CHAPTER-BY-CHAPTER ANALYSIS
PROLOGUE - PART ONE - CHAPTER ONE
Q Why do you think Spiegelman chooses to begin the story of Vladek's life with the period when he was 'young and really a nice, handsome boy'?
I think Spiegelman chooses to begin the story of Vladek's life with the period when he was 'young and really a nice, handsome boy' because he wants to introduce that character who has these attributes which later concluded by Vladek's 'troubles' throughout the war. That shows the differences of Vladek being young and old in the story of his life.
Q How does Spiegelman show early in the narrative that Artie's relationship with Vladek is a difficult one?
Spiegelman shows early in the narrative that Artie's relationship with Vladek is a difficult
…show more content…
one. The difficulties of that relationship prevents them to have an interest and comfort. The reason is because Artie never knows Vladek's life in the past. Artie is only viewed in the present who is ten- or eleven-year old son of Vladek. CHAPTER TWO Q What do we learn about Vladek from his insistence on counting and apportioning his pills? From Vladek's insistence on counting and apportioning his pills, we learn that he is agitated and anxious of his poor eyesight as a mental illness. Vladek relies on the very important values of honour and dignity. CHAPTER THREE Q Vladek often seems as outraged by relatively trivial things in the present (cigarette ash on the carpet, Mala's preoccupation with money) as he is by the horrors of war. How does this shape the reader's view of Vladek? This shapes the reader's view of Vladek who is taken prisoner, as the non-Jewish prisoners have undergone with great conditions in the camp. CHAPTER FOUR Q What is the significance of Artie complaining, 'Please, Dad, if you don't keep your story chronological, I'll never get it straight . . .'? How important is Artie's role in his father's story? The significance of Artie complaining, 'Please, Dad, if you don't keep your story chronological, I'll never get it straight . . .' is that he acts as mediator and begs his father to work the way through thoroughly. We understand that Vladek might not be a faithful or reliable narrator of the story. CHAPTER FIVE Q How do you see the suicidal actions of Anja and Tosha as they are depicted in this chapter?
Do you see one more favourably than the other? Or are they each, in their own way, an innocent victim of the holocaust?
I see the suicidal actions of Anja and Tosha as they are depicted in this chapter by three consecutive frames (p.111, frames 5, 6 and 7), the final frame focusing on Tosha's face, with her stern eyes and sweat on her forehead. Similarly, when Vladek is consoling the grieving Anja (p.124, frames 7, 8 and 9), the frames focus on the couple's faces as Vladek delivers his poignant message: that 'To die, it's easy' (frame 7).
CHAPTER SIX
Q Do you blame Vladek for destroying Anja's diaries? What is the effect of their absence on the narrative of Maus?
I would not blame Vladek for destroying Anja's diaries. The effect of their absence on the narrative of Maus is negative which is influenced that the significance of Vladek's actions cannot be ignored.
PART TWO CHAPTER ONE
Q The introduction of Francoise to the narrative allows for Artie to express some of his more private feelings and experiences. How does this develop our understanding of his character?
This allows us to understand that Francoise is shown in real life.
CHAPTER
TWO Q How does the first section of this chapter add to your sense of Artie as someone who is also a 'survivor'? We can feel the anguish and guilt that Artie is experiencing as a result of dredging up his father's past. CHAPTER THREE Q In what ways does Spiegelman show that Vladek's past will continue to haunt Artie as much as it did Vladek throughout his life? Spiegelman shows that the prisoners' ghosts and the horrors of the war still hang in the consciousness of survivors. CHAPTER FOUR Q Is anything really 'saved' in this chapter? Nothing is really 'saved' in this chapter. When Vladek produces the box of photographs for Artie, we (and Artie) are provided with a version of the family tree that puts into context the degree of loss that has been experienced in the Spiegelman and Zylberberg families. CHAPTER FIVE Q To what extent do the final pages provide a sense of resolution to the narrative? In the final frames, we are invited to question Vladek's authority as narrator. We can feel a certain sadness of Vladek and Anja and we are reminded that Vladek is not the faithful storyteller that we (and Artie) hope he is. In the final frame, Vladek tells Artie, whom he addresses as Richieu, that he has told 'enough stories for now' (p.296, frame 6).
Anja Habschied and Gabor Neugebauer, a German couple who had been missing since December 1991, were the next victims of Ivan Milat's killings. Gabor's jeans were unzipped, with the button fastened like other victims, he was shot and stabbed multiple times and he was also strangled. Anja's body was missing her skull completely and it looked as if it had been severed by a machete, knife, or sword.
Vladek’s life during the Holocaust was gruesome, but regardless of what was happening in his own life Vladek was always thinking about the safety of Anja. Vladek loved Anja dearly, if anything happened to Anja Vladek would not care about his own life, and lose the will to live. When Anja and Vladek were separated in the concentration camp, Vladek found a woman and asked her if she knew if Anja is...
In his book, Grassian looks at Alexie’s works from The Business of Fancydancing and Old Shirts and New Skins to Ten Little Indians and analyzes each work such that readers can understand what Alexie is trying to convey. In Chapter 1, Grassian gives some background on Alexie’s childhood, which helps readers understand how Alexie quickly learns the power of humor. An analysis of Alexis’s use of humor in “The Approximate Size of My Favorite Tumor” is included in Chapter 3.
