Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Education inequality in america
Comparing and contrasting public and private schools
Compare and contrast of public and private schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Education inequality in america
FeNesha Hill
English 1A
Essay 2 / Spring 2018
Structure that contribute to education inequality
Low income schools have a tendency to be truly hindered and mistreated by the privileged whites. It appears just as the privilege get the opportunity to choose the destiny of those whose they feel fall beneath their ways of life. Ways that this is being done is by the imbalanced distribution of academic resources , school financing, qualified and experienced instructors, refreshed course books, and innovations to socially rejected low income communities.
Savage Inequalities,Jonathan Kozol archives the staggering imbalances in American schools, concentrating on state funded training's "savage Inequalities " between well-to-do locale and poor area.
…show more content…
Kozol argues about the unfair standards we expect these underprivileged children to rise to. Children in these poor areas are being compared to children in affluent areas where the quality of their education is much higher. The privilege white children are able to pay for a quality education because of the foundation in which their parent live. Whereas those from low income or detriment foundations are subject to what the government is willing to assist them with. Because of that these children are being limited on their option for life. It appears as though privilege whites assume that low income children can’t surpass their situation in life regardless of the amount of money that’s given. If the society continues to ignore this problem these children will continue to be stagnate or maintain a oppressed dream given to us by favored whites.m, which will lead to hatred in the community. Putting them in a situation where they can’t see other options. While the favored white youngsters will keep up a since of prevalence due over the way that their skin shading, status and childhood does not conflict with them as far as how individuals see their money related obligation, style of dress, open talking abilities, or employment execution. Schools in low income communities lack extra programs to help kids close the achievement gap. These extra programs open doors that will allow to be challenged, develop work ethics, writing skills, experience of learning a different language and the ability to critical think. Without these programs the children are put at a disadvantage and delay of having to learn those skills later on in life if the opportunity present itself. In addition the children aren’t able to have diverse experiences which doesn’t allow them to relate to others when they get older. Children who can’t relate start sheltering themselves and those children become isolated. Children should not have to be excellent to exceed expectations in school on the off chance that they are given the chance to learn. The settle for what is most convenient option held for school structures themselves are regularly associated with the brought down desires a few instructors have of their low income students. The Middle for American Advance distributed a report in 2014 called, "The Energy of the Pygmalion Impact" which alludes to the possibility that individuals improve the situation when more is anticipated from them. There are less qualified teachers hired giving children with low socioeconomic status an unqualified education. In these areas, the children might not be able to concentrate for various reason and the teacher might give up become frustrated and believe the stereotypes about these children rather than gives them chance to prove the opposite. Due to this mentality, teachers will put a have higher desire of the privileged whites and also give the vital asset to them to succeed. Bringing about chances to get into the best schools and head towards a superior personal satisfaction. While the children of color and those with detriment foundation are being instructed to be smug in the life they were given. This treatment eventually leads to the children become discourage, begin to isolate themselves and loss hope for the future success. Putting the low income communities into the “ I’m slave mentality of my circumstance” . Why would the low income communities believe such a notation. Because is was embed into us as children as result of the teacher action to my misfortunes. In addition to unqualified teachers there is a lack of relevant materials to be taught from in the class. As much as its significance is pushed, one can't get a quality education like those of favored whites without the assets and ceaselessly spending plan. So restricted data is given to these kids since their condition of life doesn't coordinate the achievement of others. If they are not taught current events it will put them behind those who are. The kids will battle as an adult to mentally keep up with society. It will place them in an indistinguishable cycle from they were as a kids. Deferring their process to accomplish their own dream, however these kids will build the dream mapped out for them by the favored whites. In an article written by Jim Erickson, writer of Targeting minority, low income neighborhoods for hazardous waste http://ns.umich.edu/new/releases/23414-targeting-minority-low-income-neighborhoods-for-hazardous-waste-sites states “Industries are targeting low income communities as well by following a path of the least resistance areas when deciding to location toxic waste facilities.” It amazes me that we know these area don’t have the support of the government, which makes us easy targets to sacrifice for the love of money and privileged whites.
