Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Disadvantages of outcome based education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
It is not very often that a person has his own national television show, radio show, and two books that have been on the "New York Times Best Seller List." Rush Limbaugh happens to be one of these unique people, his radio show is popular, his television show has the largest audience for a program of its type and his new book is one of the best of its kind. Limbaugh always backed up his comments with facts or statistics. While the book was informative and factual, it was also very humorous. See, I Told You So was definitely a conservative use of 363 pages.Without question, Rush Limbaugh is a spokesperson for a conservative majority within the United States. His book follows what he says on his radio and television programs, which is a conservative and republican view on issues.
A few of the things he stresses in his book are that conservatives are the silent majority and President Clinton cannot ruin this country in four years. Although he stresses that conservatives are the majority, he says that liberals are trying to regain control by forcing the public schools get rid good things like the Bible and competition, and replace them with "Outcome-Based Education". Most importantly, we need to motivate people to pursue excellence and not feel sorry, pity and coddle underachievers.While the purpose of his book is to express these views, he also covers many other topics from the environment, to Dan's Bake Sale. "The spectacle was enough to drive a stake through the heart of liberalism (p.101)," says Rush Limbaugh about Dan's Bake Sale. Sixty-five thousand people flocked to Fort Collins, Colorado for what was called "Rushstock '93." This all started as a quest for Dan Kay to make $29.95 for a subscription to The Limbaugh Letter and escalated to a full day event that even Limbaugh attended.While Rush Limbaugh discusses many different controversial and serious issues, he manages to make it entertaining. He makes these serious issues amusing by sarcastic comments and pionting out the irony in government today.
Parts of the book are made for just entertainment like the Politically Correct Liberal Dictionary and the Lies, Lies chapter in which Limbaugh backs up his theory that, the Clinton administration, has cataloged an "avalanche of false hoods" with 7 pages of Clinton's major contradictions.Rush Limbaugh makes many controversial comments throughout his book, but instead of just commenting, he supports what he says.
“The O’Reilly Factor” which is aired on the Fox News Channel where he talks about political
In order to understand Morris's relationship to the jading of the voting public it is necessary to examine his career and history. Dick Morris has been around politics for his entire life. Growing up in Manhattan, his father Eugene was a prominent real estate lawyer who was very familiar with tactics of persuasion. Eugene Morris was responsible for deals that created properties such as the Lincoln Center. At an early age he taught his son all about political favor. Eugene had learned his lessons about political action from his uncle Al Cohn. Cohn was a Democratic boss of the Bronx. When Dick Morris was still very young his father abandoned him and Cohn raised him along with his own son Roy. Ironically, according to Time magazine, Roy"grew up to be one of the most hated and feared right-wing power brokers of his generation."(Pooley page 26) In addition to Roy Cohn, Morris's cousin is Jules Fierier, a liberal cartoonist. Morris saw both sides of the political spectrum from a very young age.
great success. Bill Maher however has such poor rhetorical skills that he was unable to succeed in
...rting the truth, I believe that his delivery method fails to impress thus making the truth seem false. Finkel’s war stories rely heavily on facts, which in my own opinion make it read like a textbook rather than a story. Even though Finkel gives an unbiased report of the Iraq war, in doing so he forgoes the traditional storytelling methods and undertakes the method of reporting. Finkel provides concrete factual evidence but fails to also portray emotional truths which make it hard to believe. For any storyteller, the hardest part is getting the attention of the audience and once the attention is obtained, the next hardest thing is keeping that attention. Finkel’s texts tend to lose the audience from time to time, and according to O’Brien, if Finkel cannot make the audience believe than truth is obsolete which makes his war stories false even though they are true.
The authors do eventually (pg. 205) acknowledge that some may see the book as trying to enrage the public just to sell books. In fact, Ron Levy, P...
In conclusion, many people may view Michael Moore as being uneducated and just ranting about his dislikes; however, he writes about what most of us believe and do not admit out loud. The purpose of any piece of information is to inform the public. Michael Moore effectively informs the reader about America’s poor education system, why and who to blame for this unfortunate truth, and lastly what actions can be done.
Nicholas Kristof, a columnist for the New York Times, is very straightforward in his expression of his opinions in his writing. Kristof's awareness of his audience and his connection with them allows him to present his ideas and opinions in a way that is compelling and understandable. Kristof is sure to tie in every detail and end his arguments by addressing his audience specifically. Although Nicholas Kristof creates many effective arguments through his use of witness accounts and real-life situations, his over employment of pathos leads his audience to question his objectivity due to his emotional connection to his argument.
keeps the reader interested in his topic. He addresses the opposition quite well which adds a large
...in was biased against Nixon, but I didn't use this book for the opinion, I needed a book with some factual evidence, which is what it provided.
Overall I was impressed with this text. It was difficult for me to find an inaccurate historical event because I found myself learning about topics I had never heard of before. His ability to incorporate the little picture with the big made for informative chapters, with more context than an ordinary textbook would have. Compared to other textbooks I have encountered, this one addresses facts, stories, the "little people" and diversity in a way that none is more important than the other and encourages us to criticize and also appreciate the United States.
...aw the reader's attention, and his non-stop action accounts make it hard to put the book down. His dramatic prose conveys a fiction story. He describes himself as a hero fighting the evil side of his own country. He criticizes the CIA and America a lot for what they have been doing, and what they haven't done.
...the fact that he exaggerates all sorts of things. He says abortions are inhumane but his proposal to kill and eat children is a “modest proposal”. He shows sarcasm, which is a key part of satire in the fact that in order to be satirical, you have to use textbook sarcasm since a satire is completely over the top and sarcastic. He shows this by his title and the suggestion itself.
It is a book that my child may never be able to read. It seems that the only logical reasoning to aid in what offends people is to completely eliminate the book from the library. A better approach is to understand that this book may help them examine other beliefs, attitudes, values, and traditions and to accept, tolerate, or even reject these ideas without prejudices against people who hold particular views. In the democracy In which we live, where regularly all ideas are debatable. A wide range on all points of view should be available to the public.
...the stuff he says is just for fun, a lot of parents thought he was a negative influence on his kids and felt he should be banned from radios.
While there, he decided it would be an amazing idea to write for the Times Higher Education Supplement. This would eventually lead to dozens of writings on various topics. For example, in 1982, a year after moving to America, he began writing a biweekly column for The Nation(Britannica 1.) The most well known of which was the Minority Report, which was about his friend Sidney Blumenthel, who he lambasted for, in his own words, “It’s one thing to exaggerate in your own defense, but another to falsify your own rather cowardly testimony in order to pose as an upholder of the First and Fourth amendments.” And upon discovering this, Hitchens was saddened, and he wrote the article I just quoted to rectify the mistake The Nation had made in praising him prior to the discovery. Furthermore, Hitchens continues to write for The Nation up until the 2000s, where he continued to lambaste and praise many people. However, writing his column wasn’t enough to satisfy the writer’s spirit within, and so he wrote several books, including Cyprus(1984), an inquiry into imperial powers in the mid-1970s conflict in Cyprus, The Monarchy: A Critique of Britain’s Favorite Fetish and Blood, Class, and Nostalgia: Anglo-American Ironies(1990), which was a piece on the unstable cultural exchange between America, land of the free, and England, where