Former Vice President, Al Gore begins his article“The Climate Emergency” telling a story of a time he gave a speech about climate changes in America. He describes climate changes as an urgent issue that many people don’t seem to take seriously enough to be able to address. He believes there are many leading causes that contribute to climate change such as greenhouse gases (methane) that people have brought into the Earth’s atmosphere. Gore mentions the studies of his friend Lonnie Thompson, who had noticed a skinkage of glaciers, that could possibly melt away in 20 years. By describing the dangerous outcomes of climate change and how it will affect people and the environment, he lets his audience know that people must change their actions …show more content…
to prevent further issues from occurring. Not only does he keep his focus on America, he talks about other areas in the world such as the Arctic Circle to prove how the changes in temperature are already having an effect. Gore then lists population growth, technology, and people’s way of thinking as the three leading causes of climate change to sum up why climate change has such a great impact on the environment. Gore concludes by stating how people view the Earth’s global issues as too big to fix, when as a whole, people have the ability to create a better way of living. The urgency of making a change goes back to how eventually people will be forced by authorities to adapt or confront the consequences of extinction. Gore is a credible author who provides viable information to his audience by stating statistics throughout his article to appeal to the audience’s emotions on what would occur if climate conditions became too extreme to fix. Although no specific organization of agents was mentioned in this article, Gore explains the ways people can help prevent a global epidemic. This article relates most towards Khanna’s article “Connectography:Mapping the Future of Global Civilization” in the sense that they both focus on climate changes and solutions that people are capable of making. As for the ideas in “Testing the Waters”, “How a Billionaire’s Wife Is Becoming the Mustangs’ Messiah”, and “Why You Should Let Kids Eat Dirt,” they all correlate to form a domino effect based on climate change that will lead to the extinction of both humans and organisms. Khanna, Parag. “Connectography:Mapping the Future of Global Civilization.” TIME MAGAZINE, 18 Apr. 2016, http://time.com/4291008/connectography/?iid=sr-link1. Accessed 6 February 2018. In this excerpt on Parag Khanna book “Mapping the Future of Global Civilization” he proves to his audience that a new manifest destiny must occur in the United States due to climate changes.
He gives evidence from other reliable sources like New Scientist magazine to explain how rising global temperatures will eventually cause the United States to become an inhabitable place. Khanna mentions how although people such as former president Barack Obama have enforced organizations to help prevent the spread of global warming, that it is inevitable to prevent. He then goes on to explain the reasons why countries such as Canada and Russia are not affected by climate change, which leads Khanna to present his solution of having a new manifest destiny in the United States. The only way Americans could prevent a migration to a new country is if the United States became a “hydraulic civilization,” which he claims would not make an ideal place to live. He argues that the best solution will be to have a migration that will either be voluntary or forced. Therefore, Khanna believes moving to a new country should be an option of escaping drastic climate changes. He proves his argument to be true by listing the benefits that these two countries would have if they nearly quintupled their population, letting his audience view a new manifest destiny as a reasonable option. Khanna is a credited author who is known as an international relations expert. With all the traveling he has done around the world to help make his book, he mainly persuades his readers with the statistics he has gathered to find reasonable solutions for dangerously rising temperatures in the
U.S. Overall, a forced migration would be a vast change in the lifestyle of Americans and is definitely implying a forced adaptation. Moreover, “The Climate Emergency” closely relates to the ideas of Khanna in that they both based their ideas on climate change and gave reasonable solutions that people can make. Unlike the ideas in “Why You Should Let Kids Eat Dirt” that contradict this article by allowing humans to find a way of becoming immune to diseases and possibly living in a country with harsh temperatures. As for the articles “Testing the Waters” and “How a Billionaire’s Wife Is Becoming the Mustangs’ Messiah” they focus on the idea of preservation of animals which does not relate to a migration of humans . Despite the focus on either adapting or becoming extinct in these three articles, they go against neither effect or support the ideas of Khanna. In the article “Testing the Waters” Krista Mahr explains in a precise manner the crisis that the Great Barrier Reef is currently confronting. Mahr also managed to mention other coral reefs to support the issue of what is currently happening around the world’s oceans. However, the primary focus is the Great Barrier Reef and how it is being harmed both by human actions and nature itself. These actions tend to dissatisfy tourist since these areas are world-wide known attraction, but because of these actions the overall effect is that coral will become extinct and reefs will begin to erode, which would be the extinction of coral. Mahr is not a