Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Psychology analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Psychology analysis
Amy Miller’s poem, “The World Entire,” was written in response to a viral video of random man saving a rabbit from the flames of a California wildfire. On January 20 this year, HuffPost shared an article which covered not only the rescue video but also the social response to the video and the release of the rabbit saved. The article, “Rabbit Rescued From Fire In Famous Video Released Back To The Wild” was written by the senior trends editor for HuffPost Hilary Hanson.
Throughout her entire article, Hanson shares and then explains videos from reputable sources like ABC News, Inside Edition and the California Wildlife Center all related to the main video of the rabbit being saved. However, Hanson is not just writing her response to the viral
…show more content…
video. She is providing and annotating information on the main viral video and all of its repercussive events. She starts by discussing the rabbits rescue then its release while also sharing the amount of medical attention the rabbit received, all of which have a piece of outside, mainly video, evidence. Hanson provides her assumable animal loving audience with this information in an upbeat manner to show that while this random act may have been purely emotional it’s still a good deed being done. Hanson starts her article with a video from Inside Edition, which is a video based news outlet that shares uplifting, inspirational, and trendy stories.
The video contains the viral clip of 21-year-old Chad Wadman saving the rabbit and interviews from Wadman, his mother, and the doctor that cared for the rabbit at the California Wildfire Center. Henson then continues to reassure her audience that the “wild rabbit seen in a viral video being saved from a Southern California wildfire has been released back to the wild” and shares the release video. These videos provide the context for Hanson’s article and a strong connection to her audience’s pathos. She then continues to address the opposing side of this news event. Many critics “argued that the rabbit probably didn’t need help and that intervening with wildlife can often make things worse” (Henson). However, Hanson purposely sandwiches this opposition between “a December photo of the rabbit being treated at the California Wildlife Center” taken by Alyssa Schlange and a quote from the California Wildlife Center stating, “experts do generally advise against interfering with wildlife, [but] that in this case, the rabbit was seriously injured and definitely needed medical attention.” Hanson’s whole article is set up to prove that this event was a good deed with good
outcomes.
The tone during the whole plot of in Brave New World changes when advancing throughout the plot, but it often contains a dark and satiric aspect. Since the novel was originally planned to be written as a satire, the tone is ironic and sarcastic. Huxley's sarcastic tone is most noticeable in the conversations between characters. For instance, when the director was educating the students about the past history, he states that "most facts about the past do sound incredible (Huxley 45)." Through the exaggeration of words in the statement of the director, Huxley's sarcastic tone obviously is portrayed. As a result of this, the satirical tone puts the mood to be carefree.
In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.
When individuals are provoked and questioned, it evokes an emotional and intellectual response which prompts them to reflect on their pre existing attitudes and values. Jane Harrison’s play ‘Rainbow’s end’, explores three Aboriginal women provoked by the realisation of the social and psychological barriers which prevent the indigenous Australians to be accepted. Similarly, in Sean Penn’s film ‘into the wild’, exhibits confronting experience of living alone in the wild, forcing him to reconsider his disbelief of needing human interaction in life to be fulfilled. When discoveries are provocative, it can evoke an emotional response to challenge their belief ultimately leading to reconsider and re-evaluate their previously held perspective. In
The Letter from Birmingham Jail was written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in April of 1963. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of several civil rights activists who were arrested in Birmingham Alabama, after protesting against racial injustices in Alabama. Dr. King wrote this letter in response to a statement titled A Call for Unity, which was published on Good Friday by eight of his fellow clergymen from Alabama. Dr. King uses his letter to eloquently refute the article. In the letter dr. king uses many vivid logos, ethos, and pathos to get his point across. Dr. King writes things in his letter that if any other person even dared to write the people would consider them crazy.
Margaret Wise Brown was truly fascinated by animals, and she understood children’s attraction to animals. Tellingly, when Brown reflects on her childhood she mentions her “thirty-six rabbits, two squirrels…a collie dog, and two Peruvian hens, a Belgian hare, seven fish, and a wild robin who came back every spring” (Days Before Now). From this information about Brown, one understands where her love of animals originated--her childhood. Additionally, animals were kind to her and did not restrict or belittle Brown the way some individuals did regularly. Brown was allowed to have constant interaction with animals, which proved to be influential in her writing career. Overall, Margaret Wise Brown used numerous animals, especially rabbits because of her love for creatures and the understanding she possessed of children’s love of and interest with animals.
