Rhetorical Analysis Of Kristof's Essay

324 Words1 Page

Kristof begins his essay by addressing the actions of the Obama administration that he would like to prevent. Immediately following is an illustrative two paragraphs portraying a disgusting, hellish wasteland in Phnom Penh. He uses this intense imagery to demonstrate the living conditions that Obama could be condemning poor workers in foreign lands to if he bans sweatshops in international trade agreements. Kristof assumes his readers are those who denounce sweatshops. His purpose is to persuade developed societies that sweatshops are beneficial to the people who work in them. If they believe that, then the dangers of Obama forcing sweatshops to move will decrease. In order to accomplish this purpose, Kristof mainly appeals to pathos, sprinkling

Open Document