The readers discover that Tolstoy’s motivation for writing “Sevastopol in May” was to provide Russia with an honest war narrative, not a literary cornerstone or a piece of light reading material. This realization is the clean ending that gives readers the they closure desire. By including an explicit declaration of theme and purpose at the
The comic implies that surviving the holocaust affects Vladek’s life and wrecks his relationship with his son and his wife. In some parts of the story, Vladek rides a stationary bike while narrating his story (I, 81, panel 7-9). Given the fact that it is a stationary bike, it stays immobile: no matter how hard Vladek pedals, he cannot move forward. The immobility of the bike symbolizes how survivor’s guilt will never let him escape his past. Vladek can never really move past the holocaust: he cannot even fall asleep without shouting from the nightmares (II, 74, panel 4-5). Moreover, throughout the story, the two narrators depict Vladek before, during and after the war. Before the war, Vladek is characterized as a pragmatic and resourceful man. He is resourceful as he is able to continue his black business and make money even under the strengthened control of the Nazi right before the war (I, 77 panel 1-7). However, after surviving the holocaust, Vladek feels an obligation to prove to himself and to others that his survival was not simply by mere luck, but because h...
...s would be all too happy to pay for a meal with the lives of others, there were some good people left. There were people all around who were ready to aid someone else in their quest to stay alive, sometimes at the expense of their own lives. People such as the soldier, the priest, Ms. Motonowa, and Mancie kept things going from day to day for the Spiegelmans. In the end, Vladek and the others survived not because they did not have any friends as Vladek feels, but because they had many friends. Without the people who helped them along the way, Anja and Vladek would have surely died in the concentration camps along with the hundreds of others victims who were not so lucky.
...childern in a neighboring ghetto. A friend showed Vladek the bunker under the shows and said he and the family could hide in there. There was a Jewish stranger in Sosnowiec who helped Vladek find food and shelter. Even in Auschwitz the Jews helped eachother out. Vladek managed to get Mandelbaum some necessities like a spoon, belt, and proper fitting shoes. Anja was helped in the camps as well. Mancie and a few other women would help and protect Anja. And Vladek helped Anja when he could. He would send bread and letters for Anja with Mancie. The Jews helped each other to survive.
Our aim is to portrait the character of Dmitry Dmitrich Gurov, in the context of the story, extracting those elements that are characteristic of the period in which Chekhov wrote the story. True love is a reason for everything, even deleting the laws of life. People's mistakes and weaknesses are part of life and, without contradictions, the world would not have evolved.... ... middle of paper ...
Alexie’s purpose is to communicate to the reader not to believe everything you read. He wants us to question and think deeply whatever we read so far. Alexie does this through the details of his story. It’s the details that separate the real writer from the fake. Alexie shows he is the true writer because he talks about personal aspects of his like on the Spokane Indian reservation. Alexie writes “my story, which features an autobiographical character named Thomas Builds-the fire who suffers a brain injury at birth and experience visionary seizures into his adulthood”. The details that Alexie uses to communicate his personal knowledge of a specific situation. His diction and phrasing speaks to understand the people that he was telling the
The entire novel is written in the point of view of the main character Arnold. The reader would feel as though they are having a conversation with a close friend and is then better able to relate and sympathize with Arnold’s struggles and accomplishments. For example, Arnold begins telling the reader his story by stating, “I was born with water on the brain.” (Alexie, 1) Explaining his medical condition in the beginning of the novel allows the reader to easily understand why Arnold may react differently to certain social situations. However, his medical condition also acts as an anchor allowing the reader to get closer to Arnold’s character. Without a personal connection readers may not relate or comprehend any of Arnold’s experience. Using the first person view perspective from Arnold’s character gave Alexie an advantage and makes the novel more appealing to readers.
This shows how much Vladek and Artie had grown apart and how much his father’s faultfinding affected him. This goes to show how much one person’s life tragedies affects another person trying to live a full and complete life without hatred. Another way Vladek’s animadversion touched Artie, was in his thinking as a child. He mentions to his wife that as a child he “used to think about which of [his] parents [he] would let the Nazis take to the ovens if [he] could only save one of them... usually [he] would save [his] mother.”
Alexie begins the essay by telling the audience some background information about himself and his family. He tells of how they lived on an Indian Reservation and survived on “a combination of irregular paychecks, hope, fear and government surplus food.” (Page 1, para. 1) Right from the start, Alexie grabs the emotions of his audience. Alexie then goes on to talk of his father and how because of his love for his father, he developed a love for reading. “My father loved books, and since I loved my father with an aching devotion, I decided to love books as well.” (Page 1, para. 2) He talks of how he taught himself to read and that because of the books he began to thirst for more knowledge. Alexie says that once he learned to read, he began to advance quickly in his schooling. However, because of his thirst for knowledge, he got into much trouble. “A smart Indian was a dangerous person, widely feared and ridiculed by Indians and non-Indians alike.” (Page 2, para. 6) This statement is one of the most powerful statements in the entire essay. The reason for this being that Alexie knows that trouble will come but he was not going to let it ...
character finds out that Vladmir is related to him, he is his uncle. He also
The relationship shared by Pierre and Helene is best described as a lustful charade. It is no coincidence that Pierre, one of the most introspective characters in the novel, first marries a shallow, inwardly-ugly adulterer. His first recorded attitude towards Helene is one of admira...
The overall simplicity of life in St. Petersburg is present throughout the novel and elaborated quite a lot. Life was innocent and simple in the time and very diverse due to it being the south for example, “White, mul...