Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on human genome project
Essays on the human genome project
Essay on human genome project
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on human genome project
The second concerning issue began after the completion of the thirteen-year long Human Genome Project (Schleckser). This project lead people to become curious about what genetic codes their DNA entails. Curiosity leads to the introduction of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing, which involves a consumer, to perform their test from home and receive results at home. The concerning issue involves pure DTC genetic testing which eliminates a physician completely from testing and involves consumers to decide where and when they want to get tested, send their samples off and receive their results all from home (Schleckser). One of the only pure DTC tests that can be used without the discretion of a physician is 23andMe. 23andMe was labeled the “invention of the year” in 2008 …show more content…
because is allows consumers to purchase genetic testing for only ninety-nine dollars and from the comfort of their own home. This genetic test tests for two hundred forty-seven diseases and conditions and comes with step-by-step instructions on how to perform the test (Schleckser). When performing the test you must submit a saliva test into a concealed tube to be sent off to the lab. Once the saliva sample has reached the lab it typically takes about 4-6 weeks to receive test results back. This genetic test, however, only tests the DNA through genotyping, which inspects only “predetermined locations on the genome where small variations-called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP’s)- are associated with a particular trait (Schleckser)”. This genetic testing can receive outcomes of conditions including disease risks, drug responses, carrier statuses and general traits (Schleckser). Once the consumer receives their test results back they can view them through graphs or numerically with their lifetime risk. The results also associate the consumer’s risks with the average populations. There are many people that argue that there should be a physician involved in each process of the DTC genetic testing process, such as 23andMe. Critics worry that consumer’s will purchase such products without any knowledge of them and do not understand the limitations behind them (Schleckser). One main concern is the psychological worry that consumer’s will be unable to read their test results without a physician accompanying them have this situation turn traumatic. However, each of these concerns are unverified because the DTC Industry has leaders to relay genotyping services and clarify each risk surrounding their product (Schleckser). Previous research also indicates that most people understand their data and results presented to them, take little medical attention to these responses, and do not suffer from psychological anguish. Studies also show that even if consumers sought counseling from a physician that the physician would lack knowledge concerning genetic testing and could not assist consumers in their testing (Schleckser). So, without the help from a physician consumers must be able to make conversant decisions about purchasing a genetic test and the risks that could come with following through with it. In order for the consumer to become educated about DTC genetic testing leaders from the clinic have provided thorough information about the risks and benefits of the tests (Schleckser). Consumers interested in purchasing a genetic test can find these risks and benefits through a free demo account created by the company. This demo account will show the potential consumer pretend test results of fictional people. This demo is ideal because it allows possible customers to view exactly what they will be getting when taking part in a DTC genetic test (Schleckser). As everything you do in life has risks so does DTC genetic testing. Some risks can include: “the uncertainty and probabilistic nature of results, the possibility of deeply troubling revelations, and concerns about genetic privacy or discrimination (Schleckser).” Once an individual has read and understood each risk and benefit that could come from DTC genetic testing they must purchase and mail their test so they can receive their results. One may ask if reading and understanding the test results can be difficult? The company, however, is ahead of the consumer on that due to them providing rich boundaries for showing the results in an innate format (Schleckser).
By the company putting the results in a user friendly format the company has received positive feedback regarding test results. The company performed a study including one thousand forty-six consumers. The consumers were asked to analyze two sets of test results and record their interpretations of them. From this ninety percent of the consumers answered the questions regarding the test results correctly (Schleckser). Meaning that consumers of 23andMe should be able to interpret their test results without the help of a physician. Another issue that people believe could happen without the counseling of a physician is consumers taking rash action in response to their test results. However, evidence shows that people do not act out in rash behavior from viewing their test results because they already understand that the results are probabilistic and do not determine that they will develop that disorder (Schleckser). Another similar issue is a concern among people that the genetic testing will cause psychological harm. A review in 2010 said that “no evidence of any unintended detrimental effects on motivation or mood (Schleckser)”. Recent studies did indicate that
DTC has minimal psychological impact. Minimal impact such as brief anxiety can occur following the viewing of a bad result, but the anxiety can begin to disappear within a year. The last concerning issue when involving a physician with DTC genetic testing is privacy distress. When involving a physician with genetic testing you are exposing privacy allegations (Schleckser). Involving anyone in your genetic testing can reveal information that one may not want anyone to know but himself or herself. Overall this article has many supporting facts regarding not leaving genetic testing up to the choice of the physician.
