Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character analysis for jack in lord of flies
Use of symbolism in Lord of the flies
Lord of the Flies analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Character analysis for jack in lord of flies
“There is a savage beast in every man, and when you hand him a sword and put him in a war situation, then the savage beast inside the man becomes visible.” In the allegorical novel Lord of the Flies, a group of preteen boys are stranded on an isolated island, where they are faced with the task of survival. Golding uses pristine island in which the boys portray their inner selves. As the novel progresses, William Golding explores the causes, effects, and the long discussed subject of savagery versus civilization. The group of boys are obliged to find a way to survive until they are rescued, in which they are faced with the challenge of making realistic decision. As the novel advances, the characters begin to show their various personalities, …show more content…
in which they discover that there is savagery stuffed inside every civilian man. Jack, one of the main characters, who exhibits the dark side of human nature, symbolizes uncontrollable savagery because of his discourteous behavior toward others, the use of violence, and the impulsion to kill. Jack’s brutal and vicious behavior throughout the book reveals his immaturity and hatred toward others, especially Piggy. Golding’s diction divulges Jack’s abhorrence for others because of his inconvenient behavior. When the boys build an uncontrollable fire, Piggy attempts to explain that they should be more careful, but in return, Jack calls Piggy “fatty” in a very offensive way. When Piggy tries to explain his ideas the second time, he is told to “shut up” by Jack, which causes him to completely loose courage (Golding 45). Jack gives more acknowledgement to people like Roger who agree to his views and abuses the ones who do not please him such as Piggy. Jack’s bitterness towards Piggy is because Piggy is the exact opposite of Jack, both physically and mentally. Piggy’s asthma and glasses provides Jack to repeatedly target Piggy. Jack’s cruelty, when Piggy tries to contend himself, wipes every bit of hope from Piggy. Jack, not only, insults Piggy, but he also uses his physical strength on Piggy. Jack’s hatred toward Piggy is so tenacious that “[he] smacked Piggy’s stomach” and “stuck his fist into Piggy’s stomach with bitterness” (Golding 71). Jack uses violence on Piggy when it was his own mistake that the fire burned out. Jack tends to blame others for his own mistakes, and in this case, he blames Piggy for his mistake. Jack’s lack of prudence is immensely shown when he uses this kind of behavior, which also causes him to establish wrong decision. Jack brutality causes him to make decisions out of anger and rage, and the use of fear helps him to carry out those decisions.
When Piggy is killed by Roger, Jack uses this incident as his advantage in the development of the fear and to generate his power. Jack establishes fear in everyone by stating that “there isn’t a tribe anymore” and that “the conch is gone.” Jack reveals that “[he] is the chief” and everyone must follow his order (Golding 181). Jack enforcement of such a terror, and Golding’s diction reveals the evil human inside Jack. Jack declares himself as a chief, and his word choice shows his anger and how he wants to break the rules that were previously set and make his own rules using fear. The decision that he makes are of his choice. Anger, which is a poor quality to have as an individual, is present throughout the book in Jack. Golding presents that anger can cause you to make inadequate decision through Jack’s behavior. Jack is so full of anger that he is unable to recognize the difference between good and bad which is the reason why he repeatedly uses different tactics, especially fear, to carry out his decisions. Jack consistently attempts to form a fear in everyone by screaming that “[if anyone goes against him] that is what [they will] get” (Golding 181). Jack states that there will be consequences, such as death, for the people who goes against him. Jack wants to conquer each person since he was not chosen as a chief in the beginning, so now he is …show more content…
necessitation them to be with him. Jack, not just threats them, but also punishes and hurts others. Jack makes bunch of rules and uses violence for the people who breaks them. Jack makes everything seem fun at first, but then he ‘ties Wilfred” up for hours, waiting to be beaten for some crime which was not committed by him (Golding 160). Golding’s context shows the immaturity inside Jack. Such a behavior and Golding’s context shows that Jack is not an efficient chief. In fact, he is a chief that uses violence to establish authority. Jack keeps finding erroneous reason to punish innocent people for his personal indulgement. This indicates that Jack is not an efficient chief but a chief who punishes people for invalid reasons. Jack use of violence goes to another level when the urge of killing takes place. Jack’s thirst and impulsion for killing the innocents reveals his savagery and the darkness that is present in humans. The boys came from a world where everyone is against physical violence. On the island, however, the knowledge taught to Jack fades very quickly. He quickly loses interest in that world of kindness and limits, which is why he gives his main interest hunting priority. Hunting is what brings the desire for meat and forms the urge to kill other living creatures. Jack, who first fails to kill the pig, shows no mercy the second time when he is given the opportunity. After killing, Jack’s excitement and his thirst is shown when he “laughs proudly” while saying that “[he] cuts the pig’s throat” (Golding 69). It is very unnatural for a school boy to have such an eagerness to kill, and this could only be done by a savage person like Jack. Jack is in a situation where he cannot understand nor acknowledge. Usually, when a person is in a society, a behavior of this kind is not accepted, but when put in a situation like this, the same person arrogantly confesses the thirst to kill. His thirst and impulsion to kill has become a feeling, which rules his nature. After Piggy is killed, he doesn’t show any sorrow in the death of Piggy. He instead turns Piggy’s death into his accomplishment and “[screams] widely.” Jack then shouts at everyone saying “that’s what you will get,” revealing the knowledge that no one should mess with him or the same thing will be done to them. Golding uses Jack’s tone to describe Jack’s hunger to kill. Instead of acting out some pain and grief, he is unable to acknowledge the sincerity of the situation. Jack has absolutely no regret over this kind of act. This is the hidden evil person that comes out when it is handed a sword and spears. The strong-willed, egomaniacal Jack is the embodiment of savagery and a good uncivilization.
