Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of homelessness on individuals
Challenges of homeless families
Effects of homelessness on individuals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of homelessness on individuals
Our own house is the only place where we feel safe and comfortable. Some people even have a big and fancy house like a castle. While we are relaxing into our comfortable home, have we ever think about others? who are not fortunate enough to have their own house? Have you ever spend time camping? When you are sleeping in a tent without television, kitchen, bathroom and living room? We are lucky enough to have these things in our lives. Housing is a growing problem in the country and not all the people in this country can afford a house or pay their own mortgages. In the article “Camping for their lives” by Scott Bransford The article Camping For Their Lives is an article written by Scott Bransford that talked about the rapidly growing …show more content…
In the article the author stated “For people throughout the American West, the very concept of home is changing, adjusting downward to a reality in which buying cheap land, picking out a subdivision lot, or even renting an apartment has become nothing more than a fancy daydream. That’s a painful realization for a region steeped in myths of plenty. But in these hard times, tent cities increasingly are the last province of hope for having a place of one’s own.” P.389 (17). Which is agreeable and has a good point, with the rising population of people that does not have a job people who cannot afford to pay a mortgage are growing, leaving them no choice but to build their own …show more content…
Makeshift dwellings may not be the dream homes of yesteryear, but they are simple, affordable, and sustainable in their use of salvaged materials. With imaginative designers, they could help solve the present housing crisis, a faster alternative to the process of building shelters and low-income apartment complexes.” P. 390 (18) the author showed bias in this paragraph by telling his side of the argument. “Informal urbanism, characterized by unauthorized occupation of land, makeshift construction, and lack of public utilities, is how many burgeoning nations meet their housing needs. It thrives in places like Fresno, where poverty is endemic and there is a wide gap between rich and poor.” P. 388 (9) in this paragraph it is clearly mentioned that these kinds of housing does not meet the needs of a real house to live in.
The author of the article Camping for their lives did not provided much enough point to prove his point that the tent cities are the new form of informal urbanism and the housing like tent and shanties are the valuable solution for the increasing rate of housing problem in the
In article “Camping for their lives,” author Scott Bransford gives commendable information about the tent cities and causes of them. He gave a good start to article by mentioning experience of Marie and Francisco Caro. The article starts with Marie and Francisco Caro building their tent alongside the Union Pacific Railroad tracks in downtown Fresno (p. 1). He also mentioned that how harsh the conditions were when they started building their tent by mentioning that even a strong person could wither in a place like that. As the choice of name of the topic is sensible and evocative, it helps him to get more attention towards the article. He uses expert opinions describing about the tent cities and causes. As mentioned in the text, Rahul Mehrotra
The subject of the final paper will be concentrating on the homeless people in America, and how we, as American citizens can become a voice and reduce the number of people living in the streets, cars, or wherever they can find shelter for the night. This journal will look at the subject and the path I will need follow to accomplish the task.
Segrue, Thomas J. The Origins of the Urban Crisis. Princeton, New Jersey. Princeton University Press, 1996.
Having a house and having a home used to coincide. Families used to live in the same house for generations, but now the sentimental value of having a house has changed. As Quindlen puts it, “There was a time when where you lived often was where you worked and where you grew the food you ate and even where you were buried. When that era passed, where you lived at least was where your parents had lived and where you would live with your children when you became enfeebled” (Quindlen 215). However, over time even that changed. Now we have grown to live in a house and then move on like it was nothing. Sentimental value for a house has dwindled. Quindlen demonstrates that “suddenly, where you lived was where you lived for three years, until you could move on to something else and something else again” (Quindlen 215). However, for those without a house, they would give anything to have that sentimental feeling that used to come with having a house. But that’s just the problem; for most a house and a home no longer coincide. We can own a house but not have a home, or vice versa. After all, “Home is where the heart is. There’s no place like it” (Quindlen 214). People can have a home without having a house. A home simply means having a family,
Camping is a fun activity for friends and family, that’s the time where they share their memories, and also make new ones. On the other hand, camping is when people are trying to stay off the rain, and wild animals form attacking them. That’s when camping is a time their lives depends on it. The article “Camping for their lives” by Scott Bransford talk about small and big cities that is over populated with homeless citizens. The article talks about what is happening in the scene, and what they have to face each and everyday order to survive.
It is often easy to castigate large cities or third world countries as failures in the field of affordable housing, yet the crisis, like an invisible cancer, manifests itself in many forms, plaguing both urban and suburban areas. Reformers have wrestled passionately with the issue for centuries, revealing the severity of the situation in an attempt for change, while politicians have only responded with band aid solutions. Unfortunately, the housing crisis easily fades from our memory, replaced by visions of homeless vets, or starving children. Metropolis magazine explains that “…though billions of dollars are spent each year on housing and development programs worldwide, ? At least 1 billion people lack adequate housing; some 100 million have none at all.? In an attempt to correct this worldwide dilemma, a United Nations conference, Habitat II, was held in Istanbul, Turkey in June of 1996. This conference was open not only to government leaders, but also to community organizers, non governmental organizations, architects and planners. “By the year 2000, half the world’s people will live in cities. By the year 2025, two thirds of the world population will be urban dwellers ? Globally, one million people move from the countryside to the city each week.? Martin Johnson, a community organizer and Princeton professor who attended Habitat II, definitively put into words the focus of the deliberations. Cities, which are currently plagued with several of the severe problems of dis-investment ?crime, violence, lack of jobs and inequality ?and more importantly, a lack of affordable and decent housing, quickly appeared in the forefront of the agenda.