Having been able to rise from her small town roots into an international figure that worked with Guess Watches International and even eventually the Indonesian Playboy edition, Amber Chia is a strong use of pathos. As PETA aims to identify the image of banning the “immoral” act of keeping animals caged, within zoos especially, using celebrity Amber Chia expands their influence. Not only does the use of a Malaysian celebrity gain more influence within PETA’s audience, but also as an international figure of status and credibility develops a larger influence upon the audience. As the first image uses sources from a celebrity, the second image uses another form of plausibility.
The YouTube video “U.S. Armed Forces – We Must Fight – President Reagan” by Matthew Worth was made with the intention to motivate the viewers to support the U.S. Armed Forces. The purpose of this Rhetorical Analysis is to determine whether or not the video has been successful in doing just that, motivating and drawing support for the United States Armed Forces. The video was uploaded to YouTube on February 19, 2012 and has nearly 4 million views. Matthew uses the famous speech “A Time for Choosing” by the United States former President, Ronald Wilson Reagan, who has a reputation for his patriotism, to complement the video. This video has been effective in motivating the viewers because of its strong use of the rhetorical concepts logos, ethos, and pathos.
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
Staff, E&P. “’Mutts’ Comic and Web Site Are Helping Animals.” Editor & Publisher 2 Feb. 2007. Student Resources in Context. Web. 6 Feb. 2014.
...ed a man being mauled by dogs, risked his safety to insure the safety of the victim. This scenario bears a similarity to that within the “Parable of the Good Samaritan.” The mission behind the parable is to instill in common people, the desire to help those in need. If related to modern times, one can compare this thought process to the good samaritans of the 9/11 world trade center attack. Many firemen and police officials rushed into the collapsing buildings in order to save anyone they could find. In doing so, many of those samaritans lost their lives, but many more lives were saved by their selfless actions. Had it not been for those rescuers, many more lives would have been lost. In everyday life, we will come across a situations where tough choices will be made. In this case, we need to “take a moral high road” and choose to help and not be a bystander.
Today’s economy and the environment are hurting due to the lack of nurture we have been providing. Conventional farming rules the world of agriculture, but not without a fight from organic farming. Organic farming is seen as the way of farming that might potentially nurture our nature back to health along with the added benefit of improving our own health. With her piece “Organic farming healthier, more efficient than Status Quo,” published in the Kansas State Collegian on September 3, 2013, writer Anurag Muthyam brings forth the importance behind organic farming methods. Muthyam is a senior at Kansas State University working towards a degree in Management. This piece paints the picture of how organic farming methods
In a quote by John Mill, “Does fining a criminal show want of respect for property, or imprisoning him, for personal freedom? Just as unreasonable is it to think that to take the life of a man who has taken that of another is to show want of regard for human life. We show, on the contrary, most emphatically our regard for it, by the adoption of a rule that he who violates that right in another forfeits it for himself, and that while no other crime that he can commit deprives him of his right to live, this shall.” Everyone’s life is precious, but at what price? Is it okay to let a murderer to do as they please? Reader, please take a moment and reflect on this issue. The issue will always be a conflict of beliefs and moral standards. The topic
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.
Robert's encounter with the coyote is a significant step in his understanding of animals and, in turn, this leads to a greater understanding of himself. For Robert to be a soldier, it is important for him to see the point of view of a hunter. He learns from the coyote that a hunter must be generous and kill only in order to survive ("Animals and Their Significance" 1). Robert follows the coyote and watches as it passes two gophers and does not even "pause to scuffle the burrows or even sniff at them. It just [goes] right on trotting--forward towards its goal" (26). The coyote seems to sense Robert's connection with animals and realizes that he is not a threat. This is why the coyote continues to let Robert follow behind when it knows he is there. They drink together at the river, enjoying a "special communion" (Pirie 73). Then the animal tries to communicate with Robert by barking at him, "telling Robert the valley [is] vacant: safe" and then barks another three times to announce its departure (28). When Robert returns to the base, he pays the price for his time with the coyote and is confined to the barracks, but the experience has a profound impact on him. In his confinement, he feels as if the coyote has become a part of him, and he wishes "that someone would howl" (28).
The impact a wild animal has on a community is severe. In 2009, Sandra Herold, the owner of a 200 pound chimpanzee, called her friend for help. Sandra needed assistance from Charla Nash to get her money back into its cage. Unexpectedly, the chimpanzee mauled Charla. In a 911 call Sandra frantically told the dispatcher what was happening, “He ripped her apart. Shoot him, shoot him”(Copeland 1).