Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rhetorical criticism paper
Rhetorical criticism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The world of rhetorical criticism relies heavily upon being able to identify artifacts and analyze them in a way that provides a better understanding of those artifacts and how they operate. The way in which one goes about performing a rhetorical criticism is explained by Sonja K. Foss (2009). She states that this process includes four steps which are selecting an artifact, analyzing an artifact, formulating a research question, and writing the essay. This process is a great one to follow across numerous types of criticism. It is important to understand these different types of criticism in order to use one rather than another when critiquing a particular artifact.
The movie, “The Girl on The Train,” can be analyzed through several different types of rhetorical criticism. The artifact itself is one of interest because of the messages that can be taken away from a good understanding of the main and supporting characters, as well as the plot in general. One type of
…show more content…
rhetorical criticism that can be used to analyze this is formal argumentation, especially by the means of “topoi”. This provides a great path to analyze because of the options that are available between the four different types of criticism, as well as the simpleness of the different types of arguments. Another great rhetorical criticism that can be used is generic criticism. Formal argumentation theory involves rhetoric that continually appears to help one process their thoughts and ways of thinking about a certain artifact. There are four different ways in which one can go about organizing their thoughts by means of the “topoi” of arguments. These four different types include definition, causal, evaluation, and proposal. The two that I could best utilize in analyzing my paper would be either causal or proposal. According to Fahenstock and Secor (2004), a causal argument answers the question “how did it get that way?”. In regards to “The Girl on the Train,” it would be great to utilize Frame 1 because this is where the analysis dives into the conditions, influences, and precipitating causes of a particular case. This will create a sense of organization or order in understanding the main character and the situation that they are in due to certain circumstances that include the supporting characters (p. 184). The proposal argument would work well because it answers the question “what should we do about it?”. A specific proposal can be used in the case of the movie because it “provides an exact description of what action should be taken to correct a problem” (p. 298)/ The artifacts that work best with formal argumentation are… The strengths of formal argumentation theory are… The weaknesses of formal argumentation are... Generic criticism deals with the different types of genres that include specific”rules” or guidelines that define what artifacts should be included in a certain genre and which ones should not be. These artifacts or recurring situations must be similar, and there are certain elements that help determine in which genre a specific artifact belongs. According to Foss (2009), the generic critic needs to look for similarities in rhetorical patterns across recurring situations. He states that “genres influence them to shape their materials to create particular emphases, to generate particular ideas, and to adopt particular personae”. Along with this, as the audience recognizes that a particular artifact belongs to a genre, that realization will influence the way in which one thinks about or responds to other artifacts in that genre (p. 137). The three types of generic criticisms that can be performed, according to Foss (2009), are generic description, generic participation, and generic application. The artifacts that are best for generic criticism include those that are “ a variety of texts that appear, on the surface, to share some rhetorical similarities. These artifacts can come from different time periods and be of various forms- speeches, essays, songs, works of art, and advertisements, for example- if they all seem similar in nature and function. The ones that work best for generic participation are ones that seem like they belong to a genre, but they do not seem to completely fit into it. Lastly, the artifacts that work best for generic application are ones that assess how well the artifacts themselves conform to the particular genre. “This should be an artifact that, for some reason, leads you to question how it is functioning in the context of its genre” (p. 140) Along with these three types of genre criticism, there are three elements that should be included in a generic criticism. These include situational requirements, substantive and stylistic characteristics, and the organizing principle (Foss, 2009, p. 137). The strengths of generic criticism are… The weaknesses of generic criticism are...
