Despite the promise of utopia, Jonestown was clearly no utopia. The organizational structure of the Temple was in fact a hierarchical with four distinct levels. Jones was at the top, followed by an inner circle known as “angels”. These angels dealt with the media and were responsible for Temple finances. They also served as the muscle. Underneath the inner circle was the planning commission, responsible for managing the Temple and enforcing some of the more simple rules. At the bottom was the general membership. (Asher) The white male population had certain privileges not afforded to others. They had access to money, ate better, worked less and served as the armed guards used to intimidate and control the others. Many of the “privileged” were …show more content…
not among the dead found in the carnage of Jonestown. According to the survivors, Jonestown was a slave labor camp.
The people were forced to work 16-18 hours per day, required to live in cramped living quarters separated from their families, and were poorly fed. They were physically and mentally exhausted through malnutrition and all night lectures called “White Night” where Jones would preach for hours to exhausted followers in preparation for mass suicide. In Jonestown, Paradise Lost, January 15, 2007 Directed by Tim Wolochatiuk, Jones called for White Nights consistently in the week preceding the massacre. The people were woken during the night and forced to stand for hours while an obvious drug intoxicated Jones preached at them, preparing them for mass suicide. There were allegations of beatings, forced drugs, sensory isolation, and medical and physical experimentation. The result, sophisticated brain washing. The brain washing was so complete, that Vernon Gosney left his young son behind believing that as a bi-racial child he would be more at risk in the United States than staying in Jonestown. (Paradise …show more content…
Lost) Despite the oppressive life that was the reality in Jonestown, and despite their misery, the members had nowhere to go. It was no accident that Jonestown was isolated in the jungles of Guyana with no communication with the outside world. The members were both emotionally and physically isolated from their families. Even communication and conversation between Temple members was discouraged. (Osherow). After the arrival in Jonestown, Jones’ indoctrination focused on the positive aspect of death. He preached that death was not to be feared and often subjected his followers to loyalty tests wherein mass suicides were practiced. Reiterman writes that Jones had so manipulated the people with guilt for any elitist beliefs and anyone who believed that things were not all right in Jonestown was compared to an anarchist. (Reiterman 429). Jones successfully conditioned his followers to believe in the perfection of Jonestown and ignore any of the bad associated with the Temple. Reiterman states, “They had given up so much to come to Jonestown that to even contemplate trouble in paradise would be incapacitating. It was far easier to blame themselves for failing to be content amid impossible surroundings.” (Reiterman 429-430). In the aftermath of Jonestown, countless sociologists, psychologists, and family members searched for answers and sought to understand the “Why” of Jonestown. According to Neal Osherow, by the early 1970’s most Temple members feared Jones but were so controlled by Jones and the enforced isolation, they remained in the church despite allegations of brutal beatings, public punishment, and humiliation. One survivor, Blakey stated, “Although I felt terrible about what was happening, I was afraid to say anything because I knew that anyone with a differing opinion gained the wrath of Jones and other members.” (Osherow) One of the most damaging and demoralizing aspects of Jones’ control was the break down of the family unit. Jones required each member to dedicate himself or herself to him as the Father and separated children from parents during services, eventually leading to separate living quarters in Jonestown. Parents were coerced into giving Jones and the Temple the custodial rights to their children preaching, “Families are part of the enemy system because they hurt one’s total dedication to the Cause.” Thus a dissenter could no longer depend upon his or her own family for support. (Osherow). Jones further destroyed the relationships between spouses by encouraging and requiring extramarital sexual relations, often humiliating the participants. (Osherow). The question is asked why, particularly before the move to the remote regions of Guyana, did members stay with Jones and not defect from the Temple. Before the migration to Guyana, a group of eight young adults left the Temple and went into hiding for their safety. Jones went to extreme lengths to locate them however, failing to locate them and force their return to the Temple, Jones proceeded to denigrate them and set them up as an example saying, “I promised that if you kept my teachings and followed me, you wouldn’t go to concentration camps.” (Reiterman 226). The eight defectors corresponded with Jones to bargain for the safety of their family members who remained in the Temple. Jones continued to manipulate them from a distance and is quoted as saying, “You understand that the “dictatorship of the proletariat” means I have to go to these extremes. The end justifies the means.” (Reiterman 229. Armed guards surrounded the compound, and the conditions have been likened to the concentration camps of World War II. (Osherow) Once isolated in Jonestown, despite their trepidations and fears, the majority of the members maintained their faith in the leadership.