well known American journalist, but does states credible facts from multiple resources that are expertise on the Great Barrier Reef. Mahr’s ideas were capable of linking with the inquiry by explaining how an extinction of coral reefs will eventually occur due to global warming. This ties back to the main focus in “The Climate Emergency” and “Connectography:Mapping the Future of Global Civilization” as the rise in temperatures in areas around the world are forcing a change. All three of these articles mention the errors people in these environments have made that have sped up the process of either extinction of animals or the adaptation of humans. On the other hand Sifferlin presents an opposing topic on a forced adaptation for humans in “Why You Should Let Kids Eat”, which has no association with the ideas Mahr presents since they are talking about an extinction of a species. Tim McGirk’s article is centered on Madeleine Pickens idea of having a fitter, more humane place for wild horses to live. Pickens is a woman of wealth but instead of just writing a check she chooses to do something that will truly make a change by using her money for something that will actually be noticed. Pickens started an organization called “Mustang Monument”, a refuge for wild horses that is located in Nevada. Pickens has been able to save a couple horses, however, it still isn't enough, there are obstacles like cattle ranchers who need the land for their cattle to graze upon. The ranchers are trying to pass a bill that prohibits horses from water access. Unlike the ranchers, Pickens was able to pass a bill through the U.S. congress that prohibits the slaughter of horses in the United States. Her goal is to with “Mustang Movement” is build a sanctuary for all wild horses and to teach the public about their history. McGirk is a well known veteran journalist who exquisitely tells the story of Pickens by letting his audience feel sympathy for wild horses and the danger they are facing. He shows no biased opinions as he truthfully tells the journey Pickens has gone through to make up the Mustang Monument. Overall, this article relates to the idea of having a forced extinction because of the restrictions ranchers want to put on wild horses. The organization that Pickens has managed to create demonstrates a similar concept towards Mahr’s on preventing the harm of animals. In contrary, the article by Gore is about climate change, while McGirk’s article is about a woman wanting to pursue her dreams of giving wild mustangs a sanctuary. However, both articles want to use the government to get the attention of the people in order to stop a global issue. In addition, Khanna’s article is about the choices and the changes that people must make in order to keep the Earth’s inhabitants alive. As for Sifferlin she leans more towards informing the public about a better way of life for infants in her article “Why You Should Let Kids Eat Dirt”, which has nothing to do with McGirk’s article. Caucasians are known for having the weakest immune systems out of all races. This is due to the fact that Caucasians are the most health-conscious individuals who rarely expose themselves to bacteria in their daily lives. Sifferlin talks about the importance of exposing infants to bacteria in order to grow up with strong immune systems. Children with strong immune systems are less likely to develop allergic reactions and are also less likely to get ill. Sifferlin backs up this idea by mentioning a study that Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology did on 467 infants to evaluate their health in the span of three years. Researchers came to the conclusion that humans live too clean with little exposure to germs, which is why they believe eating dirt is a possible factor that can help develop a strong immune system. Sifferlin is credibly known as a writer for Time Magazine that covers subjects over science, health, and medicine, which prove her theory on eating dirt to be reliable. She bases all of her arguments solely on facts to explain why people have such weak immune systems. Her article in no manner mentions any organizations that want infants to begin eating dirt to force an adaptation for humans, instead this idea is just an option that could lead to a better lifestyle. There is no relation in this article that goes back to the research question and therefore cannot be used for further research. On the contrary, the concept that Sifferlin presents in this article most commonly relates to “The Climate Emergency” and “ Connectography: Mapping the Future of Global Civilization” since they all lead to an adaptation in the way humans live and how they decide to use or preserve the environment for their benefits. As for “Testing the Waters” and “How a Billionaire’s Wife Is Becoming the Mustangs’ Messiah” they have nothing in common with the article since these two authors main focus is on animals and ways to prevent their extinction, which has nothing to do with improving infants immune system.
The tone during the whole plot of in Brave New World changes when advancing throughout the plot, but it often contains a dark and satiric aspect. Since the novel was originally planned to be written as a satire, the tone is ironic and sarcastic. Huxley's sarcastic tone is most noticeable in the conversations between characters. For instance, when the director was educating the students about the past history, he states that "most facts about the past do sound incredible (Huxley 45)." Through the exaggeration of words in the statement of the director, Huxley's sarcastic tone obviously is portrayed. As a result of this, the satirical tone puts the mood to be carefree.
