Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversy on the second amendment
Controversy on the second amendment
2 nd amendment the debate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Controversy on the second amendment
Today the Second Amendment is in the media more and more due to the recent up rise in crimes with firearms. Every person seems to have an opinion on whether our Second Amendment should be removed or it should not ever be touched. “A free people ought not only be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunitions to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include the government.” (George Washington) The Second Amendment of the constitution reads "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Today the actual meaning of the second amendment is still not fully clear. If you were to ask multiple people the definition of the second amendment, you would receive a different one from each person. Also, you would be able to determine whether they are pro or anti-gun …show more content…
ownership. The United States is unique with their approach to gun control. Other countries do not have the opportunities to obtain guns like we here in the U.S. do; their laws are stricter. In order for us to understand the Second Amendment better, it is best to break it down and define each part starting with a well-regulated militia, than the right to bear arms, and lastly shall not be infringed. The phrase a well-regulated militia is defined as the property of something being in proper working order. (Brain T. Halomen) This phrase has been used for a long time, even before the Second Amendment came about. It was placed in the Second Amendment to render the government powerless. Today “well-regulated” militia would be our police departments, our National Guard, and military reserves. Following, the right to bear arms, this is used to mean just that people had the right to bear arms for defense for themselves, the state, and for hunting purposes. Today, not everyone has this right. You cannot bear any arms if you have a felony charge, are under 18 years of age and 21 years of age for a handgun, if you have reason to be convicted of a violent crime, fugitive, incompetent, illegal alien, convicted of a DUI on three separate occasions in a five year span, lastly if you are subject of an active protection from abuse order (PFA). (Code section: Title 18) Last but not least, “shall not be infringed” has multiple meanings one being that infringes means to narrow the right in any way and that the purpose for the “shall not be infringed” language was to prevent regulation of the right. (David E. Young) Or that to infringe relative to the fundamental right to keep and bear arms means only to completely destroy the right and that extensive “reasonable” regulations are legitimate and do not infringe the right. (David. E Young) As you can see the Second Amendment is not as easy of a read as it seems. Words today have more than one or two meaning, as well as phrases. It is clear to see why people claim many situations to be “legal” with the excuse of the Second Amendment. Over time, since the creation of the Second Amendment many things have changed in our societies. Today there is said to be about 310 million guns in circulation in the United States, that is close to one firearm per every man, woman, and child. Isn’t that crazy to think about? Of those 310 million guns, 114 million are handguns; 110 million are rifles; and 86 are shotguns. (Schuyler Velasco) There is a continuing debate over the interpretation of the Second Amendment and whether or not it is too easy to obtain firearms and the effects the Second Amendment today are too significant to keep the this amendment around. Are guns too easily obtained in the U.S.? Well, that is a matter of opinion and everyone has one about this subject. You can walk into any establishment that sells guns in most U.S. states, be at least eighteen years old (unless trying to purchase a handgun in which you need to be 21 years old), fill out a form, they will make a quick five minute phone call to check for a clear background check, and you leave as a firearm owner. Society today is very different than it used to be, we as a country have advanced in many aspects in a short period of time.
In the world we live in today it seems to be that young children and teen are desensitized to our gun culture. Gun violence is common and seen on daily basis in the U.S. People fear those that already have firearms, so they themselves purchase a firearm(s) for protection. The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act is a provision of US federal law that requires a waiting period for handgun purchases and background checks on those who wish to purchase handguns. This came into effect on February 28th, 1994. The Brady Bill was created because of James Brady, who was shot during the attempted assassination of Ronald Regan in 1981, also the reason for why background checks are required for firearm purchases from licensed dealers. Today this act is no longer fully in effect, the part that is still used is the background check. The NRA or The National Rifle Association is on the richest and most powerful lobbies in the
country. Is having possession of a firearm no longer a necessity? It was for feeding our families and protection from animals rather than people. Is our society becoming less safe as result of the Second Amendment? Should stricter gun control laws be set in place to develop a society that is less frustrated by the fear of firearm violence? Whether we favor and respect our right to the Second Amendment or we completely disagree with our gun control policies, is up to each individual to decide. The Second Amendment is controversial. It has its pro’s and con’s but so does everything else in life.
environments. Bill Clede ideas in his article seem to be guild by the idea of
The United State of America, established by the Founding Father who lead the American Revolution, accomplished many hardship in order to construct what America is today. As history established America’s future, the suffering the United State encountered through history illustrate America’s ability to identify mistakes and make changes to prevent the predictable. The 2nd Amendment was written by the Founding Father who had their rights to bear arms revoked when they believe rising up to their government was appropriate. The Twentieth Century, American’s are divided on the 2nd Amendment rights, “The right to bear arms.” To understand why the Founding Father written this Amendment, investigating the histories and current measures may help the American people gain a better understanding of gun’s rights in today’s America.
On December 15, 1791, the Bill of Rights was ratified effective by Congress. These first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America promised the states certain rights and freedoms which could not be infringed by the government. After all, the founding fathers knew from experience that men in their weakness were often tempted by power. They had become all too familiar with this when under the control of King George in England. Therefore, in order to protect the future people of their beautiful country, they promised certain liberties which could not be taken away. Every single one of these freedoms is important for the United States of America. However, the second amendment is especially important to our nation because it allows the people to protect their freedom and defend themselves and the common good against an overreaching government.
