Rome And Carthage Similarities

447 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Role of the Senate in Ancient Rome

The differences between the governments in Rome and Carthage are as follows:

Type of Government
Rome is a republic, and runs the republican type of government in which citizens can vote and elect those representatives who make laws for them.
Carthage is an aristocracy, and runs the aristocratic type of government.

Government Structure
Rome: The government of Rome is controlled by two groups, and structured as follows:
The Patricians
The Senate: This is the highest body of government in Rome which is comprised of three hundred (300) upper class aristocrats and wealthy landowners. The senate is responsible for lawmaking, as well as the supervision of foreign affairs and treasury. The term of service is life-long.
The Consuls: These are the …show more content…

The censor conducts a heat count of Rome every five (5) years.
The Magistrates
The Praetors: These are the eight (8) judges who administered Roman law.
The Quaestors: These are the twenty (20) officials who managed financial and administrative matters.
The Aediles: These are the sixteen (16) officials who looked after particular matters of government such as public buildings, food supply and games.
The Plebeians
The Tribunes: These are the representatives of the ordinary people comprised of 10 members (primarily farmers, artisans and merchants called Plebeians).
The Assembly: This comprises of the ordinary people but limited to only the adult male citizens.

Carthage: The government of Carthage is structured as follows:
The Suffets: This is the most powerful body of government in Carthage. It is comprised of two (2) civilian individuals who oversees matters of judicial concerns, or civil lawsuits. This is equivalent to the consuls in Rome.
The Senate: The Carthaginian senate is composed of about three hundred (300) influential citizens whose membership is for life. The senate is responsible for advising the suffets on government matters including diplomatic, military, financial

Show More
Related

  • Pros And Cons Of The Roman Constitution

    749 Words  | 2 Pages

    The roman republic constitution was a set of guidelines and principles passed down through precedent, the roman republic instead of creating a democracy such as that the Athenians created, a monarchy which was previously being used by previous roman rulers and an aristocracy which Sparta used, the Constitution combined elements of all three of these governments to create a combined government known as “Senatus populusque que romanus” (S.P.Q.R) this meant “the senate and the roman people”. The Roman magistrates were elected officials during the period of the Roman kingdom, the ‘king’ (although the Romans preferred not to be called a king and instead a rex) of Rome was the principal executive magistrate, his power was absolute similar to that of a tsar

    Read More

  • Influence Of Ancient Romans On Us Government

    1092 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Roman Republic can be seen as a template for how the United States Government was formed, and still to this day consists of. The First influence that the Romans had on our government was their idea for a republic. They, our country as well, wanted their people to have a vote on who would represent them in government. The U.S. representative type of government was influenced by this. Today we vote for the people representing us in our Senate, House of Representatives, and our President. One of the main influences that the Ancient Romans had on the U.S. Government was the idea of the division of power. Today we have executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. The Ancient Romans had a very similar set-up. In Rome when organizing a government, there were many different styles between monarchies, the Senate that was the aristocracy, and the voice of democracy in the people. These acted as their different branches of government. As the U.S Government has an executive branch which consists of our President and Vice President, the Romans had counsels which acted as executive leaders for a year, and controlled the military (“The Roman Republic”). The Ancient Romans also obtained a Senate, similar to our government. In Rome, it was 300 members of the wealthy and self-serving. Today, there are career senators, and elite men in society. This is the legislative branch of our government that has been derived from the Ancient Romans. Also within the legislative branch of the Romans, they had numerous assemblies like that of the U.S. Government’s House of Representatives, based on where each member lives. Our judicial branch was based off of the Roman’s Praeto...

    Read More

  • Augustus And The Senate Essay

    447 Words  | 1 Pages

    The senate was a collective of the state’s best people, by tradition chosen from the aristocracy. Their role was to advise the elected magistrates. In practice, they came to be the collective of former magistrates. Their authority lay in their advice became like orders to serving magistrates. Their authority lay in their prestige and their experience. The roman senate was basically the governing body of men in Rome. It consisted of few hundred members, all who had to have property or money.

