Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis on the giver
Kill a mockingbird interpretation
Literary analysis on the giver
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Tones of gray are all I see. Movement of the floor is the alarm that stirs me awake. It goes off at 4:00 am every morning, every day. Heading down a marble staircase in a washed out grey cardigan that everyone wears daily, I grab of what is called an apple and bite into it. An announcement always goes off throughout the day as a reminder, an event coming up, or a warning to the citizens. People watch us with cameras, it’s their jobs to track everyone’s movement since the day you were born to the day you die. Soldiers patrol around so no one can become disobedient. Life is perfect, no mistakes are made. Then one day I realized this lifestyle is unfair. How is it unfair if everything is perfect? Sameness is a rule that is unreasonable and the lack of privacy since we are monitored. …show more content…
In the novel, The Giver it tells a story about sameness and how one boy named Jonas tried to break it. On page 95, it states, "Our people made the choice, the choice to go to sameness...We relinquished color when we relinquished sunshine and did away with difference." In other words, the quote means people made everything different disappear so no mistakes or consequences are made. However, Jonas responds on page 97 "If everything's the same, then there aren't any choices! I want to wake up in the morning and decide things!" Sameness doesn't allow choices and that's what the elders ceased. It's unfair because people are unable to show their individuality in their
The Giver and Matched are both futuristic societies with a lot of rules. In The Giver the Elders choose their match as well as their children. Jonas starts loving Fiona but isn’t allowed and stops taking the pill. In Matched the officials choose their match but they can have their own children. Cassia is matched with Xander but also loves Ky and doesn't know what to do. In both story they all get jobs for the rest of their lives but in Matched they just call it vocations. Jonas gets the Receiver of memory and Cassia is supposed to be the sorter.
“The Giver shrugged. “Our people made that choice, the choice to sameness”. This quote supports my thesis because what the Giver meant by “Our people” was the committee of elders and how they chose sameness. If the committee of elders chose that then the people in Jonas’ community didn't have a choice, they don't even know. This also proves that people choose wrong when they have
Throughout the history of the world, there has been many societies. All these societies had similar structures and ideas, but they all are different by their own special traditions and ways of life. Similarly, both our society and the society in The Giver share similar ideas, but they are different in certain areas. For example, they both celebrate birthdays and have family units, but they have their own way of doing so. Based on the celebration of birthdays and the formation of family units, our society is better than the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry.
The story in The Giver by Lois Lowry takes place in a community that is not normal. People cannot see color, it is an offense for somebody to touch others, and the community assigns people jobs and children. This unnamed community shown through Jonas’ eye, the main character in this novel, is a perfect society. There is no war, crime, and hunger. Most readers might take it for granted that the community in The Giver differs from the real society. However, there are several affinities between the society in present day and that in this fiction: estrangement of elderly people, suffering of surrogate mothers, and wanting of euthanasia.
Jimmi Hendrix said “Anything not founded on truth will fall eventually, like a castle made of sand melts into the sea.” All societies have proven that truth can be hidden or its appearance seemingly modified, but ultimately what is truth and what is lies will be separated. In The Giver, Lois Lowry depicts a society that has been sheltered from all “bad” in the world and disguises murder, emotions and even death by renaming them, hiding them, and divulging only partial truths. In doing so, the lies of the government and community are masked, and given a new name: equality. However, within this society, a minority of the population receives this unseen reality. These individuals alone holds the ability to see beyond the illusion of perfection,
For instance, the narrator says when talking about Jonas, “He had been trained since earliest childhood, since his earliest learning of language, never to lie,” (page one hundred eighty-two on the digital version). This is example of conformity is shown by how obedient the citizens in The Giver are to this rule. This blind obedience covers up the possibility to be an individual by eliminating the freedom to say whatever one would like and letting it represent themselves, whether it be negative or positive. Another thing noticed is in chapter one when the narrator mentions the telling of feelings, which is when every family member has to explain how they It is at this time when everyone is behaving the same way that there is no room for differences in behavior (individuality). It is possible for a person to show who they are without telling their feelings, but when they do this, they become like everyone else and lose their uniquity. In conclusion, the ability to express one’s self is removed when rules involving behavior are put in
“It is a sin to think words no others think and to put them down upon paper no others are to see.” This quote is from the book Anthem and explains how Equality 7-2521 was not a rule follower and did his own thing. Equality seems to only do things that he wants to do and he is not willing to let the laws hold him back. In The Giver” Jonas crosses over the boundary of memory” when he did this he released the memories to all the bystanders. Doing this he was breaking multiple laws. He then proceeded to sled down to a house and wait for his lover (Fiona). Equality and Jonas both are strong mined and want a better society and are willing to
Here is my thesis for the book The Giver. Memories make us human,without it we would not function correctly. I will 2 reasons why my thesis is correct. The “Release” of “People” and The environment of their community and the way of life.
