Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethics in sports
The importance of ethics in sports
The importance of ethics in sports
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethics in sports
Ibrahim Bakir - 13814012 Ronald Duska argues that the claim of employee loyalty towards their respective employers is inappropriate. I will support his argument in this paper. Even though, I might see things from a different take than Duska did, which I will show, I agree with the concept that employee loyalty should not and could not be prioritized over loyalty to the society. Firstly, I will state Duska’s argument along with how I see it can be supported. Then I will consider a couple of possible responses to Duska’s argument and mine, but will show they fail. Duska notes in the beginning of his paper that society is split into two parts: those who see whistleblowers as disloyal bad people and those who see the whistleblowers as brave people …show more content…
They try to create the sense of the team and put whistleblowing in the sense of an athletic match/event where you are the referee and you have the whistle, and they compare whistleblowing in real life as a player calling a foul on his own team. Which is not really true as in this case, if your team (company) is doing some things that will in turn harm more people (minimize or harm the greater good) then it is ethical/moral/permissible to call the foul on your own team. I would also like to give another point of view in this to show that even a soccer match (as an example) and a business are not alike, they still have the same concept with regards to loyalty. As I said before, that since profit is paramount in the business and if you are not helping in a business, they will not keep you and if you are not making money at the company then you will leave them. It is the same in soccer match example, because if you are not helping your team out and you are the reason they are losing matches, they will sit you on the bench or even trade you, while if you are a very good player but your team is bad and you are not fulfilling your potential as you are ‘outgrowing’ the team, then it is completely fine to request being traded or not renewing your contract in order to go play for a better
Despite finding Harley’s article easier to absorb, I will be providing insight and knowledge of Scannell’s article “Dailiness” as I drew interest into his concepts and ideas behind the notion of temporality of everyday life. After Scannell’s reading, I could see myself reflecting different notions of time and ‘media time’, through his concepts of routinisation and the ‘care structures’ of dailiness I became exposed to the recurring cycle we live in.
First I will be telling you about the pressure of being a “whistleblower”. In Fahrenheit 451 the pressure of being a “whistleblower” is so real, everyone is told to rat out everyone who has a book in their household, if they find out they have a book in the home it is burned to the ground. This is related to our society because we are pressured to do what is right, and part of my belief system is to do what is right and to point out what is wrong. For example if someone were to gossip behind their back I would try to stand up and tell them it is wrong and tell the person what the others said
Duska argues that loyalty to a corporation is in fact misguided loyalty, and he further explains that objects of loyalty
I agree with Strawson in saying that we are not truly morally responsible for what we do, in a mental respect at least. Though it suffers from many faults, there are also ways to even more clarify his argument, as I will hope to do so in the following. First off, Strawson states that for someone to be truly morally responsible, we have to understand the points that he has given. The first being that we do what we do because of the way we are. These just states that the things we do and decide are based upon how we are in that moment, in mental respects. For example, when it comes to choosing what to eat between options A or B, I will choose option A because of how I am. But if you were to choose, it would be dependent on the way that you are
Héctor L Carral, a multimedia engineer wrote an article titled Stop Saying Technology is causing Social Isolation for The Huffington Post. The author of the article has a biased option, therefore does not include any research that would refute his argument. Carral states “it’s only obvious to blame them [technology] for some of society’s problems. Carral also states I believe that accusing technology (and, again, especially smartphones) of ruining social interaction and even all kinds of experiences is, to say the least, quite wrong and misguided. There was an obvious division between the commenters who agree with Carral and those who disagree with his argument. The demographics of commentators. From observing the occupations that the commenters listed, it was apparent the people who were against Hector Carral’s article were parents and educators while the people who agreed with his
On December 2,2015 I went to to the Lynnhaven building to receive some feedback on my agreement paper for English 111. It was a very rainy day after running through the rain when I reached the writing center room. There was a yellow note saying that the writing center was in the student center until December 4,2015. After reading the note I ran back in the rain to my car.It was to cold to walk it was raining. As I approached the student center I was told by a security guard that the tutoring lab was located on the third floor. I had walked up three flights of stairs. When I had finally reached the third floor,I walk into the tutoring lab. There were about eight tables, but only four staff members and one student. Amen had approached me asking what did I need help with today. I replied saying that I would like some feedback on my paper for English. He then pointed to the writing table and said “she can assist you with your paper”.
