Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rhetorical analysis in everyday life
Rhetorical analysis proposal
Rhetorical analysis for middle school
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Who Are You and What Are You Doing Here? Is an academic style magazine article by Mark Edmundson published in Oxford America. In this piece Edmundson uses ethos, logos, and pathos to convince parents to encourage their students to follow their dreams, as well as to convince students to discover themselves during their college career. He effectively achieves his purpose through his use of credible sources (ethos), appeals to morals and values (logos), and personal experiences (pathos). Edmundson’s first approach towards achieving his purpose is the use of many credible sources. This is important because by addressing other credible sources to parents and students, it shows them that he is credible. He starts by discussing Sigmund Freud saying …show more content…
that Freud has something to say about everything and in that way if he was to solidify what he believed he would have to “talk his way past Freud” (27). This is effective because Freud is well-known by the educated; therefore, it shows his audience that he is not only well educated, but must know what he is talking about if he can argue one of the great minds of history. In the eyes of parents, it makes it easier to trust a well-educated man about their own child’s education, and it adds greatly to Edmundson’s credibility. Edmundson continues by using Ralph Emerson as a source; he says, “Emerson most centrally preaches the gospel of self-reliance and that is what I have tried most to take from him.”(26). It is effective to use Emerson this way because he shows parents how he has learned from Emerson and become self-reliant, which is something every parent strives for their student. It also adds to the credibility that he is not citing just anyone, but purposely cites successful psychologists. This is because success is an attribute to look up to, but they also know how people act and think. Edmundson highlights this when he talks about how Emerson suggests that one’s parents might not be aware of who one truly is, mainly because that individual might not know themselves (25). This is important because parents are likely to listen to Emerson, who spent his life studying human behavior, rather than Edmundson. Therefore, he can use Emerson to get his point across to the audience effectively. Another credible source Edmundson discusses is Schopenhauer, this is one of the ways we know that the parents are part of his audience because although he wrote directly to the students, he cites Schopenhauer whom most students will have no knowledge about. Edmundson doesn’t just mention Schopenhauer, but instead presents his idea that you should question what your family has to say about you. Edmundson builds off of these ideas saying that you should also value what they have to say (24). This is effective because it shows parents that he has his own ideas about what is important. Edmund’s next strategy is to appeal to morals and values.
This is effective because when it comes to their kids, parents get emotional. Whether that is positive or negative usually stems from their beliefs, but by showing parents that what he believes can build off what they believe, he will be able to convince them that he is trustworthy. The parents and students will be able to trust what he says and know that it will benefit them, along with following their moral code. This also does a good job of emphasizing the negatives that can occur if they do not follow his advice. He begins his article with congratulatory speech because he knows that parents view graduating as extremely important. He says, “You’re to be commended, and not just you but the parents, grandparents…” (18) By doing so he puts them on a pedestal and shows that he values the same achievement, along with how success comes with penalties. Edmundson warns, “If you do not undertake it [The journey of finding yourself at college], you risk leading a life of desperation.” (24). He enhances this idea by saying that if you do not listen to him, you should “get a TV for every room, buy yourself a lifetime supply of your favorite quaff, [and] crank up the porn channel…” (30), He does this to effectively scare students and parents into thinking that even if you get a good job if it is not something you will enjoy that you will be
miserable. Edmundson’s final tactic is to use personal experiences to achieve his purpose. Bringing in personal experiences is effective because it makes Edmundson more relatable to the parents and students. He illuminates the fact that like anyone he has learned from his mistakes, this makes him seem more on the same level so the students feel if he can still come out on top so can they. He first describes in detail how his father told him he was only allowed to take classes he was interested in because that’s the point of college, to discover yourself (19). This is effective because we think of father figures as being wise as well as respect that relationship and so students and parents can relate to this and be more willing to accept what he has to say. It is also the first place where he plants the idea to parent to follow his father’s lead to sit their student down and encourage them to follow their dreams. Edmundson then goes on to relay a moment when he felt threatened by a student but when he brought his concern to the authorities they just they “laughed lightly” and let the student off the hook. This is important to the piece because its shows parents how the school will no longer take care of your child the way they used to, and how students need to learn to take care of themselves. This will achieve the purpose by getting parents to sit down and discuss self-reliance and self-discovery with their students. Edmundson was very effective at conveying to students to find oneself during college and to parents to encourage their students to do what they love not just what will make them money. In order to achieve this he used a large amount of successful rhetorical choices by using credible sources, appeals to morals and values, and personal experiences. I have not given, received, or used any unauthorized assistance