From a sociological perspective there was no other way to believe and resistance was not possible. From a sociological perspective, in order to survive the person downplays and rationalizes the situation. (Osherow). As Jones began to increase the oppression of his regime, the member’s motivation to justify their commitment to the group also increased. This process is referred to as self-justification and the theory of cognitive dissonance. (Osherow). Osherow defines cognitive dissonance theory as a method whereby people seek to justify choices and commitments. This was the condition of the Temple members as Congressman Ryan began his investigation and his planned visit to Jonestown.
In 1977, many concerned family members approached the media and local politicians voicing their concerns that their family members were being held against their will in Jonestown through systematic brainwashing. Arguably, the most deviant preaching of Jones was the idea of revolutionary suicide. Jones would often share his belief that you were “better off dead and protest the unjust conditions of the world than to get destroyed by the hands of their enemies by murder and incarceration.”
(Maynard). In 1978, Congressman Leo Ryan responded to the request from concerned relatives in his political district. He organized what was to be a fact-finding mission that included members of the press and some family members. Initially they saw a settlement of people who appeared happy and content with their lives at Jonestown. However, several members secretively passed messages to Ryan asking to leave with his group. (Osherow) As seen in the documentary, Jones bids a fond farewell to the defectors, all the while knowing of the attack that would befall then at the airfield. Immediately following the murder of Ryan and his group, Jones called for the final White Night. He convinced an already brainwashed population that they would all be blamed for the murder and that the retaliation by the United States and the Guyanese police would be directed first against the children who would be tortured and killed. As he continued to preach his final message, his trusted aids began to mix the poison cocktail. (Paradise). He challenged anyone to voice a dissenting opinion and one brave woman spoke out, specifically asking that the nearly 300 children be spared. She was dragged away by armed guards and injected with the poison cocktail.
One of the darkest times in American history was the conflict with the natives. A “war” fought with lies and brute force, the eviction and genocide of Native Americans still remains one of the most controversial topics when the subject of morality comes up. Perhaps one of the most egregious events to come of this atrocity was the Sand Creek Massacre. On the morning of November 29th, 1864, under the command of Colonel John Chivington, 700 members of the Colorado Volunteer Cavalry raped, looted, and killed the members of a Cheyenne tribe (Brown 86-94). Hearing the story of Sand Creek, one of the most horrific acts in American History, begs the question: Who were the savages?
On the 29th o April, 1977 Captain Cook, commander of a British fleet, landed on the eastern shore of Australia, in an attempt to claim the land under the name of Britain. The land was to be claimed by Britain as a land where the British government could send convicts; in an attempt to ease the struggle in the over flowing prisons. Upon Cooks arrival, he was ordered to follow three rules of claiming a foreign land. They were;
of the rape of a 14 year old girl by twenty GIs ... in front of the
The Boston Massacre is considered by many historians to be the first battle of the Revolutionary War. The fatal incident happened on March 5 of 1770. The massacre resulted in the death of five colonists. British troops in the Massachusetts Bay Colony were there to stop demonstrations against the Townshend Acts and keep order, but instead they provoked outrage. The British soldiers and citizens brawled in streets and fought in bars. “The citizens viewed the British soldiers as potential oppressors, competitors for jobs, and a treat to social mores'; (Mahin 1). A defiant anti-British fever was lingering among the townspeople.
Have you ever heard the term, “Don’t drink the Kool-Aid?” or “You have drank the Kool-Aid.”? Well, ”Drinking the Kool-Aid” means you have done something that others have told you to do or did yourself. This saying comes from the cult society led by Reverend Jim Jones, named Jonestown. Jonestown was a small community in the jungle of Guyana, South America. After getting word of people coming to investigate the society, Jones had committed a mass suicide by poisoning Kool-Aid and giving it to the people of Jonestown.