I assert that Armstrong successfully argues that mental states in humans are equivalent to brain states in humans by avoiding the main objections of behaviorism and justifying that all behaviors can be explained through methods of science.
For this essay, I will evaluate the Employee Loyalty Argument derived from ‘Whistleblowing and Employee Loyalty’ by Ronald Duska. I will argue that this Employee Loyalty Argument is deductively valid but is not deductively sound because premise 2 is false. I will justify my claims that premise 2 is false by arguing about how it is rational for employees to expect their companies to recognize and fulfill a duty of loyalty to their employees if the employees also have a duty of loyalty to the companies that employ them.
MWA#2 was our argumentative news paper editorial, and the rhetorical situation was that we were hired by The Daily Lobo to write a piece about an important issue and discuss both sides ultimately contending for one side. We also need to have research on the topic and have cited our sources properly. Our audience for this assignment was to be the readers of The Daily Lobo. I very much enjoyed this assignment as I love to argue and it was very fun choosing any topic I wanted, besides the ones deemed off-limits in class. In an argument there is a process you have to follow and it roughly starts with choosing a topic of debate and then researching it on both sides to compose a more sophisticated piece. Something I learned is that your topic has
Everyone wants to be “happy.” Everyone endeavors to fulfill their desires for their own pleasure. What makes this ironic is, the fact that most don‘t know what the actual definition of happiness is. “In Pursuit of Unhappiness” presents an argument, which states that not everyone will be happy. Darrin McMahon, the article’s author, explores the ways our “relentless pursuit of personal pleasure”(McMahon P.11;S.3) can lead to empty aspirations and impractical expectations, making us sad, and not happy. Rather than working to find the happiness of others, we should all focus on finding what makes ourselves happy. It is easier to find happiness in the little things
Many other businesses may not want to do business as the company was involved with immoral behavior. The unethical business practices of the company will also gain exposure in the media and to the public (Nicol, 2015, n.p). Employees no longer keep unethical activities of the company to themselves. As a whistleblower, they may be perceived as a traitor, but in this case the senior executives are being traitors. They are taking money from immoral behavior and tarnishing the name of the company (Nicol, 2015, n.p).
Very few people can deny that we are living in an unprecedented era of human development, be it good or bad. Even if industrialism can be considered good now, do we want human’s record on the Earth for millions of years to be the smokestacks of a factory? We manipulate everything from the movement of whole bodies of water using dams, to the basic DNA in animals with bioengineering. But has human action’s altered nature so much that it has progressed shifted something as massive as a geological epoch by millions of years? It has according to Charles Mann and Paul Crutzen, who suggested that the Holocene epoch is done, and we are in a new era. They each suggested renaming the epoch Homogenocene and Anthropocene respectively, which are founded
Duboff, R. (1999). Loyal Employees Are a Key Link to a Firm's Value. Journal of Management in Engineering, 9.
Whistleblowing is the action of an employee, who reports any unethical violations they see or come across in the firm. Employees should be encouraged to practise whistleblowing, also, organisations should encourage them to act up against unethical behavior.
In cultures that value loyalty to the employer, a kind of family relationship seems to develop between employer and employee. It is a reciprocal arrangement, which the employer is concerned with assisting the employee to develop to his or her full potential and the employee is concerned about optimizing the welfare of the company. The negative aspect to absolute loyalty to one company is that an employee may stay in one job that he or she has outgrow and may miss out on opportunities to develop in new directions. From the employer’s point of view, the employee may be burdened with employees whose skills no longer match the needs of the company.