In the article “America’s Most Overrated Product: The Bachelor’s Degree” by Marty Nemko, the author argues several different views on why higher education may be very overestimated. For starters, the author shares his opinion more than anything else due to him being a career counselor. The purpose of this essay is to explain to the readers that most people start off with the idea of living the American Dream. Which is practically going to college to have a better life and career. But over the time the idea of working very hard for a Bachelor’s degree has become very dimmed. Furthermore, for some people, when they think of the American Dream they think of hope for bettering themselves and also helping their families. Unlike the author, Nemko feels that even the thought of trying to pursue to get a bachelor’s degree is overrated. The audience of this passage would most likely be teenagers going into college and parents. Nemko states that “Colleges are quick to argue that a college education is more
In Lee’s article, she uses her son as an example of why it is not necessary to go to college. In this article, it seems as if the author is not giving her son a fair chance. She does not trust that he is capable of succeeding throughout college. She says, “So I told my son (in a kind way) that his college career was over for now”. Lee uses rhetorical devices such as pathos and logos. She uses logos by stating statistics such as, “One study showed only 26 percent of those who began four-year colleges had earned a degree in six years.” She uses Pathos by using emotion words such as, “binge drinking, reckless driving and sleeping in on class days”. By using these words, she makes her audience think about the senseless things their children might do while attending
The main point to Caroline Bird’s article is that college has never been able to work its magic for everyone (15). I totally agree with this statement. Many of the high school graduates today are not mature enough to attend college immediately out of high school. Since they have been in school for thirteen years, students are thinking of some “me” time after graduation. They are not ready to settle down in a serious academic environment. My oldest daughter graduated from high school in the spring of 2009 then attended her first semester of college the following fall. She dropped out after her first semester because college was harder than she thought. She was working part-time in addition to going to school full time. There was always an outside distraction to keep her from her studies. Her grades were positive proof that students must be serious about college to gain something from attending to college.
Specifically, Cox argues that “ The many students who seriously doubted their ability to succeed, however, were anxiously waiting for their shortcomings to be exposed, at which point they would be stopped from pursuing their goals. Fragile and fearful, these students expressed their concern in several ways: in reference to college professors, particular courses or subject matter, and the entire notion of college itself-whether at the two- or the four- year level. At the core of different expressions of fear, however, were the same feelings of dread and the apprehension that success in college would prove to be an unrealizable dream.” ( 25-26). Although some believe that fear shouldn’t be an excuse to failure, whatever shape or form fear come in, the students who attend college should be grown enough to control it and not let
He seems to force what he says, rather than having a natural tone, causing the reader of the article to be left with a feeling of discontent. Although he only focuses on the negatives that those of the past have done, his argument is direct. No matter what generation you are from, it seems one always suspects the other of either ignorance or reckless abandon. It is easy for someone of the younger generation to point fingers at those who raised them, while taking no responsibility to take control of their lives. He does leave the reader with more awareness of a problem students face upon leaving school. This article is a persuasive piece due to the usage of Brooks principle message and literary
“We want to emphasize that the personal characteristics and skills of each individual are equally important”. (Page #221, para #3) Owen and Sawhill are inquiring that to be successful in any major requires dedication and personal motivation, which is another example of the authors bringing pathos into their argument. Owen and Sawhill state that “if they don’t just enroll but graduate, they can improve their lifetime prospects”. (page #220, para #1) Owens and Sawhill statement is taken as, applying with great intensions is not good enough to be successful in college. Owen and Sawhill are completely open about the fact that college isn’t for everyone and that’s perfectly acceptable. “It may be that for a student with poor grades who is on the fence about enrolling in a four-year program, the most bang-for-the-buck will come from vocationally-oriented associate’s degree or career-specific technical training”. (Page #222, para #1) this statement opens the argument to be about both, is college worth it financially, and also academically. Owens and Sawhill want their reader to understand that, being pushed to achieve something that you have no passion for attaining, only robs someone of their true
As the economy evolves and the job market continues to get more competitive, it’s becoming harder to have a successful career without some kind of college degree. This creates a belief in many young students that college actually is a commodity, something they must have in order to have a good life. There’s many different factors that influence this mindset, high schools must push the importance of the student’s willingness and drive to further their education. College isn’t just a gateway to jobs, but it is an opportunity to increase knowledge and stretch and challenge the student which in return makes them a more rounded adult and provides them with skills they might lack prior to
...a career to something that guarantees a successful life. This negative light gives many student the ugly side of college that maybe it isn't as good as it sounds. The function of the essay to deter students from becoming like sheep and following social norms, Murray wants students to become informed before making decisions that can change the outcome of their life for many years.
