Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social psychology essay on persuasion
The art of persuasion
Social psychology essay on persuasion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social psychology essay on persuasion
In the speech delivered by Joseph McCarthy towards the citizens of United States, he addresses the fact that there are members of the Communist Party within the government including the Secretary of State. He successfully addresses his point that they should remove the members of the Communist Party by using rhetorical devices such as senses he is experiencing, logos, and pathos.
By McCarthy mentioning the senses he is experiencing, he appeals to the sense of emotion. He addresses that he could “see it, feel it, and hear it all the way from the Indochina Hills.” to cause outrage and create exigency that World War II led to many wounds throughout the country and yet it seems like the country is facing challenges due to the members of the Communist Party within the government. The only way for them to fight though the challenges is that they should remove the enemies within the country as they are slowly will be influencing the country since they are in the governmental systems.
McCarthy closes the fourth paragraph by declaring a war between two diametrically opposed ideologies. By this, he creates a sense of logic that the USSR is currently opposing the ideology of United States. Since both countries play a big role in the global economy and politics, as McCarthy calls USSR the “powerful potential
…show more content…
enemy”, there would be problems that both countries would oppose one another, and therefore, two countries have to convince or fight a war to change the other’s ideology to theirs as said by McCarthy when he mentions”Today we are engaged in a final, all-out battle between Communistic atheism and Christianity.” The speaker calls communism the religion of immoralism.
The speaker believes that “religion of immoralism will more deeply wound and damage mankind than any conceivable economic or political system”. By speaker adding the explanation why communism is a religion of immoralism, he establishes a sense of logos and pathos. By the speaker explaining his intentions behind his beliefs, he addresses his point that communism leads to a bad pathway for an individual or for a country as a whole. Furthermore, he establishes fear against communism by showing the bad sides of communism such as by stating some examples of Joseph Stalin’s explanation behind the expulsion of
people. During his speech towards the US citizens, he starts asking questions to build ip exigency and pathos. By asking questions such as “Can there be anyone tonight who is so blind as to say that the war is not on?” he establishes a sense that the war is not over, and it is just starting to engage the audience to go against the ideology of communism as the war seems to be US against the ideology of communism or USSR. To engage the audience more, McCarthy asks more questions such as “Can there by anyone who fails to realize that the Communist world has said the time is now?” to build up courage in the audience to make them participate in the defeat of communism. By using a word such as “traitorous”, he creates a sense of us versus them. He explains those people who are on the Communist side are not patriotic and betrayed their country to join the Communists. Throughout his speech, he starts it off on a witty note by celebrating President Lincoln’s birthday, but breaks and starts using negative connotations to explain how bad the enemies from within acts towards them. It impacted the citizens more because it was during the time of Cold War when there was a big tension between Communism and democracy.
The Grapes of Wrath explicates on the Dust Bowl era as the reader follows the story of the Joads in the narrative chapters, and the migrants in expository chapters. Steinbeck creates an urgent tone by using repetition many times throughout the book. He also tries to focus readers on how the Dust Bowl threatened migrant dreams using powerful imagery. As well as that, he creates symbols to teach the upper class how the Dust Bowl crushed the people’s goals. In The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck utilizes imagery, symbolism, and repetition to demonstrate how the Dust Bowl threatened the “American Dream.”
Another example is that in the novel there are various burned-out churches along the way “There were no pews in the church and the stone floor was heaped with the scalped and naked and partly eaten bodies of some forty souls who’d barricaded themselves in the house of God against the heathen.” (p. 63) Why did he choose a church to such a violent description? Maybe it is merely ironic, maybe it symbolizes that no God exist at all of at least that he cannot save them from death. All in all, it is clear how McCarthy is always mixing religious with
With the onset of the Cold War, a growing Red Scare would cripple American society – effectively plunging the nation into mass hysteria and unrest over the fallacious threat of communist infiltration. This reaction was precipitated by Republican senator, Joseph McCarthy, in his speech, “Enemies from Within”, delivered in Wheeling, West Virginia, on 9 February 1950. McCarthy paints communists in a particularly harsh light to generate anti-Soviet sentiment within the American public. He uses juxtaposition to engender both indignation and fear in the audience to achieve this effect.
McCarthy was a virtually unknown politician until February 1950, where in a speech at Wheeling, West Virginia, he proclaimed “have here in my hand a list of 205 . . . a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department” (History Matters). This speech coined the “Enemies from Within” propelled McCarthy to the political spotlight and gave him huge power along with the support of the American public. McCarthy, realizing he had a great political opportunity, and continued his “anti-communist” tirade accusing powerful people in hollywood and members of the armed forces as being communists or communist sympathizers. As his skeptics grew, so did his blacklist, with McCarthy accusing every single one of his critics as communists destroying their lives and careers in the process (Victims of McCarthyism). McCarthy used this tactic to discourage any opposition, with many potential critics seeing the potential implications of their skepticism, they simply redacted their statements or never spoke
The chapter, Church, has the troop hold up in a church for a few days. In the church, the monks take an immediately likely to the troop help with food and weapon cleaning. A few of the soldiers discuss what they wanted to do before the war. The troops learn more about each other and insight into what faith can be to them.
