SCDAA Legal Case Study

640 Words2 Pages

If you are still uncomfortable then I can let Dennis do the exit Interview (this will have to be scheduled) and put a hold on your final payment until after it is completed. This should work fine as according to policy we are not required to release final vacation check for up to 30 days. I am sure I can get something scheduled with Dennis way before then. Thanks Sonja Keep in mind, I was completely aware that it is not legal to require me to complete an exit interview or threaten withholding pay. This is just another attempt of her using whatever means necessary to get things to go her way. Still, I participated to prove once and for all that I am the bigger person in this situation, and so that I could finally cut ties with this oppressive …show more content…

We would always come to the same thoughts: “There is nothing we can do. We will anger her if we bring our feelings to her attention. She will lash out tenfold. The board doesn't know us, they only know her. What if we lose our jobs. I need this job to survive.” The most abominable thing about the current status of the SCDAA is the way in which it degrades the good men and women who work there. In an effort to have a fulfilling career while supporting a great cause, we sacrifice self respect. I have often described it like this: we are like a pet who is neglected and abused. We endure poor conditions because we see no hope for change. While in my position I worked insane hours, I spent countless weekends checking and responding to nasty e-mails, nights spent in complete distress and turmoil over an interaction I had that day, I even went to a therapists to deal with what was happening in my work life. I no longer work for the SCDAA. I no longer have a need for turmoil or therapy. Most importantly, I no longer have to fear for my livelihood. The SCDAA is run on fear. I thank God everyday that I do not have to live in fear

Open Document