Erickson makes a valid point when he mentions how” the researchers found that hazardous waste sites are often built in neighborhoods where whites have already been moving out, and poor minority residents have been moving in, for a decade or two before the project arrived. Such changes may result in a further eroding of resources and political clout in these neighborhoods.“ Industries are taking it a step further by surrounding low income school with toxic substance resulting several health issues such as asthmas, cancer, and many respiratory issues.According to are Terrie E. Moffitt and the Klaus-Grawe 2012 Think Tank writers of “ Childhood exposure to violence and lifelong health” states “ website https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3869039/#__ffn_sectitle mentioned “Children are cautiously growing neurological and physical such toxins may stop or delay the process for the child to function normal in society.” If children are really the future, why is quality life only limited to privilege white children, while the rest are subject to harmful environment and possible mental delays. If we continue to ignore the health concerns of these children, these low income communities will be filled with people who become prone to behavioral problems such as ADHD, anxiety, depression, aggression and low self esteem, and possible lead to more physical health issues, like malnutrition, tuberculosis,
pneumonia. In addition to toxic substance, school building are just as worst from leaking roofs and the resulting water damage to ceilings, walls and floors, broken windows, mildew, mold, cockroach and rodent infestations have taken their toll on teachers and students, disrupting the educational process from the distract in such a stressful environment . If this problem is continuously ignore, as the children become adults the communities will consist of oppressed, violent, unable to care for themselves, high crime rate and another reason for privilege whites to point out why money will not help low communities which in turn would help the schools.
Savage Inequalities by Jonathan Kozol is an account of his travels to East St. Louis, Illinois; North Lawndale and the south side of Chicago; New York, New York; Camden, New Jersey; Washington, D.C.; San Antonio, Texas; and Cincinnati, Ohio, researching their school systems. Kozol’s book exposes the glaring inequalities present in these cities. Kozol devotes a chapter to each of these cities—with the exception of San Antonio and Cincinnati—identifying the inequalities children there face. His statistics expose these shocking injustices perpetrated by the powerful. The truths Kozol uncovers in Savage Inequalities challenge anyone’s misconceptions about equality in the United States.
Savage Inequalities written by Jonathan Kozol allows individuals to understand the conditions of several public schools in America. Kozol visited many school in approximately thirty neighborhoods between the years of 1988 and 1990. During his visits he found that there was a wide difference in the conditions between the schools in poor internal city communities and schools in the wealthier communities. It becomes clear that there is a huge contrast within the public school system of a country which claims to provide equal opportunity for all. Many children in wealthier communities begin their lives with an education that is far more advanced than children in poor communities. Therefore the lack in equal opportunity from the start is created.
Savage Inequalities, written by Jonathan Kozol, shows his two-year investigation into the neighborhoods and schools of the privileged and disadvantaged. Kozol shows disparities in educational expenditures between suburban and urban schools. He also shows how this matter affects children that have few or no books at all and are located in bad neighborhoods. You can draw conclusions about the urban schools in comparison to the suburban ones and it would be completely correct. The differences between a quality education and different races are analyzed. Kozol even goes as far as suggesting that suburban schools have better use for their money because the children's futures are more secure in a suburban setting. He thinks that each child should receive as much as they need in order to be equal with everyone else. If children in Detroit have greater needs than a student in Ann Arbor, then the students in Detroit should receive a greater amount of money.
The greatest country in the world still has problems evenly distributing education to its youth. The articles I have read for this unit have a common theme regarding our education system. The authors illustrate to the reader about the struggles in America concerning how we obtain and education. Oppression, politics, racism, and socioeconomic status are a few examples of what is wrong with our country and its means of delivering a fair education to all Americans.
Poorer schools with more diverse populations have poor educational programs. Teachers methodically drone out outdated curriculum on timetables set by standards set by the state. Students are not engaged or encouraged to be creative thinkers. They are often not even given handouts or physical elements of education to touch or feel or engage them into really connecting to the material being presented by the teacher in front of them. Time is not wasted exploring any of the subjects in a meaningful way. As much of the curriculum is gone through as the teacher can get through given the restriction of having a classroom of students that are not picking it up adequately enough according to standardized tests scores. So time is spent re-droning the material to them and re-testing before the cycle repeats in this classroom and other subject classrooms in these types of school. This education is free. As John Gatto writes about in his book, “Against School”, it seems as if the vast majority of students are being taught be blue collared, low paid but obedient citizens. As she makes her way up to less diverse, more likely private and expensive schools, the education becomes better. Students are engaged by teachers that seem to like to teach. Students are encouraged to be
The theme of the research is to discover why there is such a vast educational gap between minority and Caucasian students. Many American are unaware that such an educational gap actually exists among today’s students. This article informs us of alarming statics, such as of African American students representing a majority of the special education population, despite only making up roughly 40% of the student population. It also breaks down key events that contributed to the poor education that minority children are currently receiving. For example, in the past, it was illegal to educate African Americans and when it became legal to blacks were treated as second class students. They were segregated from their white counter parts and given hand-me-down textbooks. This article also discusses others factors that contributed to the poor education of minority students such as moral principles, socio-political, and economic stat. Despite the amount of time that has past, today’s schools are similar to the past. Minority children are still in second-rate learning environments while white students enjoy the comforts of first class school buildings and textbooks. In summary, the theme of this article was to bring attention to the educational gap among African-American, Latino, Asian, and other non-white students.
