In the book, A Misplaced Massacre Struggling Over the Memory of Sand Creek by Dr. Ari Kelman is trying to set the record straight about what really happened and why we needed to make the land of the historic massacre to be transformed as an historic land. Kelman expose the fact that many people don't know or care enough to get it right. Throughout our history, events like the Sand Creek Massacre have shaped our outlook on life. This event affected the lives of many children, women, and men who were Cheyenne and Arapaho Indians. It happened on November 29, 1864. A fight occurred over land, and led by Colonel John Chivington, a group of soldiers attacked the village. Two hundred people were killed that day. As a result of this terrible …show more content…
incident, the Indians’ and American government’s relationship became very distrustful. He's also exposing the fact that many people don't know/care enough to get it right. In the book, A Misplaced Massacre Struggling Over the Memory of Sand Creek by Dr. Ari Kelman argues for the need of to make the land of the historic massacre to be transformed as an historic land. deeds.
It is important in American history because it was a terrible violation of everything the US constitution is supposed to protect, and it was done by the US Army, and the victims were women and children. To this day there is still bitterness between the descendants of the Cheyenne and Arapaho and the American government. Even after the massacre, Native American Reservations continued to shrink and treaties made between the United States and the Native Americans were broken many times. This second class citizen treatment plays out to today with Native American Reservations still have high poverty rates, low education levels, and other issues. For example, women vs men in the workforce. The Sand Creek Massacre still affects us today because it is an important part of history. The Indians were not a threat to the soldiers. The soldiers attacked the Indians because they did not view them as equals. There were times in the 50's and 60's and even today that African Americans were singled out and killed such as Eric Garner, Trayvon Martin, and if a white person had even just a little fear that an African American was guilty of a crime, they were hung and in some instances in the middle of town It is also like with the white cops have been killing black kids today. If we don't learn from history, we are doomed to repeat
it In other words, the groups of people may be different, but discrimination is discrimination. It is important in American history because it was a terrible violation of everything the US Constitution is supposed to protect, and it was done by the US Army, and the victims were women and children. This book and the discussion tried to convey that the Sand Creek Massacre is very much important to important to our development. I really did not know much about the Sand Creek Massacre until attending this presentation. It encouraged me to do more research around this topic.
LTC George Armstrong Custer did not effectively apply the concept of mission command as a warfighting function during the Battle of Little Bighorn. While it is important to understand the context in which Custer made his decisions, those circumstances offer little in terms of excusing the fiasco that was Little Bighorn. Custer failed to follow orders, did not take pertinent intelligence into consideration, did not adequately plan or execute protection of his forces, and fought without essential fires equipment available to him. Custer did exercise good sustainment, but it was for naught, as the battle was brief.
Political. As an esteemed war hero during the Civil War, Custer was an icon who carried the support of the American people. With the people’s support our government could shift the nation’s progress westward for expansion. Custer had confined the Indians to the Black Hills reservation, and they had made it their home, then he discovered gold in the region. The government immediately wanted the land back in exchange...
The American Indians were promised change with the American Indian policy, but as time went on no change was seen. “Indian reform” was easy to promise, but it was not an easy promise to keep as many white people were threatened by Indians being given these rights. The Indian people wanted freedom and it was not being given to them. Arthur C. Parker even went as far as to indict the government for its actions. He brought the charges of: robbing a race of men of their intellectual life, of social organization, of native freedom, of economic independence, of moral standards and racial ideals, of his good name, and of definite civic status (Hoxie 97). These are essentially what the American peoples did to the natives, their whole lives and way of life was taken away,
Do you know what happen at the Battle of Little Bighorn? The Battle of Little Bighorn, also known as Custer’s Last Stand, took place on June 25, 1876 in Montana to settle the dispute over the Black Hills and drive the Indians back to their reservations. Under the command of Sitting Bull the Indian armies decided to wage war against the white people for refusing to stay out of their land in the Black Hills. To drive the Indians back into their reservations the U.S. army split into three columns to attack the Indians. A great factor to consider in the battle is the weapons used by both sides and not bringing certain weapons to the battle.
People know about the conflict between the Indian's cultures and the settler's cultures during the westward expansion. Many people know the fierce battles and melees between the Indians and the settlers that were born from this cultural conflict. In spite of this, many people may not know about the systematic and deliberate means employed by the U.S. government to permanently rid their new land of the Indians who had lived their own lives peacefully for many years. There are many strong and chilling reasons and causes as to why the settlers started all of this perplexity in the first place. There was also a very strong and threatening impact on the Native Americans through the schooling that stained the past and futures of Native Americans not only with blood but also with emotion. It was all a slow and painful plan of the "white man" to hopefully get rid of the Indian culture, forever. The Native American schools were created in an attempt to destroy the Native American way of life, their culture, beliefs and tradi...
