More handpicked essays just for you.
Explore the character of romeo in romeo and juliet
Romeo and juliet: development of juliet
Explore the character of romeo in romeo and juliet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet portrays Tybalt as a pugnacious fighter who is often quarreling with his opponents, the Montagues. At the dawn of the book a fight breaks out between a couple of low standing Montagues and Capulets. When Benvolio tries to step in and keep the peace Tybalt attacks him. “What, draw, and talk of peace! I hate the word, As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee” (I,i,80). Tybalt, even through Benvolio’s insistence on peace, attacks him for his hatred of his foe is strong. Later in the act Romeo, Mercutio, and Benvolio are attending the party put on by Lord Capulet. Tybalt eventually spots Romeo dancing with Juliet, and makes to end Romeo for it. It fits, when such a villain is a guest: I’ll not endure him” (I,v,698).
Yet again Tybalt is the aggressor, nearly starting a riot within the Capulet house. Still he is stopped before succeeding with his plan by the Lord Capulet himself. Tybalt may be a fighter, and a good one at that, his aggressive nature will ultimately end with his downfall.
He is prepared to duel, as he believes it is in “honor of my kin, / to strike him dead I hold not a sin” (I.v.58-59). His vicious behavior towards the Montague’s is due to the prolonged feud and not because of a dishonorable act directed towards him. Evidently, Tybalt respects Lord Capulet and the family name. When he goes to inform the Montague’s intrusion, Lord Capulet dismisses the enemy’s presence, ordering Tybalt to “be patient, take no note of him” (I.v.71). Despite Lord Capulet’s calm approach towards the appearance of Romeo, Tybalt`s mind is clouded with hatred and only views Romeo as a threat. Tybalt’s angered reaction at the sight of Romeo, as well as his impulsive decision to warn Lord Capulet in hopes of getting rid of the enemy, is due to the ongoing feud between the Montague’s and Capulet’s and not because of any harm directly caused by
When asked by Benvolio to make peace in the streets, Tybalt bluntly responds,” talk of peace, I hate the word. As I hate hell all Montagues.” This is the attitude of Tybalt throughout the play. He believes he is doing all for the best and uses violence as his tool. He gets angry at the ball with Romeo being there, “villain as a guest,” and believes it best to defend his family’s honor by later taking revenge. When Tybalt finds Romeo, he thinks it best to fight him and when he ends up killing Mercutio he believes he has done his duty by causing Romeo the same hurt he has brought Tybalt, “the injuries that thou hast done me.”
Tybalt is like many other young men his age and is immature. This can be seen in almost every action he makes. One can see his immaturity when he makes impulsive decisions, like when he wrote a letter to Romeo challenging him to a duel. Another immature thing that he does is when he sees a Montague, he automatically sees him/her as a evil villain because of the ancient feud. Tybalt states, “Uncle, this is a Montague, our foe,/ A villain that is hither come in spite/ To scorn at our solemnity this night.” (1.5.69-71). He sees Romeo when at the party and instantly abandons any sense maturity or reason and assumes that that man is a villian, not knowing who he is or having any knowledge about him other than his name. His childish behavior can be seen through out
This aggression is shown when Tybalt insults Romeo (3.1.55-69), calling him “thou art a villain” (3.1.56), and “boy” (3.1.61). In the context of this scene, boy is an insult. Once Romeo shows that he will not fight back (3.1.57-60), Tybalt’s ego takes control. This incident embodies cockiness as Tybalt continually berates Romeo and his friends with insults. He has no real reason to escalate this conflict as he knows that the Prince hates fighting. Despite this, Tybalt shows how cocky and abrasive he is, and perpetrates the tragedy by killing Mercutio and getting killed, himself. Since Tybalt literally beckons Romeo to draw (3.1.62), he further exemplifies cockiness. This results in a tragedy as Tybalt slays Mercutio and is slain by Romeo in turn. Furthermore, Tybalt shows aggression in his aside with Lord Capulet at the party. Tybalt says many threatening things about Romeo, calling him: “a slave” (1.5.52), his “foe” (1.5.59), and a “villain” (1.5.63). In this part of the story, Tybalt shows aggression, by wanting to kill Romeo. This is made evident by him asking his servant to grab his sword (1.5.52-4). Once again, Tybalt shows unnecessary aggression by insulting and threatening Romeo. This moves the plot towards tragedy by establishing a rivalry between Romeo and Tybalt. Later on, this rivalry results in the death of Tybalt and Mercutio. In summation, Tybalt’s aggression and cockiness results in the deaths of himself and Mercutio, making this story a
to look after your child. It was a show of wealth, so that if you have
hid in the woods. We know now that he was consumed by his grief about
Who would be willing to die for their loved ones? Romeo and Juliet would and did. Romeo and Juliet’s love and death brought two families together who could not even remember the origin of their hate. When the parents saw what their children's love for each other, they realized that their fighting had only led to suffering and insoluble conflict. Romeo and Juliet loved each other to an extent that they killed themselves rather than live apart. They did it with no hiatus. Juliet says before she kills herself, “O happy dagger, This is thy sheath. There rust and let me die.”( 5, 3, 182-183) demonstrating how she would rather die than not be with him.
