In Frankenstein’s Cat by Emily Anthes, she talks about how humans change animals by biotechnology or adding limbs. The chapter “Pin the Tail on the Dolphin” discusses the many forms of prosthetics for animals. The prosthetics service animals from marine wildlife to a domesticated dog. A substantial focus zones in on a dolphin named Winter that loses her tail due to a fishing net that cut off the circulation from the tail to rest of her body. Two scientists come together to manufacture a fake tail for the dolphin. Eventually they invent a prosthetic tale that fits on Winter. Scientists even create prosthetic legs for animals such as dogs or flamingos. People construct beaks for birds and shells for turtles. Numerous uses of prosthetics benefit animals, but some seem more frivolous, like fake testicles for your neutered dog (122-142). I agree with Anthes on how prosthetics benefit animals by giving them a better life and allowing them to execute actions they could not before, but some prosthetic uses seem more for the owner’s comfort rather than …show more content…
actually providing the animal with a useful prosthetic. Prosthetics allow an animal to complete actions they could not before and provide other benefits. Starting off with one lucky dolphin named winter. She encountered a problem when her tail died due to the circulation being cut off, and she now swims like a fish by moving her tail side to side. She now has back problems, because of the way she swims. Luckily two scientists worked together and crafted a fake tail for winter. Winter’s spine is being put back in place with the help of her new artificial tail (Anthes 28). Without the tail Winters’s back would fall out of line, causing back problems for her whole life. Now the prosthetic re-aligns her back also causing her to swim naturally by flicking her tail up and down. Even though Winter will live in the aquarium her whole life, she will live a better life with the prosthetic preventing permanent back problems. The advantage of prosthetics comes from the fact that they can help several different species of animals by offering them a better life.
One guy named Fox takes care of injured birds. One bird in particular called a sand crane would regularly injure its frail legs. Without their legs cranes cannot survive. Fox finally decided he put down enough cranes, and he started working on a prosthetic leg for the crane. The first crane to receive a plastic leg walked around as if it were her real leg (Anthes 137). The crane went from on the verge of dying to walking around naturally with a prosthetic. The crane now can live a longer healthy life, rather than dying well before its life expectancy. Cranes sometimes scratch themselves with the plastic leg as they would with their real legs. Prosthetics possess a wide range of capabilities that have the ability to help several different animals from dolphins to small fragile
cranes. Although numerous uses of prosthetics provide benefits to the animal, some uses seem more for the owner rather than actually for the betterment of the animal. People will do anything if they believe it helps their animal. Pet owners have gone as far as implanting fake testicles on their dog. Scientists tested if the fake testicles actually made a difference, and they concluded that the loss of hormones caused behavioral changes (Anthes 134). Even though the owner thought their pet would benefit from thinking it had balls, the pet actually would act different either way due to lack of hormones. The hormones have an affect more than Nueticles. The replacing of the nurtured testicles profits the male owner more than it does the pet. Some pet owners take it even further than replacing testicles. Dogs can now have plastic surgery to make them beautiful. A plastic surgeon in Brazil welcomes pets to have surgery, so they can come out looking beautiful (Anthes 136). Making a pet look beautiful benefits the owner more than the animal. People want their dogs looking beautiful, so other people will look at the dog and think the same. The pet has no idea whether if people think it looks ugly or pretty. Plastic surgery will not change a dog’s opinion of itself, making the surgery more for the satisfaction of the owner. Humans never stop progressing. People have a need to keep advancing past the possible limit. An author by the name of Sapolsky talks about “…how it is our nature to be unconstrained by our nature” (Sapolsky). With all the different technologies introduced in this book, it seems to follow Sapolsky. From creating goat milk to prevent disease to cloning animals, humans keep moving forward. Even with the advancement of Prosthetics for animals, people try to achieve perfection. If a prosthetic dolphin tail can help a dolphin swim naturally, then the possibilities seem endless. Even though several of the advancing possibilities for fake animal limbs come more for the satisfaction of the owner, humans will never stop developing.
Organisms are limited by the structure of their bodies. Some creatures are capable to do great things because of the number of limbs they have, or the density of their skin. Humans in particular are extremely reliant in the capabilities that our bodies bring to us. Our bodies however, are not all dependable, as we can injure ourselves, and even lose parts of our body. To combat this loss of body, the great minds of our species have created false limbs to replace what we have lost. This great improvement to our lives is known as, the prosthetic. In recent years this technology has expanded into a new form, that combines prosthetics and robotics to make life for people
Throughout Emily Anthes’ book Frankenstein’s Cat, the topic of animal experimentation assembles the entire book. The chapter “Double Trouble” displays the topic of cloning. The chapter talks about Dolly, the first animal to successfully be cloned, a cloned cat named CC, and even a South Korean puppy. The chapters describes the process of how the animal cloning became possible, and how many trails the scientist went through before the cloning became successful. With the success of cloning also comes the complete failures. Hundreds of animals died in the process of cloning, but as long as success comes, scientists continue to make those sacrifices. This chapter also focuses on cloning to replace a dead pet; however, the pet might not develop
After the monster is born and he has a fit, we see the lowest point so
Imagine an eight-foot-tall, misshapen human child. You might complain that this is contradictory - but do it anyway. Imagine some sort of humanoid being with the mind of a human child in an eight-foot body, green with a nail in its head if you want. This is what Frankenstein's creature is. Frankenstein's creature is mentally a child, and we see its evolution through traditional child development in the course of its narrative. But the creature is the only member of its species, and therefore its narrative can be taken to represent the history of an entire species - the creature's first experiences can be viewed as an amalgam of creation myths.
