Roethkes And The Tone Of My Papa's Waltz

753 Words2 Pages

Introduction
The professional explication by John McKenna “Roethke’s Revisions and the Tone of
My Papa’s Waltz” will be briefly summarized and critiqued in this essay. McKenna’s main
assertion is that Roethke intentionally wrote this poem with just the right balance of positive and
negative imagery to leave the overall tone open to interpretation by the reader. While McKenna
mentions the wide variation in critics’ interpretations regarding the tone of the poem being
positive, negative, or a potent mix of both, his primary basis for his conclusion comes from
comparing and contrasting two original holographic manuscripts and the final published version
of the poem.
Brief Summary
McKenna’s states his thesis, “The holograph manuscripts… …show more content…

Based on the change from girl to boy,
the critic concludes that the rough housing was more suited for a boy than a girl. After the
second stanza, the focus shifts towards the mother and away from the father. This is seen because
the author includes the reaction of the mom being disapproving. This change in focus also points
towards the parents being different. Addressing the third stanza, McKenna discovers the changes
made from forehead to right ear. This change creates a positive tone and alludes more of a formal
dance. The fourth stanza received the most revisions and it was intentional according to
McKenna. One of the changes was kept to beat. This one word created a total turn from positive
to negative tone. McKenna noted the revisions of the title built one that included the right
amount of texture for an emotionally complex vignette. In his conclusion of the poem, McKenna
concludes that the emotions of the speaker added to his belief that the poem’s tone to be a
combination of both.
Critical Interaction
McKenna felt the need to write on this poem, because he thought other people were
interpreting it wrong. He stated and explained that the poem is not one with a negative tone or …show more content…

It is easy to understand McKenna’s case,
because he does in a logical manner. An application that could be drawn from this critic is to use
other sources besides the text but it must relate to the text. The goal of the author is to state an
argument that includes the poem having two tones and convince others of it.
A strength from McKenna’s writing is that of expanding on text sources. The way he uses
evidence is easy to understand and follow. However, McKenna makes the statement that the tone
of the poem is two opposite tones. This is hard to trust, because the poem doesn’t shift in a way
that would reflect that. McKenna is using more assumptions from the text to prove his thinking
rather than letting them stand for what they were written.
Conclusion
The critic achieved a part of his goal. McKenna offered an impressive argument with
accurate evidence. However, the author did not complete his goal of convincing me to see as he
sees. I do agree that the poem has a negative tone, but I do not agree that the poem includes a
tone that is positive. In the section that refers to the mother not being able to unfrown,

Open Document