Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How women are portrayed in shakespeares plays
How women are portrayed in shakespeares plays
Women characters in Shakespearean drama
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How women are portrayed in shakespeares plays
William Shakespeare’s Richard the III revolves around the Duke of Gloucester, Richard, and his treacherous plan of lying, cheating and murdering in order to become king. In this excerpt of Act 1 scene 2, Richard has just completed one of his first major steps to becoming a villain; he has succeeded in wooing lady Anne, a potentially important political figure in the future, to his side. Alone on stage, he remarks on how surprisingly easy a task it was. He is now confident in becoming a villain to achieve his goals. The scene is meant to reveal Richard’s character through a variety of literary devices, as he starts to develop a sense of arrogance and sense of superiority. He now is starting to believe that he has a full understanding of how …show more content…
to twist love and emotions. The passage starts off with Richard gloating about his recent success.
His soliloquy opens up with two rhetorical questions as he congratulates himself. He mockingly asks himself and the audience if there was ever a “woman in this humour wooed” or “won”. His use of anaphora by repeating the words “was ever” is meant to show off his pride with his manipulation skills. He’s emphasizing the fact that for the first time possibly ever, someone has gotten a woman who previously despised them from the bottom of her heart to love them within minutes. He then makes it clear that he’s now looking down on Anne by saying that he “will have her, but he will not keep her for long.” Immediately through these first few lines, Richard’s character is revealed to be inconsiderate, and at the same time, it’s developing a sense of arrogance. His stating of “not keeping her for long” also refers to his eagerness to become king as soon as possible so he can dispose of her, showing a newfound sense of urgency with his plan resulting from the success. By implying that Anne is only a small part of his plan, he reveals his intent to use facades not just for Anne, but as many times as he needs until he is seated on the …show more content…
throne. Richard then makes it clear how difficult the task was by recalling the many things that could have gone wrong in this wooing. The use of zeugma by joining the verbs in the actions “killed her husband” and “take her” with Richard himself is meant to show the relationship between his past and recent actions and how distant they are from each other, this being the cause of Anne’s wavering emotions. He’s clearly stating that he’s just done the impossible. Richard continues to highlight the effect of past actions between him and success by reciting all the things that could’ve been an obstacle for him. He has killed both Anne’s husband and his father, as well as carrying out the wooing in her darkest times. Shakespeare uses imagery to emphasize the idea that Anne was in ruins by describing her as having “curses in her mouth, tears in her eyes” and “the bleeding witness of my hatred by”. Richard imagines that she also had “God, her conscience, and these bars” (his sins) against him and himself only “the plain devil and dissembling looks”. Yet, he still wins her over, “all the world to nothing.” It’s no surprise then that he feels superior as a villain, and his reference to the devil and his looks as his friends shows him embracing his evil self. Richard is now incredibly contempt and confident with his ability to act, as if he was not only congratulating himself, but also mocking the idea of love and how easy it was to obtain it. The mood in Richard’s speech takes a darker turn as he goes on to call everyone else inferior to him, and that he believes the whole situation is in his hands. He foils himself by comparing himself to Anne’s late husband Edward. Edward, “a sweeter and a lovelier gentleman, framed in the prodigality of nature”, is the complete opposite of Richard’s cheating habits. He personifies nature by saying that Edward’s death was “prodigal”, a poor waste of a life by nature, something that his own life could not even hope to match. Richard even goes on to say that Edward is someone “the spacious world cannot afford”; the world cannot afford to have so many pure, honorable people. The placing of the verb “afford” at the end of the sentence, a form of hypophora and the use of personification for the world makes emphasis on Edward’s value to Anne. He emphasizes how not even the world, with so many people living on it, has the ability to make everyone as pure a person as Edward. All of this, of course, is meant to be even more of a self-congratulation for Richard. He remarks on how what he believes what were were a few simple words were enough to direct Anne’s love from Edward towards him, implying that love is trivial. He stresses the foiling through the use of anaphora on the words “on me”, saying that she chooses to direct her love towards him, him of all people. His use of hyperbole by describing himself as someone “whose all not equals Edward’s moiety” (He is not half the man Edward is) signifies that his character was far worse than Edward to start with, but now he has triumphed over Edward. By doing so, he claims he is superior to Edward, that evil can erase good, and that despite his deformities, his words can make him better than anyone else. He, who has “made her widow to a woeful bed”, a metaphor for Anne feeling alone whenever night falls and she sees her empty bed, is confident that she will no longer “abase her eyes” (look down) on him. Richard’s arrogance and superiority becomes even more evident when he draws the line between him and everyone else. He compares himself to Anne, believing himself superior to the point where he refers to her as a denier, an oxymoron meaning a coin without any worth, as she is a queen with no power. He remarks on how he has mistaken his person all this while, which can refer both to his disgust at how he had to go as low as to marry a widowed, powerless queen or how he didn’t know that it was in him to be so clever that he almost fooled himself. He may also be talking about his surprise that Anne fell for him so easily and that he expected her to have a much stronger will. He follows up with a number of sarcastic remarks about how he’s so confident with the situation and he’s so above anyone else that he should go and buy a mirror just to admire himself. Richard, someone who hates people who waste their times with reflections is so “crept in favour with himself” that he is willing to joke about doing it himself, demonstrating his pride. Richard’s willingness to “adorn his body” might be his belief on the beauty of evil in a sarcastic remark. He’s embracing a bit of his deformity as he is getting ready to embrace his new villainous title of king, confident that he’ll get it. The soliloquy is wrapped up at the end when Richard declares how he will follow up on the plan.