This realistic novel opens many doors of mankind and what it is capable of. Jack is the evil side of civilization which is hidden but once that evilness rises when confronted with the choice between civilization and savagery by the isolation of moral values an society, Jack choose to forget the values of the civilization and becomes the beast that everyone fears. This shows that people choose savagery over civilization as projected by Jack. Jack illustrates a very big picture that savagery is not cramped to certain people in certain situation but is present in every
human.
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies portrays the lives of young British boys whose plane crashed on a deserted island and their struggle for survival. The task of survival was challenging for such young boys, while maintaining the civilized orders and humanity they were so accustomed too. These extremely difficult circumstances and the need for survival turned these innocent boys into the most primitive and savaged mankind could imagine. William Golding illustrates man’s capacity for evil, which is revealed in man’s inherent nature. Golding uses characterization, symbolism and style of writing to show man’s inhumanity and evil towards one another.
Jack is made the leader of the hunting tribe. He and his hunters have much trouble trying to hunt and kill a pig. Since he was raised as part of a sophisticated and wealthy family in England, he has not had any experience with hunting before. He struggles to become a hunter. But Jack is shown to have savage urges early. The author says, "he [Jack] tried to convey the...
“‘I got the conch’ Said Piggy indignantly. ’You let me speak!’ ‘ The conch doesn’t count on top of the mountain" Said Jack,’So you shut up’” (42). Here, is one of his first acts of antagonism towards his fellow human beings. The declaration he makes, claiming that Piggy has no right to speak out, displays how Jack tries to lower others in order to gain a greater authoritative position for himself. This is evidence for the statement that he uses the leadership he does have with little intentions of bettering the group as a whole.
The Lord of the Flies - Savagery. William Golding’s novel ‘The Lord of The Flies’ presents us with a group of English boys who are isolated on a desert island, left to try and retain a civilised society. In this novel, Golding manages to display the boys slow descent into savagery as democracy on the island diminishes. At the opening of the novel, Ralph and Jack get on extremely well.
Throughout the novel several different characters are introduced to the reader, such as Ralph, Jack, Simon and Piggy. With all these characters presented to the reader, one can get to see into their minds-eye, which allows the reader to analyze their character. In this case one could examine their basic morals and distinguish between the person’s natural instinct to rely on civilization or savagery to solve their problems. The author of the novel, William Golding, had a “first-hand experience of battle line action during World War II” which caused him to realize, “[that] The war alone was not what appalled him, but what he had learnt of the natural - and original- sinfulness of mankind did. It was the evil seen daily as commonplace and repeated by events it was possible to read in any newspaper which, he asserted, were the matter of Lord of the Flies” (Foster, 7-10). This being said by Golding leads one to the central problem in the novel the Lord of the Flies, which can be regarded as the distinction between civility and savagery. This can be seen through the characters that are presented in the novel, and how these boys go from a disciplined lifestyle, to now having to adapt to an unstructured and barbaric one in the jungle.
William Golding’s novel ‘The Lord of The Flies’ tells the story of a group of English boys isolated on a desert island, left to attempt to retain civilisation. In the novel, Golding shows one of the boys, Jack, to change significantly. At the beginning of the book, Jack’s character desires power and although he does not immediately get it, he retains the values of civilized behaviour. However, as the story proceeds, his character becomes more savage, leaving behind the values of society. Jack uses fear of the beast to control the other boys and he changes to become the book’s representation of savagery, violence and domination. He is first taken over with an obsession to hunt, which leads to a change in his physical appearance This change of character is significant as he leads the other boys into savagery, representing Golding’s views of there being a bad and unforgiving nature to every human.