It helps medics to find a direct genetic cause of the patient’s condition and target it with pharmaceutical or other therapies. The technology is used for the identification of DNA sequences that increase risks of current diseases and disorders; with this information carriers can start to make efforts to prevent them before the development of the problem. The video mentioned 200 actionable genes, structures that have direct links with a specific condition. Knowing about their presence, people have a chance to bring in preventive measures like taking anticoagulants in the case of identification of a thrombogenic gene. The technology led to the significant improvement of diagnostics and personalized treatments. It helped to find a rare, life-threatening mutation in case of Beery twins and assign a drug to a girl (Alexis) that returned her to a normal life. In the case of cancer genome sequencing led to the development of genetic drags, which target essential tumor genes and make malign structures to shrink. The video mentioned a product that works with the BRАF protein that induces cells to uncontrolled division; the drug led to the remission in the patient with metastasizing melanoma. Such treatment was effective in the case of cystic fibrosis. In the case of the breast cancer the technology helps to evaluate the aggressiveness of the condition and make a personalized decision about chemotherapy. The video also mentioned the pre-implantation genetic diagnosis – an early-staged technology that prevents the development of inherited disorders in
Human Genetic Screening and Discrimination in Gattaca. Works Cited Missing A few months ago I watched a movie called Gattaca, which dealt with the issue of genetic discrimination in the near future. In the movie, people were separated into two classes, those that were genetically screened and positively altered before birth and the class that was unaltered. The separate classes had stark divisions, from what jobs that you were able to apply for to where you could eat. Security was aimed at keeping unaltered people away from the enhanced people.
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company (BSNF) was formed December 31, 1996 when Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway and Burlington Northern Railroad merged as one. It is the second largest railroad system in the United States behind the Union Pacific. It owns and operates tracks in 27 states, mostly in the West and Midwest states, and a small amount of track located in Canada. Due to the complexity of the company, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway is broken down into 14 different divisions. Those divisions are then repeatedly broken down into smaller subdivisions. This was all done to help with what could easily become a logistical nightmare. However, it wasn’t a logistical nightmare that happened but a short but influential legal nightmare that ended up happening in early 2001 to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company.
Advantages of genetic testing may be helpful in determining whether or not you have a disease or are proba...
In Gattaca, the plot focuses on the ethics, the risks, and the emotional impact of genetic testing in the nearby future. The film was released in the 90s; yet in the present, the film does not give the impression of science fiction. Today, genetic testing is prevalent in many aspects of the scientific community. This paper will describe genetic testing, its purpose, diagnostic techniques that use genetic testing, relating Huntington’s disease to genetic testing, and the pros and cons of genetic testing.
The genetic technology revolution has proved to be both a blessing and a blight. The Human Genome Project is aimed at mapping and sequencing the entire human genome. DNA chips are loaded with information about human genes. The chip reveals specific information about the individuals’ health and genetic makeup (Richmond & Germov 2009).The technology has been described as a milestone by many in that it facilitates research, screening, and treatment of genetic conditions. However, there have been fears that the technology permits a reduction in privacy when the information is disclosed. Many argue that genetic information can also be used unfairly to discriminate against or stigmatize individuals (Willis 2009).
Specific purpose: To instruct my classmates on how the 23andMe genetic testing might save their genes and reveal details about their ancestry.
