Although Rudy Baylor, in The Rainmaker, is a new and unaccustomed lawyer, he certainly has his strengths and weaknesses, and with taking a case for the first time, his complexion as well as his professionalism is shown. Rudy’s jurisdiction or in other words, his area of authority, in which he’s practicing in, is Memphis, Tennessee. He studied at the University of Memphis Tennessee Law School. Rudy, who has an interest in social justice and civil rights, practiced Criminal Law and Civil Law. In other words, he would help someone sue and go through court. Desperate for a job, he goes to a corrupt but successful personal injury lawyer, who makes Rudy an associate. To earn his fee, Rudy was required to hunt for clients at a local hospital. …show more content…
He finds and proceeds to help three clients, Miss Birdsong, Donny Ray, and Kelly Riker. Miss Birdsong, is an elderly woman that refuses to pass on her will to her family and relatives when she dies. She always says “Cut. Cut. Cut”. His other client is dealing with a more brutal and critical situation. Donny lives with his parents and is dying from leukemia. He’s very sick and his mom is nursing him in bed. Donny Ray would most likely have been saved by a bone marrow transplant, had his medical claim not been denied by Great Benefit, the family's insurance carrier. Rudy ended up taking Donny’s case and bringing that to court. Meanwhile, Rudy’s last client, Kelly Riker, who he gets to know, is a young woman who was beaten with a baseball bat by her husband, who continues to abuse her. The original judge assigned to the case, is set to dismiss the case. He was very stubborn about the case and wouldn’t cooperate. He thought it was non-worth while case. So he seemed to be very nonchalant and carless about it. Yet, all of a sudden the judge suffered a fatal heart attack. Quickly afterwards, a far more sympathetic judge, took over the case. However, the new judge was very assertive and didn’t mess around. He didn’t budge on changing the court date when asked. He wasn’t stubborn, however he looked to see both sides of the situation and saw to what was fair and of course what was the truth. The company Rudy is going up against in court, Great Benefit, violated Rudy illegally.
To get ears on Rudy’s case, in terms of his discussions, Great Benefit’s lawyer planted a hidden live feed mic in Rudy’s office. That was an illegal, unfair, and unprofessional violation by them listening in. Rudy eventually found out about the mic and instead of reporting the evidence of them listening in or using the evidence against Great Benefit in court, he used the evidence to make it seem like one of the members of the jury had to do with it (jury tampering). Yet, he used it against the lawyer in court to get back at the lawyer and humiliate him. Though that was kind of clever and hysterical, it wasn’t very professional and responsible for Rudy to do. Henceforth, it was also a violation by Rudy. One other violation Rudy made was the approachment towards the victim, in which he accidently did in the court …show more content…
room. Rudy has definitely shown both positive and negative sides of his professionalism throughout this case in terms of his job and his personal life outside. Rudy had a consistency of mixing his job with/into his personal life. In my opinion, those two things, and especially with having a serious and independent job, shouldn’t correlate what so ever. For example, he became really close to Kelly and they formed a gentle and reserved kind of relationship. In fact, Rudy got too close to all three of his clients. He rented Miss Birdsong’s garage for a place to work and sleep. He even spent some of his free time with his clients. Personally, I wouldn’t want that unless I knew my lawyer well enough in some circumstance. But even that, it is still strange and unprofessional. Non the less, on the positive side his attitude is very good professionally. Overall, in consideration of both sides, I would rate Rudy very low at a professional level. Maybe it’s because he’s just starting out and it will all come in time. Inexperience is definitely and excuse though. Corresponding to his good and bad professional ways, Rudy surly has many strengths even though he has some weaknesses.
Overall, Rudy is a very likable guy; he’s caring, he’s friendly, and he’s sensitive. He’s a sociable person. Those characteristics in general are strengths that are influential. A couple of weaknesses he has is inexperience and his confidence, particularly in the court room. I would not hire Rudy Baylor, just starting his first case. I can understand why his clients needed his help because they were already at rock bottom. However, if Rudy continued to be a lawyer and proceeded to take many cases to court, after years of gaining experience, and he’s still a great guy yet he’s good at what he does, I’d hire
him. The law does provide justice to the victims in this movie. More in particular, Donny Ray and his parents were justified at the end when the jury made their decision that Great Benefit was guilty. My general statement and opinion on the U.S. legal system is that it’s essential and imperative. Laws do need to be enforced and cases should be looked upon and taken to court. It is very effective in its process. It is the Judicial Branch and that is one of the three branches of government we have. Without it, the whole world and society would be unbalanced.