    Read More

  • Rome to America

    1555 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Roman Republic, was a government, governed by an intricate constitution, which was based on the idea of separation of powers. The Roman Republic, began in 509 B.C, after the end of the Roman Monarchy and lasted for over 450 years. The constitution of the Roman Republic was highly influenced by the struggle of power between the rich families, the patricians, and other Romans who were not from famous or rich families, the plebeians. Their government was divided into three main sections, very much like the Legislative Branch, Executive, Branch, and Judicial Branch. Nowadays, the Senate and assembly resemble the Legislative Branch. In the Roman Republic, the Senate was the most powerful group. The Senate passed all laws and collected taxes. The second part of this branch, was the assembly, and the assembly was elected by the Romans from the plebeian class. The assembly elected consuls, tribunes (representatives from the plebeian class), and made laws. All members of the Senate were part of the patrician class and at the head of the Senate were two consuls. The Consuls controlled the Roman army and in order to become a consul, you had to be elected by a majority of all the citizens in Rome. The consuls, are like our president and the Executive Branch. Although the method of separation of powers came from the Roman Republic, that is not all that came from the Roman Republic that became part of the United States...

    Read More

  • Rome in The Age of Augustus

    2200 Words  | 5 Pages

    414-443. Antony Kamm The Romans: An Introduction Second Edition, Published in 2008, pages 47, 93. Dio Cassius Roman History (as presented in Antiquity 2). Augustus (Octavian) Res Gestae Divi Augusti (as presented in Antiquity 2). Eck, The Age of Augustus, p.45 (as presented in Antiquity 2).

    Read More

  • Essay On Defensive Imperialism

    2084 Words  | 5 Pages

    Those elected to leadership were admitted in the Senate where public affairs were discussed. Power divisions during the time were complicated and no single person was entitled to too much power. Tribunes, which comprised of ten men, were put into place in order to monitor the Senate and ensure that the interests of the people were protected. However, this system began to fall apart since certain individuals wanted to have more power than others. Such persons started to compete for that power, and use it to exploit Rome’s politics. Subsequently, competition for power led to civil wars that paved the way to the growth of a one-man leadership. Gradually, dictatorship replaced republic government, and when Augustus rose to power, he became the sole and undisputed leader of Rome.

    Read More

  • Evolution Of Voting Laws In Ancient Rome

    1477 Words  | 3 Pages

    Patricians were the richer people in the world at the time and owned a considerably large amounts of lands. Since they had large amounts of land, which allowed them to gain power, they were deemed patricians, They were the ones who governed the city from the Senate. The Senate was the empire’s governing body during the republic and were voted into office annually by a large group of citizens and also the equites, or men who had property. Equites were people lower in ranking under the patricians (Ancient Roman Politics, Crystalinks). All the social and political power was mostly in the hands of ancient families who are: the Cornelii family, the family of the Caesars, and the Aemilii. The Senate’s power and all other things were lost under the emperors, but the patrician families still held public opinion. The Roman’s sons were sent to be great soldiers so after they became Roman citizens, they were enlisted on their first military campaign. On their return from service in the military, the son of a patrician usually always entered into politics, and sometimes the sons of equites did the same. The young man first stood for election as an aedile, also known as a city councilor. The aediles looked after the corn supply and public amusements. They were basically there just to run the fruitless jobs that were needed. Then the next office that could be achieved was that of the quaestor, also known as the secretary of the

    Read More

  • Roman vs. Greek Civilization

    323 Words  | 1 Pages

    Eventually, however, the Greek government became democratic. Rome, on the other hand, was a republic that elected its officials, and common citizens were not allowed as many opportunities as Athenians to participate in matters of the state. While Greece had branches of government to represent citizens, Rome implemented branches of government to represent different components of society. For example, Rome had authorities to supervise public works projects, administer justice, supervise recreational activities and conduct a census (text). Rome, who, like Greece, was a polytheistic society, also appointed a priest for life who was in charge of the entire state's religion.

