Author, Alain de Botton once said, “Intimacy is the capacity to be rather weird with someone - and finding that that's ok with them” (Intimacy). Relationships are founded on an understanding and connection found between two people. Intimacy is often treated as a should be hidden away aspect of relationships. Alan Gillis and Vona Groarke use their poetry to tell the struggles and triumphs of everyday relationships. Both of them do not shy away from portraying the natural and mundane acts that occur in life such as describing the romance and intimacy between people. However, both of them choose to portray romantic intimacy in their own way. In their poetry, Alan Gillis portrays romantic intimacy directly and Vona Groarke depicts romantic intimacy …show more content…
indirectly. Romantic Intimacy is a crucial aspect of Alan Gillis and Vona Groarke’s poetry as they depict the everyday romance of the speakers of their poems. In portraying these relationships, Gillis shows how intimacy can be shown in everyday life, rather than an aspect concept. His use of imagery, especially when describing the intimacy between two individuals makes the images feel authentic and believable in telling of these romantically intimate situations. As seen in “Among the Barley,” Gillis uses physical description to show the sexual and physicality of the speaker and his or her partner’s relationship: “And when she bared her chamomile thighs, / her red-toed sunblaze, my body became/ barely fields on fire” (Among the barley 23). In these lines, he uses the description of the body of both the speaker and his or her partner in describing the speaker’s physical reaction to his or her partner’s body. While he does not censor the topic of his poem, he does use the imagery of the household places to connect the intimacy to each part of the relationship’s life. Looking at the relationship in the poem, “Among the barley,” Gillis uses dualities to compare the different sides of their relationship. In “Among the Barley,” he wrote, “So let our love be watertight and let the breeze blow through it…let us be truth, let us be dare…” (Among the barley 25). Relationships have their mountains to climb and the smooth roads. Gillis acknowledges these variants in his poem, and in doing so, he shows the romance of the relationship in a direct light. In his poetry, Gillis does not portray an unrealistic example of love, but rather shows how love can exist in a typical relationship in a direct portrayal. Although not directly speaking of Gillis’s poems primarily focused upon in this essay, Cronin wrote in his review, discussing how Gillis describes romance in two of his poems, “When Gillis takes on themes of affection or deep feeling in poems like 'Niamh' and 'Purgatory' , there is almost invariably an edge to it as if the consoling communions of desire were always subject to the disruptive pessimism of envy, jealousy, malice and uncertainty” (Cronin 112). Despite showing intimacy in his poem, he also shows the darker sides of relationships. Gillis’s “Among of the Barley” does not glorify the relationship of the speaker of the poem and his or her partner. Throughout the entire poem, he depicts the romance and intimacy in a humane tone such as discussing when they were to make love, “we meant to make love on the stairs,/ the deskchair, the windowstill…” (Among the barley 25). In using explicit details of the intimacy his poetry, he depicts direct intimacy in “Among the Barley”. Not only has Gillis displayed intimacy directly in “Among the Barley,” Gillis does this as well in his poem, “In Whose Blent Air All Our Compulsions meet”.
As discussed in Quinn’s review the poem, "In Whose Blent Air All Our Compulsions meet," Quinn notes the lyrically sound of the verses that resemble old traditional English: “in a sequence like 'In Whose Blent Air All Our Compulsions Meet', one encounters lines that sound like echoes of an older lyric tradition in English verse” (Quinn 138). In having such a lyrical sound in his poetry, Gillis's language echoes the old writers of English Poetry and gives a classical feel to his poem while still allowing the portrayal of direct intimacy in his poetry. That kind of classical connects the transition of having elegant language while speaking of intimacy in a very plain style. In that combination of language and topic, readers are able to see this elegance in the writing of this love, while also, seeing the everyday life depiction in his poetry. Quinn notes in his article, “The marvel of the poem is the original combination of registers to write about the most unoriginal of subjects, lovers out for a walk on a country lane. Slowness and speed, huckster patter and ancient lyric sweetness — Gillis wants all the old pleasures of poetry, along with the shock of slang that seems almost ahead of the curve” (Quinn 138). This poem uses an infamous image of two people in love going on a walk, but uses current slang and language to add a …show more content…
different interpretation of the cliché to this romantic scene. In doing this, he allows the image to turn into a faster paced scene, found more currently in the present day. By adding in this slang, he adds small shifts to the old style language the poem in written in and adds flair to the poem's images, especially in displaying scenes that imply or show intimacy in his poetry. Gillis does not shy away from depicting an image of this couple in bed when he writes, “Going for a pop song, going to pot/ in a Homebase bed of jasmine and bergamot:/ when you reach over, and your shadow spews/ over my bent of mind, I want to do with you” (In whose bent air p.63). By his stunning use of language in his poetry, he is able to make an unique style to his poetry that captures the direct romantic intimacy of everyday life. In looking at Alan Gillis’s poetry, Justin Quinn describes Gillis's writing, “The reader's exhilaration comes from the quick succession of surprising, humorous and sometimes outrageous imagery” (Quinn 138).
