Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religious conflict and war
Religious conflict and war
Which war was sparked by religious conflict
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religious conflict and war
War is the science of destruction or the purpose of peace. Hundreds of wars took place in history including World Wars, Revolutionary wars, Civil wars, and Religious wars. The outcomes of these battles varied widely, ranging from victorious wins to disastrous defeats. However, soldiers and major historical figures have different perspectives on fighting, both unfavorable and positive. Two of these men include Patrick Henry and Chief Joseph of the Nez Pierce Indians. Patrick Henry delivered a speech to the Virginia Convention in the prelude of the Revolutionary War and ended with the immortal words, “Give me liberty or give me death!” On the other hand, Chief Joseph recited a speech upon his surrender to the US Army. Patrick Henry believes …show more content…
He uses an exasperated tone to confess his exhaustion and explains the lists of hardships upon his people while escaping the U.S Army. The message he tries to imply is that he will no longer risk thousands of lives to solely fight in war and continue to make their Native American population extinct. Similar to Patrick Henry, Joseph also uses rhetorical strategies to communicate his message. He uses simple and short sentences to place a straightforward and honest tone which allows strong emotion to filter through. The tone is immediately established in the first few sentences when he states, “Our chiefs our killed. Looking glass is dead. Toohulhosote is dead.” The uncomplicated sentences allow the audience to focus on the emotion of human suffering behind the words instead of confusing them in a maze of advanced language. Moreover, he also uses imagery to display the cold and tragic images of “little children...freezing to death.” Chief Joseph's search for the missing children to see “how many [he] can find” is an intense appeal to pathos as well. The minor, yet genuine details express his heartache and he ceased to fight so he can assist survivors after a traumatic
Chief Joseph and Helen Hunt Jackson are two very important people who both share strong yet different perspectives toward the treachery of the U.S. Government along with the unfair treatment of Indians around the 1800’s. Chief Joseph was born in 1840 in the Wallowa valley of Oregon, and belonged to the Nez Percé tribe, which was made up of some 400 indians. The Government had made many valid promises among the tribes, just to come back and break these words with more conflict and war. All Chief Joseph was in search for was for the chaos among the whites and indians to be replaced with peace, brotherhood, and equality. Stated in the text, “We ask that the same law shall work alike on all men.” In other words, Chief Joseph believed that people
Patrick Henry’s effective diction emphasizes how much the British had suppressed the colonists and that it was time to fight for their freedom. Henry displays this through his strong use of pathos, logos, and ethos. His rhetorical questions really appeal to the logic and ethics of the colonists and leaves the no choice but to join him and rebel.
Patrick Henry was known as “the Orator of Liberty” and created his name with his speeches. When colonists were divided in 1775, some were hoping to work it out but not Patrick Henry. He thought the only choice was to go to war with Great Britain. Henry uses ethos, pathos, and logos to show his clause for going to war with Britain.
There are few speeches in the American history that compel us towards great acts of patriotism. Patrick Henry's speech in the Virginia Provincial Convention of 1775 is a prime example of one of these great speeches. During the debates on whether or not to compromise with Great Britain, Patrick Henry proposed the idea to his fellow members of the First Continental Congress to declare war on Great Britain. A reason why the speech was so powerful was the rhetorical strategies of the diction of slavery, the appeal to God, and the appeal to logic, that he deftly employed.
“Join, or Die.” “Don’t Tread on Me.” These are two mottos often used by Revolutionary supporters and fighters from about 1754 to 1783, and even sometimes today it is still used. These were battle cries that patriotic men would scream with all their might before charging onto the battlefield, where they might take their last breath. Nearly five thousand men gave their lives, for freedom’s sake. Their sacrifices were not done in vain, as the war was ended on September 3rd, 1783. This sense of victory and accomplishment is what lead these new Americans to further establishing their country, making their mark on history, and creating a new identity for themselves, as free men and woman.
During the mid 1700’s the new found America was struggling for independence from the British. This undetermined notion whether or not to declare war led to the Virginia Convention where, Governor Patrick Henry enforced our nation to engage in war. “Patrick Henry’s Speech in the Virginia Convention” emphasizes the importance of fighting for independence for the American nation, because we shouldn't be treated like slaves of the British. He persuades them to join the war effort enforcing a sense of patriotism to the members by using the rhetorical appeals of parallelism and repetition.
At the battle of Concord, Captain John Parker said, "Stand your ground; don’t fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here. " Many famous people were involved in these battles. Paul Revere was a patriot who is well-known for his famous midnight ride.