On March 5, 1770 a fight broke out in the streets of Boston, Massachusetts between a patriot mob and British soldiers. Citizens attacked a squad of soldiers by throwing snowballs, stones and sticks. British Army soldiers in turn killed five civilians and injured six others. The presence of British troops had been stationed in Boston, the capital of Province of Massachusetts Bay since 17681. The British existence was increasingly unwelcome. The British troops were sent to Boston in order to protect and support the crown-appointed colonial officials attempting to enforce unpopular Parliamentary legislation.
by Colonel James W. Forsyth. An argument started with a deaf Sioux named Black Coyote. The
Slavery has always been viewed as one of the most scandalous times in American history. It appears that the entire institution of slavery has been capsulized as white masters torturing defenseless African Americans. However, not every slave has encountered this experience. In this essay I will present the life of two former slaves Harriet Smith and Mr. George Johnson and how similar as well as different their experiences were based on interviews conducted with each of them. The negative aspects of slave life were undeniably heinous and for that reason especially, it is also important to also reveal the lives of slaves whom were treated with dignity and respect.
According to the textbook who was to blame for the Boston Massacre, several Boston resident were shot and killed by British Soldiers on the night of March 5, 1770, in what became known as Boston Massacre.
The Boston Massacre was and is still a debatable Massacre. The event occurred on March 5, 1776. It involved the rope workers of the colonial Boston and two British regiments, the twenty-ninth and the fourteenth regiments. Eleven people were shot in the incident; five people were killed and the other six were merely wounded. The soldiers and the captain, Thomas Preston, were all put on trial. All were acquitted of charges of murder, however the two soldiers who fired first, Private Mathew Killroy, and Private William Montgomery, the two soldiers were guilty of manslaughter. The causes were numerous for this event. There had been a nation wide long-term dislike towards the British, and a growing hatred towards them by the people of Boston. Even before the two regiments were sent in to monitor Boston there was a growing feud before the two sides.
Jim Jones and his infamous cult entitled, “The People’s Temple,” holds an interesting value to social psychology. Jonestown is a topic that can relate back to many sociology terms and ideas. Jonestown can be related to social deviance, the effect of American culture on social groups, labelling theory, charismatic authority, and even shows how societal history often repeats itself. American society during the late 60’s-70’s is what led to the creation of Jonestown. Jonestowns downfall provided a lot of insight to the American public of how society needed to change, proving that the deaths of about 900 people weren’t for nothing.
Throughout history, events are sparked by something, which causes emotions to rise and tensions to come to a breaking point. The Boston Massacre was no exception; America was feeling the pressure of the British and was ready to break away from the rule. However, this separation between these two parties would not come without bloodshed on both sides. The British did not feel the American had the right to separate them from under British rule, but the Americans were tired of their taxes and rules being placed upon them and wanted to succeed from their political tyrants. The Boston Massacre would be the vocal point in what would be recognized, as the Revolutionary War in American history and the first place lives would be lost for the cost of liberty. Even though the lives were lost that day, eight British soldiers were mendaciously accused of murder when it was clearly self-defense. People who are placed in a situation where their lives are threatened have the right to defend themselves. History does not have the right to accuse any one event those history may have considered the enemy guilty when they are fighting for their lives.
A dress-up party in Texas turned deadly when the host of the party, dressed as Santa Claus, began shooting at his guests. By the end of his shooting spree, he had killed one person and injured three others.
The Rape of Nanking, also known as the Nanking Massacre was a six week period when mass numbers of Chinese men and woman were killed by the Japanese. Embarrassed by the lack of effort in the war with China in Shanghai, the Japanese looked for revenge and finally were able to win the battle. The Japanese moved toward the city of Nanjing also known as Nanking and invaded it for approximately six months. Even though the people of Nanjing outnumbered the 50,000 Japanese, they were not as masterful in warfare as their opponents. Chinese soldiers were forced to surrender to the Japanese and the massacre began in which around 300,000 people died and 20,000 women were raped. The Japanese leaders had different methods of killing that were instructed to the soldiers. However, the prisoners of this “City of Blood” soon found their liberation and their justice was served.
On November 18, 1978, a notorious religious organization lead by Jim Jones became international news. As a result of manipulation and isolation, Jim Jones influenced his followers to commit suicide. Not only, but his followers were utterly convinced that what they were doing was for a good cause, specifically, a political movement. With kool-aid and a dash of cyanide, 918 people, adults and children, ended their lives that day. The aftermath of this horrific event resulted in numerous documentaries, on of which being, Jonestown: The Life and Death of Peoples Temple. Created in 2006, this documentary gives a thorough and accurate account of the events that lead up to as well as occured that day.