Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Technology and effects
Impacts of technology
Effect of technology advancement on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Max Barry’s novel Machine Man, Dr. Charlie Neumann , a modern day scientist at Better Future, has introduced self improvement through superior artificial parts. While emerging himself in his works, conflict arises such as where to draw the line with potentially dangerous new technology. Not a single character seems to be on the same page. Charlie is inventing for himself, Lola sees the idea as a way she can offer the best to her patients, and Better Future sees this as an idea for new weaponry which means more power and certainly more money. Better Future’s managers are looking to create robot soldiers, which poses as extremely dangerous for the art of war and humankind as a whole. The ultimate question is what do you limit the new …show more content…
technology too: where do you draw the line? Charlie explores into unknown and murky areas to find out. In the end he realizes Lola Shanks should be rewarded with ownership of the advances in prosthetics. Lola is the only character in the novel who can depict the differences between human beings and technology, she has a standard for humanity that keeps humans human, and it is her responsibility as a prosthetist to help amputees. Charlie foreshadows creating a superior leg after the first day of rehab with his so called cutting edge new limb.
He infers this by saying, “I sat in bed and inspected the exegesis. I really needed tools to take it apart… I still found it surprising that this was as good as it got” (Barry 30). Describing it further as a bucket on a stick, feeling very wrong, and squeezing his leg so hard it feels as if all his stitches have popped (Barry 30-32). Lola Shanks, a prosthetist, assisted Charlie when learning how to use the leg. Mr. Shanks, Lola’s father, being an amputee of various limbs gives Lola the most experience in the field. Although she has the largest experience with prosthetics in the entirety of the book, the study of prosthetics is such a tiny department compared to the cancer research department, there are few options for artificial legs, arms, et cetera. In a case study in the Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, “Researchers have concluded…they are useful for determining the type of interventions used in rehabilitation, but that it may not accurately assess the true function of the individuals within the community” (Staubach and Sutton). Meaning although those prosthetics can be useful in rehab, once the patient is back into reality they might not be the best option. In light of this Charlie proceeds to create a leg that does suit amputees in the real world. Once Lola sees what Charlie had invented mechanically engineered legs, she sees this as a world of …show more content…
opportunities opening up for amputees. When first hearing the news of a modernistic prosthetic, she was hesitant although after seeing it in action she exclaimed to Charlie that it was magnificent. Throughout the book Lola’s view of technology remains constant. Tentative and unsure she however wants nothing but the best for her patients and amputees. If Charlie had designed an engineered leg for the purpose of improving life for amputees, then Lola would have been on board immediately and the new technology would not have been so potentially dangerous. One of the main differences between Lola and Charlie is social skills.
Charlie scored a 0 on an empathy test meaning he has little to no ability to interact with others while Lola is up beat and optimistic. She encouraged Charlie constantly throughout rehabilitation. Every time they practiced walking Charlie explains her reaction as, “her eyes growing with each step, and how when I reached her she squeezed my hands” (Barry 31). In brief she makes people feel welcomed and wanted. The way she connects with Charlie, who has never connected with anyone but technology, and Carl are just a few examples of her standard of humanity. Lola has a good head on her shoulders and knows where things should stop pertaining to the advancements in her field. Although she is human and makes mistakes just like anyone else. One being letting Charlie continue his work on better parts. If she did realize what unmitigated work was happening in Lab 4 she would not have promoted it nevertheless the fact of the matter is Lola was blinded by her love for Charlie. Even though she enabled him, in a way, at the end of the novel she was the one who saved him and arguably
mankind. As a prosthetist it is your responsibility to help find the artificial limb that best suits the patient. Lola takes her job very seriously due to the fact she was exposed to amputation at such a young age. She was the reason her father had so many limbs missing and having a career in this field is a way to repay her father back. Lola feels that it is her responsibility to make you succeed and be happy. While on a walk with Charlie one day, he tells us, “I had never, ever been this happy” (Barry 33). Proving that Lola knows what her job is and accomplishes it all while making her patients happy. One might argue that she only accomplished it with Charlie because they fall in love. This argument is immediately disassembled when you look at the facts. She is successful yet again with Carl whom she does not fall in love with. She is very successful in her career. For example Lola tells us that, “I have not popped a stitch yet” (Barry 30). Based on her achievements alone she should be awarded with the responsibility of the technological advancements in her field.
