More handpicked essays just for you.
2nd amendment of the united states of america
Right to bear arms, preambal
2nd amendment of the united states of america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: 2nd amendment of the united states of america
The second amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, and it protects the right to keep and bear arms. With this law, people are permitted to own firearms for self defense or protection whenever they are physically or offensively attacked by other people. It does not corrupt protection power of citizens to save their selves and live a life free of harm. It does not carelessly provide the right of a person to possess firearms. This law enforces a requirement of firearm license, which can only be purchased after applicants undergo a background check that specifically checks the presence or a possible history of committed criminal cases. The Right to Bear Arms definitely excludes citizens who have a history of criminal acts against the community
... the Second Amendment provides a collective right to bear arms for individuals associated with an organized military force. This court’s ruling was the first to ever favor the right to bear arms for an individual and has changed how states regulate gun ownership.
The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states "a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The Second Amendment states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This statement basically means that people should be able to own guns for their own security and that right should not be taken away. The Second Amendment was added to the Constitution because the creators of the Constitution wanted to make sure that it protected basic rights, including the right to bear arms. It was also added to the Constitution because shortly after it was ratified, James Madison wanted to give more power to the state militia and to give more power to the people to give them the ability to fight back against the Federalists and the tyrannical government they were creating. After fighting off the British, the Second Amendment was created to give citizens the opportunity to fight back against controlling government and protect themselves with their own weapons.
The second amendment is made up of two clauses, the prefatory clause and the Operative Clause. The Prefatory clause states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State...?” The Operative Clause states, “...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” There is often many discord between whether the second amendment is talking about two separate groups, the militia or the people. The prefatory clause in my opinion announces the purpose for which the right was created, but doesn't suggest the main reason that the right to bear arms is valued. According to Justice Stevens, the prefatory clause stated that the purpose was to protect the state’s interest in maintaining an armed militia to
This essay will discuss the pros and cons of gun control. Some U.S. States have already adopted some of these gun control laws. I will be talking about the 2nd amendment, public safety, home safety, and do gun control laws really control guns. I hope after you have read this you will be more educated, and can pick your side of the gun control debate. So keep reading and find out more about the gun control laws that the federal and some state governments want to enforce on U.S. Citizens.
Is it any coincidence that the states with the loosest gun laws in America tend to contribute to the highest amount of national gun deaths and injuries? This is one of the main questions we should be asking when deciding what is best for our country and its citizens. Although gun control has been an ongoing issue, certain events like the Virginia Tech, Sandy Hook, and the Aurora, Colorado mass shootings have increased our attention to this topic. Although I believe that Americans possess the right to own a firearm, I believe there should be detailed screening and control systems to keep guns out of the wrong hands, to prevent more gun violence from happening in the future.
The Second Amendment “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This timeless phrase, the Second Amendment of the United States’ Constitution, is an enduring example of the principles and ideals that our country was founded on. With this statement, the founders of this country explicitly and perpetually guaranteed the American individual the right to keep and bear arms. An incomparably crucial element of this country‘s origins, the Second Amendment and the rights it guarantees have proved vital to the growth and success of our nation. The Second Amendment has often been the subject of debate, and over the years varying speculations and interpretations of its intended meaning have forced this significant phrase into a controversial spotlight.
Imagine being forced to crawl and hide with gunshots near your ears. Imagine seeing people shot to death in front of you. Believe it or not, scenes like these occur on a daily basis in America. In the first 320 days of this year there were 325 mass shootings in the nation, defined as where there were more than four victims at each shooting. (Mass Shooting Tracker). This egregious level of violence is unacceptable in a developed country and major reform in gun legislation to improve the tragic state of public safety in the United States today. Although critics of expanded gun legislation incorrectly argue that easier access to guns increases safety and that gun laws are unconstitutional, it is imperative that America adopts stronger gun control legislation because heightened regulations reduce crime rates and have successfully improved public safety in other developed countries. In a country like the United States, no one
The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The Founding Fathers included this in the Bill of Rights because they feared the Federal Government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation or individuals.
Today the Second Amendment is in the media more and more due to the recent up rise in crimes with firearms. Every person seems to have an opinion on whether our Second Amendment should be removed or it should not ever be touched. “A free people ought not only be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunitions to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include the government.” (George Washington) The Second Amendment of the constitution reads "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Today the actual meaning of the second amendment is still not fully clear. If you were to ask multiple people the definition of the second amendment, you would receive a different one from each person. Also, you would be able to determine whether they are pro or anti-gun
The second amendment says, "A well regulated militia being necessary to security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." The second amendment was made for two things. It is there for first, to guarantee the individuals right to have arms for self-defense and self-preservation. The second reason is related to the militia. The right to carry a handgun for self-protection is a privilege of citizenship. The confusion is the right of the state or the individual. The regulation of handguns could be looked at as unconstitutional. The amendment is for the people and not the state.
In today 's world, America has become a terrible place full of crime and murder. Most of these crimes have to do with guns, or some kind of shootings. The good citizens of our country need away to defend themselves from crime acts like that. No matter what, criminals will find a way to get guns in the country just like they do drugs. Also, one of the main reasons we are able to keep enemies out of our country is because of our rights to bear arms. In order to keep our country as close to safe as possible, the Second Amendment must stay in place.
The Second Amendment of the United States protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It was adopted on December 15, 1791 along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. The United States Government should not infringe on those rights by the enforcement of gun control against law-abiding citizens. Gun control does not reduce crime, does not stop criminals from obtaining guns, and does not address the real issue of violent crime. There is no evidence that gun control affects the crime rate.
Carrying firearms can have both negative and positive effect. Whenever I have ask, is it good carry to gun? Is it necessary to gun? Is it really saving lives? Should we allow everyone to have gun? I get confuse, answering these questions because I have both pros and cons about guns. I believe carrying firearms should not be allow. Especially to those who don’t have good background history. If guns only carries by police I think we would have less crime. Second Amendment explains right to have firearms. It is for saving lives, but now days we are more losing our love ones lives. Mass shooting and target killing is increasing in world wide. Why? Because getting firearms is a lot easier. In addition, we heard in news that person was mental ill
An opposing argument is that any American citizen can buy a gun, no questions asked. The second amendment does state that ‘’... the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. " In other words, American citizens have a right to bear arms and nobody can take that right away. If anybody could legally purchase guns, does that include people with a criminal record?