More handpicked essays just for you.
How advance technology affects warfare
Technology advancements in warfare
Advantages of military technology in combat
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How advance technology affects warfare
Rumsfeld overwhelming desire to reform U.S military and remake warfare in the 21st century is the third and most pronounced factor in the strategic risk accepted by the United States during the initial planning OIF. (site) He thought the U.S. ground forces were too big, slow, took too long to deploy and engage the enemy. (site) He wanted to use technological advances in weapons, navigation and communications to make U.S. land forces smaller, more agile and more lethal. (site) With this philosophy, he completely rejected OPLAN 1003-98 which called for up to 500,000 troops to defeat and secure Iraqi. (site) He thought 125,000 troops could successfully defeat Iraq. (site) He didn’t plan nor envision a heavy presence in the post war Iraqi. (site)
Should the U.S. End Overseas Military Operations? The U.S. has been sending troops to overseas countries to aid the needy, and taking certain measures to try to keep our country safe. We want to help the innocent, care for the civilians, and want them to be free. We help other countries so that maybe one day they can stand on their own! Power is everything.
Bush had been eager to go to war with Iraq from the moment he stepped into office and the administration's focus was chiefly on Iraq even before the war in Afghanistan had begun. In Where Men Win Glory, the text reveals that “in November 2001, President Bush and Vice President Cheney had instructed Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to secretly create a detailed plan for the invasion of Iraq” (Krakauer 192).
The United States has again stumbled into an overseas quagmire from which there is no easy exit. History seems to be repeating itself when again, we are led by a group of men who launch wars without exit strategies and fail to understand the nature of their enemy. In Vietnam the United States became involved because they felt the need to stop the spread of communism throughout the rest of Asia and attempt to prevent the "domino effect." The belief is that if Vietnam fell, so then would Cambodia, Laos, etc. Vietnam was the longest U.S. war with its never ending deaths, escalating destruction of Vietnam and Cambodia, and growing danger of splitting the American people (Carter 28). In Vietnam the Americans were told that U.S. was there because the South Vietnamese asked us to save them from the communist threat. But what the soldiers experienced did not add up to what the American people were being told (Thura 9). Americans have been told that the United States is going to war against Iraq in order to remove Saddam Hussein, eliminate him from power, abolish Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, and prevent Baghdad from aiding terrorist groups. (Anderson 5). In Iraq the soldiers are anxious with no evidence of weapons of mass destruction, and Saddam Hussein no longer in power the reason why U.S. is still fighting in Iraq when the war was declared over a year ago is questionable (Moore 19).
Donald H. Rumsfeld was the petitioner, while Jose Padilla was the respondent. Jose Padilla returned from Pakistan in 2002; he arrived in Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport. It was there that Padilla was detained by the Department of Defense until determined if he was an “enemy combatant” in terms with al Qaeda. It was said by the FBI that Padilla’s presence in the US was to create terroristic attacks. Padilla was moved to a military brig located in South Carolina where he was kept for the time being.
These two articles, one, an address by Attorney General John Ashcroft to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, and the other, an article written by David Cole that appeared on the Amnesty International web site, deal with the ethics and Constitutionality of the United Stated Patriot Act. David Cole, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center, argues that the Patriot Act violates citizen’s civil rights and unfairly imprisons innocent individuals. Attorney General John Ashcroft counters that the Patriot Act is justified as a preventive measure to aid in the war on terrorism.
...cleanly ending the war was the wrong way to approach the end of war because there were so many open ends with the Iraqis that could possibly lead to conflict in the future; however since the war was expensive, costing 620 billion dollars, and because three hundred ninety American soldiers had already died. After tying up loose ends with handling the Iraqi army and their leader Hussein, General Schwarzkopf, who played a major role and served as a key leader to the American army during Operation Desert Shield and Storm, made his way to where Saddam Hussein was so he could witness his surrender, however Hussein’s actions to follow this event required President Bush to put in place “no-fly zones” to protect the Kurds in Northern Iraq and the Shiites in the South. Eventually Operation Desert Storm, the biggest military operation since Vietnam, came to a successful end.
Accepting risk is an inherent necessity of commanders past and present. General Gates knew a purely defensive operation was risky, but he also knew that engaging the British on open terrain was an even greater risk. Commanders today should consider the implications of accepting too great a risk while developing the situation and operational approach to their desired end state. Whatever the mission, by empowering subordinates, enabling disciplined initiative and driving the operations process, commanders will not only provide that needed and desired leadership, they will affect the outcome of the battle.
...milar restrictions in their operations, and this ultimately led to the U.S. defeat. Perhaps if President Johnson and his politically oriented advisors would have listened to and followed the advice given by the military advisors actually in-theatre they would have been able to develop rules of engagement that aided supported the U.S. forces more fairly and allowed more freedom in tactics and thus resulting in the war being won. In the aftermath of this war US policy makers and in fact whole governments came to the same realisation. Once a situation has devolved to the point where war is seen to be the best action taken, the politics must be et aside and the proffessional war fighters be allowed to take the lead in order to gain a favorable outcome.
