Rhetorical Analysis On John Barry

It is clear that John Barry thinks science is a field of study copmlex It's very fleeting because everything can change or be canceled by an incident. Using parallelism in his writing Barry Created antitheses, juxtapositions, and syntax amplified to make the point. Barry says people are too attached to the known and this inhibits further exploration.

At the beginning of the passage, Barry implements a parallel sentence During the discussion on certainty. The effect of making the first two sentences is parallel to stress the "certainty". It defines what is known with certainty, arguing that people believe that science and discoveries SafeGuard Theme of the unknown. Then Barry proceeds to juxtapose the certainty and uncertainty. This creates an antithesis that most likely the audience can relate to personally. With the mysteries of science, all that is not well documented is scary. Thereafter, Barry provides two definitions of a new word. He describes what he firmly believes that the popular definition of courage is incorrect. Rather than simply explore the unknown with courage acceptance of "uncertainty". In this sense, to refute the popular belief and assume that this is a misconception, Barry applies Fortitude of his argument, leaving no reason for the public to disagree. The implied statement is that science does not discover at once, so people should stop relying on what is known to keep them happy and alive. In fact, Barry cites Claude Bernard, who said, "Science teaches us to doubt." In a society full

of skepticism, which is essential for science to verify the facts and truth.

Barry not only give his opinion of what science is, but he mentions that a scientist has to.

Instead of a brief statement that his first thoughts, he details it offers its arguments. he proceeds to claim that scientists should continue to research and explore, but to be aware that every tiny detail that does not match their observations deny their assumptions. That said Barry scientists have a lot of tedious work, but goes on to explain why he calls basic

work.

Finally, Barry gives an example of a shovel and dynamite. He asked what would be the best option to get into the rock. Although its main purpose may appear to have the public to answer the question, he wants the public to realize his argument is valid by creating the juxtaposition of consequences of using either.

Ultimately, the use of rhetorical devices of Barry's argument makes rock solid and not debatable. It forces the audience to agree or disagree with his statements, but it makes it extremely difficult not provide many details and information.