While the Quinn was not specifically talking directly about “Among the Barley”, this description used does represent Gillis's typical work of humor and imagery that supports his use of those in describing the romantic intimacy in the poem. By describing this couple in the way that he does, Gillis is able to normalize acts of romantic intimacy in his poetry: “then you reach over, your eyes pursed and finite,/ and blow out the candle. Here comes the night” (In whose bent air p.63). Before this last line, the couple is shown lying in the bed together, and with this darkness that encloses them after she blows out the candle, hints at the intimacy that possible could follow this poem. This line shows the closeness of this couple and the intimate love the openly share within the poem. While looking at the relationships found in “In whose bent air,” Gillis’s lines in this poem shows the relationship as a very natural one and united one: “Put your clothes on, she said, you’re not dead/ yet and we must take the air, and so on./ Yah de yah de yah. And so, we take the air” (In whose bent air p. 60). These lines depict the togetherness that these two feel as they are initially together when she tells the speaker to put their clothes on again and reminds them that they are alive.
Gillis wrote how the two must take the air, and therefore, they take it, highlighting the fact that these two are united in doing this. Such as in “Among the barley,” where the couple had meant to make love in a numerous of places and their relationship had fallen apart, Cronin’s description of how Gillis uses both sides of intimate relationships accurately depicts how Gillis enforces that no relatinships is perfect and each have their own flaws, showing that kind of intimacy in a humanized setting. “dreaming a sentence in the cells of love” (In whose bent air p. 65). In not hiding the darker sides of romance, the “cells of love” deals with entrapment possibly felt by one or both of the lovers in this poem. Unlike in Gillis’s two poems, Vona Groarke approaches depicting intimacy indirectly throughout her poems, “Intimacy” and “X”. Groarke’s details enhance the imagery found in her poetry, creating a closer read for her readers. In describing her use of houses and detail in her fourth collection, Juniper Street, Johnston wrote in his review, “This is typical of Groarke's meticulous attention to detail, to formal arrangement in her well-wrought poems, here extending
Love, partnership and commitment have been the subjects of a multitude of novels, plays poems, movies and great works of art. Throughout these works, the image of love and commitment in love have taken many different forms. Today, we easily recognize symbols of commitment in love to be items such as hearts, wedding bands, roses, etc. However, in literature, especially, more abstract and creative symbols of commitment to a loved one are often present. Additionally, the symbols of devotion that exist in literature do not always involve romantic love as opposed to many movies, painting and sculptures. For example, in the short story, “Saving Sourdi” by May-Lee Chai, symbols of loyalty to a loved one manifest between two sisters. In opposition to symbols of loyalty existing in a platonic manner as it does in “Saving Sourdi,” Peter Meinke’s “The Cranes,” provides symbols of commitment in an amorous relationship.
Hacker describes a lighthearted connection between two individuals that is extremely physically intimate and exciting, but lacks emotional connection. Although the speaker recognizes the lack of emotions associated with this relationship, she is content with this situation. Marilyn Hacker plays with enjambment to illustrate visually this separation between these two individuals. Using this literary device, the breaks and interruptions of sentences causes the reader to be pulled into her world, feeling the jarring, yet intoxicating separation the speaker feels.Next, the speaker says she is often “dazed” (2). The usage of this word denotes imagery of being dazzled and stunned by light. The obvious positive nature of this word shows how happy the speaker is in this relationship at this point in time. The duo is described as feeling “speechless and amazed” (5). These words imply a very exciting new relationship. They are so enamored with the physical part of their encounters that they have no words to be said, and no words need to be said. This ineffability implies a relationship that does not grow emotionally, but strictly physically. For two parties to be emotionally invested in each other they must appreciate each other's personalities. This is not something that is currently present in the pair described in the poem. The speaker also tells the reader that she is filled with wonder and astonishment. These positive adjectives tell us that at this point in time, the speaker is in fact happy and content with her current
The speaker begins the poem an ethereal tone masking the violent nature of her subject matter. The poem is set in the Elysian Fields, a paradise where the souls of the heroic and virtuous were sent (cite). Through her use of the words “dreamed”, “sweet women”, “blossoms” and
Rodriguez “would dishonor [] intimacy by holding onto a particular language and calling it [] family language” (Rodriguez 41). Just as Rodriguez realized the importance of “public identity” over time, he realized that intimacy is not felt and remembered with a bunch of words, but instead with feelings, memories, and the times spent together. Rodriguez recalled a few days prior to the death of his grandmother. He states that within all the conversations they had, he can simply only say what she had said to him. However, he argues that the intimacy was not simply between what she had said but the way she said it. It was the voice, the scents, the noises that was reminiscing along with her memories. Rodriguez emphasizes that it’s not about what you say that makes you have “intimate” relationships; instead it’s the people that are involved in making those relationships strong and
Love and affection is an indispensable part of human life. In different culture love may appear differently. In the poem “My god my lotus” lovers responded to each other differently than in the poem “Fishhawk”. Likewise, the presentation of female sexuality, gender disparity and presentation of love were shown inversely in these two poems. Some may argue that love in the past was not as same as love in present. However, we can still find some lovers who are staying with their partners just to maintain the relationship. We may also find some lovers having relationship only because of self-interest. However, a love relationship should always be out of self-interest and must be based on mutual interest. A love usually obtains its perfectness when it develops from both partners equally and with same affection.