The creature was created with the intention of goodness and purity but because of this, he wasn’t equipped to deal with the rejection of his creator. After Victor Frankenstein’s death, Robert Walton walks in to see the creature standing over his friend’s lifeless body.
The purpose of this prosthetic limb is to help people who have lost a hand or arm in any type of accident like Les Baugh. He one of the patients currently outgoing testing with the prosthetic limb. He lost both of his arms at a electrical accident a young age and the prosthetic he using are attached to the end of his shoulders, since the accident cut his arms right to that section. He underwent surgery in order to remap the nerves
Throughout most of literature and history, the notion of ‘the woman’ has been little more than a caricature of the actual female identity. Most works of literature rely on only a handful of tropes for their female characters and often use women to prop up the male characters: female characters are sacrificed for plot development. It may be that the author actually sacrifices a female character by killing her off, like Mary Shelly did in Frankenstein in order to get Victor Frankenstein to confront the monster he had created, or by reducing a character to just a childish girl who only fulfills a trope, as Oscar Wilde did with Cecily and Gwendolen in The Importance of Being Earnest. Using female characters in order to further the male characters’
Frankenstein has become a symbol in contemporary society. Upon hearing the name, one might imagine a tall, muscular green man with short black hair, a flat head, and two bolts pierced on both sides of his neck. Although that is the Frankenstein present now, the modern Frankenstein is only an adaptation of Mary Shelley’s original creature. Shelley’s Frankenstein, 1818, is a gothic novel in which she tells the tale of a man creating life. This creation of Victor Frankenstein’s monster eventually hurt the people he held dear. Following the popularity of the book, James Whale directed Frankenstein, in 1931, which started the movement of Frankenstein’s contemporary image. While in comparison to the novel’s questionable identity of the monster, Whale’s adaptation addresses the creation as the true monster. Whale is able to accomplish his reanimated version of the original creation through a series of drastically different aspects involving both personality and appearance in his cinematic production. Whale’s monster lacks the human appeal of Shelley’s creation through his motivation of his transgressions, lack of speech and physical appearance.
The creature in Mary Shelly’s novel Frankenstein is portrayed as a monster. Consider the presentation of the creature in the novel and the origin of the monstrous behaviour conveyed in the novel. Frankenstein’s monster is by instinct good but through watching the behaviour of humans he learns from their violent rejection of him, what it is to be human. He learns about the emotions of hate, anger, revenge and does not see the advantages of happiness and love. The message of Shelly’s novel is that through upbringing and socialisation, humans become monstrous and full of prejudice toward others different to themselves.
Stephen King’s novel Pet Sematary pays reverence to Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, encompassing and challenging elements from its characters, its plot, and the dissertations addressed in the novel. Pet Sematary is a huge interpretation of Frankenstein because how closely the characters relate, the countless similar imagery in each novel, and how each novel gives the aspect of cheating life. I plan to analyze from a comparative perspective just how much the novels parallel in storyline, characterization and intertexuality.
Countless situations created in life will always have some consequence, whether the outcome is a positive outcome or a negative outcome. During the novel, Frankenstein, there are many incidents portrayed through the characters that have both a positive outcome and a negative outcome, no matter the type of situation. The majorities of the situations that are conveyed in this novel almost always have a negative outcome because of the way the effects damage and hurt the innocence of the other characters in the story. In this novel many of the negative outcomes are a consequence of a hideous monster, known as Frankenstein’s monster, which was created by the hands of Victor Frankenstein.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein or; The Modern Prometheus, published in 1818, is a product of its time. Written in a world of social, political, scientific and economic upheaval it highlights human desire to uncover the scientific secrets of our universe, yet also confirms the importance of emotions and individual relationships that define us as human, in contrast to the monstrous. Here we question what is meant by the terms ‘human’ and ‘monstrous’ as defined by the novel. Yet to fully understand how Frankenstein defines these terms we must look to the etymology of them. The novel however, defines the terms through its main characters, through the themes of language, nature versus nurture, forbidden knowledge, and the doppelganger motif. Shelley also shows us, in Frankenstein, that although juxtaposing terms, the monstrous being everything human is not, they are also intertwined, in that you can not have one without the other. There is also an overwhelming desire to know the monstrous, if only temporarily and this calls into question the influence the monstrous has on the human definition.
Mary Shelley book Frankenstein, is a dark romantic novel that was published in the 19th century. Social prejudice based on physical appearance impacts a person's character negatively. Individuals make misjudgments based on physical aspects which affect how they treat the individual. Mary Shelly brings out the theme of appearance and prejudice in the novel Frankenstein. "The monster created by Victor Frankenstein highlights societal prejudice (Russell)."
Which is more powerful science or nature? Author Mary Shelley shows us exactly what could happen when science and nature are pitted against each other in her novel “Frankenstein Or, The Modern Prometheus”. In the novel the life of a scientist named Victor Frankenstein spirals out of control after the death of his mother. He consequently becomes dangerously obsessed with death. His mission becomes to go against nature in order to figure out the science of life. In his journey of giving a “torrent of light into our dark world” (Shelley, 61) Victor Frankenstein is faced with the consequences going against nature. I believe that Mary Shelley was against science that went over the bounds set by nature.
Prosthetic limbs, one of the examples of physical enhancement, have improved to such an extent that the capabilities and...