Procedural History: Miller filled for an appeal claiming that he was entrapped, and that the prosecutor committed misconduct.
...he fact that Brady is being called Colonel Brady by the judge; he claims it gives his opponent an unfair advantage. The mayor is brought in to resolve the issue. He also grants Drummond the title of "Colonel" on a temporary, honorary basis. Now both lawyers are called Colonel.
(3 points) What kind of defenses has the defendant raised? Or, if the case is over, what defenses did the defendant raise? If not clear in the article, what are the likely defenses?
...t his the evidence in front of a jury. Still believing in his innocence Jeff is filing for parole after fourteen years of eligibility. He is hoping to meet parole board criteria so he can be released on parole.
In this case, Vinny had to learn as he goes because he had never been in a real trial hearing before. Vinny was a personal injury lawyer in New York. During this case there were three eye witness saying that Bill and Stan were the criminals, who murdered
Miller, Roger LeRoy., Meinzinger, Mary. Paralegal Today: The Legal Team At Work. Clifton Park, NY : Delmar Cengage Learning, 2010. Print
· 1998: “The Advocate” donated by Donna Arnold to North Carolina Central University School of Law. Begins paintings for traveling exhibition, Visual Poem of Human Experience. Private commissions (6).
Consequently, Richard and Mildred’s case was heard in a City Court of Virginia, where they both plead guilty because a city lawyer representing their case
In the movie “My Cousin Vinny” the theme was that it happened to be the first case for Vinny. He was to defend his cousin. Not like the real life action where in order to pass the Bar exam you really have to know all aspects of being a lawyer. This fictional story did have some facts in it, but it did show some possible thing that could happen in real life. In a lot of instances the happenings were a little too far-fetched to be believed.
John smith, the accused, stood up in the courtroom and started yelling at the judge about what he thought of his innocence irrespective of the decision that the judge would make. He also cursed the prosecutor and kept quiet when his lawyer warned him of the negative consequences that would follow if he continued with the same behavior. Smith
The novel Theodore Boone: Kid Lawyer has a very in-depth conflict that is showcased all throughout the novel. In Theo's community, there is a high-profile murder trial about to begin. Mr. Pete Duffy, a wealthy business man, is accused of murdering his wife Myra Duffy. The prosecutors have the idea that Mr. Duffy did it for the one million dollar insurance policy he took out on his wife earlier, however they have no proof to support this accusation (Grisham 53). The defendants do however have the proof that no one saw the murder, for all everyone knew, Mr. Duffy was playing his daily round of golf at the golf course right by his house. As the trial moved on, the jury was starting to lean towards letting Mr. Duffy walk a free man. To this point, there has been no proof to support the prosecutors statements that Mr. Duffy killed h...
In the autumn of 1830 he moved to New York State and attended the academy at Canandaigua where he began his study of law. Realizing that his mother wouldn’t be unable to support him through his courses, he was determined to go to the west, and on June 24, 1833, he set out for Cleveland, Ohio, where he was dangerously ill with fever for four months. He then visited Cincinnati, Louisville, St. Louis, and Jacksonville, Illinois, but failed to receive any employment. Feeling Discouraged, he walked to Winchester. Here he found employment as clerk to an auctioneer at an administrator's sale, and was paid six dollars. He studied law at night, and on Saturdays practiced before justices of the peace.
...ing him, and the expectation was that there would be a well-publicized trial rather than a brief in which Ray admitted his guilt and was sentenced.” (Clark 240)
Savant syndrome isn’t bad or harmful at all to the autistic person it is actually highly beneficial to the person and other people so there is no need for treatment for this. There have been no previous records of anyone trying to treat savant. A big benefit that Charlie had from Raymond was being able to count playing cards. Charlie taught his brother how to play black jack. After Charlie took Raymond to the casinos in Las Vegas Raymond help Charlie when a bunch of money.
proof for the law to believe him. Due to him being a lawyer, he has