Rubashov In Arthur Koestler's Darkness At Noon

1896 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analysis of darkness at noon by harold krents

Arthur Koestler is the author of Darkness at Noon, a novel in which the main character Rubashov is imprisoned for his alleged crimes against the communist party. Rubashov is an active member in communist activities and was shown to have great value to the party’s advancement. As Rubashov is imprisoned his mind crosses between the ‘I’ and ‘We’ mindset consistently. His logic sways between dying in silence and confessing to the crimes that he has been accused of. For Rubashov to die in silence would mean he elects to stay with his individualistic mindset on how the communist party should pursue its ultimate goal, he would not be helping No. 1 further consolidate power. There are two sides to the communist party. There is the side to which Rubashov belongs, that believes that the communist party should attempt to …show more content…

For Rubashov to die in silence, he would hold true to his original belief that communism should be spread internationally. However, the opposition wants him to die, helping the party further its control. If Rubashov is to confess to the crimes and oppositional thoughts he has, he will show the citizens that there can be no opposition to No. 1’s rule and will thus help the party gain more control, furthering the communist revolution. Rubashov should die in silence. The communist party would have stood a better chance at surviving if it had a larger party population; however, there are many more risks to expanding internationally than consolidating power within a single country first, yet these are risks that would lead to greater success. Simply put, Communism can be related to a virus. The more hosts the virus has the greater potential it has for spreading, limiting this virus to one region limits it ability to spread. Rubashov should die in silence because helping No. 1 further consolidate power will only help destroy the communist party faster. Dying in silence he is holding true to his beliefs which he sides with more so than the beliefs of the

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Valentine Kataev's 'Book Time, Forward !'

    1265 Words  | 3 Pages

    Pouring concrete does not seem to be an important job to most people, and writing an entire book about pouring concrete also seems banal. But if you look at the underlying social commentary of a nation going from the old Imperial Russia, to the new Soviet Union, it speaks to the power of people coming together to achieve a single goal. The Book Time, Forward! by Valentine Kataev shows how people from all over Russia came together to become the people of the Soviet Union. Stalin used his first five year plan to unify the people to work toward a single goal of updating Russia, and making her a world power. Kataevs book Time, Forward! shows unity through a concrete pouring competition, and the people of the Soviet Union swiftly move forward

    Read More

  • Summary Of Under A Cruel Star

    1324 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the Communist Party, if people were to resist and speak up about any grievance that they had, they would be incarcerated and possibly executed. In her memoir, Kovály stated “By 1951, the atmosphere in Prague was almost as bad as it had been during the war. No one dared to speak out loud, and hardly a week passed without news of someone’s arrest” (101). This statement further explains how constantly were people arrested, and how people were so fearful that they were afraid to express themselves about anything publicly. In order to stay out of danger, “People no longer aspired toward things but away from them.

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's 'First They Came For The Communists'

    593 Words  | 2 Pages

    This connects to the theme ¨Speak up because you never know what might happen¨ and shows how if they were would have spoke up and suck together things could may be different. He said, ¨When the Nazis came for the communists, I remained silent: I was not a communist.¨(Niemoller, 1,2,3). Also, ¨When they came for me, there was no one left to speak out.¨(Niemoller, 13,14). This is an clear examples of the theme and explains it

    Read More

  • Brief Summary Of 'Chapter Analysis Of Vladek'

    826 Words  | 2 Pages

    I would not blame Vladek for destroying Anja's diaries. The effect of their absence on the narrative of Maus is negative which is influenced that the significance of Vladek's actions cannot be ignored.

    Read More

  • Guilty Betrayal in Arthur Koestler's Darkness at Noon

    1378 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rubashov is guilty for the expulsion of many innocent Party members, but ultimately for the sacrifice of the knowledge of his identity for the Party system. Upon his arrest, he has felt his subconscious attempt to reach him through toothache and shivers. These physical manifestations of his guilt allow him to become fully conscious of his guilt and, consequently, the fallibility of the Party's beliefs and methods. Rubashov is also subconsciously aware that he must pay for his guilt. There is no method for redemption, save for dying in silence. Rubashov's resignation to silence during his public trial is his expression of individuality, his complete divergence from Party principle in the suppression of the individual.

    Read More

  • The Address Of August Spies Analysis

    1107 Words  | 3 Pages

    Through the quotations he deploys, imagery he enacts and authoritative tone he embodies, Spies very deliberately takes control of the Courtroom showcasing that no matter the circumstances the collective will prevail. Spies recognizes that the trial is his condemnation so subsequently he seizes the opportunity to condemn the State of their fate as a result of their injustices. Through his willingness to sacrifice his own life to propel his convictions Spies not only makes a statement to the Court but further strengthens the concept of class-consciousness within the masses. Furthermore, signifying that there indeed “will be a time when our [their] silence will be more powerful than the voices you [the State]strangle today.”