John Yoo’s defense of the Military Commission Act of 2006 is an implicit commentary on the Hamdan versus Rumsfeld decision of 2006. The case of Hamdan expresses unilateral executive power as unbounded in a very tangible manner. In this decision and defense it is evident that the unilateral powers the president holds seem to be unbounded. Yoo’s promotion and defense of the MCA of 2006 neglects the moral costs of prohibiting habeus corpus rights, the treatment of the detainees, and the danger of unilateral executive power.
Wag The Dog Theory: Domestic Scandal And Foreign Policy [Author] [Institution] Wag The Dog Theory Of Domestic Scandal And Foreign Policy The “Wag the dog” theory of domestic scandal and foreign policy is advanced by some pundits through which, the US presidents committed the United States to overseas conflicts in order to divert public attention from national unrest or outcry does not necessarily apply to all US presidents. Some of the US presidents have indulged in foreign affairs, foreign tours, summits with foreign leaders, foreign conflicts or certain bold or rash decisions when faced with problems of economic or political nature on the domestic front. Harry S. Truman atom-bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which he could have avoided, but that would have dragged on the WWII a little longer creating more problems for him on the domestic front. Kennedy’s ill-planned Bay of Pigs fiasco in Cuba in support of the Cuban exiles planning to overthrow Fidel Castro. Reagan’s Iran-Contra Affair for secret sale of arms to the inimical Iran and channeling of ill-gotten profits to the Nicaraguan rebels. But, the classic example of the practice of the “Wag the dog” theory was by Bill Clinton. To draw away attention from his personal indiscretions, on the day Monica Lewinsky was supposed to testify before a grand jury, Clinton ordered cruise missile attack on a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan under the pretense of it was a chemical weapons factory. Later, targets in Afghanistan were attacked under the pretext that these were linked to the Saudi terrorist Osama Bin Laden who was suspected of orchestrating bombings of US embassies in East Africa. Clinton’s actions that led to his impeachment were not mere personal misdeeds, but lasting stains ...
Technology is growing fast, as is the new generations branching off with new forms of media and devices that provide us with the news. News and politics have had difficulty when informing its public and community of the events that happen in their community. Now the media and news are growing to reform to the earlier generation’s way of receiving the news and events related to them, by using media and popular culture. According to Wodak, for politics to air and to engage and intrigue its public, it must need scandal, rumour, and speculation (45). The West Wing, is a clear example of where the news and politics enter into the world of entertainment, but still informing its audience of the political world and events they may face. I will be analyzing The West Wing television series in relation to the representations of gender, race, and politics with support from examples and scholarly sources.
Throughout the years many eyebrow-raising statements have been brought up concerning the war, which quickly begins to make any war effort basis appear shallow and weak. Peter Baker, a former White House correspondent, wrote a book in which an anonymous senior Bush administration official is quoted saying, “The only reason we went into Iraq, I tell people now, is we were looking for somebody’s ass to kick.” In addition, General John Abizaid, a former head of U.S. Central Command and Military Operations in Iraq for 2007 said, “Of course it's about oil; we can't really deny that," in and interview with CNN (Juhasz 1). With such startling statements over the years...
Leaders today need to have an appreciation for the operation process, understand a situation, envision a desired future, and to lay out an approach that will achieve that future (Flynn & Schrankel, 2013). Plans need to be created that can be modified to changes in any factors considered. However, plans should not be dependent on specific information being precise or that require things to go exactly according to schedule. Instead, the staff NCO should be flexible where they can and always be prepared for the unexpected. Today’s military members are fighting an unconventional war in Iraq and Afghanistan. The enemy constantly changes their tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP’s) to counter the United States technological advances, making planning very difficult for leaders. There are multiple tools at a staff NCO’s disposal to try to anticipate an outcome of a current operation, but also assist with the development of concepts in follow-on missions. The Military Decision Making Process (MDMP) is just one tool a staff NCO can utilize. In order to stay ahead of the enemy, create effective plans and orders, it is critical for a staff NCO to assist the commander, and understand that the MDMP and planning are essential in defeating the enemy and conserving the fighting force.
Should the government decrease military spending or should it increase military spending? This is a question that many Americans wrestle with, and politically speaking, is a point of great contention since to many, military might evokes a sense of security. However, when considering this question from a foreign policy standpoint, does current military spending really match the current level of threats faced by the United States, or are too many dollars being allocated for an unnecessary level of military strength? There are certainly cons in making the decision to drastically lower military spending, but they are minimal when compared to the positive ramifications such a decision would have. This paper aims to explore these pros and cons
In this paper, I will discuss how General Petraeus began the process of bringing life back to a dismal and dilapidated Mosul. Petraeus accomplished this by providing clear direction on how to complete an election process. He led the complicated task under the guidance of ADP 6-0 Mission Command. Which proved to be successful through his constant assessment of the situation.