Seething with anger, before Tybalt decides to slay Romeo, Lord Capulet confronts Tybalt and tells him that there’s no need to ruin the festivities for a fight. Disgusted by his weakness, Tybalt angrily hissed back to the Lord, “It fits when such a villain is a guest. I’ll not endure him!” (1.2.75-76), and leaves the party in frustration. Tybalt only understands that if he slew any Montague that steps his path, he’ll be content with killing all them off instead of letting the Lord Capulet’s weakness get in the way about being hostile towards his enemies. With this intention in his mind, being a violent and headstrong man, Tybalt has to restrain himself and then loses the opportunity to slay Romeo. Therefore, he’s angry and will not rest until Romeo is slain. Thus, Tybalt’s motivation shown that, in order to quell the pain and suffering the Capulet’s has suffered, he’ll end the feud between the two families and would not stop until the deed has been
In act one scene three of Romeo and Juliet Lord Capulet states “…She hath not seen the change of fourteen years. Ere we may think her ripe to be a bride.” This means that Juliet is not quite fourteen years old and her father is not sure if she is ready to become a wife and mother. There are many differences between how people marry today, and how they married in the time of Romeo and Juliet. Some of the differences are when the people marry, why people marry, and also the level of maturity people marry at.
Through the flaws in the characterization of his characters, Shakespeare allows their weakness to manipulate and cloud their judgment. This fundamentally leads to the outcome of Romeo and Juliet, with each weakness presenting a conflict that alters the characters fate. Being especially true with the star-crossed lovers, William Shakespeare leads their perfect love into tragedy with these conflicts. In Romeo and Juliet, Juliet, Friar Lawrence, and Tybalt all contribute to conflicts that enhance the plot. From destructive flaws in their characterizations, Juliet, Friar Lawrence, and Tybalt are all consequently controlled by their weakness, therefore affecting the outcome of the play.
Drawn, and talk of peace? I hate the word, as I hate hell, all Montague’s, and thee. Have at thee cowards!” which proves to us that Tybalt is more committed to the feud then Benvolio and the Montague’s. Act 1 scene 5: in this act we look at how Romeo goes to the great. feast in the household of the Capulet’s.
Likewise I mentioned before Tybalt is always trying to stir up trouble with the Montagues. For example he tried to fight Benvolio and while he was trying to Tybalt said this, “What, drawn, and talk of peace? I hate the word, As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee. Have at thee, coward!” (Act
In Act 1 Scene 5 Tybalt makes a comment of, “It fits when such a villain is a guest. I'll not endure him” (Shakespeare 527). This shows his inability to accept anyone as they are rather than how he sees them personally. Then again on the same page he also exclaims, “Tis he, that villain Romeo.” Again Tybalt goes onto claim everyone as villain as he sees fit. He has a shortness of temper that can be seen quite easily with just these two quotes from the play.
Romeo, as a character, is shown to be a thoughtful person, but sharing his thoughts aloud does not always help the situation.Trying to have Tybalt understand his motives, he says,“Tybalt, the reason that I have for loving you helps me overcome the anger I should really feel at such an insult. I’m not a peasant. Therefore, good-bye. I see you don’t really know me”(3.1.58). Having tried to get Tybalt to not fight him, Romeo states that they should instead love, instead of hate and fight. Although, this does not really help his situation that he’s stuck in. Unknowing to him, he had caused the doom of his own best friend and didn’t really think of the way something could go wrong if it didn’t involve himself. If Romeo had only just gone along
When we, as a species, are in need of help and advice, we tend to turn to authoritative figures’ opinions, such as a doctor, teacher, or specialist, for help, in fear that our own decisions reveal to be dissatisfactory. In the play, Romeo and Juliet, by William Shakespeare (1564–1616), this can be seen from Romeo’s and Juliet’s numerous pleas and demands of the Franciscan Friar Lawrence’s help and guidance; however, the outcomes of the Holy Friar’s plans were not advantageous, in fact, it was what directly led to their tragic ends. One oughtn’t to gamble so much on advisors since these authoritative figures are human too; therefore, they are also subject to mistakes and such pressures, as nobody is perfect. They can (are able to) convince society and individuals of their ways by using their title and supposed wisdom, consciously and not, to manipulate, mislead, deceive, and take advantage of others. Lastly, it is ethical to pursue second and third opinions, as opposed to simply relying on one source, because one’s autonomy may be suppressed when engaging with so-called “superiors”. Due to the previous reasons, it must be recognized that when seeking valuable guidance – no matter physical, mental, or emotional – one ought not to rely solely on the advice and feedback of one or few seemingly knowledgeable adults and even respected members of the specific expertise.