Sealed Air Case Summary

1285 Words3 Pages

Executive Summary Sealed Air Corporation had set itself apart as the market leader in the 1970’s due to their focus in optimizing profit and supporting technological innovation. They were the first to develop closed-cell, lightweight cushioning material, as well as the first to introduce foam-in-place packaging system, and the first to engineer a complete solar heating system for swimming pools. Sealed Air planned to maintain that positioning into the next decade as their long-term goal. Acting on that goal, Sealed Air trademarked the name AirCap for its closed-cell, lightweight cushioning material and AirCap quickly became its most profitable product. This caused concern for Sealed Air because the unanticipated competition in the US developed …show more content…

Saran gave Sealed Air a competitive advantage by providing increased protection during shipping compared to uncoated bubbles. Another major point of success for Sealed Air was the importance they placed on market education to inform customers of the advantages of using coated bubbles. It worked extremely well because in 1980 Sealed Air was able to make $25.35 million in sales in the US. It wasn’t long after until competitors were able to penetrate the market forcing Sealed Air to make a choice, whether to enter the uncoated bubble packaging market or not. It was a difficult decision to make due to Sealed Air’s experience developing coated bubbles and its brand recognition. All while trying to maintain its market leadership and drive for technological innovation. The problem was if Sealed Air added uncoated bubble packaging to its mix it could unintentionally damage the reputation its most profitable product and set the company back …show more content…

We know Sealed Air’s AirCap biggest strengths are their superior protective packaging and widely known brand for being associated as a high quality brand. Sealed Air also has the advantage of being the current market leader in the coated bubble wrap market. Entry into a new market for a similar product can have the negative consequence of damaging their brand value. Especially since customers in the US are sensitive to quality and brand names, opening a new product line may prove to be more hurtful than beneficial for the company. It would also go against Sealed Air’s goal to be market leader since entry into a new market is a reactionary move to competition arising and the US has relatively low room for Sealed Air to gain a large enough market

Open Document