I visited the website before reading any of the articles so that I would have no bias when reading information about their health and ancestry service. I was sold on the idea of DTC testing at first because of the affordable price tag, and the website made me feel like I was missing out on valuable information if I did not have this testing done. After reading the articles and returning to the website once again, I felt that the information presented on the website was very misleading to me. In the carrier status reports informational section, it discusses probability of developing a condition depending on the amount of carriers for a genetic variant. The fine print then says that the tests will not tell you anything regarding your risk for the future development of diseases. These two pieces of information clash in this specific case and led me to developing a much more skeptical view of DTC testing. The information needs to be presented in a much clearer way and it makes me wonder what percentage of this company and others alike have obtained customers on the basis of misleading
The Human Genome Project is the largest scientific endeavor undertaken since the Manhattan Project, and, as with the Manhattan Project, the completion of the Human Genome Project has brought to surface many moral and ethical issues concerning the use of the knowledge gained from the project. Although genetic tests for certain diseases have been available for 15 years (Ridley, 1999), the completion of the Human Genome Project will certainly lead to an exponential increase in the number of genetic tests available. Therefore, before genetic testing becomes a routine part of a visit to a doctor's office, the two main questions at the heart of the controversy surrounding genetic testing must be addressed: When should genetic testing be used? And who should have access to the results of genetic tests? As I intend to show, genetic tests should only be used for treatable diseases, and individuals should have the freedom to decide who has access to their test results.
Although tests for diseases such as cystic fibrosis are useful because they provide information on whether people are carries of the disease or not, the results generated from it may not be reliable. Also it could introduce risks of discrimination by employers, insurance companies and others if they discover whether or not someone has had a positive result for a particular faulty gene.
Prenatal genetic testing has become one of the largest and most influencial advances in clinical genetics today. "Of the over 4000 genetic traits which have been distinguished to date, more than 300 are identifiable via prenatal genetic testing" (Morris, 1993). Every year, thousands of couples are subjecting their lives to the results of prenatal tests. For some, the information may be a sigh of relief, for others a tear of terror. The psychological effects following a prenatal test can be devastating, leaving the woman with a decision which will affect the rest of her life.
In today’s world, people are learning a great deal in the rapidly growing and developing fields of science and technology. Almost each day, an individual can see or hear about new discoveries and advances in these fields of study. One science that is rapidly progressing is genetic testing; a valuable science that promotes prevention efforts for genetically susceptible people and provides new strategies for disease management. Unnaturally, and morally wrong, genetic testing is a controversial science that manipulates human ethics. Although genetic testing has enormous advantages, the uncertainties of genetic testing will depreciate our quality of life, and thereby result in psychological burden, discrimination, and abortion.
Advanced analytics are used improve decision-making, employing digital technologies to retool manufacturing, and harnessing mobile capabilities to improve marketing, to name just a few (Ringel, et al, 2015). On 23 January 2018, I came across an article about a 23andme. 23andme is a DNA Genetic Testing and Analysis Company that was founded in 2006 by Anne Wojcicki, Linda Avey, Paul Cusenza (Seife, 2013). The founders of the company have used technology to innovate selling genetic information to society. Individuals pay to the company to the engendered technology to provide information to gain knowledge about family members. The company advertises how the genetic testing can help you learn more about your ancestors and health conditions. Consequently,
Genetic testing has become very popular as technology has improved, and has opened many doors in the scientific community. Genetic testing first started in 1866 by a scientist known as, Gregor Mendel, when he published his work on pea plants. The rest was history after his eyes opening experiments on pea plants. However, like any other scientific discovery, it bought conflicts which caused major controversies and a large population disagreed with the concept of playing with the genetic codes of human beings. Playing God was the main argument that people argument that people had against genetics. genetic testing became one of the major conflicts conflicts to talk about, due to the fact that parents could now have the option of deciding if they
Lead with Science 23andMe leads with groundbreaking research. Health has always been an unpredictable concern, however; 23andMe has made it easy to comprehend based on its evidence based decisions. They have studied conditions like cancer, dementia and diabetes. 23andMe utilizes genotyping to determine all the genetic variants that an individual possesses. Their scientists and medical experts use a rigorous process to develop the reports.