He intends to “turn yon fellow” (the dead king) in his grave”, then “return lamenting” to his love. This restates that he is willing to continue with this facade for as long as it takes, as many times as it takes until he achieves his ultimate goal. It is evident he looks down at Anne’s father due to his improper burial, likely because he was a previous enemy, but also displaying how he shows little respect for the dead and for the promises to others. His unwillingness to keep his word relates to how he sees everyone else as inferior, hence he sees no reason to actually keep his promise. He makes no hesitation in this decision, for he realises himself that there will no longer be a place for him once he stops his tyranny. His last remark, a couplet, has two potential meanings. One can interpret it as apostrophe, when he directly talks to the sun, or a metaphor, the sun representing the king. In both cases, he uses the metonymy of his shadow as his evil sins and the metaphor of his mirror as him reflecting back on these sins. It’s as if he’s saying: “let there be peace, and let the sun (the sun or the king) shine until I'm king. I shall continue to use my heinous methods until I can be seated on the throne, thinking back and looking down at the crimes i
committed.” This section represents a reveal in character for Richard, as it is the first time his sense of superiority and confidence are revealed, and his belief that emotions will go his way. This confidence ultimately leads to both his success and his demise. This is an interesting section as here, Richard is already distinguishing himself from the others as if he’s already king. This separation is what also shows his flaws as a king, as once he distances himself too far, when he needs the help of companions, he won’t have any left. Eventually, the only friends that he has, his own deformity and confidence will consume him before he knows it. His arrogance, however, blinds him greatly to the point where it will eventually be impossible for him to see any other alternative than manipulation and death. Already, it’s taking his toll when he reflects on how clever he was, or just how troubled Anne was at the time for her to have blindly accepted his ring. This passage here really brings out the crookedness of Richard, not physically, but mentally.
I feel that Richard gains our sympathy when he resigns the crown, refuses to read the paper that highlights his crimes, and smashes the mirror, which represents his vanity. In terms of kingship, I interpret the play as an exploration between the contrast with aristocratic pride in the law and the king's omnipotent powers. It also shows the chain reaction on kingship as past events in history determine present
Composers throughout various zeitgeists are linked by different representations of universal human concerns, and their texts simultaneously embody certain values and agendas individual to themselves. An exploration of Shakespeare’s King Richard III (1592) and Al Pacino’s Looking for Richard (1996) allows for a greater understanding of the composer’s respective contexts, along with their intended agendas, through the lens of their own societal values and concerns. The manipulation of Richard III’s persona, whether by authorial adaptation of historical sources related to his character, or through the differing views of Richards motives, are universal concepts, that when studied in relation to the differing time periods, accentuates the context and our understanding of recurrent aspects of the human experience.
Richard III's Usurpation and His Downfall Richards rule was always unstable due to his unlawful usurpation to the throne and his part as far as the public was concerned in the death of the two princes. As a result right from the start he didn't have the trust or support from his country. As soon as he became King people were already plotting against him. After he was crowned he travelled the country trying to raise support by refusing the generous gifts offered to him by various cities. However unknown to him a rebellion was been planned in the South.
To explore connections between texts is to heighten understanding of humanity’s progressing values and the underlying relevant themes that continue to engage societies regardless of context. William Shakespeare’s King Richard III (1592) (RIII) and Al Pacino’s docudrama Looking for Richard (1996) (LFR) demonstrate how opinion is created through comparative study, both explore the struggle for power within differing contexts to determine the duplicity of humanity. Ultimately, despite the divergent eras of composition and textual form, these connections expose the relevant social commentaries of their composers, highlighting innately human values, which remain constant.
The undeniable pursuit for power is Richard’s flaw as a Vice character. This aspect is demonstrated in Shakespeare’s play King Richard III through the actions Richard portrays in an attempt to take the throne, allowing the audience to perceive this as an abhorrent transgression against the divine order. The deformity of Richards arm and back also symbolically imply a sense of villainy through Shakespeare’s context. In one of Richard’s soliloquies, he states how ‘thus like the formal Vice Iniquity/ I moralize two meanings in one word’. Through the use of immoral jargons, Shakespeare emphasises Richard’s tenacity to attain a sense of power. However, Richard’s personal struggle with power causes him to become paranoid and demanding, as demonstrated through the use of modality ‘I wish’ in ‘I wish the bastards dead’. This act thus becomes heavily discordant to the accepted great chain of being and conveys Richard’s consumption by power.