The similarities between formal argumentation theory and generic criticism are…The differences between formal argumentation theory and generic criticism are…
After looking over the definitions of formal argumentation theory and generic criticism, along with the artifacts that work best with the two types of criticism, and the strengths and weaknesses of them both. Understanding the similarities and differences between the two also helped in determining which type of criticism works best with the movie based off of the same-titled book, “The Girl on the Train”. The most appropriate form of criticism to use in the case of critiquing the movie, “The Girl on the Train,” is generic criticism. I believe that generic criticism is the best route to go because it provides me with the opportunity to delve deep into the new subgenre that has been created through the help of this movie and a few others that carry similar
plots. Many are well aware of the genre known as Thriller. The genre is popular for including themes of crime or action, an antagonist and a protagonist, and, most importantly, a lot of suspense. The artifacts included in this genre include different books, movies, songs, and other types of art. Although “The Girl on the Train” is considered a thriller, the claim can definitely be made that the invention of this book-turned-movie, along with the other book-turned-movie, “Gone Girl,” have created a new subgenre because they are unlike the past artifacts included in the genre. In particular, generic description would be best to use in discovering whether or not a new subgenre has in fact been created (Foss, 2009, p. 141). The first element or situation requirement of the subgenre created includes the idea that there is a main character who is dealing with something from their past, and the audience perceives them as being either mysterious or a possible antagonist, rather than a typical protagonist or victim in the story or plot. The second element or substantive and stylistic characteristics revolve around the main character and their relationship with him/herself and the supporting characters. The substantive aspect is that the main character is continually putting their own lives on the line to figure out how to solve the problem that is presented from the past, and they even risk their lives in order to help the others around them. This is when the audience begins to realize that the protagonist may have more victim qualities as opposed to villain qualities. The stylistic characteristics include the way in which the main character develops with either flashbacks or reminders from unusual sources that they are not horrible people, but they have gone through specific experiences that have prevented them from being able to deal with specific events from their pasts. The last element, the organizing principle, provides the audience of the genre with numerous self-created theories or ideas that eventually lead to the idea that the protagonist could be a potential antagonist, but in the end there is always a plot twist that leads to the reality that the protagonist is truly a victim. Between the first two elements involved in generic criticism, it is easy to determine that the books-turned-movies have played a role in creating a new subgenre. The last element helps many understand why the new subgenre would remain a subgenre rather than becoming its’ own separate genre. This is because it eventually comes full circle to include a similar ending to those movies, books, etc. that are artifacts included in the Thriller genre.
Heinrichs begins by explaining the art of rhetoric and laying out the basic tools of argument. He emphasizes the importance of using the proper tense to avoid arguing the wrong issue. Furthermore, he introduces logos, ethos and pathos and shows how to “wield” each rhetorical tool. In Part 2, Heinrichs discusses common logical fallacies as well as rhetorical fouls. He remarks rhetoric’s single rule of never arguing the inarguable and demonstrates how ethos helps to know whom to trust. In Part 3, Kairos becomes an important tool for knowing the right time to persuade one’s audience. In Part 4 of the novel, the author provides examples of how to use rhetorical tools previously introduced in the
According to the FBI, more than 75 percent of all murder victims are women, and more than 50 percent of the women are between the ages of 14 and 29 years old. A part of that statistic is Kitty Genovese,a murder victim who is the focus of an editorial, “The Dying Girl that No One Helped,” written by Loudon Wainwright. Kitty was a 28 year old woman who was brutally stabbed to death while on her way home from work. The woman, named Kitty Genovese, lived in a pleasant, welcoming, residential area, in New York. There was at least 38 witnesses that came forward, and they all heard her cries for help, but no one came to her aid. Wainwright effectively demonstrates how society has started turning a “blind-eye” toward problems that can endanger someone's
Palmer, William. "Rhetorical Analysis." Discovering Arguments: An Introduction to Critical Thinking, Writing, and Style. Boston: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2012. 268-69. Print.
The author’s main argument in “Rhetoric: Making Sense of Human Interaction and Meaning-Making” is that rhetoric does not need to be complicated if writers incorporate certain elements to their writing. Downs further analyzed the elements that contribute to rhetoric such as symbols and signals, motivation, emotion, ecology, reasoning and identification. The author emphasized that writers can learn how to deliver their writing effectively once they are more aware on how rhetoric works. Downs constantly assures that rhetoric is quite simple and does not need to provoke fuzziness. Even though the term rhetorical is applied to everything, the author of the article made it clear that the “rhetorical” thing is situated. The example provided by the author in this article, further guides our understanding on what rhetoric
The Letter from Birmingham Jail was written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in April of 1963. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of several civil rights activists who were arrested in Birmingham Alabama, after protesting against racial injustices in Alabama. Dr. King wrote this letter in response to a statement titled A Call for Unity, which was published on Good Friday by eight of his fellow clergymen from Alabama. Dr. King uses his letter to eloquently refute the article. In the letter dr. king uses many vivid logos, ethos, and pathos to get his point across. Dr. King writes things in his letter that if any other person even dared to write the people would consider them crazy.
Anticipation is prevalent throughout The Road, which is set by the narrative pace, creating a tense and suspenseful feeling and tone.
