Rhetorical Analysis Of Mlk Letter To Birmingham Jail

1175 Words3 Pages

On April 16th,1963,Dr Martin Luther King wrote a letter from jail responding to a newspaper made by clergymen who accused his activities of being "unwise and untimely". King sets a strong reminder to everyone that the reason he was there was because of the injustice that surrounds Birmingham. He further expressed his side of the argument, justifying his actions, by explaining how he takes non-violent action. To develop this argument, King uses rhetorical devices and appeals. In the beginning of this letter, Dr. King makes a claim that he is not an outsider as the clergymen portrayed him to be. He goes on to talk about the organizational ties he has to Birmingham being one of the reasons he has traveled there. King expresses how his organization is a major benefit to the city of Birmingham by verbally revealing "we share staff". That's not the only reason Dr. King says he is not an outsider. He looks at himself in a similar light as Apostle Paul, he spreads his opinion on the injustices in Birmingham and around the world as "the prophets of the eighteenth century …show more content…

King is reinforcing his argument, he further explains that there are "two types of laws; just and unjust". Being that he is not one to break just laws since it is "not only a legal but moral responsibility" for him to obey them, but, at the same time he also has a "moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws." Dr. King feels as though if a law does not align with the moral and natural rights of people, then they shouldn't be followed. He then reinforced his opinion by repeating a quote by St. Augustine, "a law that is unjust is no law at all". Not only did he use St. Augustine to support his reasoning. He included the Supreme Court's decision of 1954 as well. Dr. King spoke on, how he "so diligently urges people to obey" court decisions, using outlawing segregation in schools as an example. He shows how he will abide by laws that are morally right, but refuse to side with laws that are

Open Document