Anne is quite like a modern woman in the way that if a man tells her
“I am determined to prove a villain / and hate the idle pleasures of these days. / Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous, / by drunken prophecies, libels and dreams.” Richard III, the evil Duke of Gloucester, is fighting a bloody road to the crown in Shakespeare's dramatic play. Stopped by nothing and with brilliant intelligence, Richard fights his way to the king’s position, clothing his villany with “old odd ends stolen out of holy writ.” With no one to fully trust, Richard breaks many hearts by killing all people in his way, and becomes the unstoppable villain. He hides behind a shield of kindness and care, but when he is alone, his real soul comes alive. Sending murderers, or killing people himself, he has no mercy. Manipulating Lady Anne to marry him and promising Buckingham rewards for his deeds, he knows what he is doing, and won’t stop until the crown lies at his feet.
Instead of a powerful physical image, like Queen Elizabeth I, Richard implements elegant soliloquies, engages in witty banter, and attunes the audience to his motives with frequent asides. This flexibility demonstrates Richard's thespian superiority and power over the rest of the play's cast, making him a unique character in the play, but why does he do it? This constant battle between characters to claim mastery over a scene leaves the audience with a seemingly overlooked source of power for an actor [clarify/expand].
The Effectiveness of William Shakespeare's Use of Supernatural in the Final Act of Richard III
In Shakespeare's The Tragedy of King Richard the Third, the historical context of the play is dominated by male figures. As a result, women are relegated to an inferior role. However, they achieve verbal power through their own discourse of religion and superstition. In the opening speech of Act 1, Scene 2, Lines 1-30 Lady Anne orients the reader to the crucial political context of the play and the metaphysical issues contained within it (Greenblatt, 509). Lady Anne curses her foes, using strong language to indicate her authority. She speaks in blank verse, by which she utilizes imagery to emphasize her emotions and reinforce her pleas. Her speech clearly illustrates the distinction between the submissive female role within the male sphere of war and the powerful female voice within the realm of superstition.
During the Middle Ages and Renaissance period marriage and love were idealized, divine and celebrated. Weddings were large events that included the entire families of both the groom and the bride. Reality was different; women were viewed as being fickle, inferior to men and a possession of men. Women had very little, if any, choice in who they would marry. Marriages were arranged so that both families would benefit in gaining wealth or power. Even though the ruler of England for over 4 decades was female, women were still not respected. Women were kept at home and not allowed to take place in public events. In Shakespeare’s Richard III, male and female relationships are displayed as deeply cynical and are based on lies, lust and political gain.
The task which Shakespeare undertook was to mold the hateful constitution of Richard's Moral; character. Richard had to contend with the prejudices arising from his bodily deformity which was considered an indication of the depravity and wickedness of his nature. Richard's ambitious nature, his elastic intellect, and his want of faith in goodness conspire to produce his tendency to despise and degrade every surrounding being and object, even as his own person. He is never sincere except when he is about to commit a murder.
According to many, Shakespeare intentionally portrays Richard III in ways that would have the world hail him as the ultimate Machiavel. This build up only serves to further the dramatic irony when Richard falls from his throne. The nature of Richard's character is key to discovering the commentary Shakespeare is delivering on the nature of tyrants. By setting up Richard to be seen as the ultimate Machiavel, only to have him utterly destroyed, Shakespeare makes a dramatic commentary on the frailty of tyranny and such men as would aspire to tyrannical rule.
Throughout the historical literary periods, many writers underrepresented and undervalued the role of women in society, even more, they did not choose to yield the benefits of the numerous uses of the female character concerning the roles which women could accomplish as plot devices and literary tools. William Shakespeare was one playwright who found several uses for female characters in his works. Despite the fact that in Shakespeare's history play, Richard II, he did not use women in order to implement the facts regarding the historical events. Instead, he focused the use of women roles by making it clear that female characters significantly enriched the literary and theatrical facets of his work. Furthermore in Shakespeare’s history play, King Richard II, many critics have debated the role that women play, especially the queen. One of the arguments is that Shakespeare uses the queen’s role as every women’s role to show domestic life and emotion. Jo McMurtry explains the role of all women in his book, Understanding Shakespeare’s England A Companion for the American Reader, he states, “Women were seen, legally and socially, as wives. Marriage was a permanent state” (5). McMurtry argues that every woman’s role in the Elizabethan society is understood to be a legal permanent state that is socially correct as wives and mothers. Other critics believe that the role of the queen was to soften King Richard II’s personality for the nobles and commoners opinion of him. Shakespeare gives the queen only a few speaking scenes with limited lines in Acts two, four, and five through-out the play. Also, she is mentioned only a few times by several other of the characters of the play and is in multiple scenes wit...
"What tongue speaks my right drawn sword may prove" is the sentence which concludes a short speech delivered by Henry Bolingbroke to King Richard II (1.1.6). These words are but the first demonstration of the marked difference between the above-mentioned characters in The Tragedy of Richard II. The line presents a man intent on action, a foil to the title character, a man of words.