My parents have this perfect life for me pictured in their heads, and the first thing they see me doing is going to college. They expect the best of me, and so by going to college, I will not only have fulfilled their goals for me, but I will have accomplished one of the goals I have set for myself. In our culture, when parents come to the age where they can’t support themselves, it is the duty of the children to look after them.
Before World War II, attending college was a privilege, usually reserved for the upper class, but, in today’s society scholarships, grants, and loans are available to the average student which has made pursuing a college education a social norm. Norms are usually good, they help keep society run in an organized manner by sharing common rules and values. But, when pursuing a college education becomes a norm, it does more destruction than good. For a lot of students, a major reason for attending college is because their parents tell them it’s the thing to do to become successful in life.
As a young undergraduate, I attempted to prove myself as a hardworking student by attending my courses focused and well prepared, and conducting my assignments as required. Through my undergraduate studies, I was fortunate to participate in several student and voluntary activities. Furthermore, determinant to acquire relevant practical experience, I trained and worked at several establishments applying my theoretical ed...
While I still believe the course of one’s life is a result of his or her decisions, I now realize it is also a reflection of one’s character and personality. I know that within a year, I won’t simply have a degree from Methodist University to hang on my wall; as a result of this reflection, I can also appreciate why and how I ended up there.
Thornton, Stephen P. "Freud, Sigmund [The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]." [The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]. University of Limerick, Ireland, 16 Apr. 2001. Web. 29 May 2010. .
Some of the facets of identity construction include “defining who you are, what you value, and the direction you choose to pursue in life.” In contrast, role confusion is defined by a “lack of direction and self definition” which results in a person being “unprepared for the challenges of adulthood.” Will appears to be on track to composing a stable identity; he attested to having a good sense of who he is as a person, stating “I am myself, so I don’t think anybody could know me better than I know myself,” and not partaking in the same risky behavior as his friends do, since he does not “do too many things to jeopardize [his] future.” While still in the midst of resolving the Identity versus Role Confusion conundrum, Will does not feel he has truly encountered an identity “crisis.” When asked if he had ever faced this kind of crisis, Will stated, “Like who I am? Maybe...I don’t know. I have definitely not known what I wanted to do at times, but crisis is a very strong word.” With plans to attend college and a major already chosen, Will is in limbo currently between discovering his identity that he will carry with him into adulthood and lacking a concrete direction in which he wants his life to
“People knew I was different. But not less.” Temple Grandin understood what she had, but she knew she was not less than anyone else. She did what anyone else could do. She knew she could push through everyday, no matter how hard and how long it took. Temple is not different, but she is unique! “We’re focusing so much on academics that we’ve taken out things like, art, sewing, cooking, woodworking, music, and other things that introduce kids to careers.” Temple Grandin is trying to explain and tell the world that it is not all about academics. She had the tremendously strong willpower to prove that what she was thinking was actually right. She wanted people to stop worrying about all academics and more about the arts, sports, and the creativity of all of it. Because if not, only the few students that excel at academics are