    Read More

  • Theme Of Silence In Night And Works By Elie Wiesel

    1004 Words  | 3 Pages

    This shows how silence encourages the tormentor, Hitler, as the tormentor did not decline in progress, but merely perpetuated in progress since no one stopped him from doing so, not even those who had heard the warning. The price of silence was also paid by the people who were indifferent and quiet about the injustice, A majority of them died. However those who speak out against the injustice were also killed. Such as the hangings of the pipel who was under the service of the Oberkapo of the 52nd cable Kommando. He was hanged for taking part in preparing for a rebellion, “But his young pipel remained behind, in solitary confinement. He too was tortured, but he too remained silent. The SS then condemned him to death, him and two other inmates who had been found to possess arms.”(pg 64)

    Read More

  • Ivan Denisovich Corruption

    592 Words  | 2 Pages

    Intro with Thesis: A Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich is a novel by Alexander Solzhenitsyn that documents totalitarian communism through the eyes of an ordinary prisoner in a Soviet labor camp. This story describes the protagonist, Ivan Denisovich Shukhov, as he freezes and starves with the other prisoners, trying to survive the remainder of his ten-year sentence. In this story, Solzhenitsyn uses the struggles in the camp as a way to represent the defaults of the Soviet Union under Stalin’s regime. By doing this, Solzhenitsyn uses authoritative oppression in his labour camps to demonstrate the corrupt nature of the Soviet system.

    Read More

  • Morals Vs. Selfishness

    1389 Words  | 3 Pages

    Shukhov is a likeable and yet somewhat naïve fellow who is just like everybody else. In fact, what really makes this book remarkable is not Shukhov himself. What makes it special is that, even though at first glance the story may seem to be about Shukhov, it is actually a tale of events and common occurrences that could happen to anyone. The book is not just a detail of one day in the life of Ivan, it is a relatable story of what could happen to anyone shoved into a Russian prison camp. Ivan’s life in the book is shown to be nothing more than a picture of the thousands of lives that were lost or destroyed in the Stalinist camps. Ivan Denisovich Shukhov is not one character, Ivan Denisovich Shukhov is the picture of “anyman.” Using the depiction of the beliefs, hopes, and need to survive that would arise in a common prisoner Solzhenitsyn creates a story of the victory of humane principles over corruption.

    Read More

  • One Day In the Life of Ivan Denisovich: A Comparison of the Film and Novel

    2237 Words  | 5 Pages

    This novel and film commentary analysis or interpretation will be first summarised and then critiqued. The summary will be divided into twenty- four episodes. While summarising it is well to remember that the film was made out of the book.

    Read More

  • Freedom of Thought in Solzhenitsyn's One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich

    621 Words  | 2 Pages

    Solzhenitsyn believed that it was nearly impossible to have truly free thoughts under the prison camp conditions described in One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, or in any situation where there is an authoritarian ruler. In a pris...

    Read More

  • Prisoners And Prisons In Varlam Shalamov's Kolyma Tales

    1120 Words  | 3 Pages

    Political prisoners and criminals alike were subject to brutal conditions in the Soviet gulags at Kolyma in the 20th century. In Varlam Shalamov’s Kolyma Tales, the stories of many different prisoners are told and much is revealed about how humans react under these pressures, both naturally and socially. Being in an extreme environment not only takes a toll on one’s physical well-being, but on one’s mental and emotional state as well. The stories show that humans can be reduced to a fragile, animalistic state while in the Kolyma work camps because the extreme conditions force many men to focus solely on self-preservation.

    Read More

  • Vadim Aleksandrovich Glebov's The House On The Embankment

    1900 Words  | 4 Pages

    Yuri Trifonov chronicled the life of a Soviet conformist named Vadim Aleksandrovich Glebov in his novel, “The House on the Embankment.” Vadim Glebov leads a life in support of the Soviet Union’s tyranny and oppression of human rights in order to gain the high social status and power he envied beginning in childhood. The novel is a narrative that revolves around Glebov’s education and success, and it depicts what life was like as a Soviet citizen between the 1930’s and 1970’s. Through Glebov’s revealed repressed memories, we see the ultimate example of conformity.

    Read More

  • Vivisection

    1555 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the late 1930’s while the United States was going through The Great Depression the Soviet Union was going through its own turbulent times. This would be known as the Moscow Show Trials, which took place under the Soviet leader Joseph Stalin. The book Darkness at Noon by Arthur Koestler takes place during this time period. The main character Nicholas Rubashov has been imprisoned even though he always has been loyal to the goals of the party (Koestler). This showed a shift that was happening in the country and an attempt by Stalin to eliminate any possible opposition even if they were heroes in the revolution. In the text two different concepts come to light vivisection morality where the party comes before the individual and anti-vivisection morality where the individual is sacred. Rubashov in the beginning does not embrace individualism however throughout the novel he begins to adopt individualism that he refers to as grammatical fiction. Vivisection morality is never a justifiable political system. Suppressing the rights of human beings is not only inhumane but also counter productive in creating an effective and wealthy society.

    Read More

  • The Conflict Between Individual And State And The Grammatical Fiction

    1121 Words  | 3 Pages

    Within communist doctrine the individual is only a piece of a larger system, and for the true communist the pronoun ‘I’ is not even part of his or her vocabulary. Rather, the personal ‘I’ is replaced by ‘we’, which represents the Party. The significance of Rubashov’s statement is that even his speech patterns, a physical manifestation of one’s subconscious, display his self-detachment from the Communist Party in that he has lost his ability to associate with the communist We. Over and over Rubashov is tormented by the idea "I shall pay", an unrest due to his uncertainty about the foundation of Communism he has placed himself on. Shortly after his first hearing he writes in his diary "The fact is: I no longer believe in my infallibility. That is why I am lost.

    Read More

More about Rubashov In Arthur Koestler's Darkness At Noon

Open Document