"On September 25, 1990, hearings were conducted in the United States Senate by the Select Committee on Indian Affairs regarding the historical circumstances surrounding the Wounded Knee Massacre" (United States). As a result, Senate Congressional Resolution 153 (1989-1990) was passed. The following are excerpts from that resolution: "Whereas the Sioux people who are descendants of the victims and survivors of the Wounded Knee Massacre have been striving to reconcile and, in a culturally appropriate manner, to bring to an end their 100 years of grieving for the tragedy of December 29, 1890 ... which brought to a close an era in the history of this country ... characterized by an official government policy of forcibly removing the Indian tribes and bands from the path of westward expansion and settlement through placement on reservations.... Now therefore be it resolved by the Senate, that, 1) the Congress, on the occasion of the one hundredth anniversary of the Wounded Knee Massacre of December 29, 1890, hereby acknowledges the historical significance of this event as the last armed conflict of the Indian wars period resulting in the tragic death and injury of approximately 350-375 Indian men, women, and children of Chief Big Foot 's band of Minneconjou Sioux and hereby expresses its deep regret on behalf of the United States to the descendants of the victims
... many setbacks and problems for the Natives, including poverty, alcoholism, and underperformance in education. With better acceptance of the Native culture, and aid from America as a whole, the Native American idea of freedom to self govern, roam freely, and preserve the Native culture can greater be aligned with that of American Freedom.
suffering the Native Americans are plagued with as a result of the lack of acceptance towards
“Over the Earth I come.” This is not a statement made in haste but a declaration of war, coming from the mouth of a Sioux warrior, a Dakota. They call him Crooked Lightning. That was the first and only true announcement about the planned uprising from the Dakota Nation. The Sioux Uprising of 1862 was appallingly deadly and destructive considering it may have been avoided if the United States had paid the Sioux their gold on time.
... shaped the United States than what many were originally told. The documents show that Native Americans were treated unfairly and horribly and this pertained to the timing of the situation, many of the things that caused some of the situations, and the introduction of key historical people.
The journey of exploration to the western territories brought the white man many great things, but they did face some opposition. The US government made plans to explore the Black Hills, after hearing of the gold it contained. This was not an easy task. The Sioux, with strong force, were not giving up their sacred land easily. The only way to gain the territory of the Black Hills was to wage war against the Sioux. The Battle of the Little Big Horn was one battle that the US will never forget. General George Custer led an army of men to take out the Sioux, one of the battalions was completely wiped out including Custer. The Sioux were very strong, but US had a lot more power and technology. Why did we get massacred? This question has been a mystery to many people throughout the years. Sergeant Windolph, of Benteen’s cavalry, and John F. Finerty, from General Crooks cavalry, bring us some personal accounts and memories of this tragedy.
“The Battle of the Little Bighorn, also known as Custer's Last Stand and, by the Indians involved, as the Battle of the Greasy Grass, was an armed engagement between combined forces of Lakota, Northern Cheyenne and Arapaho people against the 7th Cavalry Regiment of the United States Army. The battle, which occurred on June 25 and 26, 1876 near the Little Bighorn River in eastern Montana Territory, was the most famous action of the Great Sioux War of 1876.”i Was this battle led by a courageous General or a desperate man is search of being seen as an American hero by the eyes of America?
Many people today know the story of the Indians that were native to this land, before “white men” came to live on this continent. Few people may know that white men pushed them to the west while many immigrants took over the east and moved westward. White men made “reservations” that were basically land that Indians were promised they could live on and run. What many Americans don’t know is what the Indians struggled though and continue to struggle through on the reservations.
According to the Arapahos and Cheyenne’s the story of the Sand Creek Massacre has misrepresented and ignored the role of these Natives in the years before the massacre. Their political goals and strategies have not been considered in understanding what happened during the massacre. Therefore it is argued that it is important to acknowledge their role in this horrible event as well, in order to have a clear view on what happened. It must be noted that the treaty between the natives and settlers was made in 1851. The camp that the Arapaho and Cheyenne obtained at the Sand Creek was the result of more than 10 year strategies. It furthermore included taking responsibility in relation to the peace with Americans (Loretta 2015, 364-390). The relation between the settlers and Cheyenne and Arapaho was quite exceptional, there were a lot of tribes who tried to fight the settlers, however these 2 groups main goal was peace (Tobin 2003, 110). In order to maintain the peace they had to sacrifice a lot, however they had to maintain the peace in order to be able to stay alive. The settlers were not really interested in this peaceful coexistence, which was made clear during the massacre. This effort of the natives to maintain peace and be politically involved is often not taken into account when analysing the events of 1864 (Loretta 2015, 364-390). Most investigations focussed on the aspect of death of
Despite the promise of utopia, Jonestown was clearly no utopia. The organizational structure of the Temple was in fact a hierarchical with four distinct levels. Jones was at the top, followed by an inner circle known as “angels”. These angels dealt with the media and were responsible for Temple finances. They also served as the muscle. Underneath the inner circle was the planning commission, responsible for managing the Temple and enforcing some of the more simple rules. At the bottom was the general membership. (Asher) The white male population had certain privileges not afforded to others. They had access to money, ate better, worked less and served as the armed guards used to intimidate and control the others. Many of the “privileged” were