One such example that they could potentially be referring to is a prototype for a limb that has sensors capable of sensing and reading signals sent to missing limb from the spine. The sensor within the prosthetic was developed by the Imperial College in London, and is currently still being developed. When asked about how the development of prosthetics had lead the research team to look toward the spine, Dr. Dario Farina, who is one of the lead researchers on the team, said that, “When an arm is amputated the nerve fibres and muscles are also severed, which means that it is very difficult to get meaningful signals from them to operate a prosthetic. We've tried a new approach, moving the focus from muscles to the nervous system. This means that our technology can detect and decode signals more clearly, opening up the possibility of robotic prosthetics that could be far more intuitive and useful for patients” (Smith). Overall, one could see why someone would see this as a finished and market ready advancement, but this method of sensory technology is still just in development, and simply opens up the possibilities for expanding the field of robotic
One guy named Fox takes care of injured birds. One bird in particular called a sand crane would regularly injure its frail legs. Without their legs cranes cannot survive. Fox finally decided he put down enough cranes, and he started working on a prosthetic leg for the crane. The first crane to receive a plastic leg walked around as if it were her real leg (Anthes 137). The crane went from on the verge of dying to walking around naturally with a prosthetic. The crane now can live a longer healthy life, rather than dying well before its life expectancy. Cranes sometimes scratch themselves with the plastic leg as they would with their real legs. Prosthetics possess a wide range of capabilities that have the ability to help several different animals from dolphins to small fragile
The purpose of this prosthetic limb is to help people who have lost a hand or arm in any type of accident like Les Baugh. He one of the patients currently outgoing testing with the prosthetic limb. He lost both of his arms at a electrical accident a young age and the prosthetic he using are attached to the end of his shoulders, since the accident cut his arms right to that section. He underwent surgery in order to remap the nerves
His aim was to in-crease amputees’ confidence in the use of their prosthetics and their mental attitude. He recruited 100 volunteer amputees and put them through the programme. The results sug-gested that he achieved his aim he noted improvements in the physical and mental well-being of the volunteers. They also gained confidence in using their prosthetic which aided their recovery. Their mental well-being was particularly important as it was noted that a positive mental attitude and acceptance of the prosthetic resulted in a quicker recovery time (Dillingham, T.R., 1998).
This conflict can be observed in the film Chappie. The idea that technology could reach a point where police officers could be replaced by machines is indicative of the idea of how humans’ behavior and actions can be affected by the technology accessible to them. In this case, the technology is changing human action by removing humans from harm’s way and replacing them with machines. The change in human action as a result of technology brings up the question of whether the new human action is necessarily an improvement. As was seen in the film, the new technologies brought forth the debate of the morality of using such advanced robots. The uncertainty of the merit or value of technology is present in many of the interactions with technology seen in the course. With the changes brought about by technology, there also exists a conservative sentiment that does not see such changes as necessary. This resistance to technology can be seen in Marx, with the push for a return to a pastoral life. One other instance of the way that technology has shaped human behavior is one of the examples presented in lecture. An article spoke of how a statue was being moved as a result of too many people bumping into it because they were texting while walking and thus distracted. This provides an example of
In Brave New World, Aldous Huxley tries to convey the belief that every invention or improvement for the “betterment” of mankind is only an instrument for his ultimate destruction. “We are,” he said, “on the horns of an ethical dilemma and to find the middle way will require all out intelligence and all out good will.” This goes for all fields of life, medical, technical, social, etc. Not only in the book, but also in real life, one can see that this belief is evidently true.
Although nothing can ever fully replace any part of our bodies, most people who have suffered the loss of a body part or who were born missing something that everyone else has and needs—like a foot or a hand—would agree that something is usually better than nothing. People have used all sorts of artificial devices probably from the beginnings of human history to help them compensate for the loss of a limb. Thus in very ancient times, the first and simplest prosthesis may have been a forked tree limb that was used as a crutch to help someone walk whose leg may have been badly damaged or lost in an accident or to a disease.