“Always remember that you are absolutely unique. Just like everyone else.” This mantra from Margaret Mead is a somewhat humorous yet slightly satirical spin on how people tend to think of themselves as one-of-a-kind, irreplaceable human specimens. However, one English teacher from Wellesley High School takes this critique one step further with his polemic presentation at the school commencement. David McCullough, a Massachusetts English teacher, gave a seemingly somber sendoff to his graduates in 2012, with a speech that contained some unapologetically harsh sentiments. However, by looking past the outwardly dismal surface of the speech, the students can infer a more optimistic message. By incorporating devices of asyndeton, paradox, antimetabole, and anadiplosis, McCullough conveys to each student that even though none of them is unique, their commonality is not a fault they all have merit and should strive to view the world through a more selfless lens.
Mark Twain told us in his speech on October 17, 1907 "We build a fire in a powder magazine, then double the fire department to put it out. We inflame wild beasts with the smell of blood, and then innocently wonder at the wave of brutal appetite that sweeps the land as a consequence." Twain’s word convey the fact that as society we build an environment that enrages these wild or “insane” people then we call To fix the people that we have made into a certain way……... Twain's quote both ties into gun violence and us as Americans it's our responsibility to look out for one another be each others backbones and hold each other up when times are hard.
War is a hard thing to describe. It has benefits that can only be reaped through its respective means. Means that, while necessary, are harsh and unforgiving. William James, the author of “The Moral Equivalent of War”, speaks only of the benefits to be had and not of the horrors and sacrifices found in the turbulent times of war. James bears the title of a pacifist, but he heralds war as a necessity for society to exist. In the end of his article, James presents a “war against nature” that would, in his opinion, stand in war’s stead in bringing the proper characteristics to our people. However, my stance is that of opposition to James and his views. I believe that war, while beneficial in various ways, is unnecessary and should be avoided at all costs.
Four and a half months after the Union defeated the Confederacy at the Battle of Gettysburg, Abraham Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg Address on November 19, 1863. He gave the Union soldiers a new perspective on the war and a reason to fight in the Civil War. Before the address, the Civil War was based on states’ rights. Lincoln’s speech has the essence of America and the ideals that were instilled in the Declaration of Independence by the Founders. The sixteenth president of the United States was capable of using his speech to turn a war on states’ rights to a war on slavery and upholding the principles that America was founded upon. By turning the Civil War into a war about slavery he effortlessly ensured that no foreign country would recognize the South as an independent nation, ensuring Union success in the war. In his speech, Lincoln used the rhetorical devices of juxtaposition, repetition, and parallelism, to touch the hearts of its listeners.
Chief Joseph would utter these famous words that still live on to this day. “I am tired of fighting. Our chiefs are killed. ….It is cold and we have no blankets. The little children are freezing. ...Hear me, my chiefs, I am tired; my heart is sick and sad. From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever.” These powerful words really do describe in essence the dire situation this chief and his people were in and the great inner anguish he was felt. Therefore, even to this day many find these words piercing their
The Civil War was a war fought over slavery, and African American rights, yet the slaves’ and freedmen that this bloody war was fought over could not fight for their country. Alfred Green wished for African Americans to gain the courage and bravery to show this country true patriotism. Green continued that although their past and present situations were low they could look to a future where true freedom is possible. Green made the connection that God is on the side of freedom, and that this endeavor is just and right in the sight of God. Green closed his speech by giving the point that the south was a tyrant to their southern brethren. Green shows the African Americans that this war was not just the whites’ fight but the entire country’s fight.
Martin Luther King Jr. overlooked more than two hundred and fifty thousand people of all genders, ages, and races at the nation’s capital on August 28th, 1963. King finally had the opportunity after recurrent protests to inform the country of the cruel and unfair treatment of its citizens. Within his speech he quotes the beginning of the preamble "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal"(King 277) Throughout this speech, King was able to use Aristotle’s appeals to help persuade the American nation to change its toxic ways and come together to make things better for everyone through passion, rationality, and reliability.
The best persuasive speaker of all time using pathos as his main attraction with the famous saying “Give me Liberty or Give me Death”. Patrick Henry was born May 29, 1736 and was born ambitious; doing a lot of things as a young child that made him the man he was. Life growing up was a trying time because of his many ambitions in his work field. Patrick tried a lot of professions growing up but failed at all of them miserably. Patrick Henry is the best speaker of all time because his appeal to emotion was so strongly considered and how he made the people listening to his speech listen in awe.