Self-Esteem In Alfie Kohn's The Case Against Competition

728 Words2 Pages

A seven-year-old tennis champion, Kyle, was used to winning ever since he held a tennis racket at the age of two. His parents thought that competition would not have a negative effect on Kyle. But when Alfie Kohn, the writer of “The Case Against Competition” and a speaker on a talk show on national television, asked Kyle what he felt when he lost, Kyle replied “Ashamed.” This is a result of winning too often; it lowers your self-esteem when you lose. But competition isn’t always bad, and it gives children a reason to motivate themselves and it’s used as a learning experience, not just an opportunity to win. First of all, competition helps give children a reason to motivate themselves. In “Healthy Competition is Good for Children”, Hannah Pandel writes that “children in a competitive environment play longer than those in a non-competitive environment and have a greater sense of competence.” Because children are competing against each other, they have a motivation to …show more content…

In the article “The Case Against Competition,” he writes that “Most people lose in most competitions, and it’s obvious why that causes self-doubt. But even winning doesn’t build character; it just lets a child brag temporarily. Our competitive society has changed our sense of self-worth: you value is defined by what you have done.” Here, he is stating a fact: winning doesn’t build character. But losing does. Losing is what helps a child grow, and taking away the competitive aspect of a sport doesn’t help you win or lose. Sure, Alfie Kohn’s ideas may be valid, but will removing competition in a sport really do anything? Kids may be worried about being beaten and beating others in a race or game, but that’s just a part of human nature. Like Raj Verma said, “The goal is actually improving upon yourself.” No competition means no improving, for there isn’t a motivation to participate in a

Open Document