Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ronald reagan and inaugural address
Ronald reagan and inaugural address
Reagan's second inaugural address
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ronald reagan and inaugural address
Ronald Reagan’s Second Inaugural Ronald Reagan, the 40th president of the United States of America, tries to diminish the influence of the federal government in an individual’s life. By doing so, Ronald Reagan created a comparison between the year before (1985) to the year they were in at the time. (1986) Showing all of the positive outcomes in 1986 and the troubles during the year 1985. Reagan uses the appeal to logic to define all of the successful turnouts they’ve had and uses the appeal to emotion to focus more on how the government is too powerful; “taking away opportunities.” When Ronald created these rhetorical devices, it could convince citizens that “private values must be at the heart of public policies,” and that they don’t need …show more content…
such a big government as long as they have “private values.” It helps prove his purpose when trying to diminish the influence of the federal government in order to start capitalism. One of Reagan’s most effective methods when explaining his purpose was when he created a comparison between how time was in 1985 and how much has changed since 1986 by using juxtaposition. Reagan begins to illustrate all of the favorable accomplishments that appeared throughout the year to keep the crowd in a positive and in an inspired mood. He uses juxtaposition by comparing, “turning the greatest country on Earth into a land of broken dreams,” to “firm of heart and united in spirit.” He compares those two phrases because it indicates: though they’ve encountered tragedies throughout the past year: if they all work together, as a united country, they can fix all the catastrophes that had in 1985. Creating a comparison between the two justifies his point when saying that America has gotten better. Despite the fact that Ronald was trying to construct phrases that discussed how “our union is stronger than a year ago,” and how we’re “rising America.” He shifts towards a more serious tone and describes how America was over a year ago: listing all of the catastrophes that had happened over the past year. He creates phrases that indicate the problem. “Locked factory gate,” “long gasoline lines,” “intolerable prices,” and having “interest rates.” When Ronald creates those phrases, he is demonstrating to the people of America that they could go back to being the way before unless they keep letting the government have all control and power over the country. Reagan acts as if he were alongside with the citizens; opposing against the government, saying they’re too big and too powerful. In addition to this diction, Ronald Reagan additionally creates the appeal to logic to convey how America accomplished their objectives. Reagan analyzes how the government owes the citizens of America thanks for “37 straight months of economic growth,” ”modernized industries creating 9 million new jobs in 3 years,” ”interest rates cut in half,” ”inflation falling over from 12 percent in 1980 to under 4 today,” and “$74 billion in voluntary giving just last year alone." Constructing an appeal to logic had citizens think of the accomplishments America had achieved and it has them think that they have the power to make an impact for the better. Using the appeal to logic has citizens think: though the government were causing them trouble, they can fix the situation together and it clearly goes to show that the country has been improving without the help of the supposedly “powerful and united government.” It has them believe that they don’t need such a big government, but just private values to be the core of public policies. Reagan achieves using the appeal to logic by having citizens think that America is being improved by the hard work they’ve been putting in. Since they already think that they don’t need a government that “takes away opportunity” they make the people think that America would be better off with private values rather than a huge government. Ronald Reagan when trying to convince Americans that they don’t need such a huge government, Ronald builds a way of saying that the “government is growing beyond our consent had become a lumbering giant,” and how they’re “slamming shut the gates of opportunity,” and “threatening to crush the very roots of our freedom.” This motive would enrage the people and would have an effective way to have them oppose against the government because it convinces them to agree with Ronald’s purpose.
Although Ronald acts as if he were on the citizens side, he handles his words carefully by having citizens believe he’s opposing against the government as well and disagrees with them taking away opportunities and freedom. The appeal to emotion would be a direct way of having the people of America go against the the rules that are set by the …show more content…
government. Reagan’s goal from the beginning was to start a capitalist country and have private profiteers basically run the country instead of having an unnecessary government.
Doing so, he had the citizens of America think of how the government is violating their rights and making them oppose against the government. He created rhetorical devices like: the appeal to logic, appeal to emotion, and juxtaposition. Giving the rhetorical technique to have people believe that the government has been taking away all of their rights has been an effective outcome because it was encouraging citizens to think that they’re better off with a smaller and less powerful government. The speech he constructed in all was an impactful speech to the people of America because the way he handles his words to have America think they’re making the country a better place, but slowly making the government become a capitalist
country.
This paper is an analysis of the inaugural address of the former president Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR). We will focus on the main historical events that were happening, and how he addressed those issues in his speech. In his speech he used appeals to grow closer to the crowd he was speaking too. We will state the quotes he used and announce what kind of appeal that it is from. FDR uses words and phrases to pull the crowd in and I will discuss the effects of those words and what they had on the crowd. Finally we will talk about the overall quality and effectiveness of the speech and how it was such a great speech used.