The U.S. should not have gun control laws. The Second Amendment to the Constitution states that, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” This amendment has been around since 1791, and there has been gun control almost as long as it's been around. The National Rifle Association is an advocate of the Second Amendment and an opponent of those who propose restrictions on guns. Even Presidents Reagan and Bush are members, and Nixon, Eisenhower, and Kennedy were also members. Why do people feel the need to own a handgun? One reason is heritage. For as long as this country has been around, there have been gun owners, to defend themselves and to hunt for food. Buying, owning, or carrying a handgun doesn't hurt anyone. Until a person commits a crime, he/she is free to choose what he/she wants to do. Even if guns were completely banned from the U.S.A., people would still find a way to get them. Criminals would get guns. They would have their way, and there would be nothing we could do about it. We would have no way to defend ourselves. What is gun control to you? To me, it is the unconstitutional regulation and banning of guns to try to keep the crime rates in this country down. Does it work? Some gun laws are okay and they may work to some extent, but not to the extent that was intended. As for most of these gun laws such as the Brady Law, it serves no purpose. It is only there to make our lawmaking bodies and those of us who are too naive to see the truth feel better. Do you really think that the Brady Law keeps handguns out of the hands of criminals?
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” is stated in the United States Constitution as the Second Amendment. Several Americans wish to rid of guns from citizens, disobeying and disrespecting the Constitution. I shot my first gun when I was young and have always been surrounded by them. My neighbor does not leave the house without carrying one, nor does my eighteen year old friend. Never once have I felt unsafe or uneasy knowing that there was a gun close to me. The right to bare arms has become a popular local battle in which some people want to reduce the freedom of one owning firearms while others wish for the
For hundreds of years Americans have been growing up with the notion that it is a right to own a gun. Since the creation of the second amendment, people all over the United States have been able to guns for private use. Guns operated by the public are said to have a variety of uses such as, being able to protect oneself if conflict arises, grants the ability to put food on the table, and are used in competitions shooting targets against other people. But for many people guns have been seen as the root of all evil. Anti-gun users think that guns cause a variety of unexpected and innocent deaths. They also think that there are not enough laws in place that allow just about anyone to purchase a gun. The question of should guns be legal to all citizens has plagued our society. Do you think it is morally right for anyone to arm themselves and use it when they deem it to be necessary? Or do you think that the 2rd amendment seem unnecessary and outdated law that needs to be rewritten? These questions are just two of many that have thrown back and forth between pro-gun and anti-gun users.
history with a right to bear arms. Finally one can see the conflict of views
The Second Amendment states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This statement basically means that people should be able to own guns for their own security and that right should not be taken away. The Second Amendment was added to the Constitution because the creators of the Constitution wanted to make sure that it protected basic rights, including the right to bear arms. It was also added to the Constitution because shortly after it was ratified, James Madison wanted to give more power to the state militia and to give more power to the people to give them the ability to fight back against the Federalists and the tyrannical government they were creating. After fighting off the British, the Second Amendment was created to give citizens the opportunity to fight back against controlling government and protect themselves with their own weapons.
The Second Amendment to the Constitution(Second Amendment) of the United States of America(USA) is one of the most controversial. The Second Amendment specifically grants that, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed"
The first amendment is the cornerstone of our American society founded years ago by our forefathers. Without the first amendment many ideas, beliefs, and groups could not exist today. The first amendment guaranteed the people of the United States the freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, and freedom of petition. Although the first amendment guarantees us, Americans the freedom of speech, we cannot use it to cause others harm. This amendment has helped shaped Americans into what we are today, because of our right to assemble, speak freely, and worship as we please.
The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The Founding Fathers included this in the Bill of Rights because they feared the Federal Government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation or individuals.
Being a young American I have witnessed many problems with growing up in this great country of ours. We have homeless people who can't find work, rising inflation rates, an unbalanced budget, and more importantly, a problem with guns.
The topic of gun control comes with a widely spilt crowd. Some people believe that gun control is essential, especially in today’s world. Some people think gun control will help with decreasing crime and making the nation a safer place for us to live. On the other hand, there are people who speak of anti-gun control. These people believe the right to bear arms would make our nation a safe place to live due to the fact that we would have protection. Do you think the Government has the right to make something illegal like the right to bear arm? In my opinion, the Government cannot simply because it will be an offence to our founding fathers, who gave us the national right to bear arm. Also, for making
Should the fact that criminals are committing crimes with the use of guns violate our right to possess guns? The Second Amendment guarantees the right to bear arms, which is part of the bill of rights. With that being said we should take into account that all people who own a gun are not intending to do harm to others. Even if gun control laws happen to get passed, what about the innocent being murdered by gangs or mentally ill people? What if people try to steal possessions while using a gun to scare our American citizens? The cops cannot be there to protect us every second of the day and seconds can be a matter of life and death. Therefore, we should protect the right of free men and likewise punish the criminals who abuse this right of the Second Amendment. This issue completely contradicts the Second Amendment of the citizens of The United States written by our forefathers. Also guns do more good than harm, such as the thrill of hunting game and protecting our family and belongings.
The Second Amendment of the United States protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It was adopted on December 15, 1791 along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. The United States Government should not infringe on those rights by the enforcement of gun control against law-abiding citizens. Gun control does not reduce crime, does not stop criminals from obtaining guns, and does not address the real issue of violent crime. There is no evidence that gun control affects the crime rate.