First and foremost, many people can attest that when there are serious issues within a relationship the ability to communicate with ease and openness can diminish. Such was the case with Hemingway’s main characters. The American man and the girl immediately display a relationship with distance. The first object of conversation when they arrive to the station is what to drink. As a woman brings their drinks out she observes that, instead of looking at the American or conversing with him, the girl is looking off at the hill line. Moreover, when the couple does speak they are merely talking versus communicating. Lori Gordon opened her article on the art of relationships with this statement, “Confusion. Hurt. Silence. Missed opportunity. It is one of the ironies of modern life that many couples today are living together as complete strangers”(Intimacy: The Art of Relationships). Gordon is referring to how couples begin to withdraw emotionally from the relationship and into other activities; which, is evident in ...
Although in an ideal world it would fit that our lover was a soulmate, most rational people would agree that this is not always the case. Tom Wayman's "Wayman in Love" details an encounter between a man and a woman that, although devoid of true love, the man feels has been a long time coming. Conversely, Carol Jane Bangs' "Touching Each Others Surface's" is the remembrance of a love that is no longer alive. Both of these poems explore the topic of physical encounters that possess no feeling. However, they do so from opposite ends of the spectrum. While "Wayman in Love" is the story of a one-night stand (and therefore devoid of real emotion), "Touching Each Other's Surfaces" is a tale of love long past.
This passage marks the first of several types of love, and gives us an intuitive
Love is a concept that has puzzled humanity for centuries. This attachment of one human being to another, not seen as intensely in other organisms, is something people just cannot wrap their heads around easily. So, in an effort to understand, people write their thoughts down. Stories of love, theories of love, memories of love; they all help us come closer to better knowing this emotional bond. One writer in particular, Sei Shōnagon, explains two types of lovers in her essay "A Lover’s Departure": the good and the bad.
Almost everyone has experienced the dread and joy of having romantic feelings for another person; the butterflies that swirl around their stomach, their heightened heartbeat, and the all too familiar fight or flight instinct; even for those who feel platonic attraction to others still feel this way. However, these nerves shake off once one of the two people take the leap of faith towards the other, whether it be saying ‘hello’ or confessing how they really feel. Unfortunately for most people, they never risk talking to the person, and miss their opportunity of having a loving relationship. This idea is the main subject of Katherine Bell’s short story “The Casual Car Pool.” Through the relationships of the symbolic characters, the author argues
This poem has captured a moment in time of a dynamic, tentative, and uncomfortable relationship as it is evolving. The author, having shared her thoughts, concerns, and opinion of the other party's unchanging definition of the relationship, must surely have gone on to somehow reconcile the situation to her own satisfaction. She relishes the work entailed in changing either of them, perhaps.
During the 18th century, two great companions, William Wordsworth, collaborated together to create Lyrical Ballad, one of the greatest works of the Romantic period. The two major poems of Lyrical Ballad are Wordsworth’s “Lines Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey” and Coleridge’s “Frost at Midnight.” Even though these two poems contain different experiences of the two speakers, upon close reading of these poems, the similarities are found in their use of language, the tone, the use of illustrative imagery to fascinate the reader’s visual sense and the message to their loved ones. The speaker of “Lines Composed of a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey” is Wordsworth himself. He represents Romanticism’s spiritual view of nature.
In the first stanza, the poet seems to be offering a conventional romanticized view of Nature:
Some people believe that opposites attract. Others believe that people who are more similar will have a better relationship. Some prefer relationships with older people, and some prefer them with younger people. Jhumpa Lahiri, author of the short story collection Interpreter of Maladies, explores the dynamic of relationships in her works. In her short story “Interpreter of Maladies” a married woman confesses a secret to a man she barely knows. In her story “This Blessed House” a couple fights over the religious relics they find in their new home. While one reads Lahiri’s stories, a theme begin to emerge that shows the woman of the relationship behaving like an adolescent and the man behaving like her father due to the internalized idea of
People often assume a facade when they are suffering to spare the feelings of those they love, particularly following the dissolvement of romance. This desire to spare others stems from selflessness and love, despite the pain that accompanies a separation. Relationships and their endings are composed of complex aspects and feelings, difficult to be understood without personally suffering through it. Through language, perspective, and allusions, poets Sandra Cisneros and Jacques Prévert show how two women react outwardly and inwardly to their lovers leaving in “Monsieur Mon Ami” and “Déjeuner du Matin”, respectively, as well as how their actions contradict their emotions. Language in poetry, such as diction and syntax, allows for poets to convey