Golding has a rather pessimistic view of humanity having selfishness, impulsiveness and violence within, shown in his dark yet allegorical novel Lord of the Flies. Throughout the novel, the boys show great self-concern, act rashly, and pummel beasts, boys and bacon. The delicate facade of society is easily toppled by man's true beastly nature.
The Lord of the Flies by William Golding is tale of a group of young boys who become stranded on a deserted island after their plane crashes. Intertwined in this classic novel are many themes, most that relate to the inherent evil that exists in all human beings and the malicious nature of mankind. In The Lord of the Flies, Golding shows the boys' gradual transformation from being civilized, well-mannered people to savage, ritualistic beasts.
In life today, society holds many expectations of its people. Members of society are expected to behave in a civilized manner; conforming to law, following social norms, and acting with dignity and without violence. When the boys became marooned on the island, they were forced to question the expectations they had always observed. This brought about a large battle between those who decided to remain civil and those who would rather rebel. Civilization is pitted against acts of savagery in a plethora of ways in Lord of the Flies when determining who had the right to speak during assemblies, when the group hunted pigs, throughout the struggle over Piggy’s glasses, and finally with Simon’s death.
This is evident when Jack wants to put people in punishment if somebody breaks the rules (32). His desire to punish people shows his love of power and dominance. It also reveals that Jack could have been like one of the ambitious leaders in the past history. Another sign of becoming a savage in the society is showing an act of disrespectful to another neighbour, including Piggy. This reveals when Jack mocks Piggy by telling him, “Shut up, Fatty” (17). It also happens when Piggy condemns Jack for “[letting] the fire out”, although Jack makes a promise to “keep the smoke going” (75). However, he became so violent, so angry that he “smacked Piggy’s head” (75). Some of the uncivilized members of the society use their selfish desires, which is not aiming for the common good. For instance, Jack tells Ralph that he successfully “cut the pig’s throat” (73). He said, “There was lashing of blood…you should have seen it!” (73). This suggests that Jack is more concern about hunting rather than getting rescued. Jack, as a savage, uses his ambitious power to put people in punishment, his rude attitude to hurt people, and his way to care more about himself than others. This character greatly exemplifies a savage in the society, but another important symbol that makes a novel an allegory is the
In the novel The Lord of the flies, William Golding illustrates the decline from innocence to savagery through a group of young boys. In the early chapters of The Lord of the Flies, the boys strive to maintain order. Throughout the book however, the organized civilization Ralph, Piggy, and Simon work diligently towards rapidly crumbles into pure, unadulterated, savagery. The book emphasized the idea that all humans have the potential for savagery, even the seemingly pure children of the book. The decline of all civilized behavior in these boys represents how easily all order can dissolve into chaos. The book’s antagonist, Jack, is the epitome of the evil present in us all. Conversely, the book’s protagonist, Ralph, and his only true ally, Piggy, both struggle to stifle their inner
the boys on the island finally catch a pig and get meat, the one hunter, and
This paper will explore the three elements of innate evil within William Golding's, Lord of the Flies, the change from civilization to savagery, the beast, and the battle on the island. Golding represents evil through his character's, their actions, and symbolism. The island becomes the biggest representation of evil because it's where the entire novel takes place. The change from civilization to savagery is another representation of how easily people can change from good to evil under unusual circumstances. Golding also explores the evil within all humans though the beast, because it's their only chance for survival and survival instinct takes over. In doing so, this paper will prove that Lord of the Flies exemplifies the innate evil that exists within all humans.
“Two shelters were in position, but shaky. This one was a ruin. ‘And they keep running off. You remember the meeting? How everyone was going to work hard until the shelters were finished?’” This quote from the book Lord of the Flies is the starting point in the separation of the two main lifestyles exhibited on the island. The two options were to maintain civilization and follow the conch, or to get reckless and take the form of savagery. The choice was very difficult to some, but to others it was a very simple decision. Each lifestyle contained many differences and also a few similarities. The way each lifestyle represented the boys who followed it, the many dangers each had to encounter, and the end result of survival are the three
Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness shows the disparity between the European ideal of civilization and the reality of it, displayed by the domination, torture, exploitation and dehumanization of the African people. Conrad often emphasizes the idea of what is civilized versus what is primitive or savage. While reading the novel, the reader can picture how savage the Europeans seem. They are cruel and devious towards the very people they are supposed to be helping.