A key to ending the cycle of poverty, is educational equity. In America today, public education is unequal racially and socioeconomically (Honda 11). Internationally, America is not excelling academically. When looking closely at American student’s Program for
After watching the Teach Us All documentary on Netflix, it opened my eyes to many of the issues regarding educational inequality. The study looked at schools in Little Rock, New York City, and Los Angeles to show us the current state of U.S. education and how far we have come since the school desegregation crisis. The thesis of this documentary is that since the efforts of the Little Rock Nine, our belief is that educational inequality has improved when in reality, it hasn’t improved and the actions of our country have had negative effects. Teach Us All emphasizes the need for unity and collective action to improve our education system for the kids in poor communities that are in the most need. Our country has devoted all the resources to the middle and upper class for education and are taking money away from where it needs to
Through programs that directly fuel desegregation in schools, our educational systems have become a melting pot of different races, languages, economic status, and abilities. Programs have been in place for the past fifty years to bring students that live in school districts that lack quality educational choices, to schools that are capable of providing quality education to all who attend. Typically the trend appears to show that the schools of higher quality are located in suburban areas, leaving children who live in “black” inner-city areas to abandon the failing school systems of their neighborhoods for transportation to these suburban, “white” schools. (Angrist & Lang, 2004). This mix of inner-city and suburban cultures creates new challenges for students and teachers alike.
America’s school system and student population remains segregated, by race and class. The inequalities that exist in schools today result from more than just poorly managed schools; they reflect the racial and socioeconomic inequities of society as a whole. Most of the problems of schools boil down to either racism in and outside the school or financial disparity between wealthy and poor school districts. Because schools receive funding through local property taxes, low-income communities start at an economic disadvantage. Less funding means fewer resources, lower quality instruction and curricula, and little to no community involvement. Even when low-income schools manage to find adequate funding, the money doesn’t solve all the school’s problems. Most important, money cannot influence student, parent, teacher, and administrator perceptions of class and race. Nor can money improve test scores and make education relevant and practical in the lives of minority students.
Inequalities in Education Funding inequalities have been an issue from past to present, especially in the low-income communities. In fact, students in urban areas with less funding have low attendance, score lower on standardized testing, and a low graduation rate. Also subjected to outdated textbooks, old dilapidated buildings, students in the inner cities need to compete with their suburban and wealthy counterparts for this reason funding inequalities must end and more money should be directed to these communities from federal, state, and local governments. Frank Johnson, a writer for the National Center for Education Statistics, “Disparities in Public School Spending.”
Although education can be an escape from poverty, the people of color rarely have access to good schools or education systems.
It’s no secret that “high priced real estate increases property taxes,” (Source G) and those taxes go on to fund public schools, bringing in more affluent families. Low-income students in these schools find themselves surrounded in an environment where “classmates expect them to go on to college,” (Source G) in turn making these students more academically engaged. In addition to the positive environment, low-income students who attend more affluent schools are given access to critical support when it comes to submitting applications to elite colleges. Unfortunately, the inverse of this is also true. Low-income students who attend poorly funded schools are not given the support they need to get themselves to a quality education. This is where the Dream fails, with “a whimper of elite school applications by poor kids.” (Source E) The reality of the situation is, Ivies and other top schools are the route to the top, and without proper support, low-income students have no chance getting there, all because of their zip code and the area in which they live not sufficiently funding public
Unfortunately for impoverished and minority students, this is where they fall short. According to Brookings.edu, Schools based in communities primarily composed of low-income and minority students have fewer necessary instructional resources. Students in these communities and social class tend to lack such materials as books, core curriculum, computers, and even quality teachers. Teachers working in schools servicing low-income and minority students are usually inexperienced or underqualified. In addition to this, these teachers are required to teach significantly larger class sizes. Many of these schools don’t even offer the necessary math and science classes needed to advance to college (Hammond). Completing college is also a challenge for individuals who come from disadvantaged backgrounds. Just as in grammar schools and high schools, the quality of education within colleges need to improve. Relying on one’s own knowledge is the key in receiving upward mobility because of the financial obstacles associated with attending a University. The article “Economic Inequality and Higher Education”
Throughout the nation, education inequality affects many minority students that have low-income which reinforces the disparity between the rich and the poor. The amount of children that have a socioeconomic background of poverty in the United States is estimated to be 32.4 million (National Center for Children in Poverty, 2011). Since many of these children are from