You’re sitting alone in the café drinking your coffee and reading the newspaper. You see out of the corner of your eye a little girl sitting with her mom at the table nearby. You keep glancing over and you notice the little girl is staring you down. No matter what you do she continues to watch your every move. You wonder how long she has been sitting there and why she is gazing at you. You are being watched just like the people Michel Foucault describes, people who are simply being under constant surveillance. Foucault's work, "Panopticism," features a central control tower from which all inhabitants are watched while in their surrounding glass-walled cells. The Panopticon creates an atmosphere in which the inhabitants never know whether or not they are being watched forcing them to assume that they are at all times. With this mindset, "the exercise of power may be supervised by society as a whole" (Foucault). In other words, the people control their actions and take care of themselves appropriately just on the fact that they think they are being watched. "In appearance, [panopticism] is merely the solution of a technical problem; but, through it, a whole type of society emerges" (Foucault). The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton portrays a society that functions much like the Panopticon. Newland Archer and his fellow New Yorkers are part of a very close knit group of people. Everyone knows what everyone else's business and the gossip that surrounds them, which makes privacy a foreign concept. The only way to be accepted is to know the right people, have the right connections and, of course, have money. Once a part of the group, everyone must follow a set of unwritten rules. The society forces everyone to act a certain way, and ev...
Jonas’ community chooses Sameness rather than valuing individual expression. Although the possibility of individual choice sometimes involves risk, it also exposes Jonas to a wide range of joyful experiences from which his community has been shut away. Sameness may not be the best thing in the community because Jonas expresses how much he feels like Sameness is not right and wants there to be more individuality. Giver leads him to understand both the advantages and the disadvantages of personal choice, and in the end, he considers the risks worth the benefits. “Memories are forever.”
The Giver by Lois Lowry is about a twelve year old boy Jonas who lives in a futuristic society of sameness. In Jonas’ world everything is the same, there is no color or emotion in the society. Everyone acts the same and no one has the ability to choose. Although the people of the society are able to avoid pain and suffering, they are not able to feel happiness. Lowry is warning that if the world turns into sameness, although in may sound great for some points, like no pain, it is not, readers should value differences.
Be the change you want to see in the world.-Mahatma Gandhi. In the book and the movie “The Giver”,by Lois Lowry Jonas (the main character) makes the change he wants to see in his world. He does something considered wrong in his world to make something right happen. In the movie “The Giver”, did a very good job of keeping the plot of the movie similar to the book it was based on, rising action, climax, and falling action wise. The name of the book that the movie was based on is "The Giver". This book's rising action, climax, and falling action are very similar to the movie. The book's rising action is where Jonas starts receiving memories from the Giver that changes the way he thinks about his community. The climax would be when Jonas realizes
All over the world, people die everyday due to war, starvation, crime and under development in medicine and technology. Absence of food and technology consumes 30% of the world. With everyone being equal and the same, there would be no crime, no wars and more progression as the human species. Wars would disappear, as people would be united and therefore peaceful. As shown in the novel the giver by Lois Lowry, civilians live in a peaceful and harmonious environment with no conflict or crime. Could this be the future for humanity? One of peace and progression?
The Giver takes place in the future in a place that the people call community, the community is isolated from the rest of the world. It is protected by a boundary called the boundary of memory, and everyone is exactly the same, no one is better or worse than anyone else, they are all equal. In the communities the people have no memories of the past, for us it is the present day. The communities are not exactly controlled but they have to follow certain ruler, rules that were made by Chief Elder. None of the citizen know what feelings are, like for example they do not know what love is. The Giver is revolved around a character named Jonas, played by Brenton Thwaites, who is helped by an old man, the old man is called “The Giver”. He helps him gain little memories of the past, which is present day for us. After a while Jonas starts to feel emotions and pain, he also gains the mentality of how the world that they live in is somewhat corrupt. However, that is
Imagine a society with no memory of the past tragedies and achievements and a present with no memory of anything of the world, and it’s culture. A world with no memory of cars, rain ,sunlight snow, or seas but this also includes things that are evil and tragic as well as a great number of things. This would also include the bad things such as war, death, hate, wrath, pride, greed, pollution, sickness and racism would all be erased from the thought of this community. The following paragraphs are going to be on why creating this community would be better than not having it in this modern day society. There are many good reasons to transition to “sameness” and many reasons to remain a Federal republic The paragraphs below will explain why someone