that Tibet experienced the first incarnation of the Dalai Lama. One has to wonder if this painting is somehow related to that occurrence. According to one source, the reincarnation system for the Living Buddhas is the main point distinguishing Tibetan Buddhism from other forms of Buddhism.
After walking around The Timken Museum of Art, paintings started to look indistinguishable making ancient artist paintings battle for my absorption of attracting my eyes to glimpse intently at their art work. Much less, before running off, an intensely hued oil painting capture my attention. It read, The Piazzetta at Venice. Luca Carlevarijs made this outstanding painting which illustrated realism with every brushstroke that was imprinted into the painting. Lighting gleam from the south and brighten the streets of venice as workers sold their crafts to others. On left of the painting, laid the library of Sansovino. Clouds originated slightly bringing an ash color to the top right hand corner of the painting. Birds flew freely to the south in between the clouds. Two dog stood calmly in front of the column of Saint Theodoric. To the right , Carlevarijs illustrated the beauty of the south side of Saint Mark’s Basilica. Lucas Carlevarijs compose this dire painting to make people feel as if they were there to feel the warm of the sun on that beautiful afternoon. Carlevarijs archive this e...
Pornography is considered by many to be an unwelcome and distasteful part of our society. However, I argue that it is necessary to voice the unpopular viewpoints, under the Constitution. This paper is a defense of pornography as a constitutional right of free expression, under the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights. In illustrating this argument, I will first define pornography as a concept, and then address central arguments in favor of pornography remaining legal and relatively unregulated – such as the development of the pornography debate throughout modern US law, and how activist groups address the censorship of adult entertainment.
Sexuality has often been confused with pornography. It has been trivialised as something that is a denigration and denial of true feeling by sensationalising genuine expressivism.
There was a complaint in 1992 about having The Nude Maja in a classroom. The complaint came from a feminist English professor who stated that the painting made her students, as well as herself, uncomfortable. Another incident occurred at the University of Arizona when a female student’s photographic artwork consisting of self portraits in her underwear was physically attacked by feminists. There was also an occurrence at University of Michigan when some of their law school feminists organized a conference “Prostitution: From Academia to Activism”. This group removed a feminist-curated art exhibition held in conjunction with the conference. They felt that videos showing prostitutes at work was pornographic and unacceptable(Faigley & Selzer, 539).
...from the other side of this argument is the fact that profanity and sexually explicit material shouldn’t be exposed to young children without their parental permission. But telling teenagers and young adults who are mature enough to choose what they want to listen to is completely wrong and unjust. The key word here is choice. As stated earlier, the thing that makes this country truly great is the idea that we have the right to listen to whatever we choose we want to listen to, not what a censor thinks you should be exposed to, it’s ridiculous.
Now in the short essay, “Us and them”, David Sadaris features great examples of how one’s culture truly molds the way one views the world and how it then affects them in life. In the text Sadaris states, “We never spoke, but I’d pass them in the halls from time to time and attempt to view the world through their eyes” (Page). For Sadaris, this was nearly impossible. In the beginning of his story he explains the black and white contrast between the Tomkey’s and his own family. He talks about his relationship with television and how it was a part of daily life, while the Tomkey’s on the other hand didn’t own a television, let alone even believed in it. Not to mentions the families’ two differences with Halloween or simply the way either family would eat their dinners. This all relates back to the quote and Sadaris’s big misunderstanding with the Tomkey’s. He couldn’t understand due to the lack of knowledge he had about living the way the Tomkey’s did. He said he never even talked to the children, one could say it’s because most are too scared of what they don’t understand. Sadaris gr...
Again, there are different ideas of what is considered pornographic from artwork, movies, and books. While one may look at a painting that depicts nude forms or read a book that includes sexual acts may not see this as a form of pornography while others would find it morally offensive. Feminist would argue that the morality of porn is it is degrading and humiliating to those involved, not of its sexual nature. Their concern is that it promotes sexism and violence against women or children. “What is objectionable about pornography…is its abusive and degrading portrayal of females and female sexuality, not its content or explicitness” (Rodgerson & Wilson, 1994) However, others may feel that it is sexually liberating and in no way degrading to those involved. Those women feel in control of their sexuality and choose to participate in acts as a way of expressing themselves while feeling it has no barring on their moral character. While others would argue that it promotes immoral behavior which would lead to criminal acts or an unhealthy obsession with sex. “The most commonly feared adverse effects of pornography include undesirable sexual behaviors (e.g. adultery), sexual aggression, and loss of respect for traditional family structures and values, loss of respect for authorities, and a general nonspecific moral decay.” (Hald & Linz,
Shock Art is a very controversial form of art—some believe it exists merely to draw attention to itself, while others see it as the height of creativity. Some would argue that art itself has no set definition; that it is up to the artist and viewer to decide. What is aesthetically pleasing is a question to ask as well. Some attack the artist themselves when creating controversial work, but in the end it is the art itself that will go through many different analysis in determining if it is considered to be art or just entertainment.
Sensation refers to the process of sensing what is around us in our environment by using our five senses, which are touching, smell, taste, sound and sight. Sensation occurs when one or more of the various sense organs received a stimulus. By receiving the stimulus, it will cause a mental or physical response. It starts in the sensory receptor, which are specialized cells that convert the stimulus to an electric impulse which makes it ready for the brain to use this information and this is the passive process. After this process, the perception comes into play of the active process. Perception is the process that selects the information, organize it and interpret that information.
... sexual and violent content should not be censored to any extent because censorship impedes societal progress by giving opportunity to hidden agendas and creating unnecessary boundaries for the film industry.
Kieran, M. (2008, January 28). Art, censorship and morality. Open Learn, the Open University. Retrieved January 5, 2014 from http://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/culture/philosophy/art-censorship-and-morality
When watching a movie like this, my immediate thought is pure disgust. I feel uncomfortable, sick, and disturbed. But in a way, those feelings path the basic point of the movie. It’s human nature to shield our eyes to things that we believe are “unwatchable” because of our basic morality. However, the movie makes a point that nothing is unwatchable especially with their “over the line” use of body parts and intimate moments.
The movies they watch, the music they listen to, and the games they play have all first been screened through different rating systems to find anything in them that can be interpreted as “obscene”. Once someone finds something, the creator of the work has no choice but to delete, edit, and basically censor the offending portion, otherwise it never gets to see the light of public consumption. Censorship has been used for all different kinds of work, for all different kinds of reasons. The many examples of album covers provided at TabooTunes show different types of covers deemed “inappropriate”, and how drastically the artists had to alter the image in order to make it “friendlier” and “more appropriate” (“Taboo Tunes Gallery - Music Censorship").... ...