An Inconvenient Truth is a documentary film in which basis are put long-term researches of changes of climate, level of carbonic gas in the atmosphere, and conditions of polar ices. In this film, El Gore, a presidential candidate of 2000 and former vice president of the United States, explains the scientific and political view of global warming and its serious consequences that we already observe on Earth, and other more tragic consequences that are still to come in the near future if we do not reduce emissions of exhaust gas in the atmosphere. Nothing especially new about the global warning is presented in the film, but what made this film effective is, firs of all, the fact that El Gore, a public and well known figure in the United States, is the main protagonist of the film. Another effective point in the film is that El Gore put all the scientific work together and showed that the problem is real, it is not a myth, and it should not be ignored any longer.
Scranton believes that human beings are killing present life by ignoring the effects of global warming on the world. He continues to warn the reader that change is coming regardless of what people do now and that they human race must prepare for what is inevitably coming, as it will be the collapse of global civilization as it is known. Scranton states that this time we are living in, the anthropocene, presents humans with multiple challenges but mostly, “what it means to be human” (page 234). How to control the inevitable
The environment has become a popular topic this year due to our on-going drought. It has always been a serious issue; something Saukko informs us in her sarcastic essay “How to Poison the Earth”. She uses sarcasm and irony in her essay hoping her readers will do the complete opposite of what she is saying because of the stress she puts on the harming chemicals we use every day. We do not appreciate our environment and take it for granted. This ideal is what Ehrlich's essay “Chronicles of Ice” focuses on by using analogies and scientific definitions to describe aspects of glaciers. The melting of the glaciers introduces us to the topic of global warming and how our society is doing nothing to stop it from getting worse. Gawande’s “The Cancer-Cluster
According to the World Bank’s report, climatologists predict greenhouse gases will cause temperatures to rise 7.2 degrees before the next century (par. 8). While the rise in temperature might seem trivial, Scranton elaborates on the detrimental effects this change would cause by quoting James Clapper. Mr. Clapper, the director of national intelligence, argues that extreme weather disasters will “increasingly disrupt food and energy markets, exacerbating state weakness, forcing human migrations, and triggering riots, civil disobedience, and vandalism” (par. 7). Dr. Scranton mentions these sources in order to convince the audience that an increase of only a few degrees can have a devastating impact that will inevitably leave the planet radically different during this epoch; the current epoch we live in, named the Anthropocene, is a term invented by geologist and scientists for the epoch that is “characterized by the arrival of the human species as a geological force” (par. 10). The name of the epoch inspired Scranton to title the article “Learning How to Die in the Anthropocene” since it reaffirms his claim that we must accept that the future will not be the same as the present. Furthermore, Scranton includes a book in his article written by geophysicist David Archer incase readers remain skeptical of the scientific evidence with
Gore’s logical appeals emphasize the danger and significance of global warming in a cogent, engaging multimedia platform. Rather than monotonously expounding upon detail after detail, he uses interactive visual aids to clarify his claims. As Stefan Lovgren, in “Al Gore’s ‘Inconvenient Truth’ Movie: Fact or Hype?,” abbreviates, “the documentary handles the science well.” Gore is confident in the delivery of his information; he talks to his audience with ease and precision. He states, “[t]he relationships are actually very complicated, but there is one relationship that is far more powerful than all the others and it is this: When there is more carbon dioxide...
Mr. Gore’s speech was given in New York University on September 18, 2006 to bring awareness to the issue. Al Gore uses scientific background and research to persuade the audience by appealing to pathos, logos, and ethos used by his esoteric diction that contributes to the consequential tone to create an effective argument for global warming.
By using the information found in this book, I will be able to write about the severity of the ongoing issue of climate change. With all the dangerous effects of climate change Kahrl and Roland-Holst point out on just a single state, it becomes clear that other places around the world are experiencing the same. In fact, since Cali...