“Born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage.” (Miss, Daly, Pg.). This show the U.S. people that he really loves this country and really cares about what’s going on and what happens to it in the future. Another way he brings pathos into his speech is by the language/words he uses in his speech. When he is talking he uses a lot of words like “we”, “us”. This makes the U.S. people feel very connected to him and makes the feel like they are a part of it to, it is like they made the decision to vote him president and now they get to help him make his decisions about the future of America. In his address he says “In your hands, my fellow citizens, more than mine, will rest the final success or failure of our course.” (Miss, Daly, Pg.). which again he connects to the people by making them feel involved and by basically saying the future of America is even more in our hands then in his and it really depends on us in how we want America to turn out, and again makes the U.S people feel very patriotic and proud of their country. Overall John F Kennedy was very successful in persuading the U.S. people about their choice by using pathos and by just talking to
'With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.' In the delivery of Lincoln's 'Second Inaugural,' many were inspired by this uplifting and keen speech. It had been a long war, and Lincoln was concerned about the destruction that had taken place. Worn-out from seeing families torn apart and friendships eradicated, he interpreted his inaugural address. It was March of 1865, and the war, he believed, must come to an end before it was too late. The annihilation that had taken place was tragic, and Lincoln brawled for a closure. The 'Second Inaugural' was very influential, formal, and emotional.
Leading up to the year 1981, America had fallen into a period of “stagflation”, a portmanteau for ‘stagnant economy’ and ‘high inflation’. Characterized by high taxes, high unemployment, high interest rates, and low national spirit, America needed to look to something other than Keynesian economics to pull itself out of this low. During the election of 1980, Ronald Reagan’s campaign focused on a new stream of economic policy. His objective was to turn the economy into “a healthy, vigorous, growing economy [which would provide] equal opportunities for all Americans, with no barriers born of bigotry or discrimination.” Reagan’s policy, later known as ‘Reaganomics’, entailed a four-point plan which cut taxes, reduced government spending, created anti-inflationary policy, and deregulated certain products. Though ‘Reaganomics’ was successful both at controlling “stagflation” and promoting economic growth, it has and always will be an extremely controversial topic regarding the redistribution of wealth.
On March 4th, 1865, the Civil War was drawing to an end and Abraham Lincoln gave his Second Inaugural Address to become the President of the United States for the second time. At this point it was clear that the North was to win the war. Instead of boasting and bragging about his victory, Lincoln took a different route in his speech. He focused instead on putting the war behind the nation and reunifying the country. In this famous speech, he used various forms of rhetoric and literary devices to achieve this goal. He first employs the use of God to appeal to the pathos in the people of the North and South. The overall tone of the speech is also one of unification rather than that of celebration. Going with this is his word choice or diction; he continuously addresses the country as one instead of two split parts. These literary devices are crucial to the success of his core purpose of speech.
He knows that he will need to target the emotions of the American people to gain their support. Example one, “Hostilities exist. There is no blinking at the fact that our people, our territory, and our interests are in grave danger.” Roosevelt used pathos, here, to give America the feeling of unity, which America needed to win against Japan. Example two, “I regret to tell you that very many American lives have been lost.” Here he gets the American people angry and makes them seek revenge against the enemy. By using emotion, he gains mass interest because most listeners will be fueled by what they are
Roosevelt used personification in his speech in different ways such as he personifies his actions while his presidency in using phrases such as “but their efforts have been cast in the pattern of an outworn”. Roosevelt described something so that others can understand, he talked about the failure of America during the Great Depression. Roosevelt also talked about his plans in helping America while his presidency, “I am prepared under my constitutional duty to recommend the measures that a stricken nation in the midst of a stricken world may require”. In other words, he is emphasizing a point which it will be consider personification. Franklin D. Roosevelt also used diction in his First Inaugural Address in order to demonstrate his word choices in introducing the New Deal. America was facing severe economic issues during the Great Depression, farmers find no markets for their produce, savings of many years in thousands of families were gone and a host of unemployment citizens were facing the grim problem of existence. Roosevelt wanted actions for citizens and actions were given. Roosevelt give out examples of diction such as “let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself, nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance”, Roosevelt repeated his chosen words in some point of the phrase to achieve an artistic effect which is best known as diction. Another rhetorical device that Franklin D. Roosevelt used in his speech was antimetabole. Roosevelt used this rhetorical appeal in his speech in order to demonstrate his actions in helping America. Roosevelt talked about the desperate Americans in need of a change “the nation asks for action, and action now” where the words that Roosevelt claimed for a recover. Franklin D. Roosevelt wanted America achieve after a severe crisis and he put himself in task by putting people to
President Abraham Lincoln used many rhetorical devices to explain the effects of the civil war. Lincoln wanted the north and south to put their differences behind them and unite, to become a single unified country. Many people were surprised by Lincoln’s second inaugural speech, it was shorter than his first. He didn’t take very long to get his point a crossed about how the war would make him feel. Lincoln had hope that the country would turn around. That it would unify against all evils or troubles.