    Read More

  • American Constitutionalism Essay

    1880 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rather than creating a government that was primarily a democracy like the Athenians, an aristocracy or a monarchy, the Roman constitution mixed these three elements, therefore creating three separate branches of government. The executives served as monarchical element, the Senate as the aristocratic and finally, the Assembly as the democratic element. A complex set of checks and balances existed between these three branches. The Executive branch enforced the law, and presided over the Senate and the legislative assemblies. They had supreme civil and military authority and held office for one year, then entered the Senate for life unless impeached. The Senate was a collection of citizens who served as the legislative branch of the government as well as an advisory body. Lastly, there was the Assembly of Tribes, which contained all citizens. Romans believed that authority comes from the people and the people 's consent is necessary, therefore, the Assembly was responsible for approved or rejected laws, decided issues of war and peace, and elected executive magistrates. Besides check and balance and separation of powers, many other concepts from Roman republicanism shaped American constitutionalism. The power to veto and filibusters, the practice of term limit, impeachment, and regularly scheduled elections were all included in the Roman’s unwritten

    Read More

  • Essay On Democracy And Athenian Democracy

    1230 Words  | 3 Pages

    They were originally established with the intent to give most of the power to the people. The power to vote for the leaders and settle issues professionally. Both forms of governments had senates, which represented the people and helped the nations succeed, by not allowing one person to gain complete power like a king or emperor would. They both did not want kings ruling the entire kingdom, so they gave the people more power by allowing them a voice with some form of voting. Power was also given to representatives and officials in the republic and democracy. The Athenians were able to vote for legislation and bills, while the Romans elected officials to vote on the people’s behalf. The Roman’s established an aristocratic republic controlled by only wealthy people, so the power was not shared equally in society. On the contrary the Athenians allowed anyone to be in government as long as they were a male citizen. A form of the executive branch emerged from both systems; Rome had two consuls elected by council and Athens had a council of five hundred men. They both had different regulations on who was able to be a citizen. The Athenians only granted citizenship to native born males, while the Romans gave half citizenship to Italians allowing them to have full rights, but were not able to

    Read More

  • The Roman Senate In The Roman Republic

    1161 Words  | 3 Pages

    (notes) The tribes were "the Ramnes, Tities, and Lucres. In addition the three tribes were further divided into ten units each which were called curiae. It possessed a number of responsibilities. It had the power to approve or disapprove legislation from the king. (notes) However, it couldn 't create new legislation. (notes) The Curiate also had religious functions. Before a new king was crowned the Curiate would check the auspices by examining the entrails of an animal. (notes) If the entrails were good the new king would be crowned that day, but if the entrails were bad then the coronation would be delayed until a day when they had good entrails. (notes) The Curiate also performed animal sacrifices but the rituals changed over time and became simpler. (notes) It was also involved with private law. (notes) "[It] witnessed wills and adoptions." When the Curiate voted they did so by curiae. "Each Curiae [had] one vote, determined by the majority vote of its members." The Curiate couldn 't represent the Roman people and eventually faded in importance. (notes) Was largely replaced by the Centuriate

    Read More

  • The Roman Republic

    939 Words  | 2 Pages

    This new Republican government, which was administered by the consuls, was not the easiest to transform. Because of the expansion in Italy, the government began to initiate political institutions. These institutions enforced laws and provided authority which were very similar to imperium. “The Romans had a clear concept of executive authority, embodied in their word imperium, or “the right to command” (Spielvogel 117). Since the Romans were very sensible in their actions, they made and implemented them only as needed. The most essential positions held were the few elected magistrates and the two consuls who were “chosen annually, administered the government and led the Roman army into battle” (Spielvogel 117). If the consul was otherwise occupied, either a dictator or praetor would assume responsibility for the time being.

    Read More

  • Difference Between Greek and Roman Warfare

    410 Words  | 1 Pages

    The political system of both Roman empires was based on virtue and the republic was founded with the Senate as the center. The magistrates were elected annually and also had control of the armies. The key to Roman superiority was the patriotism and training and drills.

    Read More

  • Carthaginian Power

    758 Words  | 2 Pages

    1). The Carthaginian government had some outward similarities to the government of Roman Republic. It had two chief magistrates, a council of elders, and an assembly, which could compare with the Roman consuls, senate, and comitia respectively (Morey, 1901, Carthage and Rome section, para. 3). However, in contrast to the Roman government, the real governing power in Carthage was exercised by a few wealthy families; also, the command power of the Carthaginian army was placed in the hands of one permanent leader.

    Read More

  • Carthage And Rome: The First Punic War

    557 Words  | 2 Pages

    Carthage and Rome were very similar in their desire to be in power. Where they differed was in their military skills. Carthage was a naval force, while Rome was an army force. Carthage used their wealth to increase their holdings in the area, Carthage had a strong naval force and due to their location on the coast they were successful merchants.

    Read More

More about Rome And Carthage Similarities

Open Document