The most common stereotype associated with people who live in trailer parks is that everybody is poor. In 2009, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and U.S. Census Bureau stated, only 9.5 percent of the American population lived in mobile homes (Rector and Sheffield). As I said before I would never classify my family as poor. Sometimes my parents wouldn’t be able to afford the extra things we wanted, but they always provided the necessities. Not being able to afford the brand new toys and games that us kids wanted doesn’t mean that we were poor. It just means that we didn’t live above our income. Some people who live near me are older people who have to spend their money sparingly because they only get money once a month. Would they like to live in a house on some land? Of course they would. Is it a real possibility on their monthly income? Not likely. Their best option is to live in a mobile home because it is more affordable. Then there is John and his wife....
In 2009, Scott Bransford wrote an article called “Camping for Their Lives”. In this article, Mr. Bransford talks about tent cities and the homeless situation in the western states of the U.S. The author does not give many detailed descriptions of how the homeless come to be in their financial and living situations. Mr. Bransford appears to feel sad for the homeless in his article. He gives several examples of similar scenarios throughout the country, as well as in Canada. Although the article has a somber tone, there is only one side to the story that is given. Mr. Bransford has a few strengths but just as many weaknesses in his article.
Buying and owning your home is part of the American dream. Although the dream itself has since changed, the home still remains the main focal point. Today owning a home doesn’t necessarily mean a house. People now buy duplexes, cooperative apartments, and condominiums. For some families it could take up to a couple of generations before it’s able to have the capabilities of buying a home. To many people it means a certain achievement that only comes after years of hard work. It is a life altering decision and one of the most important someone can make in their lifetime. The reasons behind the actual purchase could vary. Before anything is done, people must understand that it’s an extraneous process and it is a long term project.
I remember reading one book about home, the author use a few examples to show what his ideal home was. The author used one multimillionaire as an example, one day the multimillionaire was found by a policeman near his house drunk. The police offer to drive him home, he replied: “Home? I don’t have a home.” When the policeman asks him about his house he said “That’s not my home, that’s just where I live.” According to the author most of multimillionaire’s family has died he lived along all by himself. The author also used another example of a man whose family got drafted apart by a civil war, after 20 years he finally found his daughter, the man instant burst with tears and said, “I’ve finally got a home again.” I believe that home means more than just a place for shelter and for family storage any more. A lot of people are still happy when they are living in cardboard boxes because they are living with the ones who they love and love them back. Without the love the house could not be comfortable at all. Statistics show that the leading cause of suicide among youth and teens are family violence. They often can’t find comfort in both home and school, and can’t find hopes in life.
One should be using ⅓ of their income to pay for housing or rent to have money left over for other necessities. For most Oregonians, this is not the case. According to an article “Raise the Roof” forty percent of Oregon renters are paying more than ⅓ of their income (Strege-Flora). With such unaffordable housing, a rising of an “alarming number of evictions of low- and fixed-income… homelessness, and housing instability [has spread] throughout Oregon (Vilet). Sandy Burke is one of the many victims of this housing dilemma. She was a resident of The Lower Pines in Ashland, Oregon and was at the time “in immediate danger of losing [her] home,” (“Strege-Flora”) along with the rest of the residents in The Lower Pines. All residents were given a one-year eviction notice with no help to move or relocate. Luckily, Oregon Action stepped into the situation and fought before the city council for what is right and advocating the “general lack of affordable housing in Ashland” (“Strege-Flora”). If it weren’t for the Oregon Action, all of the residents would have been homeless. Oregon’s lack of affordable housing drives many into homelessness and “a recent study found that 9,000 homeless people sought shelter assistance every night… [and] Oregon shelters must turn away hundreds of people each night” (“Strege-Flora”). Homelessness is not scarce in Oregon and while many of
Shelter is a necessity for humans, thus it explains the inclination of many residents of Oakland to opt for illegal spaces and adapt to poorer living conditions. ‘Willing’ refers to the consumer’s desire to buy, whereas ‘able’ tries to see whether consumers are able to afford the good or service. Due to the high costs, some lower-income residents may be unwilling and unable to buy. On the other hand, some residents may be able to purchase, or in this scenario, rent out a legal housing space, but they are unwilling due to the high
It’s not possible to construct proper buildings in a short time to meet the great demand. It’s impossible to build a proper housing with rocks or bricks or the complicated timber joineries. The only thing could be realized is tents with simple structures.
Presently, one of the main causes of homelessness in American is the lack of affordable housing. New York researchers claim that affordable housing is the answer to homelessness. Researcher, Mary Beth Shinn, states, ?homelessness is first and foremost a housing problem not a psychological one? (qtd. in Franklin 15.) Nearly all the families in their study became stably housed regardless of substance abuse, mental illness, physical illness or incarceration. This study indicates that homelessness is not a permanent condition. People do get themselves out of the problem when an intervention occurs to provide them with access to the housing market (NYU 2.) Without permanent housing, people are unable to keep jobs and are more likely to become ill. Permanent housing provides stability that enables them to find and retain employment with health benefits.
These are houses which have several small apartments. These are inexpensive and affordable. In these houses, an apartment has one bedroom and sometimes a sitting area. Kitchen and the bathroom have to be shared. Therefore, bed sits are considered as really convenient lodgings