John Fitzgerald Kennedy delivered one of the most important American speeches after being sworn in as president on January 20, 1961. His inauguration speech was so influential that it seized the nation’s attention, and quotes from it are still clearly remembered by people today. It is considered one of the best speeches ever written and ever delivered. It presents a strong appeal to pathos, ethos, and logos and accomplishes what any speaker strives for – it speaks straight to the heart of the audience and inspires people.
Life in America society is different, and while reading the two texts from Carr and Reagan, it becomes apparent that the society has evolved to the worst. Society went from a courageous “bagpipe player in the middle of a bloody battle”(Reagan ) to “A guy suing after his dog confuses a restaurant for a fire hydrant” (Carr 2). The two authors show a huge contrast while using different tones and analogies to catch the attention of the people they are trying to reach. Has American society decline that much from the World War II era? Carr seems to think so and reading Reagan’s speech shows how there is a clear difference.
He mentions the very recent violence that occurred in Selma, Alabama; where African Americans were attacked by police while preparing to march to Montgomery to protest voting rights discrimination. Without mentioning this violent event that occurred a week prior, there would not be much timeliness to his argument, and it wouldn’t have been as effective. The timeliness of his argument gave the speech a lot more meaning, and it heightened the emotions of many who heard the address. He is appealing to the emotions of many American people, both Congressmen and ordinary citizens, to encourage them to support his cause. He reminds us of all of the Americans around the world that are risking their lives for our freedom.
President Obama’s Inaugural Speech: Rhetorical Analysis. Barrack Obama’s inauguration speech successfully accomplished his goal by using rhetoric to ensure our nation that we will be in safe hands. The speech is similar to ideas obtained from the founding documents and Martin Luther King’s speech to establish ‘our’ goal to get together and take some action on the problems our country is now facing. As President Barack Obama starts his speech, he keeps himself from using ‘me’, ‘myself’, and ‘I’ and replacing it with ‘we’, ‘us’, and ‘together’ to achieve his ethos.
On March 4, 1865, Abraham Lincoln delivered his second inaugural speech. Abraham Lincoln begins by addressing the nation on the ongoing civil war and his hopes on the nation uniting as a country again. Lincoln tells them “ The progress of our arms upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself; and it its, “ Lincoln is saying that he is equal to the public and that he has also felt the wars effect. I think the main reason why this speech was written was to start reconstruction. Since the Civil War just ended, now is the time to start reconstruction. Later on, Lincoln starts talking about the North and South. It says,“ Both parties deprecated war; but one of them would make war rather than let the nations survive; and the other would accept war rather than let it perish.” It means that the North and South weren’t planning on war but because of wanting to save their nation, they sacrificed themselves and started a war. Lincoln then states, “ To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the union, even by war; while the government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it. He is saying that the war happened not because of the issue of owning slavery but because of the expansion of slavery.
Introducing himself by making mention of his initiation in the beginning paragraph of his speech, he establishes his authenticity to his audience and encourages them to lend a listening ear. Moreover, in paragraph three Roosevelt further captures his audience with logic using past evidence. As a result, he convinces the citizens of the United States that their attention is paramount to the solution of the country’s dilemma. The President explains that in prior dark times for America, the unquestionable equation to victory was always an honest and hardworking leader accompanied by understanding and supportive citizens. In addition, in paragraph four, using the descriptive nature of pathos the president pinpoints the unique effects the depression is having on some citizens of America. Consequently, calling on the sympathetic side of citizens to motivate reactions or co-operation from them, and firmly accentuates his viewpoint in the last line when he says, “Only a foolish optimist can deny the dark realities of the
In the opening of his speech he effectively placed grief in our hearts by stating that there was “long suffering men and women” that tried to calmly protest and “were brutally assaulted” and a preacher was even slain. When this was said, congress began to sympathize with him. He too used parallelism by linking “Lexington and Concord” with the events that transpired “last week in Selma, Alabama” referring to the violence that erupted that day and successfully changed the viewpoint of Congress. He also used the method of allusion by referencing the American Revolution. Additionally, he used diction repetitively throughout by choosing similar words to make it seem like everyone’s problem. For example he said “Rarely are we met with a challenge, not to our growth” and by using phrases such as “we” and “our,” he addresses the concern as a collective issue. Similarly, by repeating “our” several times, he is using anaphora to emphasize his