Clark continues by reasoning that the future technology and its dynamic link to the biological human processes is to be expected, as this has been the case throughout human history -- it is human nature for future mergers with new technology to occur based on the continuous cycle since language came into existence that Clark recognizes. Clark argues that this merger should not be feared and the development of the technology not be hindered in any way. Although, he does strongly warn that the human race needs to be cautious during this time of merging new technologies with the human body and brain. There are several concerns (opponents' fears) that Clark mentions, though, brief and less complex self admittedly. In each line of defense, there is a general underlying theme that develops. This theme he portrays is a drive to increase society's awareness of the merger of self and technology. He suggests that this awareness start with truly understanding one's self and then understanding one's interactions with technology in daily life, as he gracefully captured here, "Know Thyself; Know Thy Technologies" (Clark, 183). Clark's strongest defense to not f...
They now are very useful in allowing amputees to lead a more normal life. This paper will outline the advanced technology of bionic limbs. These bionic products combine artificial intelligence with human philosophy to create a more human-like way to restore the function of a lost limb. These bionic limbs take the pressure off amputees by sensing how their lost limb should move and adapts to movement of the amputee. The bionic product automatically controls itself without the amputee having to think about how to move it. The purpose of this paper is to inform about bionic products. It will further explain how they operate, along with their efficacy in prosthetics. Innovative bionic technology continuously increases the quality of life for amputees. That innovative technology will be explored through this paper, along with their specific functions and operations. The new products like the Power Knee, the Rheo Knee, the Propio Foot, and Symbiotic leg allow more mobility and individualistic movement for the amputee. Each was developed and tested to be efficient in the prosthetic world. I will explore case studies of people who have these products. I will explore the struggles and adaptions they had to make with the use of this technology.
The previous insert from William Lee Adams’ article, Amputee Wannabes, describes a 33-year-old man’s wish for amputation of his foot. There was nothing physically or medically wrong with this limb; John only stated that he did not feel comfortable with his own body and felt as though his foot was not a part of him. John’s leg was amputated above the knee, and he went on to describe that the operation resolved his anxiety and allowed him to be at ease in his own body (Adams, 2007).
A well supported outlook towards the future of technology would be “cautiously optimistic.” Nuclear fission is one example of this. While is did further our understanding of atomic theory and resulted in a solution to many energy woes, it also caused the tragedies of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Chernobyl. Looking towards the 21st century, artificial intelligence is shaping up to be another highly controversial piece of technology that we are only beginning to understand. As George Santayana once said, “those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it.” We can only hope that the world has learned an important lesson from these tragedies: never underestimate the power of
Some such technologies include reproductive technologies designed to see and care for mothers and fetuses prior to birth, physical prosthetics to aid with average daily motion, and machines designed to aid quality of life. While, from the outside, all of these may seem like helpful and important advancements, by examining how individuals use and interact with these technologies, we can evaluate the value of their use and potential consequences. Specifically considering the topic of body modification, this can mean several things, from Cochlear Implants to reconstructive surgery. Body modification is important to consider because one’s sense of embodiment “shifts over time or by context (Kafer 4).” While this quote specifically applies to disability, it’s used here to further emphasize how something as large as surgically changing one’s body can impact how they see themselves, and change that sense of self more permanently than temporary use of the aforementioned technologies. While having similar takes on the idea of body modification, and its effects on embodiment, both theories ultimately approach the subject slightly
Prosthetic limbs have been in use for thousands of years and have become more and more technologically advanced. Historically, prosthetic limbs have been awkward, uncomfortable, and merely a means of alleviating some of the problems that came with the loss of an arm or a leg (Bidlack), but as science behind prosthetic limbs advances, as do their capabilities to perform like normal limbs would and perform tasks previously unachievable by amputees. With technological advancements, questions arise regarding whether or not prosthetic limbs are actually better and more efficient than our own human bodies. As concerns grow, so does the controversy surrounding the participation of amputee athletes in professional sports sanctioned for able-bodied
Prosthetic limbs, one of the examples of physical enhancement, have improved to such an extent that the capabilities and...
Our minds have created many remarkable things, however the best invention we ever created is the computer. The computer has helped us in many ways by saving time, giving accurate and precise results, also in many other things. but that does not mean that we should rely on the computer to do everything we can work with the computer to help us improve and at the same time improve the computer too. A lot of people believe that robots will behave like humans someday and will be walking on the earth just like us. There should be a limit for everything so that our world would remain peaceful and stable. At the end, we control the computers and they should not control us.