Senator McCarthy paints a grim picture of the world and the conflict with Soviet Russia. The whole speech had a negative tone that was meant to instill fear in the audience. He said that they were engaged in a full out war between the immoral atheist communism and Christianity. By putting the cold war in moralistic terms of a fight against Christianity he could garner support from Christian America.
Ann Richards’s keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention in 1988 was extremely interesting to watch. I believe her speech was intended to be focused on the American family and also the American farmers. These two areas seemed to be very important to Mrs. Richards and she made a point to discuss both.
'With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.' In the delivery of Lincoln's 'Second Inaugural,' many were inspired by this uplifting and keen speech. It had been a long war, and Lincoln was concerned about the destruction that had taken place. Worn-out from seeing families torn apart and friendships eradicated, he interpreted his inaugural address. It was March of 1865, and the war, he believed, must come to an end before it was too late. The annihilation that had taken place was tragic, and Lincoln brawled for a closure. The 'Second Inaugural' was very influential, formal, and emotional.
“The great difference between our western Christian world and the atheistic Communist world is not political, gentlemen, it is moral,” is one of the many examples throughout McCarthy’s speech of him assuming an overconfident or superior tone. His claim to own a list of 205 names in the State Department of communist sympathizers gave support for this arrogant tone, but when asked McCarthy refused to provide anyone with the aforementioned list. McCarthy also used this tone when he said, “The reason why we find ourselves in a position of impotency is not because our only powerful potential enemy has sent men to invade our shores . . . but rather because of the traitorous actions of those who have been treated so well by this Nation,” expressing the idea that no one but the United States’ own countrymen had the strength to defeat their homeland. McCarthy’s tone throughout the article is one of absolute certainty, and gave his audience the incentive to trust
...en’s novel shows the soldiers’ innermost thoughts and concerns and internal conflicts which appear to outweigh the communist cause. The Things They Carried demonstrates the soldiers’ opposition to the war. However, the U. S. remained focused on preventing a communist takeover. The United States enormous political power affected history
In the beginning of McCarthy’s political career, he was already walking on thin ice. He launched a series of charges against the government. The first charge was against the communist global apparatus. McCarthy said that the organization had made a sustained attempt to penetrate the United States government and attempt to subvert its foreign policy decisions. The second charge was against the United States government itself. McCarthy said that the official defenses against foreign penetration ranged from weak to nonexistent. The third and final charge was against the government of America, ...
“Always remember that you are absolutely unique. Just like everyone else.” This mantra from Margaret Mead is a somewhat humorous yet slightly satirical spin on how people tend to think of themselves as one-of-a-kind, irreplaceable human specimens. However, one English teacher from Wellesley High School takes this critique one step further with his polemic presentation at the school commencement. David McCullough, a Massachusetts English teacher, gave a seemingly somber sendoff to his graduates in 2012, with a speech that contained some unapologetically harsh sentiments. However, by looking past the outwardly dismal surface of the speech, the students can infer a more optimistic message. By incorporating devices of asyndeton, paradox, antimetabole, and anadiplosis, McCullough conveys to each student that even though none of them is unique, their commonality is not a fault they all have merit and should strive to view the world through a more selfless lens.
I chose this word because the tone of the first chapter seems rather dark. We hear stories of the hopes with which the Puritans arrived in the new world; however, these hopes quickly turned dark because the Purtains found that the first buildings they needed to create were a prison, which alludes to the sins they committed; and a cemetery, which contradicts the new life they hoped to create for themselves.
On January 7th 1950, an acquaintance said that the communist-in-government issue would attract national publicity and enhance his chances of reelection. His first speech against the issue was on February 9th in Wheeling, West Virginia and McCarthy revealed a sheet of paper with a list of 205 names, who he said, were members of the Communist party. “He could not remember what figure he had quoted at Wheeling, whether it was 205 or 209 or 57 or whatever…” Oakley adds, which shows that McCarthy’s list wasn’t authentic and credible. In an attempt to restore confidence in the Truman administration, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee established a subcommittee headed by Democratic Senator Millard E. Tydings of Maryland to investigate McCarthy’s charges.
being a Communist, with the only source being a report on how his father reads a Serbian newspaper. (Clooney) Without genuine evidence from a credible source, an argument is as good as a blatant claim. McCarthy’s “evidence” is in fact unsubstantiated in itself. Therefore, his accusations contain no basis, and lack the foundation needed to provide solid and subs...