Lloyd F. Bitzer’s article, “The Rhetorical Situation”, is an account of what he calls the “rhetorical situation” as what he believes to be the conditions necessary for compelling a rhetorician to engage in rhetoric (35). It is Bitzer’s position that a work of rhetoric comes into existence as a response to the call of a certain state of affairs in the world (32). Furthermore, Bitzer claims that when we find ourselves in such “situations”, we are compelled to engage in rhetoric in order to restore the balance that we find lacking (34). He identifies three interconnected elements of situational rhetoric: exigence, audience, and constraints (35). Bitzer argues that a rhetorical discourse, which consists of an engagement with an audience for the purpose of compelling that audience to modify the world so as to repair the problem which is presented (35), is required to solve the problem as the world presents it (34). This lack of balance in a rhetorical situation or state of affairs in the world leads to what Bitzer calls exigence, which he defines as “an imperfection marked by urgency” (36). Bitzer also expands on the notion of a rhetorical audience, which is central to his theory of situational rhetoric. Bitzer defines a rhetorical audience as persons who, through discourse, are subject to influence and as persons who can be compelled to bring about the change called for by a rhetorical situation (37). Bitzer also identifies constraints as being a vital component to his theory, which he defines as anything within the rhetorical situation which has the power to “constrain decision” (38).
Tannen states, “In the argument culture, criticism, attack, or opposition are the predominant if not the only ways of responding to people or ideas. I use the phrase “culture of critique,” to capture this aspect. “Critique in the sense is not a general term for analysis or interpretation but rather a synonym for criticism.” Tannen states that she is calling attention to and calling into question the inherent dangers of the argument culture, however her article does not discuss an approachable strategy that would solve this social
Firstly , Tannen introduces the term “culture of critique” by beginning three successive paragraphs with the term so that the reader will not forget it. Tannen then identifies the problem presented by the “culture of critique”, that is, a tendency to attack the person making an argument, or misrepresenting the issue, rather than arguing against their position itself. She points out that instead of listening to reason, people who are caught up in the culture of critique debate as i...
Longaker, Mark Garrett, and Jeffrey Walker. Rhetorical Analysis: A Brief Guide for Writers. Glenview: Longman, 2011. Print.
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
In The Rhetorical Situation, Lloyd F. Bitzer argues that what makes a situation rhetorical is similar to that which constitutes a moral action as he writes that, “an act is moral because it is an act performed in a situation of a certain kind; similarly, a work is rhetorical because it is a response to a situation of a certain kind”.(3) By defining the rhetorical situation in this way, Bitzer further contends that rhetoric is a means to altering reality. (4) It is through the use of discourse that one is capable of changing reality through thought and action. (4) Bitzer then elaborates upon the nature of a rhetorical situation by explaining that rhetorical discourse enters a situation when: providing a response to its state of affairs; rhetorical discourse is given significant presence by the situation; the situation exists as a necessary condition for rhetorical discourse to have effect; a rhetorical situation or event may mature or decay over time; the rhetorical situation invites the use of discourse to alter its reality; the rhetorical response given to the situation is appropriate; and the situation controls the response of the discourse. While Bitzer notes that these are parameters for a situation to qualify as being rhetorical, he further discusses three constituents that are present in any rhetorical situation prior to the presence and manipulation of discourse. (6) Exigence, audience, and constraints are seen to be necessary elements in a rhetorical situation for Bitzer. Exegince, “is an imperfection marked by urgency; it is a defect, an obstacle, something waiting to be undone, a thing which is other than it should be”. (6) An audience whose members may function as mediators of change is required, as rhetoric alw...
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.
Cleanth Brooks writes in his essay “The Formalist Critics” from 1951 about criticism that formalist critics encounter and tries to show these arguments from his point of view and even indicates common ground with other literary critics. Cleanth Brooks argues that we lose the intrinsically obvious points of works of literature if we view the work through the different lenses of literary theory, however we are always viewing the literary work through a subjective lens, since the author and the critic cannot subjectively separate themselves from themselves and in making these points he contradicts himself.
Literature is an intricate art form. In order to attempt to understand the meanings and ideas within literary work, there are many forms of criticism that propose different approaches to its interpretation. Each criticism is crucial to the understanding of how individuals interpret literary works. Since each criticism has a different approach to enrich the understanding literary works, the question is raised whether one criticism should be used over others, whether a certain combination of criticisms should be used, or whether all criticisms should be taken into account. This may all be dependent on the reader’s individual preference or opinion, but each criticism presented builds on the others to create a well-rounded and unique understanding