Our world faces many issues consisting of political issues, economic crisis, poverty, world wars, and environmental issues for example. Global warming is one of the many environment issues that many pay little attention to. Mr. Al Gore in his documentary directed by David Guggenheim brings to light this climate crisis and how affective it can be to the earth and how we must address it as soon as possible as it may lead to the destruction of our world’s environment. Al Gore does a great job in identifying global warming, what are the cause and effects, and how we should address the issue that can potentially save our planet earth. Overall, Al Gore offers a credible argument and one of the many reasons Al Gore’s argument is credible is because
In the article “Global Warming’s Terrifying New Math”, written by Bill Mckibben, he firstly opens up by saying that back in 2012, according to the statistics, we surpassed the global record high for climate temperature in our nation, destroying other previous records. Despite the research and the displaying of data, nobody is doing anything to adress the following issue. Mckibben outlines three distinctive numbers that outline the following issue., 2 degrees celsius, 565 gigations, and 2795 gigtons, which he uses to validitate and support his argument. Firstly, the ongoing problem of climate change in society is fundamentally a matter of individual moral responsibility that is inspired by the insight individuals are intentionally harming the environment. Secondly there is yet to be an effective collective state response to the issue of global warming, despite approaching two full decades of ongoing and reoccuring negotiations and the very near universal participation by states in the UNFCCC. Thirdly, because this issue has been put on hold for longer than it was innitially expected, greenhouse gases are being emitted into our atmosphere, polluting our environment. The South-North issue and an ongoing debate comes into effect as all the greenhouse gases that are created and used in the Northern hemisphere are being emmited into the southern hemisphere. Hence, my thesis is; despite the fact that global warming and climate change has been an ongoing problem globally for years, humanity has failed to resolve thiis issue as it quickly begins to escalate.
Global Warming, much of what does or does not happen forty years from now, rests on our actions or inactions taken between now and then. The crucial question is whether we should pour all our resources into mitigation – reducing our carbon emissions. According to scientists who study the climate, there are other environmental problems; “we now face a global crisis in land use and agriculture that could undermine the health, security, and sustainability of our civilization”. Rather than worry too much about emissions, we should accept the world is going to get warmer anyway and adapt to global warming by building better flood defenses and developing drought-resistant crops. We cannot dispute that automobiles, factories, and power plants, displace an unprecedented twenty tons of carbon monoxide per person per year.
For these reasons, global warming stands as one of the most daunting policy issues facing our world today. This is compounded by the debate over the very existence of climate change. While countless sources of empirical evidence testify to the very real presence of climate change the world over, considerable denial of the phenomenon still exists. The argument has been made that evidence about climate change is a gross overstatement, or in some cases, a complete fabrication. Despite the evidence to the contrary, many interest groups with considerable political clout have successfully perpetuated the argument that documented changes in the environment are a product of natural cyclical changes in climate, and are not associated with human activities. However, even the acceptance of this particular brand of reality is no grounds for the disregard of environmental consciousness. Even if one accepts the premise that recent climate change is not resultant of human activity, the rationale behind environmental conservation remains ...
The first part of this essay discusses what the human species has done to deal with the problem of climate change. While some improvements have been made, the problem has not been addressed aggressively enough to stop the damage. What is amazing about this is the denial of so many people that problems exist. If they do realize the risks, they are simply not taking actions to contain the damage.
Subpoint A: Not long ago, a documentary film called “An Inconvenient truth” came out in 2006. This film raised international public awareness of climate change and reenergizing the environmental movement. A former U.S Vice president Al Gore campaigned to educate citizens about global warming through a simp...
He talks about how sea levels will rise and will be covering land in places like such as Florida and New York in his article called “Rising Sea Levels Threaten U.S. Cities”. The sea levels rising will cause some people to lose their living area. According to the passage, if we do nothing to stop climate change, over 26 million Americans ' homes might be inundated, and more than 1,500 U.S. cities and municipalities could find the areas where half of the residents live, also inundated. Moreover, the rate of increasing the sea levels is faster than ever. The passage mentions that the sea levels, rise in these 50 years is faster than the past 1,500 years. Moreover, there are more consequences caused by the climate change. According to Climate Central in Princeton, N.J., the sea levels increase might create some new wetland around the Mississippi River and there will be more flooding. Because of these consequences of climate change, the author suggests the US government to take action in reducing carbon dioxide emissions. How much sea levels increase is determined by how much carbon dioxide is emitted. The passage also warns those people who know the fact of climate change but still didn’t take action to prevent it. They will lose some of the land if we still do